Bumetanide

布美他尼
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估STP1的安全性和耐受性,专门用于治疗自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者的临床和生物学定义的亚组,即ASD表型1(ASD-Phen1)。我们做了一个随机的,双盲,安慰剂对照,平行组1b期研究,两个14天的治疗阶段(在clinicaltrials.gov注册为NCT04644003)。9名ASD-Phen1患者接受STP1治疗,3名患者接受安慰剂治疗。我们评估了安全性和耐受性,以及电生理标记,比如脑电图,听觉习惯,和听觉Chirp同步,更好地理解STP1的作用机制。此外,我们使用了几种临床量表来衡量治疗结果.结果表明,STP1耐受性良好,具有电生理标记物,表明整个大脑以及与执行功能和记忆相关的大脑区域的伽马功率显着降低且剂量相关。用STP1治疗还增加了额叶和枕骨区域的α2功率,并改善了习惯性和听觉chi声的神经同步。尽管在几个临床量表中观察到数值改善,他们没有达到统计学意义。总的来说,这项研究表明,STP1在ASD-Phen1患者中具有良好的耐受性,并显示出在ASD脑区的间接靶向作用.
    This study aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of STP1, a combination of ibudilast and bumetanide, tailored for the treatment of a clinically and biologically defined subgroup of patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), namely ASD Phenotype 1 (ASD-Phen1). We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 1b study with two 14-day treatment phases (registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04644003). Nine ASD-Phen1 patients were administered STP1, while three received a placebo. We assessed safety and tolerability, along with electrophysiological markers, such as EEG, Auditory Habituation, and Auditory Chirp Synchronization, to better understand STP1\'s mechanism of action. Additionally, we used several clinical scales to measure treatment outcomes. The results showed that STP1 was well-tolerated, with electrophysiological markers indicating a significant and dose-related reduction of gamma power in the whole brain and in brain areas associated with executive function and memory. Treatment with STP1 also increased alpha 2 power in frontal and occipital regions and improved habituation and neural synchronization to auditory chirps. Although numerical improvements were observed in several clinical scales, they did not reach statistical significance. Overall, this study suggests that STP1 is well-tolerated in ASD-Phen1 patients and shows indirect target engagement in ASD brain regions of interest.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:作用于多巴胺能细胞的主要靶标,纹状体γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)能细胞,可能是治疗帕金森病(PD)患者的一种新方法。
    目的:本研究的目的是评估布美他尼的疗效,Na-K-Cl协同转运蛋白(NKCC1)抑制剂,改善PD的运动症状。
    方法:这是一个为期4个月的双盲,随机化,平行组,在44名患有PD和运动波动的参与者中,使用1.75至3mg/天的布美他尼作为左旋多巴的辅助药物进行安慰剂对照试验。
    结果:与基线相比,与安慰剂相比,治疗4个月后OFF运动障碍协会统一帕金森病评定量表第III部分评分的平均变化(主要终点)没有显著改善.对于大多数其他结果指标,用布美他尼治疗的参与者和用安慰剂治疗的参与者之间没有观察到变化。尽管没有相关的安全信号,布美他尼耐受性差。
    结论:本研究中没有证据表明布美他尼对改善PD的运动症状有效。©2024作者由WileyPeriodicalsLLC代表国际帕金森症和运动障碍协会出版的运动障碍。
    BACKGROUND: Acting on the main target of dopaminergic cells, the striatal γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic cells, might be a new way to treat persons with Parkinson\'s disease (PD).
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of bumetanide, an Na-K-Cl cotransporter (NKCC1) inhibitor, to improve motor symptoms in PD.
    METHODS: This was a 4-month double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial of 1.75 to 3 mg/day bumetanide as an adjunct to levodopa in 44 participants with PD and motor fluctuations.
    RESULTS: Compared to the baseline, the mean change in OFF Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson\'s Disease Rating Scale Part III score after 4 months of treatment (primary endpoint) did not improve significantly compared with placebo. No changes between participants treated with bumetanide and those treated with placebo were observed for most other outcome measures. Despite no relevant safety signals, bumetanide was poorly tolerated.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence in this study that bumetanide has efficacy in improving motor symptoms of PD. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    确定药物的生物利用度和生物等效性对于开发和批准药物产品很重要。该程序支持仿制药产品和新型治疗物质的应用,做出关于安全性和有效性的重要决定,并测量药物在生物基质中的浓度。本研究旨在开发和验证一种特定的,简单,敏感,使用液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS)测量人血浆中布美坦(BUM)的准确方法。使用HypurityC18柱(4.6×50mm,5μm)在等度条件下,和LC-MS检测到正离子化采集模式。对于BUM和内标,在m/z365.08→240.10和370.04→244.52处观察到质子化前体到产物离子的跃迁,分别。BUM在血浆样品中的线性范围为3.490-401.192ng/mL。精度间值在1.76%至4.75%的范围内。间精度值范围为96.46%至99.95%。该方法已根据美国食品和药物管理局指南进行了充分验证,结果在允许范围内。Cmax和Tmax值分别为~53.097±13.537ng/mL和1.25(0.67-5.00)h,分别。新方法在研究人血浆中的BUM方面显示出令人满意的结果,可用于药代动力学和生物等效性研究。
    Determining a drug\'s bioavailability and bioequivalence is important for developing and approving a drug product. The procedure supports applications for generic drug products and novel therapeutic substances, makes important decisions regarding safety and efficacy, and measures a drug\'s concentration in biological matrices. This study aimed to develop and validate a specific, simple, sensitive, and accurate method using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) for measuring bumetanide (BUM) in human plasma. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a Hypurity C18 column (4.6 × 50 mm, 5 μm) under isocratic conditions, and LC-MS detected positive ionization acquisition modes. Protonated precursor to product ion transitions were observed at m/z 365.08 → 240.10 and 370.04 → 244.52 for BUM and internal standard, respectively. The linear range of BUM in plasma samples was 3.490-401.192 ng/mL. The inter-precision value ranged from 1.76% to 4.75%. The inter-accuracy value ranged from 96.46% to 99.95%. The method was adequately validated per the U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidelines, and the results were within permissible bounds. The Cmax and Tmax values were ~53.097 ± 13.537 ng/mL and 1.25 (0.67-5.00) h, respectively. The new approach showed satisfactory results for studying BUM in human plasma with potential use in pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence investigations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    这项研究的目的是确定布美他尼是否可以中止HypoPP患者的急性虚弱发作。这是一个随机的,双盲,cross-over,安慰剂对照II期临床试验。通过ADM的等距运动然后休息(McManis方案)引起局灶性弱点发作。参与者进行了两次研究访问,并在发作时接受了安慰剂或2mg布美他尼(定义为外展人的极小值CMAP振幅从峰值下降40%)。CMAP测量评估攻击严重性和持续时间。9名参与者完成了两次访问。治疗后1小时,布美他尼(40.6%)与安慰剂(34.9%)组的CMAP峰值振幅百分比没有显着差异(估计效果差异为5.9%(95%CI:(-5.7%;17.5%),p=0.27,主要结果)。通过早期(治疗后0-2小时)和晚期(治疗后2-4小时)疗效的曲线下面积评估的CMAP振幅在布美他尼和安慰剂之间没有统计学差异(早期疗效估计值0.043,p=0.3;晚期疗效估计值0.085,p=0.1)。两名参与者在摄入布美他尼后从发作中恢复过来;安慰剂后没有人康复。在大多数患者中,布美他尼的耐受性良好,但对挽救固定手的局灶性发作无效。尽管数据支持对这种药物的进一步研究。
    The aim of this study was to establish whether bumetanide can abort an acute attack of weakness in patients with HypoPP. This was a randomised, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial. Focal attack of weakness was induced by isometric exercise of ADM followed by rest (McManis protocol). Participants had two study visits and received either placebo or 2 mg bumetanide at attack onset (defined as 40 % decrement in the abductor digiti minimi CMAP amplitude from peak). CMAP measurements assessed attack severity and duration. Nine participants completed both visits. CMAP percentage of peak amplitudes in the bumetanide (40.6 %) versus placebo (34.9 %) group at 1hr following treatment did not differ significantly (estimated effect difference 5.9 % (95 % CI: (-5.7 %; 17.5 %), p = 0.27, primary outcome). CMAP amplitudes assessed by the area under the curve for early (0-2hr post-treatment) and late (2-4 h post-treatment) efficacy were not statistically different between bumetanide and placebo (early effect estimate 0.043, p = 0.3; late effect estimate 0.085, p = 0.1). Two participants recovered from the attack following bumetanide intake; none recovered following placebo. Bumetanide was well tolerated but not efficacious to rescue a focal attack in an immobilised hand in the majority of patients, although data supports further studies of this agent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新生儿癫痫发作很常见,但新生儿惊厥对长期神经系统结局的影响尚不清楚.我们通过分析来自布美他尼治疗新生儿癫痫的早期对照试验的数据来解决这个问题。
    根据连续视频脑电图数据计算新生儿癫痫发作负担。通过标准化发育测试和新生儿癫痫发作后复发确定神经系统结局。
    在111名登记的新生儿中,43例随机分为治疗组或对照组。治疗组和对照组之间的神经系统结局没有差异。对84例急性围产期脑损伤新生儿进行亚组分析(57例HIE,18冲程,9ICH),其中大多数(70%)患有新生儿癫痫发作。癫痫发作负担与发育评分呈显著负相关(p<0.01)。与ICH相比,HIE和卒中组的癫痫发作负担与发育评分之间的关联更强(p<0.05)。
    布美他尼没有长期的有益或不良反应,根据治疗持续时间与新生儿癫痫发作持续时间预期。对于围产期脑损伤的新生儿,较高的新生儿癫痫发作负担与较差的发育结局显着相关,特别是缺血性和出血性脑损伤。这些数据突出了需要进一步研究新生儿癫痫发作严重程度和病因的长期影响。
    UNASSIGNED: Neonatal seizures are common, but the impact of neonatal seizures on long-term neurologic outcome remains unclear. We addressed this question by analyzing data from an early-phase controlled trial of bumetanide to treat neonatal seizures.
    UNASSIGNED: Neonatal seizure burden was calculated from continuous video-EEG data. Neurologic outcome was determined by standardized developmental tests and post-neonatal seizure recurrence.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 111 enrolled neonates, 43 were randomized to treatment or control groups. There were no differences in neurologic outcome between treatment and control groups. A subgroup analysis was performed for 84 neonates with acute perinatal brain injury (57 HIE, 18 stroke, 9 ICH), most of whom (70%) had neonatal seizures. There was a significant negative correlation between seizure burden and developmental scores (p<0.01). Associations between seizure burden and developmental scores were stronger in HIE and stroke groups compared with ICH (p<0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Bumetanide showed no long-term beneficial or adverse effects, as expected based on treatment duration versus duration of neonatal seizures. For neonates with perinatal brain injury, higher neonatal seizure burden correlated significantly with worse developmental outcome, particularly for ischemic versus hemorrhagic brain injury. These data highlight the need for further investigation of the long-term effects of both neonatal seizure severity and etiology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目前针对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)核心症状的药物治疗有限,我们在这里报告了一个随机的,双盲,安慰剂对照试验以调查疗效,安全,3~6岁ASD患儿应用布美他尼的潜在神经机制。共有120名儿童被纳入研究,并随机分配给0.5mg布美他尼或安慰剂。在最后的样本中,最终分析包括119名接受至少一剂布美他尼(59名儿童)或安慰剂(60名儿童)的儿童。主要结果是儿童自闭症评定量表(CARS)评分降低,次要结局是3个月时的临床总体印象量表(CGI)-总体改善(CGI-I)评分以及自闭症诊断观察时间表(ADOS)从基线到3个月的变化.磁共振波谱(MRS)用于测量治疗前后岛叶皮层(IC)中γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)和谷氨酸神经递质的浓度。与安慰剂相比,布美他尼治疗在降低严重程度方面明显更好。没有患者因不良事件退出试验。布美他尼在降低岛叶GABA方面优于安慰剂,使用MRS测量,被证明了。临床改善与布美他尼组的岛叶GABA减少有关。总之,这项试验在一大群以中度和重度ASD为主的幼儿中进行,结果表明布美他尼在改善ASD的核心症状方面是安全有效的.然而,临床意义仍不确定,未来的多中心临床试验需要重复这些发现,并使用多种结局指标确认临床意义.
    With the current limited drug therapy for the core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), we herein report a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy, safety, and potential neural mechanism of bumetanide in children with ASD aged 3-6 years old. A total of 120 children were enrolled into the study and randomly assigned to either 0.5 mg bumetanide or placebo. In the final sample, 119 children received at least one dose of bumetanide (59 children) or placebo (60 children) were included in the final analysis. The primary outcome was a reduction in the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) score, and the secondary outcomes were the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI) -Global Improvement (CGI-I) score at 3 months and the change from baseline to 3-month in the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS). Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was used to measure γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate neurotransmitter concentrations in the insular cortex (IC) before and after the treatment. As compared with the placebo, bumetanide treatment was significantly better in reducing the severity. No patient withdrew from the trial due to adverse events. The superiority of bumetanide to placebo in reducing insular GABA, measured using MRS, was demonstrated. The clinical improvement was associated with a decrease in insular GABA in the bumetanide group. In conclusion, this trial in a large group of young children with predominantly moderate and severe ASD demonstrated that bumetanide is safe and effective in improving the core symptoms of ASD. However, the clinical significance remains uncertain, and future multi-center clinical trials are required to replicate these findings and confirm the clinical significance using a variety of outcome measures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    我们提出了“布美他尼在自闭症药物治疗和生物标志物”(BAMBI;EUDRA-CT-2014-001560-35)研究中神经认知测试的二次分析,一项随机双盲安慰剂对照(1:1)试验,对未用药的7-15岁ASD儿童进行3个月布美他尼治疗(≤1mg,每日2次).使用广义线性模型分析智商≥70的儿童对意向治疗人群的基线缺陷和治疗效果,主成分分析和网络分析。92名儿童被分配接受治疗,83名儿童有资格接受分析。发现不均匀的神经认知障碍不受布美他尼治疗的影响。网络分析显示治疗后更高的模块化(平均差异:-0.165,95CI:-0.317至-0.013,p=.034)和神经认知网络中反应抑制的相对重要性的变化(平均差异:-0.037,95CI:-0.073至-0.001,p=.042)。这项研究提供了将神经认知测试纳入ASD试验的观点。
    We present the secondary-analysis of neurocognitive tests in the \'Bumetanide in Autism Medication and Biomarker\' (BAMBI;EUDRA-CT-2014-001560-35) study, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled (1:1) trial testing 3-months bumetanide treatment (≤ 1 mg twice-daily) in unmedicated children 7-15 years with ASD. Children with IQ ≥ 70 were analyzed for baseline deficits and treatment-effects on the intention-to-treat-population with generalized-linear-models, principal component analysis and network analysis. Ninety-two children were allocated to treatment and 83 eligible for analyses. Heterogeneous neurocognitive impairments were found that were unaffected by bumetanide treatment. Network analysis showed higher modularity after treatment (mean difference:-0.165, 95%CI:-0.317 to - 0.013,p = .034) and changes in the relative importance of response inhibition in the neurocognitive network (mean difference:-0.037, 95%CI:-0.073 to - 0.001,p = .042). This study offers perspectives to include neurocognitive tests in ASD trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:环型利尿剂与噻嗪类利尿剂共同给药是高血压和容量超负荷患者的一种治疗策略。这项研究的目的是评估布美他尼联合氯噻酮治疗慢性肾脏病(CKD)4-5KDIGO患者的疗效和安全性。
    方法:进行双盲随机研究。患者被随机分为两组:布美他尼加氯噻酮组(干预)和布美他尼加安慰剂组(对照组),以评估TBW的差异。基线和随访30天之间的ECW和ECW/TBW。体积超负荷定义为生物电阻抗分析,即假定健康参考人群的第90百分位数以上的液体体积。该研究的注册号为NCT03923933。
    结果:纳入32例患者,平均年龄为57.2±9.34岁,肾小球滤过率(eGFR)中位数为16.7ml/min/1.73m2(2.2-29)。第7天全身水(TBW)的升容量超负荷减少(干预:-2.5vs.对照:-0.59,p=0.003)和第30天(干预:-5.3vs.对照:-0.07,p=0.016);第7天的细胞外水(ECW)升数(干预:-1.58vs.对照:-0.43,p<0.001)和第30天(干预:-3.05vs.控制:-0.15,p<0.000)。第7天收缩压也降低(干预:-18vs.控制:-7.5,p=0.073)和第30天(干预:-26.1vs.控制:-10,p=0.028)和第7天的舒张压(干预:-8.5vs.控制:-2.25,p=0.059)和第30天(干预:-13.5vs.控制:-3.4,p=0.018)。
    结论:在没有肾脏替代治疗的CKD4-5期KDIGO中,布美他尼与氯噻酮联合治疗容量超负荷和高血压比安慰剂更有效。
    BACKGROUND: The co-administration of loop diuretics with thiazide diuretics is a therapeutic strategy in patients with hypertension and volume overload. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with bumetanide plus chlorthalidone in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4-5 KDIGO.
    METHODS: A double-blind randomized study was conducted. Patients were randomized into two groups: bumetanide plus chlorthalidone group (intervention) and the bumetanide plus placebo group (control) to evaluate differences in TBW, ECW and ECW/TBW between baseline and 30 Days of follow-up. Volume overload was defined as \'bioelectrical impedance analysis as fluid volume above the 90th percentile of a presumed healthy reference population. The study\'s registration number was NCT03923933.
    RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with a mean age of 57.2 ± 9.34 years and a median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 16.7 ml/min/1.73 m2 (2.2-29) were included. There was decreased volume overload in the liters of total body water (TBW) on Day 7 (intervention: -2.5 vs. control: -0.59, p = 0.003) and Day 30 (intervention: -5.3 vs. control: -0.07, p = 0.016); and in liters of extracellular water (ECW) on Day 7 (intervention: -1.58 vs. control: -0.43, p < 0.001) and Day 30 (intervention: -3.05 vs. control: -0.15, p < 0.000). There was also a decrease in systolic blood pressure on Day 7 (intervention: -18 vs. control: -7.5, p = 0.073) and Day 30 (intervention: -26.1 vs. control: -10, p = 0.028) and in diastolic blood pressure on Day 7 (intervention: -8.5 vs. control: -2.25, p = 0.059) and Day 30 (intervention: -13.5 vs. control: -3.4, p = 0.018).
    CONCLUSIONS: In CKD stage 4-5 KDIGO without renal replacement therapy, bumetanide in combination with chlorthalidone is more effective in treating volume overload and hypertension than bumetanide with placebo.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经元兴奋抑制(E/I)失衡被认为是神经发育障碍的重要病理生理机制。结节性硬化症(TSC)的临床前研究,表明改变的氯化物稳态可能会损害GABA能抑制,从而损害E/I平衡调节。因此,纠正氯化物稳态可能构成缓解行为症状的治疗目标。最近,我们在“布美他尼改善结节性硬化症患者过度兴奋行为试验”(BATSCH试验;Eudra-CT:2016-002408-13)的开放标签研究中显示,氯调节剂布美他尼改善了行为症状.这里,我们将静息态EEG作为BATSCH的辅助分析,以研究对网络水平E/I平衡变化敏感的EEG测量值与对布美他尼的临床反应之间的关联.10名TSC参与者(8-21岁)的EEG可用。光谱功率,长程时间相关性(LRTC),在治疗前和治疗91天后比较α频率带的功能E/I比(fE/I)。将治疗前的措施与29名典型发育儿童(TDC)进行了比较。EEG测量值与异常行为检查表-易怒子量表(ABC-I)相关,社会反应量表-2(SRS-2),和重复行为量表修订(RBS-R)。在基线,TSC显示出比TDC更低的α带绝对功率和fE/I。绝对功率增加通过布美他尼治疗,显示出适度的,尽管不重要,与RBS-R改善的相关性有趣的是,基线脑电图测量值与临床结果之间的相关性表明,在具有E/I平衡点周围网络特征的儿童中,大多数反应可能是预期的。总之,在TSC中存在指向抑制主导网络的E/I失衡。尽管与临床改善的关系尚无定论,但我们确定了布美他尼的神经生理学作用。尽管如此,我们的结果进一步表明,基线网络特征可能会影响治疗反应.这些发现强调了E/I敏感的EEG措施在TSC新的治疗干预措施中的可能实用性。
    欧盟临床试验注册,EudraCT2016-002408-13(www.临床试验登记。欧盟/ctr-search/trial/2016-002408-13/NL)。2016年7月25日注册
    Neuronal excitation-inhibition (E/I) imbalances are considered an important pathophysiological mechanism in neurodevelopmental disorders. Preclinical studies on tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), suggest that altered chloride homeostasis may impair GABAergic inhibition and thereby E/I-balance regulation. Correction of chloride homeostasis may thus constitute a treatment target to alleviate behavioral symptoms. Recently, we showed that bumetanide-a chloride-regulating agent-improved behavioral symptoms in the open-label study Bumetanide to Ameliorate Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Hyperexcitable Behaviors trial (BATSCH trial; Eudra-CT: 2016-002408-13). Here, we present resting-state EEG as secondary analysis of BATSCH to investigate associations between EEG measures sensitive to network-level changes in E/I balance and clinical response to bumetanide. EEGs of 10 participants with TSC (aged 8-21 years) were available. Spectral power, long-range temporal correlations (LRTC), and functional E/I ratio (fE/I) in the alpha-frequency band were compared before and after 91 days of treatment. Pre-treatment measures were compared against 29 typically developing children (TDC). EEG measures were correlated with the Aberrant Behavioral Checklist-Irritability subscale (ABC-I), the Social Responsiveness Scale-2 (SRS-2), and the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R). At baseline, TSC showed lower alpha-band absolute power and fE/I than TDC. Absolute power increased through bumetanide treatment, which showed a moderate, albeit non-significant, correlation with improvement in RBS-R. Interestingly, correlations between baseline EEG measures and clinical outcomes suggest that most responsiveness might be expected in children with network characteristics around the E/I balance point. In sum, E/I imbalances pointing toward an inhibition-dominated network are present in TSC. We established neurophysiological effects of bumetanide although with an inconclusive relationship with clinical improvement. Nonetheless, our results further indicate that baseline network characteristics might influence treatment response. These findings highlight the possible utility of E/I-sensitive EEG measures to accompany new treatment interventions for TSC.
    UNASSIGNED: EU Clinical Trial Register, EudraCT 2016-002408-13 (www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2016-002408-13/NL). Registered 25 July 2016.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    国际上正在研究布美他尼(口服液体制剂0.5mgbid)作为治疗7-17岁儿童和青少年自闭症谱系障碍核心症状的疗效,随机化,双盲,安慰剂对照III期研究。主要终点是治疗6个月后儿童自闭症评定量表2(CARS2)总原始评分的变化。在基线,分析的211名参与者广泛代表了这个年龄段的自闭症受试者:平均(SD)年龄,10.4(3.0)岁;男性占82.5%;智商≥70的占47.7%。平均CARS2评分为40.1(4.9),平均社会反应量表评分为116.7(23.4)。最终的研究结果将提供布美他尼在自闭症儿童和青少年中的疗效和安全性的数据。
    The efficacy of bumetanide (oral liquid formulation 0.5 mg bid) as a treatment for the core symptoms of autism spectrum disorders in children and adolescents aged 7-17 years is being investigated in an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. The primary endpoint is the change in Childhood Autism Rating Scale 2 (CARS2) total raw score after 6 months of treatment. At baseline, the 211 participants analysed are broadly representative of autistic subjects in this age range: mean (SD) age, 10.4 (3.0) years; 82.5% male; 47.7% with intelligence quotient ≥ 70. Mean CARS2 score was 40.1 (4.9) and mean Social Responsiveness Scale score was 116.7 (23.4). Final study results will provide data on efficacy and safety of bumetanide in autistic children and adolescents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号