Antithrombins

抗凝血酶
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:获得系统评价,关于儿科体外膜氧合(ECMO)期间特定凝血因子的监测和更换的改良Delphi共识支持儿科ECMO抗凝合作。
    方法:使用PubMed进行了结构化文献检索,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆(CENTRAL)数据库从1988年1月到2020年5月,在2021年5月更新。
    方法:纳入的研究评估了抗凝血酶的监测和替代,纤维蛋白原,和vonWillebrand因子在儿科ECMO支持中的应用。
    方法:两位作者独立回顾了所有引文,如果需要,由第三个审阅者解决冲突。29个参考文献用于数据提取和知情建议。使用标准化的数据提取表格构建证据表。
    结果:使用预后研究质量工具评估偏倚风险。使用建议分级评估来评估证据,发展,和评价体系。一个由48名专家组成的小组在两年内开会,制定基于证据的建议,当缺乏证据时,以专家为基础的共识声明。通过研究与开发/加利福尼亚大学适宜性方法,使用基于Web的修改的Delphi过程来建立共识。共识被定义为超过80%的协议。我们提出了一项薄弱的建议和四项专家共识声明。
    结论:没有足够的证据来制定关于监测和替代抗凝血酶的建议,纤维蛋白原,和vonWillebrand因子在ECMO儿科患者中的应用。用于替换关键止血参数的最佳监测和参数在很大程度上是未知的。
    OBJECTIVE: To derive systematic review informed, modified Delphi consensus regarding monitoring and replacement of specific coagulation factors during pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for the Pediatric ECMO Anticoagulation CollaborativE.
    METHODS: A structured literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from January 1988 to May 2020, with an update in May 2021.
    METHODS: Included studies assessed monitoring and replacement of antithrombin, fibrinogen, and von Willebrand factor in pediatric ECMO support.
    METHODS: Two authors reviewed all citations independently, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer if required. Twenty-nine references were used for data extraction and informed recommendations. Evidence tables were constructed using a standardized data extraction form.
    RESULTS: Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. The evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. A panel of 48 experts met over 2 years to develop evidence-based recommendations and, when evidence was lacking, expert-based consensus statements. A web-based modified Delphi process was used to build consensus via the Research And Development/University of California Appropriateness Method. Consensus was defined as greater than 80% agreement. We developed one weak recommendation and four expert consensus statements.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to formulate recommendations on monitoring and replacement of antithrombin, fibrinogen, and von Willebrand factor in pediatric patients on ECMO. Optimal monitoring and parameters for replacement of key hemostasis parameters is largely unknown.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的广泛应用,迫切需要一种快速检测方法来排除临床相关的血浆水平.准确和快速地确定DOAC水平将指导医疗决策(a)确定DOAC对自发性或创伤诱发的出血的潜在贡献;(b)确定逆转的适当候选者,或(c)优化紧急手术或干预的时机。DOAC试纸测试使用一次性条带来鉴定尿样中的因子Xa-或凝血酶抑制剂。根据系统的文献检索结果,然后对五个检索到的临床研究的简单汇总进行分析,当与液相色谱串联质谱法或校准显色测定法测量的水平相比时,测试条具有高灵敏度和可接受的高阴性预测值,以可靠地排除血浆DOAC浓度>30ng/mL.基于这些数据,提出了一种简单的算法来增强急性护理适应症的医疗决策,主要适用于没有现成的定量测试和24/7的医院。该算法不仅确定DOAC暴露,而且区分因子Xa和凝血酶抑制剂以更好地指导临床管理。
    BACKGROUND:  With the widespread use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), there is an urgent need for a rapid assay to exclude clinically relevant plasma levels. Accurate and rapid determination of DOAC levels would guide medical decision-making to (1) determine the potential contribution of the DOAC to spontaneous or trauma-induced hemorrhage; (2) identify appropriate candidates for reversal, or (3) optimize the timing of urgent surgery or intervention.
    RESULTS:  The DOAC Dipstick test uses a disposable strip to identify factor Xa- or thrombin inhibitors in a urine sample. Based on the results of a systematic literature search followed by an analysis of a simple pooling of five retrieved clinical studies, the test strip has a high sensitivity and an acceptably high negative predictive value when compared with levels measured with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry or calibrated chromogenic assays to reliably exclude plasma DOAC concentrations ≥30 ng/mL.
    CONCLUSIONS:  Based on these data, a simple algorithm is proposed to enhance medical decision-making in acute care indications useful primarily in hospitals not having readily available quantitative tests and 24/7. This algorithm not only determines DOAC exposure but also differentiates between factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors to better guide clinical management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:遗传性和获得性血栓形成倾向是静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的危险因素。测试是否有助于指导管理决策是有争议的。
    目的:这些来自美国血液学会(ASH)的循证指南旨在支持血栓性检查的决策。
    方法:ASH成立了一个多学科指南小组,涵盖临床和方法学专业知识,并将利益冲突的偏见降至最低。麦克马斯特大学年级中心提供了后勤支助,进行了系统评价,并创建了证据概况和证据到决策表。建议评估的分级,使用开发和评估(GRADE)方法。建议可征求公众意见。
    结果:专家组同意关于血栓形成倾向检测和相关管理的23项建议。由于建模假设,几乎所有建议都基于证据中非常低的确定性。
    结论:专家组强烈建议不要在开始使用联合口服避孕药(COC)之前对普通人群进行测试,和有条件的建议,在以下情况下进行血栓性测试:a)与非手术性重大短暂性或激素危险因素相关的VTE患者;b)脑或内脏静脉血栓形成患者,否则抗凝治疗将被停用;c)有抗凝血酶家族史的个体,蛋白C或蛋白S缺乏,当考虑对轻微的诱发危险因素进行血栓预防时,并提供指导以避免COC/HRT;d)具有高风险血栓症类型家族史的孕妇;e)血栓形成风险低或中等且有VTE家族史的癌症患者。对于所有其他问题,研究小组针对血栓形成倾向的检测提供了有条件的建议.
    Hereditary and acquired thrombophilia are risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Whether testing helps guide management decisions is controversial. These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) intend to support decision making about thrombophilia testing. ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel covering clinical and methodological expertise and minimizing bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre provided logistical support, performed systematic reviews, and created evidence profiles and evidence-to-decision tables. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach (GRADE) was used. Recommendations were subject to public comment. The panel agreed on 23 recommendations regarding thrombophilia testing and associated management. Nearly all recommendations are based on very low certainty in the evidence due to modeling assumptions. The panel issued a strong recommendation against testing the general population before starting combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and conditional recommendations for thrombophilia testing in the following scenarios: (a) patients with VTE associated with nonsurgical major transient or hormonal risk factors; (b) patients with cerebral or splanchnic venous thrombosis, in settings where anticoagulation would otherwise be discontinued; (c) individuals with a family history of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiency when considering thromboprophylaxis for minor provoking risk factors and for guidance to avoid COCs/hormone replacement therapy; (d) pregnant women with a family history of high-risk thrombophilia types; and (e) patients with cancer at low or intermediate risk of thrombosis and with a family history of VTE. For all other questions, the panel provided conditional recommendations against testing for thrombophilia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    INTRODUCTION Dabigatran etexilate has become widely used in New Zealand, but information relating to when renal function monitoring is being undertaken is lacking. AIM To investigate if clinically appropriate renal function monitoring is being undertaken in New Zealand primary care for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients prescribed dabigatran etexilate. METHODS New Zealand non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients\' prescription and primary care health data were extracted from national administrative databases for the period 1 July 2011 to 31 December 2015. The proportion of patients who had serum creatinine measurements at close proximity to treatment initiation and 12-months post initiation were assessed with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and compared with Fisher\'s exact test. Log-rank tests for univariate analysis (gender, age, ethnicity and deprivation) effects on serum creatinine testing at dabigatran etexilate treatment initiation and 12-months post initiation were performed. RESULTS Overall, 1,948 patients who had been dispensed dabigatran etexilate with available primary care health data were identified. A total of 1,752 (89.9% [CI: 88.5-91.2]) patients had a renal function test at dabigatran etexilate initiation. There were 929 (72.8% [CI: 70.2-75.2]) patients who received ≥1 year supply of dabigatran etexilate and of these 207 (22.3% [CI: 19.6.6-25.1]) had a serum creatinine test 1 year after initiation. Demographic univariate analysis yielded insignificant log-rank tests for association with having serum creatinine measurements, except for Pacific Peoples. DISCUSSION There appears to be sub-optimal adherence to renal function monitoring for non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who receive more than 12-months\' treatment with dabigatran etexilate in New Zealand primary care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis, either symptomatic or incidental, is a common complication in the history of cancer disease. The risk of VTE is 4-7-fold higher in oncology patients, and it represents the second leading cause of death, after cancer itself. In cancer patients, compared with the general population, VTE therapy is associated with higher rates of recurrent thrombosis and/or major bleeding. The need for treatment of VTE in patients with cancer is a challenge for the clinician because of the multiplicity of types of cancer, the disease stage and the imbricated cancer treatment. Historically, in cancer patients, low molecular weight heparins have been preferred for treatment of VTE. More recently, in large randomized clinical trials, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demonstrated to reduce the risk of VTE. However, in the \"real life\", uncertainties remain on the use of DOACs, especially for the bleeding risk in patients with gastrointestinal cancers and the potential drug-to-drug interactions with specific anticancer therapies.In cancer patients, atrial fibrillation can arise as a perioperative complication or for the side effect of some chemotherapy agents, as well as a consequence of some associated risk factors, including cancer itself. The current clinical scores for predicting thrombotic events (CHA2DS2-VASc) or for predicting bleeding (HAS-BLED), used to guide antithrombotic therapy in the general population, have not yet been validated in cancer patients. Encouraging data for DOAC prescription in patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer are emerging: recent post-hoc analysis showed safety and efficacy of DOACs for the prevention of embolic events compared to warfarin in cancer patients. Currently, anticoagulant therapy of cancer patients should be individualized with multidisciplinary follow-up and frequent reassessment. This consensus document represents an advanced state of the art on the subject and provides useful notes on clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Consensus Development Conference
    Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are mostly prescribed to prevent cardioembolic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). An increasing number of guidelines recommend DOAC in AF patients with preserved renal function for the prevention of thromboembolism, and an increased use of DOAC in daily practice has been recorded also in elderly patients. Ageing is associated with a reduction in glomerular filtration rate, and impaired renal function, regardless of the cause, increases the risk of bleeding. Multiple medication use (polypharmacy) for treating superimposed co-morbidities is common in both elderly and chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and drug-drug interaction may cause accumulation of DOAC, thereby increasing the risk of bleeding. The safety profile of DOAC in patients with CKD has not been defined with any certainty, particularly in those with severely impaired renal function or end stage renal disease. This has been due to the heterogeneity of studies and the relative paucity of data. This document reports the position of three Italian scientific societies engaged in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation who are treated with DOAC and present with CKD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗凝血酶是凝血级联中的辅因子,具有温和的抗凝血活性,并且促进肝素作为抗凝剂的作用。抗凝血酶浓缩物给药指南各不相同,但最常见的建议是每单位体重的抗凝血酶浓缩物使血浆抗凝血酶水平增加1.5%至2.2%(取决于制造商)。我们旨在根据年龄和疾病状态建立剂量建议。
    对5年内所有抗凝血酶浓缩物剂量的回顾性分析。我们计算了达到的任何相应抗凝血酶浓缩物剂量的增加,按体重指数,并进行了多变量分析,以确定与抗凝血酶浓缩物有效性相关的独立因素。
    一所大学附属儿童医院的PICU。
    一百五十五名患者在PICU接受治疗。
    无。
    562剂抗凝血酶浓缩物对155例患者血浆抗凝血酶水平的影响,其中414个(73.7%)抗凝血酶浓缩物剂量在体外生命支持治疗期间给予,进行了分析。对于所有患者来说,每单位抗凝血酶浓缩物/kg使血浆抗凝血酶水平增加0.86%(SD0.47%).血浆抗凝血酶水平的增加受体重的影响(增加0.76%[四分位数范围,<5kg的患者为0.6-0.92%;1.38%[四分位距,1.11-2.10%]对于>20千克),疾病状态(抗凝血酶增加最差的肝衰竭)以及患者是否接受了体外循环支持治疗(在体外生命支持下抗凝血酶增加较少)。给药时的肝素剂量不影响抗凝血酶水平的变化量。
    目前的抗凝血酶浓缩物给药指南高估了危重患儿对血浆抗凝血酶水平的影响。目前的建议导致抗凝血酶浓缩物给药剂量不足。年龄,疾病状态,在使用抗凝血酶浓缩物时,应考虑体外生命支持。
    Antithrombin is a cofactor in the coagulation cascade with mild anticoagulant activity and facilitates the action of heparin as an anticoagulant. Antithrombin concentrate dosing guidelines vary but most commonly suggest that each unit of antithrombin concentrate per body weight increases the plasma antithrombin level by 1.5% to 2.2% (depending on manufacturer). We aimed to establish a dosing recommendation dependent on age and disease state.
    A retrospective analysis of all antithrombin concentrate doses over a period of 5 years. We calculated the increase any respective antithrombin concentrate dose achieved, indexed by body weight, and performed a multivariable analysis to establish independent factors associated with the effectiveness of antithrombin concentrate.
    A PICU at a university-affiliated children\'s hospital.
    One hundred fifty-five patients treated in a PICU.
    None.
    The effect of 562 doses of antithrombin concentrate on plasma antithrombin levels administered to 155 patients, of which 414 (73.7%) antithrombin concentrate doses administered during extracorporeal life support treatment, were analyzed. For all patients, each unit of antithrombin concentrate/kg increased plasma antithrombin level by 0.86% (SD 0.47%). Plasma antithrombin level increase was influenced by body weight (increase of 0.76% [interquartile range, 0.6-0.92%] for patients < 5 kg; 1.38% [interquartile range, 1.11-2.10%] for > 20 kg), disease state (liver failure having the poorest antithrombin increase) and whether patients were treated with extracorporeal circulatory support (less antithrombin increase on extracorporeal life support). Heparin dose at the time of administration did not influence with amount of change in antithrombin level.
    Current antithrombin concentrate dosing guidelines overestimate the effect on plasma antithrombin level in critically ill children. Current recommendations result in under-dosing of antithrombin concentrate administration. Age, disease state, and extracorporeal life support should be taken into consideration when administering antithrombin concentrate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Aspirin and P2Y12 receptor antagonists are widely used across the spectrum of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Gastrointestinal complications, including ulcer and bleeding, are relatively common during antiplatelet treatment and, therefore, concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is often prescribed. However, potential increased risk of cardiovascular events has been suggested for PPIs, and, in recent years, it has been discussed whether these drugs may reduce the cardiovascular protection by aspirin and, even more so, clopidogrel. Indeed, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies suggested an interaction through CYP2C19 between PPIs and clopidogrel, which could translate into clinical inefficacy, leading to higher rates of cardiovascular events. The Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency sent a warning in 2010 discouraging the concomitant use of clopidogrel with omeprazole or esomeprazole. In addition, whether the use of PPIs may affect the clinical efficacy of the new P2Y12 receptor antagonists, ticagrelor and prasugrel, remains less known. According to current guidelines, PPIs in combination with antiplatelet treatment are recommended in patients with risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding, including advanced age, concurrent use of anticoagulants, steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and Helicobacter pylori infection. Like traditional anticoagulants, novel oral anticoagulants may cause gastrointestinal bleeding. Results from both randomized clinical trials and observational studies suggest that high-dose dabigatran (150 mg bid), rivaroxaban and high-dose edoxaban (60 mg daily) are associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding as compared with warfarin. However, the usefulness of PPIs in patients receiving these anticoagulants deserves to be further demonstrated. Given the large number of patients treated with antithrombotic drugs and PPIs, even a minor reduction of platelet inhibition or anticoagulant effect potentially carries a considerable clinical impact. The present joint statement by ANMCO and AIGO summarizes the current knowledge regarding the widespread use of platelet inhibitors, anticoagulants, and PPIs in combination. Moreover, it outlines evidence supporting or opposing drug interactions between these drugs and discusses consequent clinical implications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管在三级护理机构的儿科患者中静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的发生率增加,有抗血栓干预经验的儿科医师相对较少.
    美国血液学会(ASH)的这些指南,基于现有的最佳证据,是为了支持病人,临床医生,和其他卫生保健专业人员在他们关于儿科静脉血栓栓塞管理的决定。
    ASH成立了一个多学科指南小组,其中包括2名患者代表,并进行了平衡,以最大程度地减少利益冲突带来的潜在偏见。麦克马斯特大学年级中心支持指导方针制定过程,包括更新或进行系统证据审查(截至2017年4月)。小组根据临床医生和患者的重要性,优先考虑临床问题和结果。小组使用了建议评估的分级,发展,和评估(等级)方法,包括等级证据到决策框架,评估证据并提出建议,受到公众的评论。
    小组同意了30项建议,涵盖有症状和无症状的深静脉血栓形成,特别关注中心静脉接入装置相关静脉血栓栓塞的管理。小组还讨论了肾和门静脉血栓形成,脑桥静脉血栓形成,和纯合蛋白C缺乏。
    尽管小组提出了许多建议,需要更多的研究。重点包括了解无症状血栓形成的自然史,确定能够对儿童进行风险分层以升级治疗的亚组边界,以及对儿童新型抗凝剂的适当研究。
    Despite an increasing incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric patients in tertiary care settings, relatively few pediatric physicians have experience with antithrombotic interventions.
    These guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH), based on the best available evidence, are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about management of pediatric VTE.
    ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 2 patient representatives and was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline-development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews (up to April of 2017). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.
    The panel agreed on 30 recommendations, covering symptomatic and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis, with specific focus on management of central venous access device-associated VTE. The panel also addressed renal and portal vein thrombosis, cerebral sino venous thrombosis, and homozygous protein C deficiency.
    Although the panel offered many recommendations, additional research is required. Priorities include understanding the natural history of asymptomatic thrombosis, determining subgroup boundaries that enable risk stratification of children for escalation of treatment, and appropriate study of newer anticoagulant agents in children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号