The effectiveness of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with angiography compared with angiography guidance alone in treating aortic conditions, such as dissections, aneurysms, and blunt traumatic injuries, remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the current literature for IVUS use during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and abdominal endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases was conducted in March 2024 adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies comparing outcomes of TEVAR/EVAR with and without IVUS were identified. The outcomes of interest included contrast volume, fluoroscopy and procedural time, perioperative endoleak, and reinterventions and all-cause mortality during follow-up. Data with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted. Pooled analysis was performed using a random-effect model. Subgroup analysis was performed stratified by the condition being treated. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. A total of 4,219 patients (n = 2,655 IVUS and n = 1,564 non-IVUS) from 9 observational studies were included. The IVUS group exhibited a reduction in contrast agent volume (weighted mean difference -34.65 mL, 95% CI -54.73 to -14.57) and fluoroscopy time (weighted mean difference -6.13 minutes, 95% CI -11.10 to -1.15), with no difference in procedural time. The perioperative type I and III endoleak occurrences were similar (risk ratio 2.36, 95% CI 0.55 to 10.11; risk ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.09 to 5.77, respectively). Reintervention and mortality during follow-up were comparable (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.97; hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.18, respectively). All the included studies had small risks of bias. In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides evidence that IVUS enables the safe deployment of TEVAR/EVAR with reduced contrast agent and radiation exposure.

BACKGROUND: Due to the lack of specificity symptoms and site of onset of castleman disease (CD), it is difficult to diagnose and poses unique challenges for both patients and clinicians, leading to confusion in diagnosis and delays in treatment. To enhance understanding, we present 3 cases of CD treated at our hospital, including a single-center, multicenter, and mixed-type CD.
METHODS: Case 1: A 53-year-old female patient was admitted with a chief complaint of \"abdominal pain and fever for 10 days.\" Marked enlargement of inguinal lymph nodes on both sides was observed. Case 2: A 58-year-old female patient was admitted with the main complaint of \"discovering a left lower abdominal mass during a routine checkup for the past 10 days.\" Upon deep palpation, a palpable mass of approximately 5.0 * 3.0 cm was identified in the left lower abdomen. Case 3: A 40-year-old male patient was admitted with the main complaint of \"progressive right upper abdominal and lumbar back pain for over 6 months.\" Computed tomography examination revealed multiple nodular soft tissue masses between the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava, with the largest measuring 5.0 * 4.0 cm.
METHODS: Based on the immunohistochemical results, the diagnoses for the 3 patients are as follows: Case 1: Multicentric Castleman\'s Disease (Mixed Type). Case 2: Pelvic Retroperitoneal Castleman Disease (Hyaline Vascular Type). Case 3: Castleman Disease Multicentric Type.
METHODS: Case 1: cyclophosphamide 0.6-1 g + vincristine 2 mg + methylprednisolone 50 mg/5 days. Cyclophosphamide 1 g + prednisone 30-50 mg/5 days. This alternating chemotherapy cycle is repeated every 6 months. Case 2: Laparoscopic pelvic mass excision surgery. Case 3: Surgical excision of the mass.
RESULTS: Case 1: After a 43-month follow-up, the patient\'s general symptoms have improved compared to before, but regular chemotherapy is still necessary at present. Case 2: The patient did not take any medication postoperatively, and there has been no evidence of metastasis or recurrence during the 18-month follow-up. Case 3: The patient did not take any medication, and there has been no evidence of metastasis or recurrence during the 21-month follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: The lack of specific signs on imaging studies and nonspecific blood tests increases the difficulty of diagnosis. However, tissue biopsy remains a feasible option. Therefore, we recommend conducting thorough examinations for suspected CD patients to reduce misdiagnosis and determine the CD type for effective targeted treatment.

BACKGROUND: Acute aortic occlusion (AAO) is a rare but serious condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality.
OBJECTIVE: This review provides an emergency medicine focused evaluation of AAO, including presentation, assessment, and emergency department (ED) management based on current evidence.
CONCLUSIONS: AAO refers to obstruction of blood flow through the aorta due to either thrombosis or embolism. This condition primarily affects older adults ages 60-70 with cardiovascular comorbidities and most commonly presents with signs and symptoms of acute limb ischemia, though the gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, and spinal cord may be affected. The first line imaging modality includes computed tomography angiography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. ED resuscitative management consists of avoiding extremes of blood pressure or heart rate, maintaining normal oxygen saturation and euvolemic status, anticoagulation with heparin, and pain control. Emergent consultation with the vascular surgery specialist is recommended to establish a plan for restoration of perfusion to ischemic tissues via endovascular or open techniques. High rates of baseline comorbidities present in the affected population as well as ischemic and reperfusion injuries place AAO patients at high risk for complications in an immediate and delayed fashion after surgical management.
CONCLUSIONS: An understanding of AAO can assist emergency clinicians in diagnosing and managing this rare but devastating disease.

BACKGROUND: Infected aortic grafts and mycotic aneurysms represent one of the most complex challenges faced by vascular surgeons. Treatment has progressed from extra-anatomical bypass to in situ reconstruction. Additionally, bovine pericardium reconstruction (BPR) has increased, due to accessibility and reduced lower limb morbidity. There remains, however, limited evidence for its use. The aim is to pool all known data to understand outcomes following BPR of mycotic aneurysms or infected vascular grafts.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in November 2021 with subsequent computerized meta-analysis of the pooled results and a final search in March 2022. Three databases, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and National Institutes of Health PubMed (PubMed), were searched for the search term \"(bovine OR xenoprosthetic) AND (aneurysm)\", according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
RESULTS: From 9 studies, there were 133 patients: 67% graft infections and 33% mycotic aneurysms. Fifty-seven percent of reconstructions were in the abdominal aorta and 33% were in the thoracic aorta. One hundred fifty-eight pathogens were identified, including Staphylococcus aureus (23%), Candida albicans (13%), and Escherichia coli (13%). In 12%, no microorganisms were identified. Thirty-day mortality was 19.14% (CI 10.83-28.71), late mortality was 19.08% (confidence interval [CI] 7.76-32.83), and overall mortality was 40.20% (CI 29.82-50.97). One patient died intraoperatively. There were a total of 151 in-hospital complications after 30 days postoperation. Common complications were acute renal failure (17%), pneumonia (14%), delirium (12%), respiratory insufficiency (11%) and renal insufficiency (7%). Lower limb ischemia was low, occurring in 5.66% (CI 0.54-13.82) of patients. Loss of graft patency leading to reintervention occurred in 1.20% (CI 0.00-7.71) of the grafts. Reinfection rate was 0.00% (CI 0.00-1.21).
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis highlights low reinfection and high graft patency using BPR with medium-length follow-up; however, there remain limited long-term and comparative data regarding options for aortic reconstruction. As expected in this complex cohort, the complication rate and 30-day mortality remain high.

At present, research on blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) is limited, with the majority being case reports. Consequently, there is a significant knowledge gap concerning this condition. To address this, we conducted a systematic review by extensively searching major databases. We included all literature that provided individual (non-identifiable) data on BAAI patients, irrespective of the study design. Furthermore, we undertook regression analyses to identify predictors of death after BAAI. The search yielded 2,099 results, leading to the inclusion of 102 case reports and one conference abstract. Using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for assessment, all studies were deemed of medium to high quality. In total, 133 patients were included, with a median age of 34 years, and 73.7% being male. The predominant clinical manifestation was pain, reported in 65.6% of patients. The most frequently observed aortic lesion severity was grade A (intimal tear or intramural hematoma) at 46.9%, and the most common lesion location was zone III (infrarenal aorta) in 88.3% of cases.  The overall mortality after BAAI was 15.3%. Multivariate regression analyses revealed the following predictors of death after BAAI: lower limb ischemia (relative risk [RR] = 7.137, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.154 - 44.161), cardiopulmonary arrest (RR = 10.250, 95% CI 1.452 - 72.344), and injuries to body parts other than the abdomen and lumbar spine (RR = 2.593, 95% CI 1.189 - 5.655). In conclusion, this review provides a detailed quantitative summary of BAAI\'s clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, emphasizing its high mortality rate and identifying three critical variables as predictors of death.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes after semi-conversion (open conversion with graft preservation) after failed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and semi-conversion failure. Secondary outcomes were 30-day major systemic complications, endoleak recurrence, reinterventions, and overall survival.
METHODS: The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023421153). All studies reporting the outcomes of semi-conversions for failed EVAR were eligible for inclusion. Quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. A random effects meta-regression of proportions was conducted using the double arcsine-Tukey transformation, given the frequent zero event rate in the primary outcome. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic.
RESULTS: Eight studies were included in the review after full text screening. A total of 196 patients underwent semi-conversion at a mean time from EVAR of 47.4 months, 68.9% in an elective setting. Mean age at conversion was 78.1 years, and the main indication was isolated endoleak type II (70.1% of cases). Aortic clamping was not necessary in 92.3% of semi-conversions; the aortic sac was opened in 96.1% of cases; in 93.3% of cases, ligation/suture of one or more culprit arteries were performed; and aortic neck banding was executed in 29.2%. At 30 days from surgery, the pooled mortality and the major systemic complications rates were 5.3% (I2 = 24.9%) and 13.4% (I2 = 54.3%), respectively. At follow-up, endoleak recurred after 12.6% semi-conversions (I2 = 83.2%), and the rate of reinterventions was 7% (I2 = 50.1%); the semi-conversion failure rate was 5.5% (I2 = 54.1%), and the overall survival was 84.6% (I2 = 33.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Semi-conversions have acceptable 30-day mortality rates, but the early and mid-term risks of complications, reinterventions, ruptures, and infections are not negligible. This procedure might be an alternative to complete or partial graft explant in patients whom aortic cross-clamping is not ideal.

Mycotic aneurysm is one of the extra-intestinal manifestations of Salmonella Enteritidis infection. The diagnosis of this condition is challenging owed to its variation in clinical presentations. We presented a case of a 54-year-old man with underlying diabetes mellitus and chronic smokers presented with acute right flank pain and fever associated with mild jaundice. The initial laboratory investigations suggested features of obstructive jaundice and urinary tract infection. The contrast enhancing computed tomography of the abdomen revealed the presence of saccular mycotic aneurysm located at the infrarenal abdominal aorta. The blood culture grew Salmonella Enteritidis which was susceptible to ceftriaxone, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ampicillin, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Intravenous ceftriaxone was initiated, and he underwent open surgery and artery repair at day 8 of admission. He responded well to the treatment given and subsequently discharged home after completed three weeks of intravenous ceftriaxone.

BACKGROUND: To perform a scoping review analyzing the current evidence reporting on acute kidney injury (AKI) after elective open surgery (OS) of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (c-AAAs) and evaluate the impact of renal perfusion, and the different types of solutions on renal morbidity.
METHODS: Research questions were defined, and a literature search was performed following the PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews. Multicenter, single-center observational studies were considered eligible. No abstracts only and unpublished literature were included.
RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty studies were screened, 20 studies met screening criteria and were included, reporting 1552 patients treated for c-AAAs. The majority did not receive renal perfusion and the others received different types of renal perfusions. Acute kidney injury is a common complication after c-AAAs OS, with an incidence up to 32.5%. Heterogeneity in AKI classifications reduce the ability to compare outcomes after perfusion and nonperfusion strategies. Pre-existing CKD, ischemic injury due to suprarenal aortic clamping are major determinants of AKI after aortic surgery. Most papers reported chronic kidney disease (CKD) at admission. Another debated topic is the indication for renal perfusion during c-AAAs OS. Controversial results for cold renal perfusion have been found.
CONCLUSIONS: In the context of c-AAAs, this review identified the need to standardize the definition of AKI to reduce reporting bias. Besides this, it showed the need to assess the indication for renal perfusion and the type of perfusion solution to be used.

OBJECTIVE: Direct connection between the celiac trunk (CT) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is very rare, knowledge of this anomaly is of great importance to surgeons and anatomists.
BACKGROUND: Splanchnic arteries arise from the abdominal aorta (AA). Unusual development of these arteries can lead to considerable variations. Historically there were a lot of classification of the variation in the CT and IMA, none of the classifications describes a direct connection from IMA to CT.
METHODS: We report a rare case in which the connection between the CT and AA was lost and replaced by a direct anastomosis with IMA.
RESULTS: 60 year old male presented to the hospital to undergo a computed tomography scan. Which showed that there was no CT arising from the AA, but there was a large anastomosis arises from the IMA and ended with a short axis and Left gastric artery (LGA), Splenic artery (SA), Common hepatic artery (CHA) arise from this axis, these arteries continued to the stomach and spleen and liver normally. The anastomosis provides the total supply to the CT. The CT branches are normal.
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the arterial anomalies provides an important help in clinical surgical implications especially in organs transplant.

Pseudocoarctaion of the aorta is a rare congenital anomaly occurring in isolation or with other congenital heart diseases. The anatomical basis of the condition is linked to an elongated, redundant aorta which may affect the arch, or the abdominal aorta rarely giving rise to kink and buckling without causing any significant functional stenosis. It should be carefully differentiated from the common true coarctation of the aorta. No clinical features are specific to pseudo coarctation and are often diagnosed incidentally. Although asymptomatic in the majority, few patients can have nonspecific symptoms and complications due to aneurysm formation, dissection, or rupture of the aorta. Hence Pseudocoarctaion should be closely followed for the onset of symptoms or possible complications. Without recommendations, no specific therapy is indicated in asymptomatic patients, although symptoms and complications warrant definitive treatment. As the natural history of the disease is unknown, the condition, when diagnosed, should be closely followed up for the occurrence of any complications. This article reports a pseudo aortic coarctation involving the arch and a brief literature review of this rare congenital anomaly.