Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration

球囊闭塞逆行经静脉闭塞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨充气机监测球囊闭塞逆行静脉闭塞症(ImBRTO)在检测球囊破裂中的诊断功效,并评估ImBRTO治疗胃静脉曲张的有效性和安全性。
    方法:在2018年6月至2024年6月之间,连续31例患者(年龄:61.7±12.4岁;男性20例,女性11例)接受ImBRTO治疗胃静脉曲张。封堵球囊用充气装置充气,以监测硬化过程中的球囊破裂,保持气球充气至少3小时。
    结果:技术成功率为100%。球囊破裂发生率为6.5%(2/31),两者都通过充气装置中的压降来诊断。在两个病人中,由于球囊早期破裂(<3h),需要更换导管和额外注射硬化剂.在所有情况下都取得了临床成功并完全消除了胃静脉曲张。未观察到手术相关并发症。随访结束时无复发静脉曲张破裂出血病例(中位数:5.2个月)。
    结论:ImBRTO被证明是治疗胃静脉曲张的有效和安全的技术。气球完整性的实时监测允许及时决策,导致良好的临床结果。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of inflator-monitored balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (ImBRTO) in detecting balloon rupture and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ImBRTO in treating gastric varices.
    METHODS: Between June 2018 and June 2024, 31 consecutive patients (age: 61.7 ± 12.4 years; male 20, female 11) underwent ImBRTO for gastric varices. An occlusion balloon was inflated with an inflation device to monitor for balloon rupture during sclerosing, maintaining the balloon inflation for at least 3 h.
    RESULTS: The technical success rate was 100%. The incidence of balloon rupture was 6.5% (2/31), both diagnosed by a pressure drop in the inflation device. In one of the two patients, catheter replacement and an additional injection of a sclerosing agent were required due to early balloon rupture (< 3 h). Clinical success and complete elimination of gastric varices were achieved in all cases. No procedure-related complications were observed. There were no cases of recurrent variceal bleeding at the end of the follow-up (median: 5.2 months).
    CONCLUSIONS: ImBRTO proves to be an effective and safe technique for treating gastric varices. The real-time monitoring of balloon integrity allows for timely decisions, resulting in excellent clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:球囊闭塞逆行静脉闭塞(BRTO)被开发为肝硬化患者胃静脉曲张的有效治疗方法。因为这些患者的肝纤维化被认为是晚期的,他们的预后预计较差。在这项研究中,我们调查了患者的预后和特征。
    方法:我们招募了2009年至2021年间接受BRTO治疗的55例肝硬化患者。评估静脉曲张复发和长期预后的相关因素。对45例患者进行生存分析,不包括在1个月内死亡的人,预后不明,或其治疗转化为其他治疗。
    结果:在平均2.3年的随访期间,10例患者食管静脉曲张复发,可以通过内镜治疗。非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)与静脉曲张复发有关(风险比[HR]=4.27,95%CI:1.17-15.5,p=0.028)。术后1、3、5年生存率为94.2%,74.0%,63.5%,分别,10例患者死于肝细胞癌(n=6),肝功能衰竭(n=1),脓毒症(n=1),未知原因(n=2)。估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)水平被证明是显着的不良预后因素(HR=0.96,95%CI:0.93-0.99,p=0.023)。合并症高血压(HTN)是eGFR低的主要原因,和HTN也与生存率显着相关(HR=6.18,95%CI:1.57-24.3,p=0.009)。大多数HTN患者接受钙通道阻滞剂和/或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗。
    结论:BRTO治疗肝硬化患者的临床病程取决于包括肾功能在内的代谢因素,HTN合并症,和NASH。
    BACKGROUND: Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) was developed as an effective treatment for gastric varices in patients with cirrhosis. Because liver fibrosis in these patients is assumed to be advanced, their prognosis is expected to be poor. In this study, we investigated the prognosis and characteristics of the patients.
    METHODS: We enrolled 55 consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis treated with BRTO between 2009 and 2021 at our department. To evaluate factors related to variceal recurrence and long-term prognosis, survival analysis was performed on 45 patients, excluding those who died within 1 month, had an unknown prognosis, or whose treatments were converted to other treatments.
    RESULTS: During a mean follow-up period of 2.3 years, esophageal varices recurred in 10 patients and could be treated endoscopically. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) was related to the variceal recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.27, 95% CI: 1.17-15.5, p = 0.028). The survival rate after the procedure at 1, 3, and 5 years was 94.2%, 74.0%, and 63.5%, respectively, and 10 patients died of hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 6), liver failure (n = 1), sepsis (n = 1), and unknown reasons (n = 2). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) level was proved to be a significant poor prognostic factor (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99, p = 0.023). The comorbid hypertension (HTN) was the main cause of low eGFR, and HTN was also significantly related to survival (HR = 6.18, 95% CI: 1.57-24.3, p = 0.009). Most of the patients with HTN were treated with calcium channel blocker and/or angiotensin receptor blocker.
    CONCLUSIONS: The clinical course of patients with cirrhosis treated with BRTO was dependent on the metabolic factors including renal function, comorbid HTN, and NASH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们先前报道了肝硬度(LS)作为门体分流(PSS)闭塞的预后预测因子。本研究旨在重新研究球囊闭塞逆行经静脉闭塞(BRTO)后终末期肝病钠(MELD-Na)评分改善模型的预测因素,并评估门脉高压患者的术后预后使用新确定的因素。
    方法:回顾性纳入了2008年至2021年接受BRTO的75例患者。术前和术后1个月计算MELD-Na评分。我们监测了长期结果并分析了术后生存率。
    结果:术后一个月,46例(61.3%)患者的MELD-Na评分下降.单变量分析显示,评分改善与9个因素存在显著关联,包括较低的LS水平和较高的国际标准化比率(INR)。受试者工作特征曲线分析的多变量逻辑回归分析确定术前LS水平和INR是术后MELD-Na评分改善的重要独立预测因子,最佳截止值分别为28.1kPa和1.06。LS<28.1kPa和INR≥1.06的组合显示预测评分改善的敏感性和特异性分别为84.8%和75.9%。分别。对于倾向得分模型,我们匹配了24名年龄相似的患者,性别,MELD-Na得分,和伴随的肝细胞癌。Kaplan-Meier分析确定LS<28.1kPa和INR≥1.06患者的累积生存率明显高于其他人群。
    结论:LS和INR的组合可以预测PSS闭塞后MELD-Na评分的改善和预后的改善。
    We previously reported liver stiffness (LS) as a prognostic predictor of portosystemic shunt (PSS) occlusion. This study aims to reinvestigate the predictive factors of the model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) score amelioration following balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) and to evaluate the postoperative prognoses of patients with portal hypertension by using newly identified factors.
    Seventy-five patients who underwent BRTO between 2008 and 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. The MELD-Na scores were calculated preoperatively and one month postoperatively. We monitored long-term outcomes and analyzed postoperative survival.
    At one month postoperatively, the MELD-Na score decreased in 46 (61.3%) patients. Univariate analyses revealed a significant association of the score amelioration with nine factors, including lower LS levels and a higher international normalized ratio (INR). A multivariate logistic regression analysis with receiver operating characteristic curve analyses identified preoperative LS levels and INR as significant independent predictors of the postoperative MELD-Na score amelioration, with optimal cutoffs of 28.1 kPa and 1.06, respectively. The combination of LS < 28.1 kPa and INR ≥ 1.06 showed a sensitivity and specificity of 84.8% and 75.9% for the prediction of the score amelioration, respectively. For the propensity score model, we matched 24 patients with similar age, sex, MELD-Na score, and concomitant hepatocellular carcinoma. Kaplan-Meier analysis determined significantly higher cumulative survival rates in patients with LS < 28.1 kPa and INR ≥ 1.06 than in other populations.
    A combination of LS and INR can predict the MELD-Na score amelioration and prognosis improvement following PSS occlusion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:自发性门体分流术(SPSS)的胃静脉曲张(GV)与内窥镜氰基丙烯酸酯的异位栓塞有关。本研究旨在评估EUS引导的弹簧圈栓塞联合内窥镜氰基丙烯酸酯注射与球囊闭塞逆行静脉闭塞(BRTO)治疗GV高危异位栓塞的疗效和安全性。
    UNASSIGNED:我们回顾性分析了6家三级医院的104例GV高危异位栓塞患者(SPSS最窄直径大于或等于5mm,最大直径通常>8mm),他们在2014年1月至2020年12月期间接受了EUS引导下的线圈栓塞联合内窥镜氰基丙烯酸酯注射或BRTO。结果包括再出血,生存,和并发症。
    未经评估:EUS组和BRTO组包含59和45名患者,分别。两组的技术成功率相似(96.6%vs.95.6%,P=1.000)。在后续行动中,两组5天再出血率和6周死亡率均为0%.一年全因再出血率(20.0%vs.18.9%,P=0.900)和1年死亡率(2.0%vs.0%,EUS组的P=1.000)与BRTO组相似。EUS组一名患者出现异位栓塞,而BRTO组没有。两组的平均天数相似(16.0[四分位数间距(IQR),12.0–19.0]vs.16.5[IQR,11.8-26.0],P=0.165)和住院费用(¥45950.6[IQR,39330.2-55768.2]vs.¥51205.8[IQR,31628.8-74251.5],P=0.680)。多因素分析显示,分流管最窄直径(比值比[OR]=1.86;95%置信区间[CI]:1.062-3.258;P=0.03)和血红蛋白含量(OR=0.941;95%CI:0.892-0.992;P=0.025)是影响生存的预后因素。
    UNASSIGNED:EUS引导的弹簧圈栓塞联合内镜下氰基丙烯酸酯注射治疗GV高危异位栓塞的疗效和安全性与BRTO相当。
    UNASSIGNED: Gastric varices (GV) with spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) are associated with ectopic embolism in endoscopic cyanoacrylate. This study targeted to assess the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection versus balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) for GV with high-risk ectopic embolism.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed six tertiary hospitals\' 104 patients with GV at high-risk ectopic embolism (the narrowest diameter of SPSS was greater than or equal to 5 mm and the maximum diameter usually >8 mm) who underwent EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection or BRTO from January 2014 to December 2020. The outcomes included rebleeding, survival, and complications.
    UNASSIGNED: The EUS group and BRTO group contained 59 and 45 patients, respectively. The technical success rate between the two groups was similar (96.6% vs. 95.6%, P = 1.000). During the follow-up, both groups\' 5-day rebleeding rate and 6-week mortality rate were 0%. One-year all-cause rebleeding rate (20.0% vs. 18.9%, P = 0.900) and 1-year mortality rate (2.0% vs. 0%, P = 1.000) in the EUS group were similar to the BRTO group. One patient experienced ectopic embolism in the EUS group, while the BRTO group did not. Both groups had similar mean days (16.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 12.0-19.0] vs. 16.5 [IQR, 11.8-26.0], P = 0.165) and cost of hospitalization (¥ 45950.6 [IQR, 39330.2-55768.2] vs. ¥ 51205.8 [IQR, 31628.8-74251.5], P = 0.680). Multivariate analysis showed that the narrowest diameter of the shunt (odds ratio [OR] = 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.062-3.258; P = 0.03) and content of hemoglobin (OR = 0.941; 95% CI: 0.892-0.992; P = 0.025) were the prognostic factors for survival.
    UNASSIGNED: The efficacy and safety of EUS-guided coil embolization combined with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for GV with high-risk ectopic embolism are comparable to BRTO.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:四维(4D)流磁共振成像(MRI)评估球囊闭塞逆行经静脉闭塞(BRTO)前后血液动力学变化的有效性尚不清楚。
    目的:评估4D血流MRI评估BRTO前后门静脉系统血流动力学变化的可行性。
    方法:我们包括10名患者(7名男性,3名妇女;平均年龄=67岁)患有肝硬化,患有胃底静脉曲张破裂出血或肝性脑病的风险很高。在BRTO之前和之后进行上腹部的非对比4D流MRI。此外,我们比较了门静脉(PV)的血流速度,肠系膜上静脉(SMV),脾静脉(SV),左肾静脉,以及BRTO前后的下腔静脉。此外,使用门静脉造影和4D血流MRI评估BRTO前后SMV和SV的流向.
    结果:BRTO后,PV和SV的血流速度显着增加(P<0.05)。BRTO后SMV的血流速度没有明显变化,下腔静脉,和左肾静脉.在四名患者中,门静脉造影证实,在BRTO后,SV和SMV中的肝藻流变为肝瓣流。此外,4D流MRI正确评估了70%-100%患者的SMV和SV中的流动方向。
    结论:4D血流MRI可用于检测BRTO前后门静脉系统的血流动力学变化。
    BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing hemodynamic changes before and after balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) remains unclear.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of 4D flow MRI for assessing hemodynamic changes in the portal venous system before and after BRTO.
    METHODS: We included 10 patients (7 men, 3 women; mean age = 67 years) with liver cirrhosis who had a high risk of gastric variceal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy. Non-contrast 4D flow MRI of the upper abdomen was performed before and after BRTO. In addition, we compared the blood flow rates in the portal vein (PV), superior mesenteric vein (SMV), splenic vein (SV), left renal vein, and inferior vena cava before and after BRTO. Moreover, the flow directions of the SMV and SV before and after BRTO were assessed using both portography and 4D flow MRI.
    RESULTS: There was a significant post-BRTO increase in the blood flow rate in the PV and SV (P < 0.05). There was no significant post-BRTO change in the blood flow rates in the SMV, inferior vena cava, and left renal vein. In four patients, portography confirmed that hepatofugal flow in the SV and SMV changed to hepatopetal flow after BRTO. Moreover, 4D flow MRI correctly assessed the flow directions in the SMV and SV in 70%-100% of the patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: 4D flow MRI can be used to detect hemodynamic changes in the portal venous system before and after BRTO.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先天性门体分流术是门静脉系统和体循环之间罕见的异常连接。门体分流是肝硬化患者的常见发现,导致胃食管静脉曲张,肝性脑病,和其他人。然而,目前尚无共识或文献描述如何治疗无症状的门体分流和正常肝脏患者.
    方法:患者为一名39岁女性,接受供体右肝切除术用于活体肝移植。病人天生健康,然而,由于门体分流术的发展,手术后出现了肝性脑病。门体分流术偷走了门静脉血流,成像模式显示门脉主干变窄,代表门静脉血流量的长期消耗。进行球囊闭塞逆行经静脉闭塞(B-RTO)以闭塞门体分流。B-RTO增加门静脉血流量,肝性脑病伴高氨血症已成功解决,没有爆发任何其他门静脉高压症状。
    结论:先天性门体分流术本身并不是供肝切除的禁忌症,但围手术期应考虑血管内分流闭塞或术中结扎这些分流。
    BACKGROUND: Congenital portosystemic shunt is an infrequent abnormal connection between the portal vascular system and the systemic circulation. Portosystemic shunts are common findings in patients with cirrhosis, causing gastroesophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, and others. However, there is no consensus or literature describing how to manage asymptomatic patients with portosystemic shunts and normal liver.
    METHODS: The patient was a 39-year-old female who underwent donor right hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation. The patient was healthy by nature, however, developed hepatic encephalopathy after the surgery due to a development of portosystemic shunt. Portosystemic shunt stole portal blood flow, and imaging modalities revealed narrowing of the portal trunk, representing prolonged depletion of portal blood flow. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (B-RTO) was performed for occlusion of the portosystemic shunt. B-RTO increased portal blood flow, and hepatic encephalopathy with hyperammonemia was successfully resolved without the outbreak of any other symptom of portal hypertension.
    CONCLUSIONS: A congenital portosystemic shunt itself is not a contraindication for donor hepatectomy, but perioperative endovascular shunts occlusion or intraoperative ligature of these shunts should be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们回顾性比较了内镜下静脉曲张闭塞(EVO)和逆行经静脉闭塞(RTO)治疗急性心底静脉曲张出血的效果。
    方法:纳入在两家医院接受EVO或RTO治疗的急性心底静脉曲张破裂出血患者。
    结果:分析了90例接受EVO治疗的患者和86例接受RTO治疗的患者。EVO组的终末期肝病平均模型评分明显高于RTO组(13.5vs.11.7,P=0.016)。出血控制率高(97.8%vs.96.5%),EVO和RTO组的治疗相关并发症发生率较低(2.2%vs.3.5%)。在18.0个月的中位随访期间,34例(19.3%)和7例(4.0%)患者发生胃底静脉曲张(GV)和食管静脉曲张再出血,分别。EVO组和RTO组的所有静脉曲张再出血率相当(32.4%vs.2年期为20.8%,P=0.150),EVO组GV再出血率明显高于RTO组(32.4%vs.2年期的12.8%,P=0.003)。在倾向得分匹配分析中(EVO患者71例与RTO组71例患者),EVO组的所有静脉曲张和GV再出血率均明显高于RTO组(均P<0.05)。在Cox回归分析中,EVO(vs.RTO)是GV再出血风险较高的唯一重要预测因子(风险比3.132,P=0.005)。两组死亡率相似(P=0.597)。
    结论:EVO和RTO均能有效控制急性心底静脉曲张破裂出血。治疗后RTO在预防全静脉曲张和GV再出血方面优于EVO,具有相似的生存结果。
    OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively compared the effect of endoscopic variceal obturation (EVO) and retrograde transvenous obliteration (RTO) in acute cardiofundal variceal bleeding.
    METHODS: Patients with acute cardiofundal variceal bleeding treated with EVO or RTO at two hospitals were included.
    RESULTS: Ninety patients treated with EVO and 86 treated with RTO were analyzed. The mean model for end-stage liver disease score was significantly higher in EVO group than in RTO group (13.5 vs. 11.7, P = 0.016). The bleeding control rates were high (97.8% vs. 96.5%), and the treatment-related complication rates were low in both EVO and RTO groups (2.2% vs. 3.5%). During the median follow-up of 18.0 months, gastric variceal (GV) and esophageal variceal rebleeding occurred in 34 (19.3%) and 7 (4.0%) patients, respectively. The all-variceal rebleeding rates were comparable between EVO and RTO groups (32.4% vs. 20.8% at 2-year, P = 0.150), while the GV rebleeding rate was significantly higher in EVO group than in RTO group (32.4% vs. 12.8% at 2-year, P = 0.003). On propensity score-matched analysis (71 patients in EVO vs. 71 patients in RTO group), both all-variceal and GV rebleeding rates were significantly higher in EVO group than in RTO group (all P < 0.05). In Cox regression analysis, EVO (vs. RTO) was the only significant predictor of higher GV rebleeding risk (hazard ratio 3.132, P = 0.005). The mortality rates were similar between two groups (P = 0.597).
    CONCLUSIONS: Both EVO and RTO effectively controlled acute cardiofundal variceal bleeding. RTO was superior to EVO in preventing all-variceal and GV rebleeding after treatment, with similar survival outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    抗病毒治疗的最新进展使肝炎病毒的控制;然而,这些并不能完全消除肝病的病理状况,门静脉高压仍然是一个临床问题。我们在此报告一例乙型肝炎病毒/丙型肝炎病毒(HBV/HCV)诱导的失代偿期肝硬化,其中包括介入放射学和内窥镜检查的全面管理,基于我们临床研究的证据,其次是HBV和HCV共同感染的抗病毒治疗是成功的。这个案例清楚地表明了全面管理的有效时机,表明它除了改善肝功能外,还延长了重要的预后。
    Recent advances in antiviral therapy have enabled control of the hepatitis virus; however, these do not completely eliminate the pathological condition of liver disease, and portal hypertension remains a clinical problem. We herein report a case of hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus (HBV/HCV)-induced decompensated liver cirrhosis for which total management consisting of interventional radiology and endoscopy, based on the evidence of our clinical studies, followed by antiviral therapy for co-infection with HBV and HCV was successful. This case clearly indicates the effective timing of total management, suggesting that it prolongs the vital prognosis in addition to improving the hepatic function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:球囊闭塞逆行经静脉闭塞术(BRTO)可能是目前胃静脉曲张患者的最佳治疗方法之一。这项研究检查了肝硬化患者BRTO治疗胃静脉曲张后食管静脉曲张的恶化率。材料和方法:我们招募了91例因胃底静脉曲张而接受BRTO的肝硬化患者。总的来说,检查了50例患者BRTO后食管静脉曲张的恶化率。通过上消化道内窥镜检查评估食管静脉曲张及其相关恶化。根据胃静脉曲张的主要流入道将患者分为两组:(1)左胃静脉(LGV)组37例,LGV宽度大于3.55mm,(2)非LGV组13例胃短静脉或胃后静脉患者。此外,对治疗结果进行回顾性分析.结果:LGV宽度(p<0.01)是BRTO后食管静脉曲张恶化的主要危险因素。此外,LGV是最常见的流入道,LGV组包含74%(37/50)的患者。BRTO后1、2、3和4年的食管静脉曲张加重率为40%,62%,65%,68%,分别。根据流入道对BRTO后食管静脉曲张加重率的比较表明,LGV组的加重率明显高于非LGV组(p=0.03)。在超过一半的科目中,LGV是胃静脉曲张的主要流入道,与具有不同流入道来源的患者相比,该组患者在BRTO后经历了更频繁的食管静脉曲张加重。结论:胃静脉曲张BRTO时,应注意LGV宽度。
    Background and Objectives: Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) could be currently one of the best therapies for patients with gastric varices. This study examined the exacerbation rates for esophageal varices following BRTO for gastric varices in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 91 cirrhotic patients who underwent BRTO for gastric varices. In total, 50 patients were examined for exacerbation rates of esophageal varices following BRTO. Esophageal varices and their associated exacerbation were evaluated by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients were allocated into two groups according to the main inflow tract for gastric varices: (1) 37 patients in the left gastric vein (LGV) group with an LGV width of more than 3.55 mm, and (2) 13 patients in the non-LGV group who had short gastric vein or posterior gastric vein. Moreover, treatment outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Results: LGV width (p < 0.01) was the major risk factor for the deterioration of esophageal varices post BRTO. In addition, LGV was the most common inflow tract, and the LGV group contained 74% (37/50) of patients. The exacerbation rates of esophageal varices at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years post BRTO were 40%, 62%, 65%, and 68%, respectively. The comparison of the exacerbation rates for esophageal varices following BRTO according to inflow tract showed that the exacerbation rates were significantly higher in the LGV group than those of the non-LGV group (p = 0.03). In more than half of the subjects, LGV was the main inflow tract for gastric varices, and this group experienced more frequent exacerbations of esophageal varices following BRTO compared to patients with different inflow tract sources. Conclusion: Careful attention should be paid to the LGV width when BRTO is performed for gastric varices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号