外阴阴道假丝酵母菌病（VVC）是临床常见的生殖道炎症，造成患者外阴瘙痒、分泌物增多等不适，白假丝酵母菌是其最常见的致病原。诊断VVC推荐使用革兰染色涂片显微镜检查，观察到假菌丝及芽生孢子即可诊断；真菌培养推荐用于治疗困难或反复发作患者。诊断VVC后推荐进行分类，区分单纯性及复杂性VVC。单纯性VVC的治疗选用单疗程药物。复杂性VVC的治疗变化较大：重度VVC建议延长疗程；复发性VVC建议强化治疗后巩固治疗；妊娠期VVC禁用口服抗真菌药物，推荐阴道唑类药物治疗；非白假丝酵母菌感染或耐药假丝酵母菌感染推荐非唑类抗真菌药物或者依据真菌培养选择药物；VVC再发建议巩固治疗1~2个疗程；VVC合并混合感染建议同时治疗；VVC的抗真菌治疗联合使用微生态制剂推荐用于治疗无效或反复发作的患者。.

Invasive candidiasis (IC) ranks among the primary causes of deadly fungal infections. The frequency of IC rises alongside increasing number of patients with altered immune systems, critically ill, chronic diseases, and various medical procedures. The disease causes high morbidity and mortality, as well as prolonged stay and increases hospital costs. The diagnosis and management of IC in Indonesia is still a challenge. Laboratory facilities in identifying pathogenic fungi and susceptibility tests to antifungals are still limited. Clinical awareness and financial support from health policymakers are also insufficient. Early diagnosis is essential for proper treatment to reduce morbidity and mortality rates. Initiated by the Indonesian Pulmonary Mycoses Centre (IPMC), several expert representatives from six medical professional organizations in Indonesia have agreed to set up a meeting series to prepare a joint draft on the diagnosis and management of IC. The expert panel aimed to achieve a consensus on the clinical practice guidelines for diagnosing and treating IC in Indonesia.

Seborrheic Dermatitis of the scalp (SSD) is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory skin condition. Current SSD treatments mainly consist of topical applications of anti-fungals and anti-inflammatory agents. to review information about SSD and to provide dermatologists with practical recommendations for managing adult SSD. Material and methods: Between September and December 2023, an international group of experts in dermatology and hair and scalp disorders met to discuss published data about SD, SSD, dandruff, and management options. A total of 131 manuscripts available from PubMed were analysed, discussed and used for the present consensus. Each author was asked to complete a table listing currently used treatments to treat SSD according to the literature and to their own experience. The authors confirmed their use and regimen and commented on local treatment exceptions. They then agreed on prescription practices and proposed a general treatment approach. Currently, approved therapies to manage moderate and severe forms of SSD do not exist and there is a need for adapted and approved medications that treat efficiently and safely the disease. We propose a treatment algorithm that allows for the treatment of all severity grades of SSD. This algorithm may be completed with local treatment specifications. Despite the lack of approved therapies to manage moderate forms of SSD, a treatment algorithm is proposed and may help prescribers to manage SSD more efficiently.

BACKGROUND: The global prevalence of invasive fungal infections (IFI) is increasing, particularly within Intensive Care Units (ICU), where Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. represent the most important pathogens. Diagnosis and management of IFIs becomes progressively challenging, with increasing antifungal resistance and the emergence of rare fungal species. Through a consensus survey focused on assessing current views on how IFI should be managed, the aim of this project was to identify challenges around diagnosing and managing IFIs in the ICU. The current status in different countries and perceived challenges to date amongst a multidisciplinary cohort of healthcare professionals involved in the care of IFI in the ICU was assessed.
METHODS: Using a modified Delphi approach, an expert panel developed 44 Likert-scale statements across 6 key domains concerning patient screening and minimal standards for diagnosis of IFIs in ICU; initiation and termination of antifungal treatments and how to minimise their side effects and insights for future research on this topic. These were used to develop an online survey which was distributed on a convenience sampling basis utilising the subscriber list held by an independent provider (M3 Global). This survey was distributed to intensivists, infectious disease specialists, microbiologists and antimicrobial/ICU pharmacists within the UK, Germany, Spain, France and Italy. The threshold for consensus was set at 75%.
RESULTS: A total of 335 responses were received during the five-month collection period. From these, 29/44 (66%) statements attained very high agreement (≥ 90%), 11/44 (25%) high agreement (< 90% and ≥ 75%), and 4/44 (9%) did not meet threshold for consensus (< 75%).
CONCLUSIONS: The results outline the need for physicians to be aware of the local incidence of IFI and the associated rate of azole resistance in their ICUs. Where high clinical suspicion exists, treatment should start immediately and prior to receiving the results from any diagnostic test. Beta-D-glucan testing should be available to all ICU centres, with results available within 48 h to inform the cessation of empirical antifungal therapy. These consensus statements and proposed measures may guide future areas for further research to optimise the management of IFIs in the ICU.

Super-bioavailable itraconazole (SB ITZ) overcomes the limitations of conventional itraconazole (CITZ) such as interindividual variability and reduced bioavailability. It has been approved for systemic mycoses in Australia and Europe as 50 mg and the USA as 65 mg and in India as 50 mg, 65 mg, 100 mg, and 130 mg. However, data on the ideal dose and duration of SB ITZ treatment in managing dermatophytosis are insufficient. This consensus discusses the suitability, dosage, duration of treatment, and relevance of using SB ITZ in managing dermatophytosis in different clinical scenarios. Sixteen dermatologists (>15 years of experience in the field and ≥2 years clinical experience with SB ITZ), formed the expert panel. A modified Delphi technique was employed, and a consensus was reached if the concordance in response was >75%. A total of 26 consensus statements were developed. The preferred dose of SB ITZ is 130 mg once daily and if not tolerated, 65 mg twice daily. The preferred duration for treating naïve dermatophytosis is 4-6 weeks and that for recalcitrant dermatophytosis is 6-8 weeks. Moreover, cure rates for dermatophytosis are a little better with SB ITZ than with CITZ with a similar safety profile as of CITZ. Better patient compliance and efficacy are associated with SB ITZ than with CITZ, even in patients with comorbidities and special needs such as patients with diabetes, extensive lesions, corticosteroid abuse, adolescents, and those on multiple drugs. Expert clinicians reported that the overall clinical experience with SB ITZ was better than that with CITZ.

Amphotericin B (AmB) is a broad-spectrum and potent polyene antifungal drug for the treatment of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs). Currently, amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmB-D) and three AmB lipid formulations, namely liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB), amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD), and amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) are available for clinical use. In view of clinical concerns and misperceptions in the selection of different formulations of AmB, the present consensus summarized their pharmaceutical characteristics, antifungal mechanism, pharmacokinetics/phamacodynamics, drug interactions, indications, dosage, local administration, and adverse reactions based on the latest clinical research evidence, guidelines, and clinical experience. This consensus also recommends formulation selection and dosage adjustment for the treatment of target IFDs and in special populations, thereby providing expert consensus for clinical decision-making and standardized application of AmB.
两性霉素B（AmB）是临床治疗侵袭性真菌病（IFD）广谱强效的多烯类抗真菌药物。目前已有两性霉素B脱氧胆酸盐（AmB-D）及3种AmB脂质剂型，包括两性霉素B脂质体（L-AmB）、两性霉素B胶状分散体（ABCD）和两性霉素B脂质复合物（ABLC）可供临床使用。根据临床在选择AmB不同剂型方面关注与困惑的问题，本共识结合国内外最新临床研究证据、指南、共识以及临床经验，针对AmB 4种不同剂型的药剂学特点、抗真菌作用机制、药代动力学/药效学、药物相互作用、适应证、用法用量、局部用药、不良反应防治等特点，明确AmB在IFD目标治疗的剂型与剂量选择，并对特殊人群的用法用量加以规范，为该类药物的临床决策与合理应用提供指导意见。.

Cryptococcosis is a major worldwide disseminated invasive fungal infection. Cryptococcosis, particularly in its most lethal manifestation of cryptococcal meningitis, accounts for substantial mortality and morbidity. The breadth of the clinical cryptococcosis syndromes, the different patient types at-risk and affected, and the vastly disparate resource settings where clinicians practice pose a complex array of challenges. Expert contributors from diverse regions of the world have collated data, reviewed the evidence, and provided insightful guideline recommendations for health practitioners across the globe. This guideline offers updated practical guidance and implementable recommendations on the clinical approaches, screening, diagnosis, management, and follow-up care of a patient with cryptococcosis and serves as a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence on cryptococcosis. This Review seeks to facilitate optimal clinical decision making on cryptococcosis and addresses the myriad of clinical complications by incorporating data from historical and contemporary clinical trials. This guideline is grounded on a set of core management principles, while acknowledging the practical challenges of antifungal access and resource limitations faced by many clinicians and patients. More than 70 societies internationally have endorsed the content, structure, evidence, recommendation, and pragmatic wisdom of this global cryptococcosis guideline to inform clinicians about the past, present, and future of care for a patient with cryptococcosis.

The incidence and mortality of COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) are high in critically ill patients. Although COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (CAPM) is relatively rare, its severity and often a delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis lead to its high mortality. The diagnosis and treatment of CAPA and CAPM in critically ill patients are challenging. Early diagnosis and a standardized therapy are the two most important factors for a good outcome. Therefore, a working group of experts from Chinese Thoracic Society and Chinese Association of Chest Physicians Critical Care Group was organized to develop this consensus based on the current medical evidence and clinical practice, in order to improve the ability of clinical treatment for critically ill patients with CAPA and CAPM. The working group drafted a preliminary text based on the literature and clinical practice experience. Following two rounds of discussion, 16 final recommendations were made, with the recommendation strength divided into recommend, suggest and not recommend.-Utilization of chest images and bronchoscopy1. Chest CT, rather than chest X-ray, is recommended for possible CAPA or CAPM patients to provide diagnostic evidence and localization for bronchoscopy to obtain microbiological specimens. A diagnosis of CAPA could not be made on the basis of positive signs on chest CT alone. Chest contrast CT or pulmonary artery CT (CTPA) is recommended in patients with probable CAPM.2. In the case of possible CAPA or CAPM, it is recommended that bronchoscopy and BALF collection for microbiological examinations be pereformed as soon as possible.-The selection strategies of microbiological examinations3. Microscopic examination, culture, GM testing and PCR for aspergillus Spp. of BALF are recommended in patients with probable CAPA. Fungal staining and culture of BALF are suggested for possible CAPM. Selected appropriate specimens for molecular biological detection are suggested in critically ill patients and possible CAPM.-Diagnostic critieria4. The revised ECMM/ISHAM consensus statement is recommended as the diagnostic criteria for CAPA and the Delphi consensus statement is recommended as the diagnostic criteria for CAPM.-Appropriate time for antifungal therapy5. Prophylactic therapy of CAPA with amphotericin B or its liposomes is suggested for patients with severe COVID-19, especially those with risk factors for CAPA.6. It is recommended to start the empirical anti-Aspergillus therapy as soon as possible for possible CAPA, and obtain the microbiological evidence for aspergillosis at the same time.7. Prophylactic therapy for CAPM is not recommended for severe COVID-19 patients.8. Early initiation of empirical therapy for possible CAPM is recommended, and microbiological evidence should be obtained at the same time.-Clinical applications for antifungal agents9.Voriconazole or isavuconazole are recommended as initial treatment for CAPA. Amphotericin B liposomes are suggested as the initial treatment for CAPM. Isavuconazole or posaconazole may be an option in patients with renal insufficiency or amphotericin B liposome intolerance/unavailability.10. In CAPA patients with tracheobronchitis, antifungal drug inhalation is recommended in addition to systemic antifungal medication.11. Combination therapy is not recommended as initial therapy for CAPA, but may be used as a salvage therapy strategy. Triazole or amphotericin B in combination with caspofungin or micafungin is recommended; whereas amphotericin B in combination with triazole is not recommended. For CAPM patients with extensive lesions, rapid progression or poor general condition, a combination of amphotericin B liposome with isavuconazole or posaconazole is suggested.-Response assessment and treatment duration12. It is recommended that treatment response be assessed comprehensively according to the clinical symptoms/signs, imaging and microbiological examination of patients. CAPA can be evaluated in combination with the dynamic change in serum GM.13. The recommended treatment duration of CAPA is at least 6-12 weeks. A total course of at least 3-6 months is suggested for CAPM, and the sequential treatment should be considered according to the response to 4-6 weeks of intravenous therapy.-How to adjust the anti-inflammatory therapy14. In patients with severe COVID-19 combined with possible or probable filamentous fungal infection, it is suggested that of anti-inflammatory therapy be stopped or reduced appropriately, taking into account of the severity of the infection and inflammation of the disease course. The combination of baritinib and/or tozzizumab based on glucocorticoids is not suggested in these patients.-How to treat the underlying diseases15. In patients with diabetes, strict glycaemic control is suggested. In patients with long-term use of glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants, it is suggested to reduce the intensity of immunosuppression. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is suggested to use to improve the circulating granulocyte levels in patients with granulocyte deficiency due to various causes.-When an operation should be considered16. In patients with CAPA, surgery is not recommended unless large blood vessels, pericardium, or chest wall are involved, or the patient has recurrent or massive hemoptysis. For CAPM patients, early surgical removal of lesions after diagnosis is recommended. Surgery is a high-risk procedure in patients with severe COVID-19, and a multidisciplinary team discuss is suggested.
重症COVID-19相关肺曲霉病（CAPA）的发病率及病死率均较高。而新型冠状病毒感染相关肺毛霉病（CAPM）虽然相对少见，但疾病本身的严重性加之误诊及诊断延误也导致其病死率居高不下。目前，重症CAPA及CAPM的诊断及治疗均面临巨大挑战。如何早期诊断并规范治疗是救治成功的关键。因此，中国医师协会呼吸医师分会危重症学组与中华医学会呼吸病学分会危重症学组发起并组织相关领域专家，基于目前的循证医学证据及临床实践经验，撰写本共识，以期提高重症CAPA及CAPM患者的临床救治。工作组结合文献及临床实践经验，形成共识的初步文本。经两次讨论会，最终确定16条核心推荐意见并给出推荐强度，分为推荐、建议及不推荐。.

Regardless of the available antifungals, intraabdominal candidiasis (IAC) mortality continues to be high and represents a challenge for clinicians.
This opinion paper discusses alternative antifungal options for treating IAC. This clinical entity should be addressed separately from candidemia due to the peculiarity of the required penetration of antifungals into the peritoneal cavity. Intraabdominal concentrations may be further restricted in critically ill patients where pathophysiological facts alter normal drug distribution. Echinocandins are recommended as first-line treatment in guidelines for invasive candidiasis. However, considering published data, our pharmacodynamic analysis suggests the required increase of doses, postulated by some authors, to attain adequate pharmacokinetic (PK) levels in peritoneal fluid. Given the limited evidence in the literature on PK/PD-based treatments of IAC, an algorithm is proposed to guide antifungal treatment. Liposomal amphotericin B is advocated as first-line therapy in patients with sepsis/septic shock presenting candidemia or endophthalmitis, or with prior exposure to echinocandins and/or fluconazole, or with infections by Candida glabrata. Other situations and alternatives, such as new compounds or combination therapy, are also analysed.
There is a critical need for more robust clinical trials, studies examining patient heterogeneity and surveillance of antifungal resistance to enhance patient care and optimise treatment outcomes. Such evidence will help refine the existing guidelines and contribute to a more personalised and effective approach to treating this serious medical condition. Meanwhile, it is suggested to broaden the consideration of other options, such as liposomal amphotericin B, as first-line treatment until the results of the fungogram are available and antifungal stewardship could be implemented to prevent the development of resistance.

BACKGROUND: Mortality from candidemia is higher in elderly population than in younger patients, which may be related to suboptimal management. The aim of the present study is to evaluate adherence to the recommendations for the clinical management of candidemia in a population over 75 years before and after implementing specific training.
METHODS: We recorded retrospectively data from candidemia episodes in elderly patients during two periods of time: 2010-2015 years (before training) and 2017-2022 years (after training), as well as adherence to the recommendations of the clinical practice guidelines, mortality and consultation to infectious disease specialists.
RESULTS: Forty-five episodes of candidemia were recorded in the first period and 29 episodes in the second period. A better compliance to the recommendations of the clinical practice guidelines was observed in the second period: echocardiogram performance (75.9% vs. 48.9% p = .021), fundoscopy (65.5% vs. 44.4% p = .076), follow-up blood cultures (72.4% vs. 42.2% p = .011), removal of central venous catheter (80% vs. 52.9% p = .080) and adequate antifungal treatment (82.6% vs. 52.6% p = .018). A trend towards lower mortality was observed during the second period (27.6% vs. 44.4% p = .144).
CONCLUSIONS: The improvement of knowledge of clinical guidelines on candidemia and the participation of infectious disease specialists may increase the quality of care in elderly patients with candidemia. It would be necessary to enlarge the sample size to evaluate the real impact of this intervention on mortality.