Epidemiologic studies on the risk of multiple sclerosis (MS) or demyelinating events associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) use among patients with rheumatic diseases or inflammatory bowel diseases have shown conflicting results. Causal directed acyclic graphs (cDAGs) are useful tools for understanding the differing results and identifying the structure of potential contributing biases. Most of the available literature on cDAGs uses language that might be unfamiliar to clinicians. This article demonstrates how cDAGs can be used to determine whether there is a confounder, a mediator or collider-stratification bias and when to adjust for them appropriately. We also use a case study to show how to control for potential biases by drawing a cDAG depicting anti-TNFα use and its potential to contribute to MS onset. Finally, we describe potential biases that might have led to contradictory results in previous studies that examined the effect of anti-TNFα and MS, including confounding, confounding by contraindication, and bias due to measurement error. Clinicians and researchers should be cognizant of confounding, confounding by contraindication, and bias due to measurement error when reviewing future studies on the risk of MS or demyelinating events associated with anti-TNFα use. cDAGs are a useful tool for selecting variables and identifying the structure of different biases that can affect the validity of observational studies.

暂无摘要。

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a severe, life-threatening disease that represents a major therapeutic challenge. There is a lack of randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of various treatment options for GPP. TNFα inhibitors have proven to be effective and are increasingly used in this indication. In the current paper, we present two patients with GPP treated with infliximab (Ifx) and a literature review appraising currently available data on the use of Ifx in GPP. Case 1 was a 73-year-old woman with GPP who exhibited lack of treatment response or primary intolerance to standard therapeutic options (high-dose acitretin, methotrexate, cyclosporine A, and methylprednisolone). However, Ifx therapy combined with low-dose acitretin resulted in rapid and sustained resolution of skin lesions. Case 2 was a 60-year-old man with GPP and numerous comorbidities who was initially treated with Ifx in combination with methotrexate, with good treatment response for 9 months. Following an infection-induced flare of GPP at week 38, methotrexate was discontinued in favor of low-dose acitretin and Ifx continued. This regimen again resulted in rapid resolution of pustules. We present these cases to highlight the advantage of long-term Ifx therapy with low-dose acitretin in GPP.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterised by the presence of acetylcholine receptor antibodies and by blocking the transmission of the signal in the neuromuscular junction causing muscle weakness. It can be associated with several autoimmune diseases and certain drugs, between them Etanercept an anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agent. A 42-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to methotrexate, was treated with adalimumab (ADA), a human monoclonal antibody against the TNF, in a dosage scheme of 40 mg every 14 days subcutaneously. The patient responded well to ADA therapy with sustained remission for 18 months when she developed blurred vision and eyelid ptosis of the left eye. The diagnosis of ocular MG was made. ADA has been discontinued and she started a treatment with pyridostigmine showing an excellent response and complete remission within a 2-month period. This is the first report making an association of ADA and ocular MG. Thus, rheumatologists dealing with patients treated with TNF inhibitors should be aware of the possible development of neurological adverse events, among them MG.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) has been associated with insulin resistance (IR), a well-established pathophysiological feature of Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM). Inconsistent literature evidence suggests that IR could be ameliorated by biological medications targeting TNFα.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of TNFα inhibitors (TNFi) on IR in RA patients.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review in order to identify the available data on the effect of anti- TNFα medications on IR in RA patients. For this purpose, MedLine (via PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and SCOPUS were searched up to December 2016.
RESULTS: The search strategy retrieved 209 individual records. Of these, only 12 articles were included in the systematic review. The pooled analysis under a random-effects model demonstrated a significant improvement of IR after treatment with TNFi quantified with the HOmeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), with a standardized difference in means (SDM) of -0.847 (95%CI: -1.278 - 0.417, p < 0.0001). Heterogeneity across studies was high (Q = 65.00 with df = 9, p < 0.001, I2 = 89.15%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that TNFα blockade might improve IR in RA patients.

BACKGROUND: To review the frequency with which anti-TNF-α loses its effect and dose \"intensification\" is required for Crohn\'s disease (CD) treatment.
METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies. Raw data from studies meeting inclusion criteria were pooled for effect estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed for exploration of heterogeneity regarding all outcomes.
RESULTS: Eighty-six eligible studies were included. Estimates of loss of response (LOR) incidence ranged from 8 to 71%. The random effects pooled incidence of LOR with a median follow-up of 1-year was 33% (95% CI 29-38, 55 studies, n = 6135). The effect estimate based on data from patients with infliximab was 33% (95% CI 27-40), 30% (95% CI 22-39) for adalimumab, and 41% (95% CI 30-53) for certolizumabpegol. Overall, the mean percentage of patients\' LOR to anti-TNFs was 38.5%. The annual risk for LOR was 20.9% per patient-year. The random-effects pooled rate of need for dose intensification with a median follow-up of 1 year was 34% (95% CI 28-41, 38 studies, n = 10,690). The effect estimate for infliximab was 38% (95% CI 28-50), 36% (95% CI 30-43) for adalimumab, and 2% (95% CI 2-3) for certolizumab-pegol. The mean percentage of patients who needed an anti-TNF dose escalation was 23% with an annual risk of 18.5% per patient-year. There was no evidence of publication bias for incidence of LOR but not for the dose intensification (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, around one-third of CD patients experience a LOR and required dose intensification in primary anti-TNF-α responders.

Axial spondyloarthritis (Ax SpA) refers to chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases that mainly affect the axial skeleton, leading to erosions and new bone formation in the sacroiliac joints and/or the spine. Ax SpA includes the radiographic form of the disease, ie, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and the nonradiographic Ax SpA (non-Rx Ax SpA) forms. Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) agents are used in the treatment of Ax SpA in patients who do not respond to or are intolerant to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In these patients, anti-TNFα agents show promising results by targeting the inflammatory process and providing symptomatic relief. Golimumab is a fully human anti-TNFα agent that is currently approved for the treatment of both AS and non-Rx Ax SpA in Europe. This review focuses on the results of clinical trials with golimumab for the treatment of AS (GO-RAISE studies) and non-Rx Ax SpA (GO-AHEAD study) and on the effects of this agent on imaging findings (radiographic progression, magnetic resonance imaging inflammation) as well as on biological parameters. Overall, golimumab is a valid therapeutic option in patients with AS and non-Rx Ax SpA in Europe.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is a relatively rare complication in non-HIV patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment. Since the introduction of tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors cases of this complication have increased. We report the case of a 54-year-old, HIV-negative patient, who presented to our department with a long history of pustular psoriasis with poor response to traditional treatments. During the last admission he developed a severe flare that was unresponsive to cyclosporine, therefore infliximab was initiated. After the third dose he developed PCP that required admission to the intensive care unit, with a positive response to i.v. administration of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. During follow up a mutation in the IL36RN gene compatible with an IL-36RN deficiency was found and anakinra was started, with rapid improvement of his psoriasis. PCP is a severe complication in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy and is probably underreported by dermatologists. There are no clinical guidelines for PCP prophylaxis in dermatological patients who will receive immunosuppressive or biological treatments. We believe that it is necessary to report the cases of PCP to assess the real impact of this complication and develop appropriate prophylaxis guidelines.