The objective of this study was to examine the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes for surgically-treated atypical femur fractures (AFFs) compared to typical femoral diaphyseal fractures. Two large trauma center databases were retrospectively queried for surgically-treated femur fractures. Fractures were grouped into AFFs and compared to a control cohort. Controls for the AFF group included women with diaphyseal fractures without additional AFF characteristics. Patients were contacted for administration of the Short Form-36v2 Health Survey. Surveys were completed an average of 30.3 months (range, 6-138 months) and 25.5 months (range, 5-77 months) postoperatively for the AFF and non-AFF groups, respectively. All patients were female, with 46 patients in the AFF and 26 patients in the non-AFF group. The average age of the AFF group was 70.1 years compared with an average age of 67.4 years in the non-AFF group (p = 0.287). Over 90% (91.3%) of patients in the AFF group had a history of bisphosphonate use while 26.9% of patients in the non-AFF group had used bisphosphonates (p < 0.0001). Patients with AFF reported their postoperative physical and mental health to be no different than similarly aged patients with femoral diaphyseal fractures, as measured by the Short Form 36, version 2 (SF-36v2) Health Survey. These data suggest that mid-term patient-reported quality of life outcomes are similar among women who sustain an AFF compared to a cohort of more typical femoral diaphyseal fractures. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Atypical femur fractures (AFFs) are well-established serious complication of long-term bisphosphonate and denosumab therapy in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis. To elucidate underlying mechanism(s) for the development of AFF, we performed a nested case-control study to investigate bone tissue nanomechanical properties and prevailing bone microstructure and tissue-level remodeling status as assessed by bone histomorphometry. We hypothesized that there would be differences in nanomechanical properties between patients with and without AFF and that bone microstructure and remodeling would be related to nanomechanical properties. Thirty-two full-thickness transiliac bone biopsies were obtained from age- and sex-matched patients on long-term bisphosphonate therapy with (n = 16) and without an AFF (n = 16). Standard histomorphometric measurements were made in each sample on three different bone envelopes (cancellous, intracortical, and endosteal). Iliac bone wall thickness was significantly lower on all three bone surfaces in patients with AFF than in those without AFF. Surface-based bone formation rate was suppressed similarly in both groups in comparison to healthy premenopausal and postmenopausal women, with no significant difference between the two groups. Nanoindentation was used to assess material properties of cortical and cancellous bone separately. Elastic modulus was higher in cortical than in cancellous bone in patients with AFF as well as compared to the elastic modulus of cortical bone from non-AFF patients. However, the elastic modulus of the cancellous bone was not different between AFF and non-AFF groups or between cortical and cancellous bone of non-AFF patients. Resistance to plastic deformation was decreased in cortical bone in both AFF and non-AFF groups compared to cancellous bone, but to a greater extent in AFF patients. We conclude that long-term bisphosphonate therapy is associated with prolonged suppression of bone turnover resulting in altered cortical remodeling and tissue nanomechanical properties leading to AFF. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Asian race, younger age, higher body mass index (BMI) and antiresorptive drugs have all been associated with atypical femur fractures (AFFs). This increased risk of AFF in Asians is important as by 2050, >50% of hip fractures globally will occur in Asia, with an increased demand for antiresorptive drugs being likely. It is also currently unclear whether AFF risk is increased in all Asian subgroups. We therefore aimed to identify the incidence of AFFs in an Australian tertiary hospital, the contribution of ethnic origin to AFF risk, and determine other clinical risk factors for AFF. From January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2017, 97 AFFs (82 complete and 15 incomplete) occurred in 71 individuals in the overall study population of 204,358. Patients with AFF were more likely to be female (88.7% vs 69.1%, p < 0.001) and younger [median (IQR): 74(52-92) years vs 83(75-88) years, p < 0.001] than the \"typical\" femur fracture group (n = 3330). The cumulative incidence rate of AFF was 4.2 per 100,000 person-years, far lower than for any ICD-10 AM coded \"typical\" femur fracture (202.9 per 100,000 person-years). Asians were 3.4 (95%CI, 2.1-5.6) times more likely to sustain an AFF than non-Asians, the highest incidence being in those from South East Asian countries (16.6 per 100,000 person years), suggesting differences in risk between Asian countries. In the nested case-control study, bisphosphonate use was an independent association with AFF development. We conclude Asian ethnicity is an important association with AFF in this large Australian cohort.

The paper focuses on the identification of atypical fractures (AFFs). This paper examines the concordance between objective classification and expert subjective review. We believe the paper adds critical information about how to apply the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) criteria to diagnose AFFs and is of high interest to the field.
BACKGROUND: Assess American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) criteria for identifying atypical femoral fractures (AFFs).
METHODS: Two orthopedic surgeons independently evaluated radiographs of 372 fractures, applying ASBMR criteria. We assessed ease of applying ASBMR criteria and whether criteria-based assessment matched qualitative expert assessment.
RESULTS: There was up to 27% uncertainty about how to classify specific features. 84% of films were classified similarly for the presence of AFF according to ASBMR criteria; agreement increased to 94% after consensus meeting. Of 37 fractures categorized as AFFs based on ASBMR criteria, 23 (62.2%) were considered AFFs according to expert assessment (not relying on criteria). Only one (0.5%) femoral shaft fracture that did not meet ASBMR criteria was considered an AFF per expert assessment. The number of major ASBMR features present (four vs five) and whether there was periosteal or endosteal thickening (\"beaking\" or \"flaring\") played major roles in the discrepancies between ASBMR criteria-based and expert-based determinations.
CONCLUSIONS: ASBMR AFF criteria were useful for reviewers but several features were difficult to interpret. Expert assessments did not agree with the ASBMR classification in almost one-third of cases, but rarely identified an AFF when a femoral shaft fracture did not meet ASBMR AFF criteria. Experts identified lateral cortical transverse fracture line and associated new-bone formation along with no or minimal comminution as crucial features necessary for the definition of atypical femoral fractures.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have tried to determine the characteristics of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) through age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched comparison with non-AFFs. However, we hypothesized that diaphyseal AFFs would have characteristics different from those of subtrochanteric AFFs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features of diaphyseal/subtrochanteric AFFs and determine the factors related to fracture location.
METHODS: One hundred forty-seven patients with AFF were enrolled, 114 patients (78%) had a history of bisphosphonate use. Forty-nine patients (33%) had bilateral lesion, and 35% of patients had thigh pain. Patients were divided into two groups according to fracture location: 52 patients (35.4%) with subtrochanteric AFF and 95 patients (64.6%) with diaphyseal AFF. The patient demographics and fracture characteristics of the two groups were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for variables related to fracture location.
RESULTS: The patients in the diaphyseal AFFs group were older and had lower BMI, lower BMD, and larger lateral and anterior bowing. Multivariate analysis revealed that age greater than 65 years and low BMD were related with diaphyseal location. With greater lateral bowing angle, the AFF location was moved from the subtrochanteric area to the diaphyseal area.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that patients with diaphyseal AFFs had different characteristics compared with those with subtrochanteric AFFs.