Bourdieu

布迪厄
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疾病中的不平等,服务提供,结果在北欧普遍福利国家有很好的记录。在疾病康复轨迹期间产生不平等的方式仍然未知。在这种情况下,长期的脑损伤康复为不平等和潜在机制的隐蔽方面提供了一个窗口。我们通过将框架场结构与家庭在严重的后天性脑损伤(严重的ABI)后动员资本的分类能力相结合来实证检验不平等。使用Bourdieuan理论框架,根据现场的概念,doxa,文化健康资本(CHC),和康复资本(RC),我们设计了一个包含专业记录的纵向案例研究,观察,以及追踪和分析受试者轨迹的访谈。我们发现,在严重的ABI之后,家庭的持续积累和资本转化至关重要,因为涉及许多不同领域特定议程和doxas的多方面康复过程。本研究通过包括其他康复背景来补充在医疗保健背景下开发的先前概念(CHC和RC)。社会阶层之间资本形式的差异导致赢家和输家,并反映在年轻人的康复轨迹中,以一个极端轨迹上的连续性和另一个极端轨迹上的断裂为特征。
    Inequalities in illness, service provision, and outcomes are well documented in the Nordic universal welfare state. The ways in which inequalities are produced during illness recovery trajectories remain largely unknown. Long-term brain injury rehabilitation in this context provides a window into veiled aspects of inequality and the underlying mechanisms. We examine inequality empirically by combing framing field structures with the classed abilities of families to mobilise capital after a severe acquired brain injury (severe ABI). Using a Bourdieuan theoretical framework, informed by the concepts of field, doxa, cultural health capital (CHC), and rehabilitation capital (RC), we designed a longitudinal case study encompassing professional records, observations, and interviews that tracked and analysed subjects\' trajectories. We found that families\' consistent accumulation and conversion of capital was crucial after a severe ABI because of the multifaceted rehabilitation process involving many different field specific agendas and doxas. This study supplements previous concepts (CHC and RC) developed in a health care context by including other rehabilitation contexts. These disparities in forms of capital amongst social classes result in winners and losers and were reflected in the rehabilitation trajectories of the young adults, characterised by continuity on one extreme and broken trajectories on the other.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    医学教育研究领域处于两个截然不同的学术世界的十字路口:高等教育和医学。因此,这一领域为探索跨学科知识交流的新形式提供了独特的机会。
    通过查看2017年影响因子最高的五种期刊的引文模式,对医学教育研究中的跨学科知识流动进行了研究。把握医学教育知识流动的特殊性,高等教育领域被用作比较者。总的来说,研究了2017年发表的64篇医学教育和41篇高等教育文章的2031篇引文。
    医学教育研究人员利用的知识社区范围比他们在高等教育中的同龄人要窄。医学教育研究人员主要引用发表在健康和医学教育期刊上的文章(占所有引用的80%),在较小程度上,在教育和社会科学期刊上发表的文章。在高等教育中,虽然引用文献的最大份额是领域内部的(36%),研究人员引用了来自社会科学领域的文献。研究结果表明,高等教育学者比医学教育同事从更广泛的社区和角度与学者进行对话。
    使用PierreBourdieu的doxa和字段概念,有人认为,进入高等教育研究空间的认识文化的多样性有助于其跨学科性质。相反,医学中相对同质的认知文化的存在可能会阻碍跨学科知识交流。
    The medical education research field operates at the crossroads of two distinct academic worlds: higher education and medicine. As such, this field provides a unique opportunity to explore new forms of cross-disciplinary knowledge exchange.
    Cross-disciplinary knowledge flow in medical education research was examined by looking at citation patterns in the five journals with the highest impact factor in 2017. To grasp the specificities of the knowledge flow in medical education, the field of higher education was used as a comparator. In total, 2031 citations from 64 medical education and 41 higher education articles published in 2017 were examined.
    Medical education researchers draw on a narrower range of knowledge communities than their peers in higher education. Medical education researchers predominantly cite articles published in health and medical education journals (80% of all citations), and to a lesser extent, articles published in education and social science journals. In higher education, while the largest share of the cited literature is internal to the domain (36%), researchers cite literature from across the social science spectrum. Findings suggest that higher education scholars engage in conversations with academics from a broader range of communities and perspectives than their medical education colleagues.
    Using Pierre Bourdieu\'s concepts of doxa and field, it is argued that the variety of epistemic cultures entering the higher education research space contributes to its interdisciplinary nature. Conversely, the existence of a relatively homogeneous epistemic culture in medicine potentially impedes cross-disciplinary knowledge exchange.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Fundamental cause theory (FCT) is among the most widely recognised and accepted social science frameworks used to examine the processes driving health inequalities. Despite the wide influence of the theory, it remains largely underutilised in practical and applied research on health disparities. This paper proposes that Pierre Bourdieu\'s theories of capital and symbolic power can be integrated with FCT to address limitations in the latter theory, making it more useful in health disparities research. Using a case study of U.S. health insurance claim denials for genetic testing among women with a breast cancer diagnosis, this work illustrates how the theoretical constructs of FCT and Bourdieu\'s work articulate, and consequently deepens our appreciation for the durable relationship between socioeconomic status and health. Study results reveal the multiple and complex mechanisms that play a role in access to healthcare services, which has significant implications for how we think about the role of health policy in addressing health disparities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    Class relations have been proven to affect various aspects of social life, even in modern individualized societies. However, following claims on individualization and the so-called \'death of class\' thesis, studying the subjective dimension of class - that is, the way individuals perceive of class relations and their own position within them - has gone out of style. We argue that even in equalized societies, subjective class perceptions may still influence attitudes and behaviour as they evolve to fit modern class relations. To explore the existence as well as structure and content of perceived social classes, this article investigates how people describe society and social groups in focus group discussions. We find that groups in different positions in terms of education and economy all tend to apply hierarchical class categories to describe Danish society, which is normally seen as one of the most equal societies and political systems in the world. In addition, we find that economic resources serve as a baseline for the hierarchical ordering, often supplemented with notions of education, lifestyle and/or occupational profile. Even though people are somewhat uncomfortable with the notion of class, their descriptions of Danish society and classes are surprisingly similar within and across groups. We conclude that not only do class relations matter; people are also highly aware of the existing classes and able to position themselves and others according to their notion of classes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文旨在考虑与儿童健康维护有关的儿童社会学,恢复和推广,通过讨论三个相互交叉的主题:儿童作为少数群体的社会群体;儿童作为体现的社会行为者,儿童作为代际分工的代理人。我建立在我以前的工作,儿童的健康状况的谈判,在家庭和学校,回顾过去15年左右的一些重要发展和研究。这一时期对童年的研究有了扩展,在语言和地理上;并将注意力集中在儿童的健康和福祉与社会对他们作为有偿工人和学童的期望之间。
    This paper aims to consider the sociology of childhood in relation to child health maintenance, restoration and promotion, through discussion of three intersecting themes: children as a minority social group; children as embodied social actors and children as agents in the inter-generational division of labour. I build on my previous work on children\'s negotiations of their health status, at home and at school and review some important developments and research studies over the last 15 years or so. This period has seen the expansion of research on childhood, linguistically and geographically; and has focused attention on how children\'s health and well-being relate to social expectations of them as paid workers and as schoolchildren.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号