OBJECTIVE: Few studies evaluate physicians\' choice of antiseizure medication (ASM) to treat patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The objective of this study was to analyze the choice of ASM and its use by age, sex, psychiatric comorbidities, and concurrent treatment with other drugs (antidepressant medications and contraceptives) in patients who initiated epilepsy treatment using monotherapy.
METHODS: Included in this study were persons (any age) with an incident hospital diagnosis of epilepsy during 2010-2022 in the Swedish Patient Register (SPR), preceding a first dispensing of any ASM (as reported in the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, SPDR) for the period 2010-2022. Incident patients were identified using retrospective information during 2000-2009 in the SPR. Primary outcome was first dispensed ASM by age, sex, comorbidity, and comedication with antidepressants or contraceptives (SPDR). Secondary outcomes were time to ASM switch or termination assessed by survival analyses.
RESULTS: Of 67,984 patients included (mean age 46; 46% female), 66,441 initiated ASM treatment using monotherapy. Relative risk (RR) for initiating treatment using monotherapy did not differ between age groups, sex, or patients with concurrent treatment with antidepressants, contraceptives, or psychiatric illness (RR and 95% CI did include 1.0). The share initiating treatment using levetiracetam increased from 10% in 2010 to 55% in 2022; valproic acid: 10%-5%. The likelihood of initiating treatment using 1 of the 5 most frequent ASMs differed between all compared groups (0.3 < RR < 1; 95% CI < 1; 1 < RR < 15; 1 <95% CI). Seven percent of female patients of childbearing age initiated treatment with valproic acid, levetiracetam was the most frequent initial ASM in patients with psychiatric comorbidity (40.2%), and lamotrigine the most prescribed initial ASM to women on contraceptives (50.4%). Highest likelihoods of treatment termination were found among children (1.72 < RR < 3.07; 1 <95% CI) and among patients with psychiatric comorbidity (initiated on carbamazepine, RR 1.38; 1 <95% CI or lamotrigine, RR 1.31; 1 <95% CI). Thirty-one percent to 47% of patients switched from an initial monotherapy to a new monotherapy within 5 years. Twenty percent to 42% terminated ASM treatment within 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Levetiracetam and lamotrigine were the most frequently dispensed initial ASMs, also among patients with comorbidities or comedications complicating the use of these ASMs, highlighting the need for improved education of prescribers concerning ASM selection in relation to individual patient characteristics. Use of ASMs in hospital is not captured in the SPDR.

BACKGROUND: There is not a preferred medication for treating refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and intravenous ketamine is increasingly used. Ketamine efficacy, safety, dosage, and influence of other variables on seizure cessation while on ketamine infusions are not well studied. We aimed to characterize ketamine effect on RSE, including interictal activity on electroencephalogram (EEG) and when done by Teleneurocritical care (TNCC).
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study from August 2017 to October 2022. Patients 18 years or older who had RSE and received ketamine were included. The primary outcome was effect of ketamine on RSE including interictal activity; secondary outcomes were effect of other variables on RSE, care by TNCC, ketamine infusion dynamics, adverse events, and discharge outcomes. Logistic regression was used.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients from five hospitals met inclusion criteria; 30 patients had RSE and interictal activity on EEG. Median age was 56.8 years (IQR 18.2) and 26% had previously diagnosed epilepsy. Sixteen (31%) patients were treated virtually by TNCC. In those with RSE on EEG, ketamine was added as the fourth antiseizure medication (mean 4.4, SD 1.6). An initial bolus of ketamine was used in 24% of patients (95 mg, IQR 47.5), the median infusion rate was 30.8 mcg/kg/min (IQR 40.4), and median infusion duration was 40 h (IQR 37). Ketamine was associated with 50% cessation of RSE and interictal activity at 24 h in 84% of patients, and complete seizure cessation in 43% of patients. In linear regression, ASMs prior to ketamine were associated with seizure cessation (OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.9-6.9, p = 0.05), while the inverse was seen with propofol infusions (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.001-0.43, p = 0.01). RSE management by in-person NCC versus virtual by TNCC did not affect rates of seizure cessation.
CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine infusions for RSE were associated with reduced seizure burden at 24 h, with 84% of patients having 50% seizure reduction. Similar efficacy and safety was observed irrespective of underlying RSE etiology or when done via TNCC vs in-person NCC.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a hallmark of IQSEC2-related encephalopathy within a phenotypic variability ranging between early onset epileptic and developmental encephalopathy and X-linked intellectual disability with epilepsy.
METHODS: Data including demographic aspects, gene variants, seizure semiology and timing, EEG features, neuroimaging and response to therapy were retrospectively collected in patients with IQSEC2-related epilepsy referring to 8 Italian tertiary centres.
RESULTS: The reported cohort included 11 patients (8 males and 3 females). Mean age at the onset of epilepsy was 3.90±2.80 years. No cases were reported in the first year of life. No specific epileptic syndromes were recognized. Predominant seizure-types in the age range 12-36 months included focal onset tonic seizures with impaired awareness, myoclonic seizures, and late onset spasms. Generalized motor seizures were predominant in patients between 3 and 6 years and between 12 and 18 years while focal motor seizures with impaired awareness were the most represented types between 6 and 12 years. No patients experienced status epilepticus. EEG patterns included a delayed maturation of EEG organization, irregular focal or diffuse slow activity, multifocal or diffuse epileptiform abnormalities. No structural epileptogenic lesions were detected at MRI. Valproate, lamotrigine, clobazam, topiramate and levetiracetam were the most used antiseizure medication. Complete seizure freedom was achieved only in 2 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Onset of epilepsy after the first year of age, predominance of focal seizures with impaired awareness and generalized motor seizures, no pathognomonic underlying epileptic syndrome and infrequent occurrence of status epilepticus emerged as the main features of IQSEC2-related epilepsy phenotype.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a new data-driven method to predict the therapeutic indication of redeemed prescriptions in secondary data sources using antiepileptic drugs among individuals aged ≥65 identified in Danish registries.
METHODS: This was an incident new-user register-based cohort study using Danish registers.
METHODS: The study setting was Denmark and the study period was 2005-2017.
METHODS: Participants included antiepileptic drug users in Denmark aged ≥65 with a confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy.
METHODS: Sensitivity served as the performance measure of the algorithm.
RESULTS: The study population comprised 8609 incident new users of antiepileptic drugs. The sensitivity of the algorithm in correctly predicting the therapeutic indication of antiepileptic drugs in the study population was 65.3% (95% CI 64.4 to 66.2).
CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm demonstrated promising properties in terms of overall sensitivity for predicting the therapeutic indication of redeemed antiepileptic drugs by older individuals with epilepsy, correctly identifying the therapeutic indication for 6 out of 10 individuals using antiepileptic drugs for epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) associated with antiepileptic medications. The current study aims to investigate the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of antiepileptic medication-induced SCARs in hospitalized children.
METHODS: The current five-year retrospective study was conducted at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. This study included all children with a definite diagnosis of SCARs secondary to the use of antiepileptic medications based on the world health organization (WHO) definition. In our study SCARs were categorized into three fields: Hypersensitivity syndrome, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).
RESULTS: Among 259 children with SCARs induced by antiepileptic medications, 199 (76.83%), 42 (16.22%), and 18 (6.95%) had hypersensitivity syndrome, DRESS, and SJS/TEN, respectively. Phenobarbital was the most common offending drug in all types of SCARs. The multinomial logistic regression model revealed that lymphadenopathy increased the occurrence of DRESS by 35 times compared to hypersensitivity syndrome (P < 0.001). Girls were at risk of SJS/TEN approximately 6 times more than boys (P = 0.027). Age (P = 0.021), weight (P = 0.036), and mucosal involvement (P < 0.001) affected the hospitalization duration in children with SCARs related to antiepileptic medication.
CONCLUSIONS: There are some similarities and differences in the clinical and epidemiological features of Iranian children suffering from antiepileptic medication-induced SCARs.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify factors that contribute to the discontinuation of perampanel.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with epilepsy at the Department of Psychiatry, Hokkaido University Hospital. We evaluated the factors contributing to perampanel discontinuation as primary outcomes using Cox proportional hazards regression. Then, we explored the components contributing to the primary outcomes using logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were included, 44.9% of whom discontinued participation, 22.0% had intellectual disability, and 23.7% had a psychiatric disorder other than intellectual disability. Adverse effects occurred in 65% of the patients, 23.7% had psychiatric adverse effects (PAE), and 49.2% had common adverse effects (CAE). The effect of PER to suppress seizures was confirmed in 65.3% of them. Discontinuation was influenced by non-response (Hazard Ratio (HR) 6.70, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 3.42-13.1), the occurrence of PAE (HR 3.68, 95% CI 1.89-7.16), CAE (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.06-3.41), and comorbid psychiatric disorders (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.21-4.59). Moreover, comorbid intellectual disability correlated with a low risk of PAE (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.89).
CONCLUSIONS: The discontinuation of perampanel is influenced by poor efficacy and the occurrence of common/psychiatric adverse effects. The discontinuation of perampanel is influenced by poor efficacy and the occurrence of common/psychiatric adverse effects. Consideration of factors contributing to perampanel discontinuation may assist in determining the indication for perampanel treatment.

A post hoc analysis of data from Asian patients included in the study BIA-2093-304 was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety/tolerability and efficacy of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures. Part I was a randomized controlled trial, in which patients received ESL (800 or 1200 mg once daily [QD]) or placebo, assessed over a 12-week maintenance period. Patients completing Part I could enter two open-label extension periods (Part II, 1 year; Part III, ≥2 years), during which all received ESL (400-1600 mg QD). Safety/tolerability was assessed by evaluating treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy assessments included responder and seizure freedom rates. The safety population included 125, 92, and 23 Asian patients in Parts I, II, and III, respectively. Incidence of ESL-related TEAEs was 61.3%, 45.7%, and 17.4% during Parts I, II, and III, respectively. ESL-related TEAEs (most commonly, dizziness, somnolence, and headache) were consistent with ESL\'s known safety profile. During Part I, responder rates were higher with ESL 800 (41.7%) and 1200 mg QD (44.4%) versus placebo (32.6%), although not statistically significant. Seizure freedom rates with ESL 800 (5.5%) and 1200 mg QD (11.1%) were also higher versus placebo (0%) (p < 0.05 for ESL 1200 mg QD versus placebo). At the end of Part II, responder and seizure freedom rates were 60.3% and 14.7%, respectively. In summary, adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures were responsive to treatment with ESL as adjunctive therapy and generally showed treatment tolerance well for up to 3 years. No new/unexpected safety findings were observed.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who are not eligible for open brain surgery is the continuation of anti-seizure medication (ASM) and neuromodulation. This treatment does not cure epilepsy but only decreases severity. The PRECISION trial offers a non-invasive, possibly curative intervention for these patients, which consist of a single stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) treatment. Previous studies have shown promising results of SRT in this patient population. Nevertheless, this intervention is not yet available and reimbursed in the Netherlands. We hypothesize that: SRT is a superior treatment option compared to palliative standard of care, for patients with focal DRE, not eligible for open surgery, resulting in a higher reduction of seizure frequency (with 50% of the patients reaching a 75% seizure frequency reduction at 2 years follow-up).
METHODS: In this waitlist-controlled phase 3 clinical trial, participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either receive SRT as the intervention, while the standard treatments consist of ASM continuation and neuromodulation. After 2-year follow-up, patients randomized for the standard treatment (waitlist-control group) are offered SRT. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with focal DRE and a pretreatment defined epileptogenic zone (EZ) not eligible for open surgery will be included. The intervention is a LINAC-based single fraction (24 Gy) SRT treatment. The target volume is defined as the epileptogenic zone (EZ) on all (non) invasive examinations. The seizure frequency will be monitored on a daily basis using an electronic diary and an automatic seizure detection system during the night. Potential side effects are evaluated using advanced MRI, cognitive evaluation, Common Toxicity Criteria, and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of the SRT treatment will be evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomized trial comparing SRT with standard of care in patients with DRE, non-eligible for open surgery. The primary objective is to determine whether SRT significantly reduces the seizure frequency 2 years after treatment. The results of this trial can influence the current clinical practice and medical cost reimbursement in the Netherlands for patients with focal DRE who are not eligible for open surgery, providing a non-invasive curative treatment option.
BACKGROUND: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05182437. Registered on September 27, 2021.

A growing body of evidence suggests that adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the healthcare system. Fifteen to twenty-five percent of patients with epilepsy discontinued antiseizure drugs (ASDs) within 6 months of therapy owing to intolerable adverse drug reactions. In Ethiopia, the prevalence of antiseizure adverse drug reactions and associated factors was not extensively conducted in advanced settings like Jimma Medical Centers. Hence, the objective of this study is to assess patterns of adverse drug reactions and associated factors among ambulatory epileptic patients at tertiary hospitals in Ethiopia. A hospital-based prospective observational study was spanned for 1 year. Two hundred ninety patients were consecutively recruited into the study from all epileptic patients attending the ambulatory clinic. Relevant data were collected through patient interviews and medical chart reviews. The causality assessment was done by using the Naranjo Probability Scale. Epi-Data manager version 4.6.0.4 was used for data entry and statistical analysis was performed by Statistical Package for Social Science version 25.0 (SPSS). Stepwise backward logistic regression analysis was done to identify factors that increase the risk of antiseizure adverse drug reactions. The mean (± SD) age of the participants were 29.91(± 11.26) years. The overall prevalence of ADR was 33.8% (95% CI 29.2-39.9%). A total of 110 adverse drug reactions were identified among 98 patients with an average of 1.12 per patient. ADRs were frequently reported with phenobarbital (52.04%) and phenytoin (34.70%). The commonly identified adverse drug reactions were epigastric pain (27.55%) and central nervous system drowsiness (23.46%). Comorbidity (AOR = 5.91, 95% CI (2.14-16.32), seizure-free period of fewer than 2 years (AOR = 1.94, 95% CI (1.18-3.19), and polytherapy (AOR = 1.35, 95% CI (1.80-2.26) were significantly associated with adverse drug reactions. This trial had a comparatively high percentage of adverse medication reactions. Adverse medication reactions were more common in patients with polytherapy, comorbidities, and seizure-free durations less than two years. Therefore, medical practitioners should advise patients who exhibit these traits on how to reduce or avoid bad drug responses or provide comfort in the event of small incidents.