UNASSIGNED: In the realm of autoimmune rheumatic diseases, understanding JAK inhibitors (JAKi) nuances is vital. Baricitinib, tofacitinib, upaacitinib, filgotinib, and peficitinib exhibit subtle yet impactful pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) variations.
UNASSIGNED: This narrative review critically assesses PK and PD distinctions among globally approved JAKi for rheumatoid arthritis, which primarily guide clinical decisions in autoimmune diseases, particularly rheumatoid arthritis. It explores the intricate JAK-STAT signaling pathway, offering insights into JAKs\' roles in inflammation, hematopoiesis, and immune homeostasis. Emphasis on PK parameters, including absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion, along with CYP3A4 drug interactions, is highlighted. The review underscores integrating PK and PD properties, considering patient-specific factors like hepatic and renal clearance, for judicious JAKi selection in RA and related autoimmune conditions. The literature has been collected from all available databases based on the review question.
UNASSIGNED: Integrating PK and PD properties with patient-specific factors is pivotal for judicious JAKi selection. Recognizing disparities in PK and PD across diseases, ethnicities, and environmental factors is crucial for personalized JAKi choices. This expert opinion underscores the significance of a second compartment analysis, elucidating the interplay between PK and PD and its impact on JAKi efficacy.

UNASSIGNED: The pathophysiology of COVID-19 involves a signalling pathway based on the Janus kinases (JAKs) and the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) family of proteins. As such, there has been growing interest in exploring JAK inhibitors as potential therapeutic agents for this disease.
UNASSIGNED: To provide a comprehensive summary of the efficacy of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of COVID-19 through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search was conducted in multiple electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and preprint repositories, without language restrictions, to identify relevant studies published up to December 31, 2023.
UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the administration of JAK inhibitors in patients with COVID-19 were included.
UNASSIGNED: Through the systematic literature search, a total of 20 RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. A random-effects model was employed to estimate the pooled odds ratio for death with administration of a JAK inhibitor relative to non-administration of such an agent, with 95% confidence interval. Meta-analysis of these trials revealed a significant reduction in mortality among patients with COVID-19 who received JAK inhibitors relative to those who did not receive these agents (pooled odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.84).
UNASSIGNED: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that JAK inhibitors, specifically baricitinib, may address the urgent need for effective treatments in the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic by reducing the risk of death among affected patients. However, further research, including larger-scale RCTs, is needed to establish the efficacy and safety of other JAK inhibitors in the treatment of COVID-19 and to generate more robust evidence regarding their use in this specific patient population.
UNASSIGNED: La physiopathologie de la COVID-19 implique une voie de signalisation basée sur les Janus kinases (JAK) et les protéines STAT (pour signal transducer and activator of transcription en anglais, soit, les protéines transductrices de signal et activatrices de transcription). C’est pourquoi l’étude des inhibiteurs de JAK en tant qu’agents thérapeutiques potentiels pour cette maladie suscite un intérêt croissant.
UNASSIGNED: Fournir un résumé complet de l’efficacité des inhibiteurs de JAK dans le traitement de la COVID-19 grâce à une revue systématique et une méta-analyse.
UNASSIGNED: Une recherche systématique de la littérature a été menée dans plusieurs bases de données électroniques (PubMed, Scopus et le Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) et dans les référentiels de prépublications, sans restrictions linguistiques, pour identifier les études pertinentes publiées jusqu’au 31 décembre 2023.
UNASSIGNED: Le principal résultat d’intérêt était la mortalité, toutes causes confondues. Des essais contrôlés randomisés (ECR) portant sur l’administration d’inhibiteurs de JAK chez des patients atteints de COVID-19 ont été inclus.
UNASSIGNED: Grâce à la recherche documentaire systématique, un total de 20 ECR répondant aux critères d’inclusion ont été identifiés. Un modèle à effets aléatoires a été utilisé pour estimer le rapport de cotes groupé de décès avec l’administration d’un inhibiteur de JAK par rapport à la non-administration d’un tel agent, avec un intervalle de confiance de 95 %. La méta-analyse de ces essais a révélé une réduction significative de la mortalité chez les patients atteints de COVID-19 ayant reçu des inhibiteurs de JAK par rapport à ceux n’ayant pas reçu ces agents (rapport de cotes groupé 0,70, intervalle de confiance à 95 % 0,58–0,84).
UNASSIGNED: Les résultats de cette revue systématique et méta-analyse indiquent que les inhibiteurs de JAK, en particulier le baricitinib, pourraient répondre au besoin urgent de traitements efficaces dans le cadre de la pandémie de COVID-19 en cours en réduisant le risque de décès parmi les patients touchés. Cependant, des recherches supplémentaires, y compris des ECR à plus grande échelle, sont nécessaires pour établir l’efficacité et l’innocuité d’autres inhibiteurs de JAK dans le traitement de la COVID-19 et pour générer des éléments probants plus solides concernant leur utilisation dans cette population de patients en particulier.

BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) relapse despite standard therapy with glucocorticoids, methotrexate and tocilizumab. The Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signalling pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of GCA and JAK inhibitors (JAKi) could be a therapeutic alternative. We evaluated the effectiveness of JAKi in relapsing GCA patients in a real-world setting and reviewed available literature.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of GCA patients treated with JAKi for relapsing disease at thirteen centers in Spain and one center in United States (01/2017-12/2022). Outcomes assessed included clinical remission, complete remission and safety. Clinical remission was defined as the absence of GCA signs and symptoms regardless of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) values. Complete remission was defined as the absence of GCA signs and symptoms along with normal ESR and CRP values. A systematic literature search for other JAKi-treated GCA cases was conducted.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (86% females, mean age 72.3) with relapsing GCA received JAKi therapy (baricitinib, n = 15; tofacitinib, n = 10; upadacitinib, n = 10). Before JAKi therapy, 22 (63%) patients had received conventional synthetic immunosuppressants (e.g., methotrexate), and 30 (86%) biologics (e.g., tocilizumab). After a median (IQR) follow-up of 11 (6-15.5) months, 20 (57%) patients achieved and maintained clinical remission, 16 (46%) patients achieved and maintained complete remission, and 15 (43%) patients discontinued the initial JAKi due to relapse (n = 11 [31%]) or serious adverse events (n = 4 [11%]). A literature search identified another 36 JAKi-treated GCA cases with clinical improvement reported for the majority of them.
CONCLUSIONS: This real-world analysis and literature review suggest that JAKi could be effective in GCA, including in patients failing established glucocorticoid-sparing therapies such as tocilizumab and methotrexate. A phase III randomized controlled trial of upadacitinib is currently ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03725202).

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Biological drugs (BD) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have revolutionized the treatment of diverse dermatoses. However, there are concerns regarding their safety, especially the risk of cancer and opportunistic infections. Here, we discuss the risk of cancer associated with the BD and JAKi used in dermatology.
METHODS: A narrative review was carried out. All relevant articles evaluating the risk of cancer associated with BD or JAKi and published between January 2010 and February 2024 were selected.
RESULTS: Multiple large studies have evaluated the association between BD, JAKi and cancer risk. However, there is a lack of prospective, comparative studies. Overall, patients undergoing BD and JAKi present a cutaneous cancer incidence similar to that in the general population. The drugs more strongly associated with non-skin cancer risk were anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNFs) agents and JAKi (especially tofacitinib and oral ruxolitinib). This risk appears to increase with age, the presence of other factors (such as chronic immunosuppression from previous drugs or other comorbidities), and specific diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and myelodysplastic syndrome. Conversely, BD such as interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may even reduce the risk of some visceral and hematological malignancies. In patients with dermatological conditions such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, the risk of malignancies may be lower than in other subgroups, and probably comparable to the general population.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of cancer in patients undergoing BD or JAKi is generally low. This incidence can be higher in elderly patients with RA or myelodysplastic syndrome, and in those undergoing prolonged therapy with tofacitinib or ruxolitinib (oral), or anti-TNF agents.

Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis (anti-MDA5-DM) is frequently complicated by progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD), the prognosis of which is poor, and management is a major challenge. We treated three patients with anti-MDA5-DM-associated ILD (anti-MDA5-DM-ILD) using the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, baricitinib, which improved lung opacities and saved two patients. We reviewed 6 patients with anti-MDA5-DM-ILD who had been treated with tofacitinib at our institution. Five of the patients survived, although discontinuation of tofacitinib due to complications was frequently observed. In addition, a literature search of patients with anti-MDA5-DM-ILD who were treated with JAK inhibitors yielded 21 articles involving 79 cases. All patients except one were treated with tofacitinib, and the survival rate was 75.9%. Although not statistically confirmed, the deceased patients tended to be older and had higher ferritin levels. A total of 92 complications were observed, 11 of which resulted in JAK inhibitor discontinuation. Cytomegalovirus reactivation comprised a substantial percentage of all complications and of those patients who required JAK inhibitor discontinuation. Five cases with fatal infective complications were also observed. While tofacitinib has been proposed to be a therapeutic option for anti-MDA5-DM-ILD, other JAK inhibitors, including baricitinib, are a treatment option. Further investigation is warranted to optimize treatment of anti-MDA5-DM-ILD.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of oral and injectable systemic treatments, such as methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, tofacitinib, baricitinib, corticosteroids, statins, zinc, apremilast, etc., for treating vitiligo lesions.
METHODS: Databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were meticulously searched for studies spanning from 2010 to August 2023, focusing on systemic oral and injectable therapies for vitiligo, using comprehensive keywords and search syntaxes tailored to each database. Key data extracted included study design, treatment efficacy, patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, and safety profiles.
RESULTS: In a total of 42 included studies, oral mini-pulse corticosteroid therapy (OMP) was the subject of six studies (14.2%). Minocycline was the focus of five studies (11.9%), while methotrexate, apremilast, and tofacitinib each were examined in four studies (9.5%). Antioxidants and Afamelanotide were the subjects of three studies each (7.1%). Cyclosporine, simvastatin, oral zinc, oral corticosteroids (excluding OMP) and injections, and baricitinib were each explored in two studies (4.8%). Azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and Alefacept were the subjects of one study each (2.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Systemic treatments for vitiligo have been successful in controlling lesions without notable side effects. OMP, Methotrexate, Azathioprine, Cyclosporine, Mycophenolate mofetil, Simvastatin, Apremilast, Minocycline, Afamelanotide, Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Antioxidants, and oral/injectable corticosteroids are effective treatment methods. However, oral zinc and alefacept did not show effectiveness.

Due to high heterogeneity and risk of bias (RoB) found in previously published meta-analysis (MA), a concrete conclusion on the efficacy of baricitinib in reducing mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients was unable to form. Hence, this systematic review and MA were conducted to analyse whether RoB, heterogeneity, and optimal sample size from placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are still the problems to derive a concrete conclusion. Search engines PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and other sources like preprints and reference lists were searched with appropriate keywords. The RoB and MA were conducted using RevMan 5.4. The grading of the articles was conducted using the GRADEPro Guideline Development Tool. Ten RCTs were included in the current systematic review. Only five low RoB articles are Phase III placebo-controlled RCTs with a high certainty level based on the GRADE grading system. For the MA, based on five low RoB articles, baricitinib statistically significantly reduced mortality where the risk ratio (RR) = 0.68 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.56-0.82; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0%; P = 0.85]. The absolute mortality effect (95% CI) based on the grading system was 35 fewer mortalities per 1000 COVID-19 patients, whereas in the baricitinib and control groups, the mortality was 7.4% and 10.9%, respectively. With the presence of an optimal sample size of 3944 from five low RoB-placebo-controlled RCTs, which represent a minimum of 300 million population of people and with the presence of 0% heterogeneity from MA, the effectiveness of baricitinib in reducing the mortality in COVID-19 patients is concretely proven.

UNASSIGNED: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease. It affects multiple organ systems and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The treatment for SLE primarily aims at controlling and remitting the disease. Baricitinib is a kinase inhibitor that selectively inhibits JAK1 and JAK2 enzymes. Recently this drug is being investigated as a potential therapeutic option for SLE.
UNASSIGNED: To analyze the efficacy of baricitinib in treating SLE.
UNASSIGNED: Search of databases identified relevant studies that reported the efficacy of baricitinib. Data of patient characteristics, intervention details, and outcomes was extracted. The data from the studies were pooled using a random-effects model. The odds ratio with their respective 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to analyze the results. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
UNASSIGNED: 3 RCTs were included in the analysis. 1849 patients were extracted from the included studies, most of the participants were females with a mean age of 43 years. The studies showed a significant effect of Baricitinib 4 mg in achieving SRI-4 [OR = 1.42 (95 % CI: 1.01, 2.00); p = 0.04]. There was no significant association of Baricitinib 2 mg in achieving SRI-4. Both dosages of the drug did not have any significant association in achieving LLDAS as compared to placebo. Serious adverse side effects were significantly associated with Bar 4 mg as compared to Bar 2 mg.
UNASSIGNED: Our meta-analysis suggests that baricitinib might be a potential treatment option for SLE. Further large-scale clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings. Potential side effects should also be considered while the administration of this drug.

Introduction: Tocilizumab and baricitinib are recommended treatment options for COVID-19 patients with hyperinflammatory response; however, there is a lack of systematic review directly evaluating their efficacy and safety. Objective: This review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab and baricitinib in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Methods: Relevant databases were searched for studies that compared the effect or safety of baricitinib or tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The mortality was the main outcome. The hospital length of stay or adverse drug reactions were taken into consideration as secondary endpoints. The analyses were performed in Revman 5.3 or Stata 16.0. The protocol and analysis plan were pre-registered in PROSPERO, with the registration number CRD42023408219. Results: In total, 10 studies with 2,517 patients were included. The overall pooled data demonstrated that, there was no statistically significant difference in the 28-day mortality rate and the hospital length of stay between the tocilizumab and baricitinib (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.80-1.51, p = 0.57; OR = -0.68, 95% CI = -2.24-0.87, p = 0.39). The adverse reactions including secondary infection rate, thrombotic and bleeding events, and acute liver injury of tocilizumab were significantly higher than that of baricitinib. (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.18-1.88, p < 0.001,OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.11-2.08, p = 0.009; OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.11-2.08, p = 0.009; OR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.49-3.35, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In patients hospitalized with COVID-19, no discernible difference in therapeutic efficacy was observed between tocilizumab and baricitinib; however, the group treated with baricitinib demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of adverse effects.