Arteriovenous graft

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    评估多次单插管技术(MUST)对动静脉移植物(AVG)结局的影响。
    对2018年1月至2021年12月在郑州大学第一附属医院创建的AVG进行了回顾性研究。分析患者的临床资料及其静脉通路的随访资料。根据是否使用MUST将受试者分为MUST组和非MUST组。比较两组患者的累积通畅率和并发症发生率。采用Logistic回归分析AVG应用MUST的影响因素。
    必须组包括115AVG和非必须组,122AVG。1年,2年,3年,MUST组的4年累积通畅率为100%,99.1%,95.2%,85.4%,73.2%,分别,而非必须组则为97.5%,92.7%,77.7%,69.7%,50.0%,分别,2年和3年通畅率差异有统计学意义(P=0.022,P=0.004)。MUST组以(中位数[四分位距])表示的标准干预率明显低于非MUST组(0.46[0.00,0.94]vs.0.97[0.60,1.59],Z=-5.808,P<0.001)。MUST组共24例(20.9%)AVG和非MUST组60例(49.2%)AVG的标准干预率>1.0/患者年,两组之间具有显著差异。MUST组有3例(2.6%)AVG,非MUST组有7例(5.7%)AVG合并动脉瘤(χ2=20.737,P<0.001)。MUST组1例(0.9%)AVG和非MUST组6例(4.9%)AVG有移植物感染,组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.121)。多因素logistic回归显示联盟设施透析(比值比[OR]=2.713,95%置信区间[CI]:1.698-4.336,P<0.001],随访良好[OR=2.189,95%CI:1.221~3.927,P=0.009]是AVG应用MUST的影响因素。
    必须改善AVG的累积通畅性,并在不增加移植物感染风险的情况下降低介入频率和动脉瘤的发生率。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the effects of the multiple single cannulation technique (MUST) on the outcomes of arteriovenous graft (AVG).
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study of AVG created between January 2018 and December 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University was conducted. The clinical data of patients and their follow-up data for venous access were analyzed. Subjects were divided into the MUST group or the non-MUST group according to whether MUST was used. The cumulative patency rate and complication incidence were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression was applied to analyze the influencing factors of applying MUST in AVG.
    UNASSIGNED: The MUST group included 115 AVG and the non-MUST group, 122 AVG. The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 4-year cumulative patency rates of the MUST group were 100%, 99.1%, 95.2%, 85.4%, and 73.2%, respectively, while those for the non-MUST group were 97.5%, 92.7%, 77.7%, 69.7%, and 50.0%, respectively, with the 2-year and 3-year patency rates showing significant difference (P=0.022, P=0.004). The standard intervention rate expressed in (median [interquartile range]) in the MUST group was significantly lower than that in the non-MUST group (0.46 [0.00, 0.94] vs. 0.97 [0.60, 1.59], Z=-5.808, P<0.001). A total of 24 (20.9%) AVG in the MUST group and 60 (49.2%) AVG in the non-MUST group had a standard intervention rate >1.0 per patient-year, with significant difference between the two groups. Three (2.6%) AVG in the MUST group and 7 (5.7%) AVG in the non-MUST group were complicated by aneurysm (χ 2=20.737, P<0.001). One (0.9%) AVG in the MUST group and 6 (4.9%) AVG in the non-MUST group had graft infection, with the difference between the groups showing no significance (P=0.121). Multivariate logistic regression showed that dialysis in the alliance facilities (odds ratio [OR]=2.713, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.698-4.336, P<0.001], and excellent follow-up [OR=2.189, 95% CI: 1.221-3.927, P=0.009] were the influencing factors of applying MUST in AVG.
    UNASSIGNED: MUST improves the cumulative patency of AVG and decreases the intervention frequency and the incidence of aneurysm without increasing the risk of graft infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前,三种膨体聚四氟乙烯(ePTFE)假体类型最常用于需要长期血管通路进行血液透析的终末期肾病(ESKD)患者.然而,比较三种ePTFE移植物的研究有限。本研究比较了三种用于ESKD患者上肢动静脉移植(AVG)手术的ePTFE假体移植的临床疗效和术后并发症。纳入2016年1月至2019年9月入住我们中心的需要上肢AVG手术的ESKD患者。总的来说,282名完成2年随访的患者被纳入,并根据ePTFE移植类型分为以下三组:GPVG组采用PROPATEN®移植,带有直型GORE®ACUSEAL的GAVG组,以及带有VENAFLO®II的BVVG组。分析比较两组患者的通畅率和通路相关并发症发生率。术后对患者进行随访,数据收集于术后6,12,18和24个月.根据这些随访时间点,在GPVG组中,原发性通畅率为74.29%,65.71%,51.43%,42.86%;辅助原发通畅率为85.71%,74.29%,60.00%,和48.57%;二次通畅率为85.71%,80.00%,71.43%,和60.00%。在GAVG组中,原发性通畅率为73.03%,53.93%,59.42%,38.20%;辅助原发通畅率为83.15%,68.54%,59.55%,53.93%;二次通畅率为85.39%,77.53%,68.54%,62.92%,分别。在BVVG组中,原发性通畅率为67.24%,53.45%,41.38%,29.31%;辅助原发通畅率为84.48%,67.24%,55.17%,和44.83%;二次通畅率为86.21%,81.03%,68.97%,和60.34%,分别。三种移植物的通畅率差异无统计学意义。总的来说,GPVG中的18、4和12名患者,GAVG,和BVVG组,分别,经历血清肿。在三个移植物中,GORE®ACUSEAL吻合止血时间最短。三个移植物的首次插管时间为GPVG为16(±8.2),GAVG为4(±4.9),和BVVG在18(±12.7)天。GPVG组与其他两组的术后肿胀率差异无统计学意义。此外,关于术后血管通路狭窄和血栓形成,三种移植物类型之间没有发现统计学上的显着差异。缺血盗血综合征,假性动脉瘤,或感染。总之,术后原发性无统计学差异,辅助小学,在三组中观察到或继发性移植物通畅率。吻合止血时间较短,第一次插管时间,ACUSEAL®移植物比其对应物观察到血清肿的发生。PROPATEN®移植物术后上肢肿胀的发生率高于其他移植物。在其余并发症方面,三个移植物之间未观察到统计学上的显着差异。
    Currently, three expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) prosthetic graft types are most commonly used for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who require long-term vascular access for hemodialysis. However, studies comparing the three ePTFE grafts are limited. This study compared the clinical efficacy and postoperative complications of three ePTFE prosthetic graft types used for upper limb arteriovenous graft (AVG) surgery among patients with ESKD. Patients with ESKD requiring upper limb AVG surgery admitted to our center between January 2016 and September 2019 were enrolled. Overall, 282 patients who completed the 2-year follow-up were included and classified into the following three groups according to the ePTFE graft type: the GPVG group with the PROPATEN® graft, the GAVG group with the straight-type GORE® ACUSEAL, and the BVVG group with the VENAFLO® II. The patency rate and incidence of access-related complications were analyzed and compared between groups. The patients were followed up postoperatively, and data were collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. Respective to these follow-up time points, in the GPVG group, the primary patency rates were 74.29%, 65.71%, 51.43%, and 42.86%; the assisted primary patency rates were 85.71%, 74.29%, 60.00%, and 48.57%; and the secondary patency rates were 85.71%, 80.00%, 71.43%, and 60.00%. In the GAVG group, the primary patency rates were 73.03%, 53.93%, 59.42%, and 38.20%; the assisted primary patency rates were 83.15%, 68.54%, 59.55%, and 53.93%; and the secondary patency rates were 85.39%, 77.53%, 68.54%, and 62.92%, respectively. In the BVVG group, the primary patency rates were 67.24%, 53.45%, 41.38%, and 29.31%; the assisted primary patency rates were 84.48%, 67.24%, 55.17%, and 44.83%; and the secondary patency rates were 86.21%, 81.03%, 68.97%, and 60.34%, respectively. The differences in patency rates across the three grafts were not statistically significant. Overall, 18, 4, and 12 patients in the GPVG, GAVG, and BVVG groups, respectively, experienced seroma. Among the three grafts, GORE® ACUSEAL had the shortest anastomosis hemostatic time. The first cannulation times for the three grafts were GPVG at 16 (±8.2), GAVG at 4 (±4.9), and BVVG at 18 (±12.7) days. No significant difference was found in the postoperative swelling rate between the GPVG group and the other two groups. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences were found across the three graft types regarding postoperative vascular access stenosis and thrombosis, ischemic steal syndrome, pseudoaneurysm, or infection. In conclusion, no statistically significant differences in the postoperative primary, assisted primary, or secondary graft patency rates were observed among the three groups. A shorter anastomosis hemostatic time, first cannulation time, and seroma occurrence were observed with the ACUSEAL® graft than with its counterparts. The incidence of upper extremity swelling postoperatively was greater with the PROPATEN® graft than with the other grafts. No statistically significant differences were observed among the three grafts regarding the remaining complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们报告了因假性动脉瘤破裂而死亡的尸检;一名70多岁的男子被发现死于右臂分流术大量出血。尸检和病理检查显示,死亡原因是由于感染的假性动脉瘤破裂引起的失血性休克。破裂的动脉瘤和假性动脉瘤是透析的并发症,和死亡是罕见的,因为他们被发现立即治疗。然而,这些破裂通常发生在非医疗机构,如果患者不了解急救知识,则可能导致死亡。因此,患者教育很重要。大约只有一半的因分流术大量出血而死亡的人被尸检。在日本,尸检或部分尸检被认为是必要的,以确定出血是否是创伤性的,并防止医疗错误被忽视。
    We report an autopsy of a death due to a ruptured infected pseudoaneurysm; a man in his 70s was found dead with massive bleeding from the shunt of his right arm. Autopsy and pathological examination revealed that the cause of death was hemorrhagic shock due to rupture of an infected pseudoaneurysm. Ruptured aneurysms and pseudoaneurysm are a complication of dialysis, and death is rare because they are treated immediately on discovery. However, these ruptures often occur in non-medical facilities and could result in death if the patient does not have knowledge of first aid. Thus, patient education is important. Approximately only half of the deaths due to massive bleeding from a shunt are autopsied. In Japan, autopsies or partial autopsies are considered necessary to determine whether a bleeding was traumatic and to prevent medical errors from being overlooked.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    动静脉移植物(AVG)已成为许多患者构建血液透析通道的首选选择。临床试验表明,与聚合物材料相比,脱细胞血管移植物表现出优异的通畅性和优异的生物相容性;然而,它仍然面临诸如内膜增生和管腔扩张等挑战。缺乏合适的动物模型阻碍了我们在分子水平上描述和解释脱细胞血管移植物的上述病理现象和体内适应过程的能力。在这项研究中,我们首先从使用同种异体脱细胞血管移植物构建透析通路的患者中收集临床样本,并评估其组织学特征和移植后5年的免疫细胞浸润状态。手术前,我们使用非侵入性超声评估了去细胞化血管移植物的通畅性和内膜增生.随后,为了研究去细胞化血管移植物在动物模型中的体内适应性,我们尝试在小动物模型中使用去细胞化血管移植物构建AVG模型.我们采用物理-化学-生物学方法对大鼠颈动脉进行去细胞化,和组织学评估证明了细胞和抗原成分的成功去除,同时保留了细胞外基质成分,例如弹性纤维和胶原纤维。基于这些结果,我们设计并构建了第一个同种异体脱细胞大鼠颈动脉AVG模型,表现出优异的通畅性和非常相似的临床特征。用这个动物模型,我们提供了去细胞化血管移植物在不同时间点的组织学特征和部分免疫细胞浸润的初步描述,包括第7天,第21天,第42天,以及植入后一年。这些发现为进一步研究小动物模型中脱细胞血管移植物的体内适应过程奠定了基础。
    Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) have emerged as the preferred option for constructing hemodialysis access in numerous patients. Clinical trials have demonstrated that decellularized vascular graft exhibits superior patency and excellent biocompatibility compared to polymer materials; however, it still faces challenges such as intimal hyperplasia and luminal dilation. The absence of suitable animal models hinders our ability to describe and explain the pathological phenomena above and in vivo adaptation process of decellularized vascular graft at the molecular level. In this study, we first collected clinical samples from patients who underwent the construction of dialysis access using allogeneic decellularized vascular graft, and evaluated their histological features and immune cell infiltration status 5 years post-transplantation. Prior to the surgery, we assessed the patency and intimal hyperplasia of the decellularized vascular graft using non-invasive ultrasound. Subsequently, in order to investigate the in vivo adaptation of decellularized vascular grafts in an animal model, we attempted to construct an AVG model using decellularized vascular grafts in a small animal model. We employed a physical-chemical-biological approach to decellularize the rat carotid artery, and histological evaluation demonstrated the successful removal of cellular and antigenic components while preserving extracellular matrix constituents such as elastic fibers and collagen fibers. Based on these results, we designed and constructed the first allogeneic decellularized rat carotid artery AVG model, which exhibited excellent patency and closely resembled clinical characteristics. Using this animal model, we provided a preliminary description of the histological features and partial immune cell infiltration in decellularized vascular grafts at various time points, including Day 7, Day 21, Day 42, and up to one-year post-implantation. These findings establish a foundation for further investigation into the in vivo adaptation process of decellularized vascular grafts in small animal model.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在前臂和臂头静脉不再作为选项后,对于血液透析患者,在一期贵重臂-基底静脉转位(BBAVF)和直臂动静脉移植(AS-AVG)之间选择上臂血管通路存在争议.本研究旨在比较各组之间的结果。
    方法:回顾了2014年8月至2019年12月的所有一期BBAVF和AS-AVG。如果从肘部折痕到腋窝存在3毫米或更大的合适的贵重静脉,一级BBAVF是首选。AS-AVG适用于需要及时有效通路或没有合适贵重静脉的患者。
    结果:包括28个一期BBAVF和74个AS-AVG。基线特征无显著差异,除了AS-AVG之前的同侧通路较少(9%vs39%;p<.001)。术后并发症无差异。有6次损失随访(BBAVF3次,AS-AVG3次),24(96%)和64(90%)在一级BBAVF和AS-AVG后成熟,分别(p=.676)。BBAVF花费了约30天(95%CI:10,51)的更长时间来首次成功插管。一级BBAVF的主要通畅性显着更好(危险比(HR)为3.0(95CI:1.2,7.7)),而继发性通畅性没有差异。总的通路失败(即未能成熟结合任何血栓形成或维持通畅的干预)显著有利于BBAVF(HR2.7(95CI:1.1,6.6))。
    结论:只要有合适的手臂贵重静脉,当前臂AVF时,一级BBAVF优于AS-AVG,前臂AVG,手臂头静脉都出来了.然而,它需要比AS-AVG更长的时间来开始插管。
    OBJECTIVE: After forearm and arm cephalic veins are no longer available as options, the choices of arm vascular access between one-staged brachial-basilic vein transposition (BBAVF) and arm straight arteriovenous graft (AS-AVG) for hemodialysis are controversial. This study aims to compare outcomes between groups.
    METHODS: All one-staged BBAVF and AS-AVG from August 2014 to December 2019 were reviewed. In cases of suitable basilic vein of 3 mm or more present from cubital crease to axilla, one-staged BBAVF was preferred. AS-AVG was performed for patients who need timely functioning access or have no suitable basilic vein.
    RESULTS: Twenty-eight one-staged BBAVF and 74 AS-AVG were included. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different, except AS-AVG had less previous ipsilateral access (9% vs 39%; p < .001). Postoperative complications were not different. With six loss follow-ups (3 in BBAVF and 3 in AS-AVG), 24 (96%) and 64 (90%) matured after one-staged BBAVF and AS-AVG, respectively (p = .676). BBAVF took about 30 days (95% CI: 10, 51) longer time to first successful cannulation. Primary patency was significantly better for one-staged BBAVF (hazard ratio (HR) of 3.0 (95%CI: 1.2, 7.7)), whereas secondary patency was not different. The total access failure (i.e. failure to mature combined with any thrombosis or intervention to maintain patency) significantly favored BBAVF (HR 2.7 (95%CI: 1.1, 6.6)).
    CONCLUSIONS: Provided a suitable arm basilic vein is available, one-staged BBAVF is preferred over AS-AVG when forearm AVF, forearm AVG, and arm cephalic veins are out. However, it requires a longer time to start cannulating than AS-AVG.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:一些研究表明,与局部(LA)和全身麻醉(GA)相比,局部(RA)为血液透析(HD)的动静脉瘘(AVF)提供了更好的通畅性。这项研究评估了12个月时麻醉方式对长期瘘功能的影响。
    方法:对5家安全网医院在2014年至2019年连续病例中接受基于头静脉的HD患者进行了回顾性回顾。主要终点是12个月时的功能通畅。子集分析分别评估了前臂下部和腕部与上臂AVF的头端。双变量和多变量逻辑回归模型评估了麻醉方式与12个月时瘘功能之间的关系。
    结果:在研究期间产生了818个头瘘。总体12个月功能通畅率为78.7%,包括81.3%的上臂AVF通畅率和73.3%的腕部AVF通畅率(p=0.009)。12个月有功能性和非功能性AVF的患者在麻醉方式方面没有统计学上的显著差异,当地,和全身麻醉(p=0.343)。多变量回归分析确定AVF/AVG病史(OR0.24,p=0.007),术中接受全身抗凝治疗(OR2.49,p<0.001),静脉直径(OR1.85,p=0.039)与12个月时的AVF功能通畅独立相关。
    结论:在12个月时,麻醉方式与头型AVF的功能通畅之间没有关联。需要进一步的研究来更好地确定哪些患者可能从区域麻醉中受益。
    OBJECTIVE: Some studies suggest that regional anesthesia provides better patency for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for hemodialysis access as compared to local and general anesthesia. This study evaluates the impact of anesthetic modality on long term fistula function at 12 months.
    METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing cephalic vein-based hemodialysis access in consecutive cases between 2014 and 2019 was conducted from five safety net hospitals. The primary endpoint was functional patency at 12 months. Subset analysis individually evaluated cephalic-based lower forearm and wrist vs upper arm AVFs. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models evaluated the relationship between anesthetic modality and fistula function at 12 months.
    RESULTS: There were 818 cephalic-based fistulas created during the study period. The overall 12-month functional patency rate was 78.7%, including an 81.3% patency for upper arm AVF and 73.3% for wrist AVF (P = .009). There was no statistically significant difference among patients with functional and nonfunctional AVFs at 12 months with respect to anesthetic modality when comparing regional, local, and general anesthesia (P = .343). Multivariate regression analysis identified that history of AVF/arteriovenous graft (odds ratio [OR], 0.24; P = .007), receiving intraoperative systemic anticoagulation (OR, 2.49; P < .001), and vein diameter (OR, 1.85; P = .039) as independently associated with AVF functional patency at 12 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was no association between anesthetic modality and functional patency of cephalic-based AVFs at 12 months. Further studies are needed to better define which patients may benefit from regional anesthesia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:动静脉瘘和移植物是大多数血液透析患者的生命线,低接入流量通常需要与通畅相关的干预,如血管成形术或血栓切除术,以防止访问失败。我们检查了早期接入流量,初始瘘管/移植物插管后测量,预测1年内血管通路通畅相关干预。
    方法:这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究。在172例接受瘘管/移植物手术的患者中,52(30.2%)记录了通过Transonic™超声稀释技术进行的访问流量测量,在初始插管后的平均48天内进行。需要与通畅相关的干预,被定义为正在经历一个图,血管成形术,血栓切除术,或者手术翻修,在1年内确定。生成受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),以评估首次和平均进入流速的诊断性能,以预测1年内与通畅相关的干预。
    结果:52名研究对象中有28名(53.8%)在1年内需要通畅相关干预。他们的特征与不需要通畅相关干预的人没有显着差异。然而,与不需要通畅相关干预的患者相比,首次接入流速显着降低(898vs.1471mL/min;p=0.003),平均接入流量(841vs.1506mL/min;p<0.001)。ROC分析显示,首次接入流速和平均接入流速预测1年内需要通畅相关干预,ROC曲线下面积为0.743(95%置信区间[CI]0.608,0.877)和0.775(95%CI0.648,0.903),分别,表现出可接受的歧视。
    结论:在接受血液透析的成年人中,早期通路流速测量可预测首次血管通路插管后1年内与通畅相关的介入治疗.需要进行其他研究以确认这些发现并确定最佳的通路流速截止值,以预测狭窄风险较高的血管通路。
    BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous fistulas and grafts are lifelines for most hemodialysis patients, and a low access flow rate often requires patency-related intervention, such as angioplasty or thrombectomy, to prevent access failure. We examined whether early access flow rate, measured after initial fistula/graft cannulation, predicts vascular access patency-related intervention within 1 year.
    METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Among 172 patients undergoing surgical creation of a fistula/graft, 52 (30.2%) had documented access flow rates measurement by the Transonic™ ultrasound dilution technique, performed within an average of 48 days from initial access cannulation. The need for a patency-related intervention, defined as undergoing a fistulogram, angioplasty, thrombectomy, or surgical revision, was ascertained within 1 year. A receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) was generated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of first and average access flow rates for predicting patency-related intervention within 1 year.
    RESULTS: Twenty-eight (53.8%) of the 52 study subjects required a patency-related intervention within 1 year. Their characteristics were not significantly different from those who did not require patency-related interventions. However, first access flow rates were significantly lower in patients requiring patency-related intervention compared to those who did not (898 vs. 1471 mL/min; p = 0.003), as were average access flow rates (841 vs. 1506 mL/min; p < 0.001). The ROC analyses revealed that first access flow rates and average access flow rates predicted the need for patency-related intervention within 1 year, with an area under-the-ROC curve of 0.743 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.608, 0.877) and 0.775 (95% CI 0.648, 0.903), respectively, demonstrating acceptable discrimination.
    CONCLUSIONS: In adults undergoing hemodialysis, early access flow rate measurement can predict patency-related intervention within 1 year after initial vascular access cannulation. Additional studies are required to confirm these findings and identify optimal access flow rate cut-off values to predict vascular accesses at higher risk of stenosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估经颈静脉入路在血栓形成的直动静脉移植物(AVG)血管内再通中与直接血液透析入路(常规入路)的疗效和结果。
    方法:我们回顾性评估了在2006年10月至2021年10月期间在一家机构接受了血栓形成的直AVG的抽吸血栓切除术和经皮腔内血管成形术的患者。83例患者(男39例,女44例)共138例,分为经颈静脉入路组(A组)和常规入路组(B组)。技术和临床成功,介入后原发性通畅,累积通畅,并比较围手术期并发症。
    结果:A组和B组之间的人口统计学数据无统计学差异。A组和B组的技术成功率分别为96.4%(80/83)和98.2%54/55(p>0.05)。平均手术时间为61.4min(A组)和70.5min(B组)(p>0.05)。干预后两组患者的原发通畅率差异无统计学意义。A组和B组的累积通畅率为911.9天(范围122-6277)和1062.3天(范围72-2302天),分别为(p>0.05)。B组中的一名患者经历了严重的移植物破裂。B组2例患者在鞘管插入部位形成假性动脉瘤。A组未观察到IJV狭窄或血栓形成或穿刺部位血肿的病例。
    结论:经颈静脉入路与常规方法一样安全有效,用于血栓形成的直AVG的血栓抽吸切除术和经皮腔内血管成形术。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and outcome of the transjugular approach in endovascular recanalization of a thrombosed straight arteriovenous graft (AVG) compared to those of the direct hemodialysis access approach (conventional approach).
    METHODS: We retrospectively assessed patients who underwent aspiration thrombectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for thrombosed straight AVG performed at a single institution between October 2006 and October 2021. A total of 138 thrombosed AVGs in 83 patients (39 male and 44 females) were divided into the transjugular approach group (Group A) and the conventional approach group (Group B). Technical and clinical success, postintervention primary patency, cumulative patency, and periprocedural complications were compared.
    RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in demographic data between groups A and B. The technical success rate of group A and B was 96.4% (80/83) and 98.2% 54/55, respectively (p > 0.05). The mean procedure time was 61.4 min (Group A) and 70.5 min (Group B) (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in postintervention primary patency. The cumulative patency of Groups A and B was 911.9 days (range 122-6277) and 1062.3 days (range 72-2302 days), respectively (p > 0.05). One patient in Group B experienced a major graft rupture. Pseudoaneurysm formation at the sheath insertion site occurred in two patients in Group B. No cases of stenosis or thrombosis of the IJV or hematoma at the puncture site were observed in Group A.
    CONCLUSIONS: The transjugular approach is as safe and effective as the conventional approach for aspiration thrombectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of thrombosed straight AVGs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管接受血液透析的终末期肾病患者经常会出现透析相关的血栓性并发症,目前仍缺乏比较不同血管内抢救技术对移植物和瘘的疗效的文献.这项研究旨在比较采用旋转溶栓装置和球囊浸渍的机械溶栓/血栓切除术后透析通路的主要通畅性。
    使用三级医疗中心的患者记录数据库,所有在2016年8月至2022年7月期间接受CleanerXT™旋转血栓切除术系统用于血管内抢救动静脉瘘或动静脉移植物的旋转血栓切除术的患者均纳入人群.根据手术日期,将14例接受球囊浸渍以进行血管内抢救的患者与旋转血栓切除术组的患者相匹配。测量两组的瘘管或移植物的主要通畅性。
    共有13例患者接受了旋转血栓切除术(10例移植,3个瘘管)与14个接受球囊浸渍以进行透析通路抢救的患者(10个移植物,4瘘管)。两组中有6例患者需要额外的移植物入路抢救(46%的旋转血栓切除术;43%的球囊浸渍)。旋转血栓切除术的下一次透析抢救的中位时间为51天,球囊浸渍的中位时间为43.5天(W9,临界值1;符合统计学差异)。
    与通过球囊浸渍的抢救相比,通过旋转血栓切除术进行的血管内介入抢救可以提供更长的主要通畅性。然而,需要对更大的研究人群进行更长时间的随访前瞻性研究,以阐明使用CleanerXT™装置进行旋转血栓切除术的安全性和有效性.
    UNASSIGNED: Although end stage renal disease patients who undergo hemodialysis frequently experience dialysis-associated thrombotic complications, there remains a paucity of literature comparing the efficacy of different endovascular salvage techniques for grafts and fistulas. This study aims to compare primary patency in dialysis access following salvage mechanical thrombolysis/thrombectomy with a rotational thrombolysis device versus balloon maceration.
    UNASSIGNED: Using a database of patient records at a tertiary medical center, all patients who underwent rotational thrombectomy with the Cleaner XT™ Rotational Thrombectomy System for endovascular salvage of arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft from August 2016 to July 2022 were included in the population. Fourteen patients who underwent balloon maceration for endovascular salvage were matched to the patients in the rotational thrombectomy group based on date of procedure. The primary patency of the fistula or graft for the two groups was measured.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 13 patients who underwent dialysis access salvage with rotational thrombectomy (10 grafts, 3 fistulas) were matched with 14 patients who underwent balloon maceration for dialysis access salvage (10 grafts, 4 fistulas). Six patients in both groups required additional graft access salvage (46% rotational thrombectomy; 43% balloon maceration). The median time to next dialysis salvage was 51 days for rotational thrombectomy and 43.5 days for balloon maceration (W + 9, critical value 1; compatible with statistically significant difference).
    UNASSIGNED: Endovascular access salvage by rotational thrombectomy may provide longer primary patency compared to salvage by balloon maceration. However, a longer follow-up prospective study of a larger study population is necessary to clarify the safety and efficacy of rotational thrombectomy using the Cleaner XT™ device.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号