BACKGROUND: Acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is caused by significant disturbances in the cerebral bloodflow (CBF) that lead to brain ischaemia and eventually result in irreversible brain tissue damage. The main goal of its treatment is to restore bloodflow to the areas at risk of necrosis. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are the mainstay of current therapy, with the latter being widely employed in selected patients with radiologically proven large vessel occlusion (LVO). Despite convincing evidence of its efficacy, up to half of patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) still do not achieve a beneficial functional outcome; this is mainly due to unfavourable brain tissue sequelae. Therefore, factors associated with known adverse brain changes, such as larger infarct size or haemorrhagic and oedematous complications, should be adequately addressed.
OBJECTIVE: To review the available literature describing AIS brain tissue outcome assessed by computed tomography (CT) and/ or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients undergoing MT treatment. Additionally, to evaluate the association of post-MT tissue changes with short- and long-term prognosis.
METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases according to established criteria.
RESULTS: We found a total of 264 articles addressing the most common types of AIS tissue sequelae after EVT (i.e. MT with or without IVT as bridging therapy) by brain CT and MRI. These were: follow-up infarct volume (FIV), cerebral oedema (COD) and haemorrhagic transformation (HT). As the next step, 37 articles evaluating factors associated with defined outcomes were selected. Several non-modifiable factors such as age, comorbidities, pretreatment neurological deficit, and collateral circulation status were found to affect stroke tissue sequelae, to varying degrees. Additionally, some factors including time to treatment initiation, selection of treatment device, and periprocedural systemic blood pressure, the modification of which can potentially reduce the occurrence of an unfavourable tissue outcome, were identified. Some recently revealed biochemical and serological parameters may play a similar role.
CONCLUSIONS: The identification of factors that affect post-MT ischaemic area evolution may result in studies assessing the effects of their modification, and potentially improve clinical outcomes. Modifiable parameters, including periprocedural systemic blood pressure and some biochemical factors, may be of particular importance.

OBJECTIVE: Glycerol is thought to be superior to mannitol in the treatment of cerebral oedema and elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), particularly with safety concerns. However, the current evidence remains insufficient. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of glycerol versus mannitol in this meta-analysis.
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chongqing VIP information, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the reference lists of relevant articles were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing glycerol and mannitol in patients with brain oedema and elevated ICP. Two investigators independently identified the articles, assessed the study quality and extracted data. Data analyses were performed using RevMan software.
CONCLUSIONS: Thirty trials involving 3144 patients met our inclusion criteria. Pooled data indicated that glycerol and mannitol had comparable effectiveness in controlling cerebral oedema (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.03; p = .97), but the risks of acute kidney injury and electrolyte disturbances were significantly lower with glycerol (RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.27 and RR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.30, respectively) than mannitol. Moreover, there seemed to be a lower probability of rebound ICP after the withdrawal of glycerol. Neither haemolysis nor elevated blood glucose levels were observed in the glycerol group.
CONCLUSIONS: Regarding the balance between efficacy and safety, glycerol could be an effective and more tolerable alternative therapy for cerebral oedema and elevated ICP than mannitol, especially for high-risk populations of renal failure.

Intracranial hypertension (ICH) is a major cause of death after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Continuous hyperosmolar therapy (CHT) has been proposed for the treatment of ICH, but its effectiveness is controversial. We compared the mortality and outcomes in patients with TBI with ICH treated or not with CHT.
We included patients with TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 12 and trauma-associated lesion on brain computed tomography (CT) scan) from the databases of the prospective multicentre trials Corti-TC, BI-VILI and ATLANREA. CHT consisted of an intravenous infusion of NaCl 20% for 24 hours or more. The primary outcome was the risk of survival at day 90, adjusted for predefined covariates and baseline differences, allowing us to reduce the bias resulting from confounding factors in observational studies. A systematic review was conducted including studies published from 1966 to December 2016.
Among the 1086 included patients, 545 (51.7%) developed ICH (143 treated and 402 not treated with CHT). In patients with ICH, the relative risk of survival at day 90 with CHT was 1.43 (95% CI, 0.99-2.06, p = 0.05). The adjusted hazard ratio for survival was 1.74 (95% CI, 1.36-2.23, p < 0.001) in propensity-score-adjusted analysis. At day 90, favourable outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale 4-5) occurred in 45.2% of treated patients with ICH and in 35.8% of patients with ICH not treated with CHT (p = 0.06). A review of the literature including 1304 patients from eight studies suggests that CHT is associated with a reduction of in-ICU mortality (intervention, 112/474 deaths (23.6%) vs. control, 244/781 deaths (31.2%); OR 1.42 (95% CI, 1.04-1.95), p = 0.03, I 2 = 15%).
CHT for the treatment of posttraumatic ICH was associated with improved adjusted 90-day survival. This result was strengthened by a review of the literature.