OBJECTIVE: our study aimed to characterize the lung ultrasound (LUS) patterns noted immediately after delivery in term and near-term neonates, and to investigate whether the LUS scores or patterns observed at that point could anticipate the need for respiratory support in the sample of patients studied.
METHODS: We performed two ultrasound examinations: one in the delivery room and the second at one hour of age. The anterior and lateral regions of both lungs were examined. We assessed the correlation between the LUS scores or patterns and the gestational age, umbilical arterial blood gases, the need for respiratory support (CPAP or mechanical ventilation), the presence of respiratory distress, and the need for the administration of oxygen.
RESULTS: LUS scores were significantly higher in the delivery room examination (8.05 ± 1.95) than at 1 h of age (6.4 ± 1.75) (p < 0.001). There were also statistically significant differences between the LUS patterns observed in different lung regions between the delivery room exam and the exam performed at 1 h of age (p values between 0.001 and 0.017). There were also differences noted regarding the LUS patterns between different lung regions at the exam in the delivery room (the right anterior region LUS patterns were significantly worse than the right lateral LUS patterns (p < 0.004), left anterior LUS patterns (p < 0.001), and left lateral LUS patterns (p < 0.001)). A statistically significant correlation was found between LUS scores and the gestational age of the patients (r = 0.568, p < 0.001-delivery room; r = 4.0443, p < 0.001-one hour of age). There were statistically significant associations between LUS scores, patterns at delivery (p < 0.001) and 1 h of age (p < 0.001), and the need for respiratory support (CPAP or mechanical ventilation).
CONCLUSIONS: LUS in the delivery room offers important information regarding lung fluid elimination and aeration of the lungs, and early LUS features are significantly associated with the risk of respiratory distress and the need for respiratory support.

BACKGROUND: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a major comorbidity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and is associated with a poor outcome. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the impact of SDB treatment on IPF. We assessed at one year: (1) the effect of CPAP and/or nocturnal oxygen therapy on IPF regarding lung function, blood mediators, and quality of life; (2) adherence to SDB treatment and SDB changes.
METHODS: This is a prospective study of consecutive newly diagnosed IPF patients initiating anti-fibrotic treatment. Lung function, polysomnography, blood tests and quality of life questionnaires were performed at inclusion and after one year. Patients were classified as obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), central sleep apnoea (CSA), and sleep-sustained hypoxemia (SSH). SDB therapy (CPAP and/or nocturnal oxygen therapy) was initiated if needed.
RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled (36% had OSA, 22% CSA, and 12% SSH). CPAP was started in 54% of patients and nocturnal oxygen therapy in 16%. At one-year, polysomnography found improved parameters, though 17% of patients had to add nocturnal oxygen therapy or CPAP, while 33% presented SDB onset at this second polysomnography. CPAP compliance at one year was 6.74 h/night (SD 0.74). After one year, matrix metalloproteinase-1 decreased in OSA and CSA (p = 0.029; p = 0.027), C-reactive protein in OSA (p = 0.045), and surfactant protein D in CSA group (p = 0.074). There was no significant change in lung function.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of SBD with CPAP and NOT can be well tolerated with a high compliance. IPF patients may exhibit SDB progression and require periodic re-assessment. Further studies to evaluate the impact of SDB treatment on lung function and serological mediators are needed.

Surfactant replacement for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is currently guided by oxygen (FiO2) requirement in preterm neonates. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as an important predictive tool; however, there is a paucity of evidence from developing countries. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS score in comparison to standard criteria based on FiO2 requirement for prediction of surfactant requirement. In this prospective study, preterm neonates of < 34 weeks\' gestation with RDS were included within 2 h of life. Surfactant was administered if the FiO2 requirement exceeded 30%. Baseline characteristics, respiratory parameters, and LUS clips were recorded soon after birth and compared between the surfactant and non-surfactant groups. LUS scoring was later performed by masked assessors which was not used in the management of neonates. Among 82 neonates (mean gestation 30.6 weeks and weight 1375 g) included in the study, 33 (40.2%) received surfactant. The surfactant group had a higher Silverman score, required higher FiO2 and mean airway pressure, and needed invasive ventilation more frequently. The mean (± SD) LUS score was significantly higher in the surfactant (9.4 ± 3.2) compared to the non-surfactant group (5.1 ± 2.1). The diagnostic accuracy of LUS scoring was determined by ROC curve analysis (AUC (95% CI): 0.83 (0.74-0.92), p < 0.01). A cutoff score of ≥ 8 for LUS was considered optimal for the prediction of surfactant requirement (sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of 70% (51-84) and 80% (66-90), respectively).    Conclusion: Lung ultrasound is a valid diagnostic tool for the prediction of surfactant requirements in resource-limited settings. What is Known: • Lung ultrasound has a good diagnostic accuracy in predicting the need for surfactant administration in preterm neonates in developed countries, but its role in developing countries is unclear. What is New: • Lung ultrasound proved to be a valid diagnostic tool in predicting surfactant replacement therapy in resource-limited settings. • The diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound was better in neonates on non-invasive ventilation, compared to invasive ventilation.

UNASSIGNED: Prematurity is the highest risk for under-five mortality globally. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of antenatal dexamethasone on neonatal mortality in early preterm in a resource-constrained setting without assisted ventilation.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective (2008-2013) cohort study in clinics for refugees/migrants on the Thai-Myanmar border included infants born <34 weeks gestation at home, in, or on the way to the clinic. Dexamethasone, 24 mg (three 8 mg intramuscular doses, every 8 hours), was prescribed to women at risk of preterm birth (28 to <34 weeks). Appropriate newborn care was available: including oxygen but not assisted ventilation. Mortality and maternal fever were compared by the number of doses (complete: three, incomplete (one or two), or no dose). A sub-cohort participated in neurodevelopmental testing at one year.
UNASSIGNED: Of 15,285 singleton births, 240 were included: 96 did not receive dexamethasone and 144 received one, two or three doses (56, 13 and 75, respectively). Of live-born infants followed to day 28, (n=168), early neonatal and neonatal mortality/1,000 livebirths (95%CI) with complete dosing was 217 (121-358) and 304 (190-449); compared to 394 (289-511) and 521 (407-633) with no dose. Compared to complete dosing, both incomplete and no dexamethasone were associated with elevated adjusted ORs 4.09 (1.39 to 12.00) and 3.13 (1.14 to 8.63), for early neonatal death. By contrast, for neonatal death, while there was clear evidence that no dosing was associated with higher mortality, adjusted OR 3.82 (1.42 to 10.27), the benefit of incomplete dosing was uncertain adjusted OR 1.75 (0.63 to 4.81). No adverse impact of dexamethasone on infant neurodevelopmental scores (12 months) or maternal fever was observed.
UNASSIGNED: Neonatal mortality reduction is possible with complete dexamethasone dosing in pregnancies at risk of preterm birth in settings without capacity to provide assisted ventilation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative effectiveness of Helmet-CPAP (H_CPAP) with respect to high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNO) in avoiding greater need for intubation or mortality in a medium complexity hospital in Chile during the year 2021.
METHODS: Cohort analytical study, single center.
METHODS: Units other than intensive care units.
METHODS: Records of adults with mild to moderate hypoxemia due to coronavirus type 2.
METHODS: None.
METHODS: Need for intubation or mortality.
RESULTS: 159 patients were included in the study, with a ratio by support of 2:10 (H_CPAP:HFNO). The 46.5% were women, with no significant differences by sex according to support (p = 0.99, Fisher test). The APACHE II score, for HFNO, had a median of 10.5, 3.5 units higher than H_CPAP (p < 0.01, Wilcoxon rank sum). The risk of intubation in HFNO was 42.1% and in H_CPAP 3.8%, with a significant risk reduction of 91% (95% CI: 36.9%-98.7%; p < 0.01). APACHE II does not modify or confound the support and intubation relationship (p > 0.2, binomial regression); however, it does confound the support and mortality relationship (p = 0.82, RR homogeneity test). Despite a 79.1% reduction in mortality risk with H_CPAP, this reduction was not statistically significant (p = 0.11, binomial regression).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of Helmet CPAP, when compared to HFNO, was an effective therapeutic ventilatory support strategy to reduce the risk of intubation in patients with mild to moderate hypoxemia caused by coronavirus type 2 in inpatient units other than intensive care. The limitations associated with the difference in size, age and severity between the arms could generate bias.

UNASSIGNED: The improvement in oxygenation after helmet application in hypoxemic patients may be explained by the alveolar recruitment obtained with positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) or by the administration of a more accurate inspiratory fraction of oxygen (FiO2). We have designed the \"ZEEP-PEEP test\", capable to distinguish between the FiO2-related or PEEP-related oxygenation improvement. Our primary aim was to describe the use of this test during helmet CPAP to assess the oxygenation improvement attributable to PEEP application.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a prospective physiological study including adult critically ill patients. Respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were recorded before helmet application (PRE step), after helmet application without PEEP (ZEEP step) and after the application of the PEEP valve (PEEP step), while maintaining a constant FiO2. We defined as \"PEEP responders\" patients showing a PaO2/FiO2 ratio improvement ≥10% after PEEP application.
UNASSIGNED: 93 patients were enrolled. Compared to the PRE step, PaO2/FiO2 ratio was significantly improved during helmet CPAP both at ZEEP and PEEP step (189 ± 55, 219 ± 74 and 241 ± 82 mmHg, respectively, p < 0.01). Both PEEP responders (41%) and non-responders showed a significant improvement of PaO2/FiO2 ratio after the application of helmet at ZEEP, PEEP responders also showed a significant improvement of oxygenation after PEEP application (208 ± 70 vs 267 ± 85, p < 0.01).
UNASSIGNED: Helmet CPAP improved oxygenation. This improvement was not only due to the PEEP effect, but also to the increase of the effective inspired FiO2. Performing the ZEEP-PEEP test may help to identify patients who benefit from PEEP.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with sleep apnea (SA) are at increased cardiovascular risk. However, little is known about the risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in patients with SA. Therefore, we studied the relation between SA patients who did and did not receive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy with OHCA in the general population.
METHODS: Using nationwide databases, we conducted a nested case-control study with OHCA-cases of presumed cardiac causes and age/sex/OHCA-date matched non-OHCA-controls from the general population. Conditional logistic regression models with adjustments for well-known OHCA risk factors were performed to generate odds ratio (OR) of OHCA comparing patients with SA receiving and not receiving CPAP therapy with individuals without SA.
RESULTS: We identified 46,578 OHCA-cases and 232,890 matched non-OHCA-controls [mean: 71 years, 68.8% men]. Compared to subjects without SA, having SA without CPAP therapy was associated with increased odds of OHCA after controlling for relevant confounders (OR:1.20, 95%-Cl:1.06-1.36), while having SA with CPAP therapy was not associated with OHCA (OR:1.04, 95%-Cl:0.93-1.36). Regardless of CPAP therapy, age and sex did not significantly influence our findings. Our findings were confirmed in: (I) patients with neither ischemic heart disease nor heart failure (untreated SA, OR:1.24, 95%-CI:1.04-1.47; SA with CPAP, OR:1.08, 95%-CI:0.93-1.25); and (II) in patients without cardiovascular disease (untreated SA, OR:1.33, 95%-CI:1.07-1.65; SA with CPAP, OR:1.14, 95%-CI:0.94-1.39).
CONCLUSIONS: SA not treated with CPAP was associated with OHCA, while no increased risk of OHCA was found for SA patients treated with CPAP.

Rationale: Randomized controlled trials of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention among patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have been largely neutral. However, given that OSA is a heterogeneous disease, there may be unidentified subgroups demonstrating differential treatment effects. Objectives: We sought to apply a novel data-drive approach to identify nonsleepy OSA subgroups with heterogeneous effects of CPAP on CVD outcomes within the Impact of Sleep Apnea Syndrome in the Evolution of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ISAACC) study. Methods: Participants were randomly partitioned into two datasets. One for training (70%) our machine-learning model and a second (30%) for validation of significant findings. Model-based recursive partitioning was applied to identify subgroups with heterogeneous treatment effects. Survival analysis was conducted to compare treatment (CPAP vs. usual care [UC]) outcomes within subgroups. Results: A total of 1,224 nonsleepy OSA participants were included. Of 55 features entered into our model, only two appeared in the final model (i.e., average OSA event duration and hypercholesterolemia). Among participants at or below the model-derived average event duration threshold (19.5 s), CPAP was protective for a composite of CVD events (training hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; P = 0.002). For those with longer event duration (>19.5 s), an additional split occurred by hypercholesterolemia status. Among participants with longer event duration and hypercholesterolemia, CPAP resulted in more CVD events compared with UC (training HR, 2.24; P = 0.011). The point estimate for this harmful signal was also replicated in the testing dataset (HR, 1.83; P = 0.118). Conclusions: We discovered subgroups of nonsleepy OSA participants within the ISAACC study with heterogeneous effects of CPAP. Among the training dataset, those with longer OSA event duration and hypercholesterolemia had nearly 2.5 times more CVD events with CPAP compared with UC, whereas those with shorter OSA event duration had roughly half the rate of CVD events if randomized to CPAP.

Background and Objectives: In patients with COVID-19, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) are widely applied as initial treatments for moderate-to-severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The aim of the study was to assess which respiratory supports improve 28-day mortality and to identify a predictive index of treatment response. Materials and Methods: This is a single-center retrospective observational study including 159 consecutive adult patients with COVID-19 and moderate-to-severe hypoxemic acute respiratory failure. Results: A total of 159 patients (82 in the CPAP group and 77 in the HFNC group) were included in the study. Mortality within 28 days was significantly lower with HFNC compared to CPAP (16.8% vs. 50%), while ICU admission and tracheal intubation within 28 days were significantly higher with CPAP compared to HFNC treatment (32% vs. 13%). We identified an index for survival in HFNC by including three variables easily available at admission (LDH, age, and respiratory rate) and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio at 48 h. The index showed high discrimination for survival with an AUC of 0.88, a negative predictive value of 86%, and a positive predictive value of 95%. Conclusions: Treatment with HFNC appears to be associated with greater survival and fewer ICU admission than CPAP. LDH, respiratory rate, age, and PaO2/FiO2 at 48 h were independently associated with survival and an index based on these variables allows for the prediction of treatment success and the assessment of patient allocation to the appropriate intensity of care after 48 h. Further research is warranted to determine effects on other outcomes and to assess the performance of the index in larger cohorts.

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, but the benefit of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is uncertain. However, most randomized controlled trials have focused on the role of CPAP in secondary prevention, although there is growing evidence of a potential benefit on early CV disease. Weight loss in combination with CPAP may be superior but is difficult to achieve and maintain with conventional measures alone. Objectives: The aim of this study was to gain insights into the effect of CPAP on early atherosclerotic processes and to compare it with a glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1-mediated weight loss regimen in patients with OSA. Methods: We performed a randomized proof-of-concept study comparing CPAP, a GLP1-mediated weight-loss regimen (liraglutide [Lir]), and both in combination for 24 weeks in 30 consecutive patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index >15 events/h; body mass index 30-40 kg/m2; and no history of diabetes, heart failure, or unstable CV disease). In addition to extensive evaluation for CV risk factors and endothelial function at baseline and end of study, subjects underwent 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT) for the measurement of aortic wall inflammation (target-to-background ratio) and coronary computed tomography angiography for semiautomated coronary plaque analysis. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. CPAP alone and in combination resulted in greater reduction in apnea-hypopnea index than Lir alone (mean difference, -45 and -43 events/h, respectively, vs. -12 events/h; P < 0.05). Both Lir and combination treatment led to significant weight loss, but only CPAP alone resulted in significant decrease in vascular inflammation (aortic wall target-to-background ratio from 2.03 ± 0.34 to 1.84 ± 0.43; P = 0.010), associated with an improvement in endothelial function and a decrease in C-reactive protein. Low-attenuation coronary artery plaque volume as a marker of unstable plaque also decreased with CPAP (from 571 ± 490 to 334 ± 185 mm3) and with combination therapy (from 401 ± 145 to 278 ± 126 mm3) but not with Lir. Conclusions: These data suggest that CPAP therapy, but not GLP1-mediated weight loss, improves vascular inflammation and reduces unstable plaque volume in patients with OSA. Further large randomized controlled studies are warranted to assess the benefit of CPAP therapy in modifying early CV disease. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04186494).