Hyponatremia is a common electrolyte abnormality affecting hospitalized patients.1 It is an independent predictor for mortality and is associated with increased length of hospital stay and higher costs. The most serious potential complication is hyponatremic encephalopathy, a medical emergency that can result in death or irreversible brain injury if inadequately treated.2 Hypertonic saline is a safe and effective means of correcting hyponatremia.2-4 A rare yet serious complication from excessive correction of chronic hyponatremia is the development of cerebral demyelination.

Organic acidurias, such as glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA1), methylmalonic (MMA), and propionic aciduria (PA) are a prominent group of inherited metabolic diseases involving accumulation of eponymous metabolites causing endogenous intoxication. For all three conditions, guidelines for diagnosis and management have been developed and revised over the last years, resulting in three revisions for GA1 and one revision for MMA/PA. The process of clinical guideline development in rare metabolic disorders is challenged by the scarcity and limited quality of evidence available. The body of literature is often fragmentary and where information is present, it is usually derived from small sample sizes. Therefore, the development of guidelines for GA1 and MMA/PA was initially confronted with a poor evidence foundation that hindered formulation of concrete recommendations in certain contexts, triggering specific research projects and initiation of longitudinal, prospective observational studies using patient registries. Reversely, these observational studies contributed to evaluate the value of newborn screening, phenotypic diversities, and treatment effects, thus significantly improving the quality of evidence and directly influencing formulation and evidence levels of guideline recommendations. Here, we present insights into interactions between guideline development and (pre)clinical research for GA1 and MMA/PA, and demonstrate how guidelines gradually improved from revision to revision. We describe how clinical studies help to unravel the relative impact of therapeutic interventions on outcome and conclude that despite new and better quality of research data over the last decades, significant shortcomings of evidence regarding prognosis and treatment remain. It appears that development of clinical guidelines can directly help to guide research, and vice versa.

Glutaricacidemia type 1(GA1) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by reduced or missing glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase activity which hamps metabolism of lysine, hydroxylysine and tryptophan. The catabolic products of glutarylcarnitine and glutaric acid are abnormally accumulated in the body, resulting in metabolic disorders which primarily lead to damage to the nervous system. Clinical manifestations of patients include macrocephaly, dystonia, dyskinesia, and developmental retardation. Acute encephalopathy may be induced in infants and young children due to infection, vaccination and surgery. For GA1 is a rare disease and its clinical manifestations are similar to other neurological diseases, it may be easily missed or misdiagnosed. To facilitate early diagnosis and treatment and improve the prognosis, this consensus was formulated by pediatric experts from the fields of endocrinology and genetic metabolism through full discussion and reference to the latest literature and guidelines home and abroad.

BACKGROUND: Inherited neurometabolic disorders (iNMDs) represent a group of almost seven hundred rare diseases whose common manifestations are clinical neurologic or cognitive symptoms that can appear at any time, in the first months/years of age or even later in adulthood. Early diagnosis and timely treatments are often pivotal for the favorable course of the disease. Thus, the elaboration of new evidence-based recommendations for iNMD diagnosis and management is increasingly requested by health care professionals and patients, even though the methodological quality of existing guidelines is largely unclear. InNerMeD-I-Network is the first European network on iNMDs that was created with the aim of sharing and increasing validated information about diagnosis and management of neurometabolic disorders. One of the goals of the project was to determine the number and the methodological quality of existing guidelines and recommendations for iNMDs.
METHODS: We performed a systematic search on PubMed, the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), the Guidelines International Network (G-I-N), the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to identify all the published guidelines and recommendations for iNMDs from January 2000 to June 2015. The methodological quality of the selected documents was determined using the AGREE II instrument, an appraisal tool composed of 6 domains covering 23 key items.
RESULTS: A total of 55 records met the inclusion criteria, 11 % were about groups of disorders, whereas the majority encompassed only one disorder. Lysosomal disorders, and in particular Fabry, Gaucher disease and mucopolysaccharidoses where the most studied. The overall methodological quality of the recommendation was acceptable and increased over time, with 25 % of the identified guidelines strongly recommended by the appraisers, 64 % recommended, and 11 % not recommended. However, heterogeneity in the obtained scores for each domain was observed among documents covering different groups of disorders and some domains like \'stakeholder involvement\' and \'applicability\' were generally scarcely addressed.
CONCLUSIONS: Greater efforts should be devoted to improve the methodological quality of guidelines and recommendations for iNMDs and AGREE II instrument seems advisable for new guideline development. The elaboration of new guidelines encompassing still uncovered disorders is badly needed.

Ketogenic diet is a nonpharmacologic treatment for childhood epilepsy not amenable to drugs. At the present time, two works based on national research, one in Germany and one in the United States provide international guidelines to ensure a correct management of the ketogenic diet. Our Italian collaborative study group was set up in order to formulate a consensus statement regarding the clinical management of the ketogenic diet, patient selection, pre-ketogenic diet, counseling, setting and enforcement of dietary induction of ketosis, follow-up management, and eventual discontinuation of the diet.

OBJECTIVE: Epileptic seizures are the cause of between 0.3 and 1.2% of all visits to hospital emergency departments. Twenty-five per cent of patients visit after having their first seizure. Such an impact seems to justify the development of a health care protocol. Our proposal is to draw up a set of implicit evidence-based consensus practice guidelines, to use Liberati\'s nomenclature, concerning aspects related to the diagnostic procedure and recommended therapeutic management of patients with a first seizure who are being attended in an emergency department.
METHODS: A selective search was conducted on PubMed-Medline for quality scientific information on the subject using scientific evidence filters. This search was completed in other scientific evidence search engines, such as Tripdatabase, Biblioteca Cochrane Plus or DARE. The selected references were analysed and discussed by the authors, and the available evidence and any recommendations that could be drawn from it were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 47 primary documents and 10 practice guidelines or protocols related with the proposed topic were identified. The recommendations were inserted in the text explicitly.
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic and therapeutic protocol for all paroxysmal phenomena in emergencies consists of three successive phases: diagnosis of the cause of the epilepsy, integration of the significance of the seizure within the clinical context, and designing the therapeutic scheme. Each phase will depend on the outcomes of the previous one as a decision algorithm. The fundamental tools in each phase are: patient record and examination (phase 1), and complementary tests (phase 2). They are then used to produce a therapeutic decision scheme.

暂无摘要。