Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

良性阵发性位置性眩晕
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性眩晕被定义为在没有实际运动的情况下对自己或周围环境的运动的感知,这是急诊科入院的常见原因。此类症状的医疗资源利用率和住院时间较高。此外,急性期脑成像效率较低,考虑到CT和MRI对诊断作为中枢型眩晕病因的疾病的敏感性有限。在阴性结果的情况下,依靠影像学检查可能会提供错误的保证,或者不当延长院内检查。另一方面,临床检查,特别是对眼球震颤特征的评估,已被证明是高度准确和高效的由专家执行。文献数据指出,急诊医生通常没有使用这些技能或错误地使用它们。近年来,已经引入了几种临床算法,目的是提高急诊医师在评估这种特定病理时的诊断准确性。无论是“HINTS”和“STANDING”算法都经过了急诊医师手中的外部验证,显示出良好的诊断准确性。这份共识文件的目的是提供科学证据,支持医生在急诊科评估成年急性眩晕患者的临床决策。特别是在没有明确相关神经系统体征的情况下。该文件旨在提供一种直接和多学科的方法。同时,它试图划定制定本地诊断和治疗途径的基准,并为培训和研究计划的发展提供基础。
    Acute vertigo is defined as the perception of movement of oneself or the surroundings in the absence of actual motion and it is a frequent cause for emergency department admissions. The utilization of medical resources and the duration of hospital stay for this kind of symptom is high. Furthermore, the efficiency of brain imaging in the acute phase is low, considering the limited sensitivity of both CT and MRI for diagnosing diseases that are the causes of central type of vertigo. Relying on imaging tests can provide false reassurance in the event of negative results or prolong the in-hospital work-up improperly. On the other hand, clinical examinations, notably the assessment of nystagmus\' features, have proven to be highly accurate and efficient when performed by experts. Literature data point out that emergency physicians often do not employ these skills or use them incorrectly. Several clinical algorithms have been introduced in recent years with the aim of enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of emergency physicians when evaluating this specific pathology. Both the \'HINTS and \'STANDING\' algorithms have undergone external validation in emergency physician hands, showing good diagnostic accuracy. The objective of this consensus document is to provide scientific evidence supporting the clinical decisions made by physicians assessing adult patients with acute vertigo in the emergency department, particularly in cases without clear associated neurological signs. The document aims to offer a straightforward and multidisciplinary approach. At the same time, it tries to delineate benchmarks for the formulation of local diagnostic and therapeutic pathways, as well as provide a base for the development of training and research initiatives.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)是老年人头晕和跌倒的最常见原因之一。诊断和治疗BPPV可以减少跌倒,从而降低与跌倒相关的发病率和死亡率。最近的世界瀑布指南建议对有跌倒风险的老年人进行BPPV的正式评估,但前提是他们报告眩晕。然而,该建议忽略了以下数据:(i)许多患有BPPV的老年人将头晕视为模糊的不稳定(而不是眩晕),和(ii)其他人可能根本没有头晕症状。无眩晕的BPPV是由于前庭对自我运动的感知受损,称为“前庭失认症”。前庭失认症是在衰老中发现的,神经变性和创伤性脑损伤,并导致漏诊的BPPV显著增加。没有眩晕的BPPV患者通常最容易受到与该疾病相关的负面结果的影响。因此,我们建议简化世界瀑布指南:所有有客观或主观平衡问题的老年人(>60岁),不管有症状的投诉,应进行位置测试以检查BPPV。
    Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is amongst the commonest causes of dizziness and falls in older adults. Diagnosing and treating BPPV can reduce falls, and thereby reduce fall-related morbidity and mortality. Recent World Falls Guidelines recommend formal assessment for BPPV in older adults at risk of falling, but only if they report vertigo. However, this recommendation ignores the data that (i) many older adults with BPPV experience dizziness as vague unsteadiness (rather than vertigo), and (ii) others may experience no symptoms of dizziness at all. BPPV without vertigo is due to an impaired vestibular perception of self-motion, termed \'vestibular agnosia\'. Vestibular agnosia is found in ageing, neurodegeneration and traumatic brain injury, and results in dramatically increased missed BPPV diagnoses. Patients with BPPV without vertigo are typically the most vulnerable for negative outcomes associated with this disorder. We thus recommend simplifying the World Falls Guidelines: all older adults (>60 years) with objective or subjective balance problems, irrespective of symptomatic complaint, should have positional testing to examine for BPPV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    学术急诊医学学会的《急诊科合理和适当护理指南》(GRACE-3)是针对急诊科(ED)中急性头晕和眩晕的成年患者的主题。一个多学科指南小组应用了建议评估的分级,发展,和评估(GRADE)方法,用于评估持续时间少于2周的急性头晕成年ED患者的五个问题的证据确定性和建议强度。预期人群是向ED呈现急性头晕或眩晕的成年人。小组根据头晕的时间和触发因素得出了15项基于证据的建议,但认识到存在替代诊断方法,如STANDING方案和眼球震颤检查结合步态不稳定或存在血管危险因素。作为总体建议,(1)急诊临床医生应接受急性前庭综合征(AVS;HINTS)患者床旁体检技术和良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV;Dix-Hallpike试验和Epley动作)的诊断和治疗方法的培训。为了帮助区分AVS患者的中枢和外周原因,我们建议:(2)在眼球震颤患者中使用HINTS(用于受过使用培训的临床医生),(3)使用手指摩擦进一步帮助排除眼球震颤患者的中风,(4)无眼球震颤患者使用步态不稳定的严重程度,(5)不要使用脑计算机断层扫描(CT),(6)如果有接受过HINTS培训的临床医生,请勿使用常规磁共振成像(MRI)作为一线测试,和(7)在中央或模棱两可的HINTS检查患者中使用MRI作为确认测试。在自发性发作性前庭综合征患者中:(8)寻找脑缺血的症状或体征,(9)不要使用CT,和(10)如果有短暂性脑缺血发作的关注,使用CT血管造影或MRI血管造影。在患有触发(位置)发作性前庭综合征的患者中,(11)使用Dix-Hallpike试验诊断后管BPPV(pc-BPPV),(12)不要使用CT,(13)不要常规使用MRI,除非存在非典型的临床特征。在诊断为前庭神经炎的患者中,(14)考虑短期类固醇作为治疗选择。在诊断为pc-BPPV的患者中,(15)用Epley手法治疗。很明显,截至2023年,在没有经过特殊培训的急诊临床医生的常规实践中,提示测试不准确,部分是由于在错误的患者中使用,部分是由于其解释问题。大多数急诊医生没有接受使用HINTS的培训。因此,这不是护理标准,该术语的法律意义(“普通医生在类似情况下会做什么”)或通用意义(“医生在常规实践中通常使用的标准行为”)。
    This third Guideline for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department (GRACE-3) from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine is on the topic adult patients with acute dizziness and vertigo in the emergency department (ED). A multidisciplinary guideline panel applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations regarding five questions for adult ED patients with acute dizziness of less than 2 weeks\' duration. The intended population is adults presenting to the ED with acute dizziness or vertigo. The panel derived 15 evidence-based recommendations based on the timing and triggers of the dizziness but recognizes that alternative diagnostic approaches exist, such as the STANDING protocol and nystagmus examination in combination with gait unsteadiness or the presence of vascular risk factors. As an overarching recommendation, (1) emergency clinicians should receive training in bedside physical examination techniques for patients with the acute vestibular syndrome (AVS; HINTS) and the diagnostic and therapeutic maneuvers for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV; Dix-Hallpike test and Epley maneuver). To help distinguish central from peripheral causes in patients with the AVS, we recommend: (2) use HINTS (for clinicians trained in its use) in patients with nystagmus, (3) use finger rub to further aid in excluding stroke in patients with nystagmus, (4) use severity of gait unsteadiness in patients without nystagmus, (5) do not use brain computed tomography (CT), (6) do not use routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a first-line test if a clinician trained in HINTS is available, and (7) use MRI as a confirmatory test in patients with central or equivocal HINTS examinations. In patients with the spontaneous episodic vestibular syndrome: (8) search for symptoms or signs of cerebral ischemia, (9) do not use CT, and (10) use CT angiography or MRI angiography if there is concern for transient ischemic attack. In patients with the triggered (positional) episodic vestibular syndrome, (11) use the Dix-Hallpike test to diagnose posterior canal BPPV (pc-BPPV), (12) do not use CT, and (13) do not use MRI routinely, unless atypical clinical features are present. In patients diagnosed with vestibular neuritis, (14) consider short-term steroids as a treatment option. In patients diagnosed with pc-BPPV, (15) treat with the Epley maneuver. It is clear that as of 2023, when applied in routine practice by emergency clinicians without special training, HINTS testing is inaccurate, partly due to use in the wrong patients and partly due to issues with its interpretation. Most emergency physicians have not received training in use of HINTS. As such, it is not standard of care, either in the legal sense of that term (\"what the average physician would do in similar circumstances\") or in the common parlance sense (\"the standard action typically used by physicians in routine practice\").
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管是临床实践中最常见的外周性眩晕类型之一,良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)仍未得到诊断和治疗,即使在富裕的医疗保健系统中。完全更新的临床实践指南的出版极大地促进了BPPV的诊断和治疗。这项研究评估了我们临床环境中指南的采用情况,并回顾了改善护理质量的进一步建议。
    方法:这项回顾性横断面调查包括在5年期间(2017-2021年)在该国最大的三级护理中心诊断为BPPV的1155名成年患者。前三年(2017-2020年)和919名患者的数据全部收集,其余236名患者(2020-2021年)仅部分是由于COVID-19大流行对转诊的干扰。
    结果:根据患者图表和我们的医疗保健数据库判断,医生对已发布的临床指南的熟悉程度和依从性总体上不能令人满意。在我们的样品中,粘附性从0变化到40.5%。只有20-30%的病例遵循了诊断和重新定位程序作为一线治疗的建议。
    结论:BPPV患者的护理质量有很大的改善机会。除了在初级卫生保健一级进行持续和系统的教育之外,医疗保健系统可能需要采取更先进的措施,以确保更好地遵守指南并随后降低医疗成本。
    OBJECTIVE: Despite being one of the most common types of the peripheral vertigo encountered in clinical practice, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) remains underdiagnosed and undertreated, even in affluent health care systems. The publication of fully updated clinical practice guidelines significantly facilitated the diagnosis and treatment of BPPV. This study evaluates the adoption of the guidelines in our clinical setting and reviews further recommendations for quality-of-care improvement.
    METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional survey included a total of 1155 adult patients diagnosed with BPPV at the biggest tertiary care center in the country during a 5-year period (2017-2021). The data for the first three years (2017-2020) and 919 patients were collected in full, and for the remaining 236 patients (2020-2021) only partially due to the disturbance in referrals caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
    RESULTS: The familiarity with and adherence to the published clinical guidelines by physicians judged by patients\' charts and our health care database were overall unsatisfactory. The adherence varied from 0 to 40.5% in our sample. The recommendations for making the diagnosis and for repositioning procedure as first-line therapy were followed in only 20-30% of cases.
    CONCLUSIONS: There are large opportunities for improvement in quality of care of BPPV patients. Apart from constant and systematic education at the primary health care level, the health care system may need to adopt more advanced measures of ensuring better adherence to guidelines and subsequent reduction in medical costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定对2017年美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(AAO-HNS)初级保健(PC)中良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)的管理和治疗指南的依从性,并比较关键建议是否因性别而异,种族,或保险状况。
    方法:回顾性图表回顾。
    方法:在一个医疗系统中有26个诊所。
    方法:回顾性分析了2018年至2022年诊断为BPPV的458例PC患者的图表。确定了诊断为BPPV的情况。从临床接触记录来看,人口统计,症状学,管理,和治疗被提取。非参数分析用于确定AAO-HNS指南是否在性别方面有所不同,种族,或保险状况。
    结果:在458名患者中,249(54.4%)没有接受诊断检查,只有4例(0.9%)患者接受影像学检查.关于治疗,只有51人(11.1%)接受了埃普利演习,263例(57.4%)接受前庭抑制药物治疗,12.4%接受专科医生转诊。关于性,种族,或保险状况,接受Dix-Hallpike诊断操作没有显着差异,Epley机动,前庭抑制药物,成像,或转介专家。
    结论:我们的数据表明,在遵循AAO-HNS指南方面仍然存在差距;然而,这些差距没有性别差异,种族,或保险状况。应注意增加诊断和治疗手段的使用,但减少使用前庭抑制药物治疗PC中的BPPV。
    To determine adherence to the 2017 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) guidelines for the management and treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) in primary care (PC) and compare whether key recommendations differed by sex, race, or insurance status.
    Retrospective chart review.
    Twenty-six clinic locations within a single healthcare system.
    Charts of 458 patients diagnosed with BPPV in PC between 2018 and 2022 were reviewed. Encounters where the diagnosis of BPPV was made were identified. From the clinical encounter note, demographics, symptomatology, management, and treatment were extracted. Nonparametric analyses were used to identify whether AAO-HNS guidelines differed regarding sex, race, or insurance status.
    Of 458 patients, 249 (54.4%) did not receive a diagnostic exam, and only 4 (0.9%) patients received imaging. Regarding treatment, only 51 (11.1%) received the Epley maneuver, with 263 (57.4%) receiving vestibular suppressant medication and 12.4% receiving a referral to a specialist. In regard to sex, race, or insurance status, there was no significant difference in receiving a Dix-Hallpike diagnostic maneuver, Epley maneuver, vestibular suppressant medication, imaging, or referral to a specialist.
    Our data suggest that there continue to be gaps in the adherence to AAO-HNS guidelines; however, these gaps did not differ by sex, race, or insurance status. Care should be taken to increase the use of diagnostic and treatment maneuvers but decrease the use of vestibular-suppressant medications for the treatment of BPPV in PC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)是ED的常见表现。证据表明,对指南推荐护理的依从性低,但是对此的原因却知之甚少。这项研究使用理论领域框架(TDF)来探索澳大利亚大都市ED中BPPV管理中医学和物理治疗临床实践的障碍和促进因素。
    方法:从2021年5月至12月,对在墨尔本急诊室工作的13名医务人员和13名物理治疗师进行了半结构化访谈,澳大利亚。访谈使用TDF来探索BPPV指南推荐的评估和治疗技术的感知障碍和促进者。对数据进行了主题分析,以确定相关领域并生成主题和信念陈述。
    结果:代表8个TDF领域的15个信念陈述被确定为ED中BPPV管理的关键因素。最突出的领域是知识和技能,因为它们在有关教育的职业之间的信仰陈述相互矛盾,技能发展和自信;记忆,注意和决策过程,以感知演示文稿的复杂性,包括难以回顾诊断和治疗技术;以及环境背景和资源,以用于他们关于时间和工作量压力的共同信念陈述。前庭理疗的可用性被认为是提供医务人员推荐护理的障碍和促进者。但这是独立实践的障碍,因为它无意中限制了医务人员技能发展的机会。
    结论:已经确定了ED中BPPV管理的几个可修改的障碍和促进因素。观察到专业群体之间的差异,这些发现将指导未来的干预措施,以改善ED中BPPV指南推荐的评估和治疗技术的使用.
    BACKGROUND: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a common presentation to the ED. Evidence suggests low adherence to guideline-recommended care, but the reasons underlying this are poorly understood. This study used the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to explore the barriers and facilitators to medical and physiotherapy clinical practices in the management of BPPV in an Australian metropolitan ED.
    METHODS: From May to December 2021, semistructured interviews were conducted with 13 medical staff and 13 physiotherapists who worked at an ED in Melbourne, Australia. Interviews used the TDF to explore the perceived barriers and facilitators to the delivery of guideline-recommended assessment and treatment techniques for BPPV. Data were analysed thematically to identify relevant domains and generate themes and belief statements.
    RESULTS: Fifteen belief statements representing eight domains of the TDF were identified as key factors in the management of BPPV in the ED. The most prominent domains were knowledge and skills due to their conflicting belief statements between professions concerning education, skill development and self-confidence; memory, attention and decision processes for the perceived complexity of the presentation including difficulty recalling diagnostic and treatment techniques; and environmental context and resources for their shared belief statements concerning time and workload pressures. The availability of vestibular physiotherapy was considered both a barrier and facilitator to the delivery of recommended care by medical staff, but a barrier to independent practice as it unintentionally limited the opportunities for skill development in medical staff.
    CONCLUSIONS: Several modifiable barriers and facilitators to the management of BPPV in the ED have been identified. Differences were observed between the professional groups, and these findings will guide a future intervention to improve the use of guideline-recommended assessment and treatment techniques for BPPV in ED.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    引言在以前的研究中已经注意到在临床医生中关于良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)的管理的临床实践中的差异。这种变化可能与对临床实践指南的不同依从性有关。目的评估临床医生对BPPV指南的依从性,并调查不同专业和资格之间依从性的差异。方法这是一项横断面研究,在6月至8月之间进行了基于小插图的调查,2020年。我们包括从事管理BPPV的临床医生,他们至少有一年的临床经验。我们排除了学生,和不参与BPPV患者管理的临床医生。要求参与者根据四个假设的患者小插曲做出管理选择。样本范围从第一个小插图的77名参与者到最后一个小插图的45名参与者。结果我们纳入了77名临床医生,大多数是耳鼻喉科医师(31.2%)。受访者平均遵守该指南的比例为63.3%。结果表明,耳鼻喉科医师的依从性高于不同专业的临床医师(p=0.006,d=0.72)。此外,具有研究生学位的临床医生比仅具有学士学位的临床医生更有可能坚持该指南(p=0.014,d=0.58),并且了解该指南的参与者更有可能坚持该指南(p<0.001,d=1.05).最后,回归分析显示,依从性受研究生学位和指南意识的影响。结论耳鼻喉科医师比其他专科医师更有可能遵守该指南。在所有专业中,较高的依从性与指南意识和研究生学位相关.
    Introduction  Variations in clinical practice regarding the management of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) among clinicians have been noted in previous studies. Such variations might be related to the different adherence to clinical practice guidelines. Objective  To evaluate clinicians\' adherence to BPPV guidelines and investigate the variations in the adherence between different specialties and qualifications. Methods  This is a cross-sectional study with a vignettes-based survey conducted between June and August, 2020. We included clinicians engaged in managing BPPV that had at least one year of clinical experience. We excluded students, and clinicians who were not involved in the management of individuals with BPPV. Participants were asked to make their management choices based on four hypothetical patient vignettes. The sample ranged from 77 participants for the first vignette to 45 participants for the last vignette. Results  We included 77 clinicians in the study, with the majority being Otolaryngologists (31.2%). The respondents\' mean adherence to the guideline was of 63.3%. Result showed that Otolaryngologists\' adherence was higher than that of clinicians from different specialties ( p  = 0.006, d  = 0.72). Furthermore, clinicians with a postgraduate degree were more likely to adhere than those with a bachelor\'s degree only ( p  = 0.014, d  = 0.58) and participants who were aware of the guideline were more likely to adhere to it ( p  < 0.001, d  = 1.05). Lastly, regression analysis exhibited that adherence was affected by postgraduate degree and guideline awareness. Conclusion  Otolaryngologists were more likely to adhere to the guideline than other specialties. Among all specialties, higher adherence was associated with guideline awareness and postgraduate degrees.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:良性阵发性位置性眩晕的诊断和治疗延迟会极大地影响患者的生活质量并增加医疗费用。本研究旨在评估良性阵发性位置性眩晕的诊断和治疗临床实践指南的质量。
    方法:截至2021年10月30日,完成了对临床实践指南的全面数据库搜索。四名独立审查员在质量评估中使用了《研究和评估指南II》工具。
    结果:得分最高的是“清晰度和表现”(58.33±22.7)。最低得分为“适用性”(13.96±30.1)。总的来说,四项临床实践指南为"低质量",只有一项指南为"高质量".
    结论:这篇综述发现良性阵发性位置性眩晕的临床实践指南开发质量明显不足,强调需要对未来的指导方针制定采取更严格的方法。
    BACKGROUND: Delays in the diagnosis and therapy of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo can greatly impact quality of life and increase healthcare costs for patients. This study aimed to appraise the quality of clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
    METHODS: A comprehensive database search of clinical practice guidelines was completed up to 30 October 2021. Four independent reviewers used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument in the quality appraisal.
    RESULTS: The highest score was in \'clarity and presentation\' (58.33 ± 22.7). The lowest score was in \'applicability\' (13.96 ± 30.1). Overall, four clinical practice guidelines were \'low quality\' and only one guideline was \'high quality\'.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review identified a significant lack of quality in clinical practice guideline development for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, highlighting the need for a more rigorous approach for future guideline development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号