OBJECTIVE: To analyze the genetic findings, clinical spectrum, and natural history of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) in a cohort of 222 children and adults.
METHODS: Single-center retrospective, consecutive, observational study.
METHODS: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of BVMD from pedigrees with a likely disease-causing monoallelic sequence variant in the BEST1 gene.
METHODS: Data were extracted from electronic and physical case notes. Electrophysiologic assessment and molecular genetic testing were analyzed.
METHODS: Molecular genetic test findings and clinical findings including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), choroidal neovascularization (CNV) rates, and electrophysiologic parameters.
RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients from 141 families were identified harboring 69 BEST1 variants. Mean age at presentation was 26.8 years (range, 1.3-84.8 years) and most patients (61.5%) demonstrated deterioration of central vision. Major funduscopic findings included 128 eyes (30.6%) with yellow vitelliform lesions, 78 eyes (18.7%) with atrophic changes, 49 eyes (11.7%) with fibrotic changes, 48 eyes (11.5%) with mild pigmentary changes, and 43 eyes (10.3%) showing a vitelliruptive appearance. Mean BCVA was 0.37 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; Snellen equivalent, 20/47) for the right eye and 0.33 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/43) for the left eye at presentation, with a mean annual loss rate of 0.013 logMAR and 0.009 logMAR, respectively, over a mean follow-up of 9.7 years. Thirty-seven patients (17.3%) received a diagnosis of CNV over a mean follow-up of 8.0 years. Eyes with CNV that received treatment with an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent showed better mean BCVA compared with eyes that were not treated with an anti-VEGF agent (0.28 logMAR [Snellen equivalent, 20/38] vs. 0.62 logMAR [Snellen equivalent, 20/83]). Most eyes exhibited a hyperopic refractive error (78.7%), and 13 patients (6.1%) received a diagnosis of amblyopia. Among the 3 most common variants, p.(Ala243Val) was associated with a later age of onset, better age-adjusted BCVA, and less advanced Gass stages compared with p.(Arg218Cys) and p.(Arg218His).
CONCLUSIONS: BVMD shows a wide spectrum of phenotypic variability. The disease is very slowly progressive, and the observed phenotype-genotype correlations allow for more accurate prognostication and counselling.
BACKGROUND: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

OBJECTIVE: The vitelliform stage is the typical phenotypic manifestation of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). As yet, no study has focused specifically on the clinical changes occurring in the vitelliform stage over the follow-up.
METHODS: The survey takes the form of a prospective observational study with a 5-year follow-up. Twenty-one eyes of 11 patients in the vitelliform stage were examined annually. The primary outcome was the identification of the changes in the vitelliform lesion over a 5-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included changes in structural optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters and the correlation with the BCVA variation over the follow-up.
RESULTS: Spectral domain OCT at baseline showed one subform characterized by solid vitelliform deposition, in 81% of eyes, and another subform characterized by a combination of solid deposition and subretinal fluid, in 19% of eyes. Overall, 62% of eyes showed an increase in the area of vitelliform deposition. Once the maximal area was reached, a progressive flattening of the vitelliform deposition took place, with subsequent flattening of the vitelliform lesion and formation of subretinal fluid. Hyperreflective foci (HF) increased in number as long as the vitelliform area continued to expand, with no variation in HF when the vitelliform lesion flattened or the subretinal fluid formed.
CONCLUSIONS: The vitelliform stage reveals more subforms with clinical variations over the follow-up. Our data suggest that the substage before the flattening of the lesion, thus before the so-called subretinal fluid accumulates and when the visual acuity is still high, might offer the best opportunity for an optimal therapeutic approach.