Bipolar spectrum disorder

双相谱障碍
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    社会,文化,和结构性因素与寻求精神卫生专业人员帮助的延误和情绪障碍患者治疗依从性差有关。这项定性研究通过对接受BSD诊断和治疗的患者(不包括双极-I)进行37次深入的半结构化访谈,研究了伊朗被诊断患有双极谱系障碍(BSD)的个体的服务和对治疗的反应。访谈探讨了两个广泛的领域:1)应对和寻求帮助的策略;2)治疗障碍和对治疗结果的期望。多种因素影响了伊朗BSD诊断患者的求助策略和轨迹,包括:精神保健系统的结构局限性;生物精神病学的实践模式;伊朗政府允许的官方心理学和咨询服务的特征;散居国外的伊朗心理学家和顾问的流行心理学和咨询(通过散居国外的社交媒体提供);以及另类精神和基于邪教的团体。提高精神卫生服务的质量和可及性,至关重要的是,在医疗保健系统中进行结构性变革,将人权和个人价值观置于国家的政治和意识形态价值观之上,并在促进对精神医疗保健提供者的世俗培训和生态社会护理模式的行业中进行变革。
    Social, cultural, and structural factors are associated with delays in seeking help from mental health professionals and poor treatment adherence among patients with mood disorders. This qualitative study examined the perspectives on the services and response to treatments of individuals diagnosed with Bipolar Spectrum Disorder (BSD) in Iran through 37 in-depth semi-structured interviews with patients who had received BSD diagnosis and treatment (excluding Bipolar-I). Interviews explored two broad areas: 1) coping and help-seeking strategies; and 2) barriers to treatment and expectations of outcomes from treatment. Multiple factors influenced the help-seeking strategies and trajectories of patients with BSD diagnoses in Iran, including: structural limitations of the mental healthcare system; modes of practice of biological psychiatry; characteristics of the official psychology and counseling services permitted by Iran\'s government; popular psychology and consultation (offered through social media from the diaspora) by Iranian psychologists and counsellors in the diaspora; and alternative spiritual and cult-based groups. To improve the quality and accessibility of mental health services, it is essential to have structural changes in the healthcare system that prioritize human rights and individuals\' values over the political and ideological values of the state and changes in the professions that promote secular training of mental healthcare providers and an ecosocial model of care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    小儿双相情感障碍是一种非常普遍和病态的疾病,被认为是普遍的公共卫生问题。目前批准的治疗通常会带来严重副作用的风险。因此,这项研究评估了N-乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)的疗效和耐受性,在患有双相谱系障碍的儿童和青少年中。
    我们进行了为期12周的NAC开放标签试验,用于治疗年龄在5-17岁的双相谱系障碍儿童和青少年的躁狂和轻躁狂,包括具有完全和阈值下躁狂症状的参与者。接受那些有和没有混合状态并伴有抑郁的人,青年躁狂症量表评分≥20分和<40分。躁狂症和抑郁症的症状使用年轻躁狂症评定量表(YMRS)进行评估,汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS),儿童抑郁量表(CDRS)躁狂症和抑郁症的临床总体印象(CGI)严重程度(CGI-S)和改善(CGI-I)量表。
    这项研究的辍学率很高,只有53%完成了所有12周。YMRS显着减少,HDRS,和CDRS从基线到终点的平均得分。在24名暴露的参与者中,54%的患者通过YMRS降低≥30%来测量抗躁狂反应,46%的患者在终点时CGI-I躁狂评分≤2。此外,62%的参与者有通过HDRS降低≥30%来衡量的抗抑郁反应。31%的人有通过CDRS降低≥30%来衡量的抗抑郁反应,38%的患者在终点时CGI-I抑郁评分≤2.
    这些在小样本中的试点开放标签发现提供了支持NAC在儿科人群中的耐受性和安全性的初步数据。这项试点规模研究的结果表明躁狂症和抑郁症的改善是有希望的,但需要用单药随机安慰剂对照临床试验和更大的样本进行复制。
    ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02357290。第一次注册06/02/2015。
    Pediatric bipolar disorder is a highly prevalent and morbid disorder and is considered a prevalent public health concern. Currently approved treatments often pose the risk of serious side effects. Therefore, this study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of N-acetylcysteine (NAC), in children and adolescents with bipolar spectrum disorder.
    We conducted a 12-week open-label trial of NAC for treatment of mania and hypomania in children and adolescents ages 5-17 with bipolar spectrum disorder including participants with full and subthreshold manic symptoms, accepting those with and without mixed states with co-occurring depression, and Young Mania Rating Scale scores ≥ 20 and < 40. Symptoms of mania and depression were assessed using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Children\'s Depression Rating Scale (CDRS), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scales for mania and depression.
    This study had a high drop-out rate with only 53% completing all 12 weeks. There was a significant reduction in YMRS, HDRS, and CDRS mean scores from baseline to endpoint. Of the 24 exposed participants, 54% had an anti-manic response measured by a reduction in YMRS ≥ 30% and 46% had a CGI-I mania score ≤ 2 at endpoint. Additionally, 62% of participants had an anti-depressive response measured by a reduction in HDRS ≥ 30%, 31% had an anti-depressive response measured by a reduction in CDRS ≥ 30%, and 38% had a CGI-I depression score ≤ 2 at endpoint.
    These pilot open-label findings in a small sample provide preliminary data supporting the tolerability and safety of NAC in a pediatric population. The findings of this pilot scale study indicating improvement in mania and depression are promising, but require replication with a monotherapy randomized placebo controlled clinical trial and larger sample.
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02357290 . First Registration 06/02/2015.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine whether adding combination of agents with anti-inflammatory and neurotrophic effects is more efficacious than mood stabilizer alone in improving clinical symptoms, plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), cytokine levels, and metabolic profiles in patients with bipolar spectrum disorder.
    METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, controlled 12-week clinical trial, patients with moderate mood symptoms (HDRS ≥ 18 or YMRS ≥ 14) were recruited. The patients were randomly assigned to a group while still undergoing regular valproate (VPA) treatments: VPA + dextromethorphan (DM) (30 mg/day) + memantine (MM) (5 mg/day) (DM30 + MM5) (n = 66), VPA + DM (30 mg/day) (DM30) (n = 69), VPA + MM (5 mg/day) (MM5) (n = 66), or VPA + Placebo (Placebo) (n = 69). Symptom severity, immunological parameters [plasma tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and C-reactive protein (CRP)] and plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were regularly examined. Metabolic profiles [cholesterol, triglycerides, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C), fasting serum glucose, body mass index (BMI)] were measured at baseline and at 2, 8, and 12 weeks.
    RESULTS: Depression scores were significantly (P = 0.03) decreases and BDNF levels significantly (P = 0.04) increased in the DM30 + MM5 group than in the Placebo group. However, neither depressive scores nor BDNF levels were significantly different between the DM30, MM5, and Placebo groups. Changes in certain plasma cytokine and BDNF levels were significantly correlated with metabolic parameters.
    CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that add-on DM30 + MM5 was significantly more effective than placebo for clinical symptoms and plasma BDNF levels. Additional studies with larger samples and mechanistic studies are necessary to confirm our findings. Trial registration NCT03039842 (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/). Trial date was from 1 Jan 2013 to 31 December 2016 in National Cheng Kung University Hospital. Registered 28 February 1 2017-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03039842?term=NCT03039842&rank=1.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Study
    OBJECTIVE: Because of high rates of co-occurrence, common familial risk, and phenotypic similarities, we conjectured that substance use and bipolar disorder might have a common substrate of origin in bipolarity and that they might lie on a continuum of bipolarity. Thus it was aimed to investigate the association between bipolarity and substance use through a controlled, clinic based study.
    METHODS: Cross sectional assessment and comparison of bipolarity as trait in four groups, namely the substance use disorder (SUD), bipolar disorder (BPAD), dual diagnosis (DD), and the healthy control (HC) groups. Bipolar spectrum diagnostic scale (BSDS) was used. The quality of life in these four groups was also assessed using WHOQOL-Bref scale.
    RESULTS: The mean Bipolar spectrum diagnostic scale (BSDS) score in SUD was 11.0 ± 5.3 which was more than that of HC (6.2 ± 3.9) and lesser than that in BPAD (18.4 ± 4.2) and DD (20.6 ± 3.6). Differences among all four groups were statistically significant. SUD group was found to have significantly higher score than healthy control. The BSDS score of DD and BPAD groups were higher than those of SUD but the difference between BPAD and DD was non-significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results showed a potential association between substance dependence and bipolarity. Mood dysregulation appears to be the link between the two. The gradient of bipolarity detected by BSDS screener suggests a continuum model between substance use and bipolar disorder. However, this is a clinic based study and only male patients have been taken for study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: The major aims of this study were to identify factors that may predict the diagnostic conversion from major depressive disorder (MDD) to bipolar disorder (BP) and to evaluate the predictive performance of the bipolar spectrum disorder (BPSD) diagnostic criteria.
    METHODS: The medical records of 250 patients with a diagnosis of MDD for at least 5 years were retrospectively reviewed for this study.
    RESULTS: The diagnostic conversion from MDD to BP was observed in 18.4% of 250 MDD patients, and the diagnostic criteria for BPSD predicted this conversion with high sensitivity (0.870) and specificity (0.917). A family history of BP, antidepressant-induced mania/hypomania, brief major depressive episodes, early age of onset, antidepressant wear-off, and antidepressant resistance were also independent predictors of this conversion.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study was conducted using a retrospective design and did not include structured diagnostic interviews.
    CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic criteria for BPSD were highly predictive of the conversion from MDD to BP, and conversion was associated with several clinical features of BPSD. Thus, the BPSD diagnostic criteria may be useful for the prediction of bipolar diathesis in MDD patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号