Bispecific antibodies

双特异性抗体
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    越来越多的证据表明,放疗可能会增强免疫治疗的疗效。本研究旨在评估靶向PD-L1和CTLA-4的双特异性抗体KN046联合化疗和姑息性放疗治疗晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的可能性。在这个开放标签中,Ib期试验,晚期ESCC患者接受化疗和姑息性放疗,和KN046,预定义的递增剂量为1、3或5mg/kg(在化疗周期中每3周一次,在KN046维持期间每2周一次)。化疗方案包括顺铂(75mg/m2,d1)和紫杉醇(135-175mg/m2ivgtt。,d1).放射治疗细节,包括网站,定时,剂量,和碎片模式,由调查员自行决定。主要结果是剂量限制性毒性(DLT)。从2019年5月到2021年4月,在剂量组中招募了25名患者:1mg/kg中的3名,3mg/kg中的12,和10在5mg/kg。在剂量递增期间未观察到DLT。客观缓解率为41.7%(95CI22.1-63.4),而疾病控制率为87.5%(95CI67.6~97.3)。中位随访时间为11.8个月,中位无进展生存期为7.8个月(95CI5.2~9.7),中位总生存期为15.9个月(95CI8.4-NE).48.0%的患者报告了严重不良事件,主要是白细胞减少症(16%),免疫介导性小肠结肠炎(12%),免疫介导的肺炎(8%),和中性粒细胞减少(8%)。KN046联合化疗和姑息性放疗可能是可行的,在晚期ESCC患者中显示出良好的安全性和显着的疗效。
    There is growing evidence to suggest that radiotherapy might enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. This study aimed to assess the possibility of KN046, a bispecific antibody targeting PD-L1 and CTLA-4, combined with chemotherapy and palliative radiotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In this open-label, phase Ib trial, patients with advanced ESCC were administered chemotherapy with palliative radiotherapy, and KN046 in the predefined escalation dosages of 1, 3, or 5 mg/kg (every 3 weeks during chemotherapy cycles and every 2 weeks during KN046 maintenance). The chemotherapy regimen constituted cisplatin (75 mg/m2 i.v., d1) and paclitaxel (135-175 mg/m2 ivgtt., d1). Radiotherapy specifics, including site, timing, dose, and fragmentation pattern, were at the investigator\'s discretion. The primary outcome was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). From May 2019 to April 2021, 25 patients were enrolled across the dosage groups: 3 in 1 mg/kg, 12 in 3 mg/kg, and 10 in 5 mg/kg. No DLT was observed during the dose escalation. The objective response rate was 41.7% (95%CI 22.1-63.4), while the disease control rate was 87.5% (95%CI 67.6-97.3). At a median follow-up of 11.8 months, the median progression-free survival was 7.8 months (95%CI 5.2-9.7) and median overall survival was 15.9 months (95%CI 8.4-NE). Serious adverse events were reported in 48.0% of patients, predominantly leukopenia (16%), immune-mediated enterocolitis (12%), immune-mediated pneumonitis (8%), and neutropenia (8%). Combining KN046 with chemotherapy and palliative radiotherapy might be feasible, showing a favorable safety profile and notable efficacy in advanced ESCC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)是一种全身性炎症反应,通常被观察为T细胞重定向疗法的一类效应。本文为护士的诊断提供了重要的实践指导,监测,以及接受泰利他单抗治疗的患者的CRS管理,基于MajesTEC-1临床试验和实际护理实践的经验。
    方法:MajesTEC-1是teclistamab在复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中的1/2期研究。为了降低高等级CRS的风险,仔细监测患者的早期体征和CRS症状(包括发烧,必须在teclistamab管理之前完全解决)。
    结果:对几个研究地点的护士进行的一项调查提供了更多的现实生活见解,以了解来自三个国家的四个学术机构管理CRS的护理最佳实践。
    结论:在MajesTEC-1中,72%的使用teclistammab治疗的患者出现CRS,其中大多数是低等级的。所有病例均已解决,均未导致治疗中断。CRS的现实生活支持措施通常与研究中概述的措施一致。
    结论:因为护士是病人护理的前线,它们在及时识别CRS的体征和症状以及及时适当的支持性治疗中起着至关重要的作用。本综述对护士的诊断提供了重要的实践指导,监测,以及接受泰利他单抗治疗的患者的CRS管理,基于MajesTEC-1试验和实际护理实践的经验。
    OBJECTIVE: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a systemic inflammatory response that is commonly observed as a class effect of T-cell-redirecting therapies. This article provides important practical guidance for nurses relating to the diagnosis, monitoring, and management of CRS in patients receiving teclistamab, based on experience from the MajesTEC-1 clinical trial and real-life nursing practice.
    METHODS: MajesTEC-1 is a phase 1/2 study of teclistamab in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. To mitigate the risk of high-grade CRS, patients were carefully monitored for early signs and symptoms of CRS (including fever, which must have fully resolved before teclistamab administration).
    RESULTS: A survey of nurses from several of the study sites provided additional real-life insights into nursing best practices for managing CRS from four academic institutions in three countries.
    CONCLUSIONS: In MajesTEC-1, 72% of patients treated with teclistamab experienced CRS, the majority of which was low grade. All cases resolved and none led to treatment discontinuation. Real-life supportive measures for CRS are generally aligned with those outlined in the study.
    CONCLUSIONS: Because nurses are on the frontline of patient care, they play a crucial role in promptly recognizing the signs and symptoms of CRS and responding with timely and appropriate supportive treatment. This review provides important practical guidance for nurses on diagnosis, monitoring, and management of CRS in patients receiving teclistamab, based on experience from the MajesTEC-1 trial and real-life nursing practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    免疫治疗已经形成了弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的治疗方法,利妥昔单抗可显著改善复发和未治疗患者的结局.最近,突破性的免疫疗法,如嵌合抗原受体T细胞,已经进入复发/难治性(R/R)DLBCL的治疗领域,并在几个国家获得监管批准。通过开发双特异性抗体(BsAbs),进一步探索了利用患者自身T细胞对抗癌症的概念。设计用于同时靶向两种不同抗原的一类工程抗体产品。这些新型药物在严重预处理的B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中表现出令人印象深刻的单药活性和可控的毒性。在这次审查中,我们提供了最近完成或正在进行的R/RDLBCL患者BsAbs试验的最新概述,包括单代理结果,新兴的组合数据,和新颖的结构。
    Immunotherapy has shaped the treatment approach to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with rituximab leading to remarkable improvements in outcomes for both relapsed and treatment-naïve patients. Recently, groundbreaking immunotherapies like chimeric antigen receptor T-cells have entered the treatment arena for relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL and gained regulatory approval in several countries. The concept of harnessing a patient\'s own T-cells to combat cancer has been further explored through the development of bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), a class of engineered antibody products designed to simultaneously target two different antigens. These novel drugs have demonstrated impressive single-agent activity and manageable toxicity in patients with heavily pretreated B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In this review, we provide an up-to-date overview of recently completed or ongoing BsAbs trials in patients with R/R DLBCL, including single-agent results, emerging combination data, and novel constructs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:双特异性抗体(BsAb)是用于复发性/难治性多发性骨髓瘤的有效治疗方法。尽管耐受性良好的安全性,感染性事件在临床试验中似乎很常见.关于流行病学的真实世界数据,特点,在接受BsAb治疗的患者中,感染的危险因素和结局仍需要考虑.
    方法:回顾性研究,2020年12月至2023年2月,在14个法国中心对BsAb治疗的MM患者进行了多中心研究。主要目的是描述需要住院治疗的感染发生率,具体治疗,或BsAb施用中的适应。
    结果:在229例接受BsAb治疗的MM患者中,153(67%)接受了testlistamab,47(20%)接受了elranatamab和29(13%)talquetamab。我们共报告了234例感染,包括123名(53%)≥3级。主要感染影响呼吸道(n=116,50%),其次是菌血症(n=36,15%)。住院率为56%(n=131),20例(9%)感染导致死亡。在所有患者中,首次感染的全球累积发生率为70%,73%的患者用BCMA靶向治疗,51%的患者用GPRC5D靶向BsAb治疗。在单变量分析中,用于CRS/ICANS的皮质类固醇与较高的首次感染风险相关(HR=2.13;95CI:1.38-3.28),而GPRC5D靶向BsAb和抗菌药物预防与较低的风险相关(HR=0.53;95CI:0.3-0.94和HR=0.65;95CI:0.46-0.9).精细和灰色多变量模型发现,只有用于CRS/ICANS的皮质类固醇与较高的首次感染风险相关(HR=2.01;95CI:1.27-3.19)。
    结论:实施旨在降低BsAb感染风险的预防措施至关重要,特别是在接受CRS/ICANS糖皮质激素治疗的患者中。
    OBJECTIVE: Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are an effective treatment used in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Despite a well-tolerated safety profile, infectious events appear to be frequent in clinical trials. Real-world data on epidemiology, characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of infections in patients treated with BsAb are still needed.
    METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre study in BsAb-treated patients with multiple myeloma was performed in 14 French centres from December 2020 to February 2023. The primary objective was to describe the incidence of infections that required hospitalization, specific treatment, or adaptation in BsAb administration.
    RESULTS: Among 229 patients with multiple myeloma treated with BsAb, 153 (67%) received teclistamab, 47 (20%) received elranatamab, and 29 (13%) talquetamab. We reported a total of 234 infections, including 123 (53%) of grade of ≥3. Predominant infections affected the respiratory tract (n = 116, 50%) followed by bacteraemias (n = 36, 15%). The hospitalization rate was 56% (n = 131), and 20 (9%) infections resulted in death. Global cumulative incidence of the first infection was 70% in all patients, 73% in patients treated with B-cell maturation antigen-targeting, and 51% with GPRC5D-targeting BsAb. In univariate analyses, corticosteroids for cytokine release syndrome (CRS)/immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were associated with a higher risk of first infection (HR = 2.13; 95% CI, 1.38-3.28), whereas GPRC5D-targeting BsAb and anti-bacterial prophylaxis were associated with a lower risk (HR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.3-0.94 and HR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.9). Fine and Gray multivariate model found that only corticosteroids for CRS/ICANS were correlated with a higher risk of first infection (HR = 2.01; 95% CI, 1.27-3.19).
    CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of preventive measures that aim to mitigate the risk of infection under BsAb is pivotal, notably in patients who received corticosteroids for CRS/ICANS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    目的:本研究的目的是确定安全性,可行性,和用多次输注抗CD3x抗EGFR双特异性抗体(EGFRBi)武装T细胞(EGFRBAT)联合放疗和化疗治疗4级星形细胞瘤的免疫反应。
    方法:本I期研究采用3+3剂量递增设计,以测试新诊断的4级星形细胞瘤(AG4)患者静脉注射EGFRBAT联合放疗和替莫唑胺(TMZ)的安全性和可行性。找到可行剂量后,有未甲基化O6-甲基鸟嘌呤-DNA甲基转移酶(MGMT)肿瘤的扩增队列每周接受无TMZ的EGFRBAT治疗.
    结果:在7例患者中,最高可行剂量为80×109EGFRBAT,无剂量限制性毒性(DLT)。由于有限的T细胞扩增,我们不能增加剂量。在另外三名未甲基化MGMT肿瘤患者的队列中没有DLT,他们每周接受八次无TMZ的EGFRBAT输注。EGFRBATs输注诱导外周血单核细胞(p<0.03)和NK细胞活性(p<0.002)的胶质瘤特异性抗肿瘤细胞毒性增加,和IFN-γ的血清浓度增加(p<0.03),IL-2(p<0.007),和GM-CSF(p<0.009)。
    结论:用EGFRBAT以80×109的最大可行剂量靶向AG4,有或没有TMZ是安全的,并诱导显著的抗肿瘤特异性免疫应答。这些结果支持进一步的临床试验,以检查这种过继细胞疗法在MGMT未甲基化GBM患者中的功效。
    结果:gov标识符:NCT03344250。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety, feasibility, and immunologic responses of treating grade 4 astrocytomas with multiple infusions of anti-CD3 x anti-EGFR bispecific antibody (EGFRBi) armed T cells (EGFR BATs) in combination with radiation and chemotherapy.
    METHODS: This phase I study used a 3 + 3 dose escalation design to test the safety and feasibility of intravenously infused EGFR BATs in combination with radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with newly diagnosed grade 4 astrocytomas (AG4). After finding the feasible dose, an expansion cohort with unmethylated O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) tumors received weekly EGFR BATs without TMZ.
    RESULTS: The highest feasible dose was 80 × 109 EGFR BATs without dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in seven patients. We could not escalate the dose because of the limited T-cell expansion. There were no DLTs in the additional cohort of three patients with unmethylated MGMT tumors who received eight weekly infusions of EGFR BATs without TMZ. EGFR BATs infusions induced increases in glioma specific anti-tumor cytotoxicity by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (p < 0.03) and NK cell activity (p < 0.002) ex vivo, and increased serum concentrations of IFN-γ (p < 0.03), IL-2 (p < 0.007), and GM-CSF (p < 0.009).
    CONCLUSIONS: Targeting AG4 with EGFR BATs at the maximum feasible dose of 80 × 109, with or without TMZ was safe and induced significant anti-tumor-specific immune responses. These results support further clinical trials to examine the efficacy of this adoptive cell therapy in patients with MGMT-unmethylated GBM.
    RESULTS: gov Identifier: NCT03344250.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    MEDI-565, a bispecific, single-chain antibody targeting human carcinoembryonic antigen on tumor cells and the CD3 epsilon subunit of the human T-cell receptor complex, showed antitumor activity in carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing tumors in murine models.
    This phase I, multicenter, open-label dose escalation study enrolled adults with gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas. MEDI-565 was given intravenously over 3 hours on days 1 through 5 in 28-day cycles, with 4 single-patient (0.75-20 μg) and 5 standard 3 + 3 escalation (60 μg-3 mg; 1.5-7.5 mg with dexamethasone) cohorts. Primary objective was determining maximum tolerated dose; secondary objectives were evaluating pharmacokinetics, antidrug antibodies, and antitumor activity.
    Thirty-nine patients were enrolled (mean age, 59 years; 56% male; 72% colorectal cancer). Four patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (2 at 3 mg; 2 at 7.5 mg + dexamethasone): hypoxia (n = 2), diarrhea, and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Five patients reported grade 3 treatment-related adverse events: diarrhea, CRS, increased alanine aminotransferase, hypertension (all, n = 1), and hypoxia (n = 2); 6 experienced treatment-related serious adverse events: diarrhea, vomiting, pyrexia, CRS (all, n = 1), and hypoxia (n = 2). MEDI-565 pharmacokinetics was linear and dose-proportional, with fast clearance and short half-life. Nineteen patients (48.7%) had antidrug antibodies; 5 (12.8%) had high titers, 2 with decreased MEDI-565 concentrations. No objective responses occurred; 11 (28%) had stable disease as best response.
    The maximum tolerated dose of MEDI-565 in this patient population was 5 mg administered over 3 hours on days 1 through 5 every 28 days, with dexamethasone. Pharmacokinetics were linear. No objective responses were observed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号