BACKGROUND: Publications reveal different outcomes achieved by genetically knocking out a long non-coding microRNA-host-gene (lncMIRHG) versus the administration of pharma-cologic antagomirs specifically targeting the guide strand of such intragenic microRNA. This suggests that lncMIRHGs may perform diverse functions unrelated to their role as intragenic miRNA precursors.
OBJECTIVE: This review synthesizes in silico, in vitro, and in vivo findings from our lab and others to compare the effects of knocking out the long non-coding RNA MIR22HG, which hosts miR-22, versus administering pharmacological antagomirs targeting miR-22-3p.
METHODS: In silico analyses at the gene, pathway, and network levels reveal both distinct and overlapping targets of hsa-miR-22-3p and its host gene, MIR22HG. While pharmacological an-tagomirs targeting miR-22-3p consistently improve various metabolic parameters in cell culture and animal models across multiple studies, genetic knockout of MIR22HG yields inconsistent results among different research groups.
RESULTS: Additionally, MIR22HG functions as a circulating endogenous RNA (ceRNA) or \"sponge\" that simultaneously modulates multiple miRNA-mRNA interactions by competing for binding to several miRNAs.
CONCLUSIONS: From a therapeutic viewpoint, genetic inactivation of a lncMIRHG and pharmaco-logic antagonism of the guide strand of its related intragenic miRNA produce different results. This should be expected as lncMIRHGs play dual roles, both as lncRNA and as a source for primary miRNA transcripts.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in females and despite advances in treatment, it represents the leading cause of cancer mortality in women worldwide. Conventional therapeutic modalities have significantly improved the management of BC patients, but subtype heterogeneity, drug resistance, and tumor relapse remain the major factors to hamper the effectiveness of therapy for BC. In this scenario, miRNA(miR)-based therapeutics offer a very attractive area of study. However, the use of miR-based therapeutics for BC treatment still represents an underdeveloped topic. Therefore, this systematic review aims at summarizing current knowledge on promising miR-based therapeutics for BC exploring original articles focusing on in vivo experiments.
METHODS: The current systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and EMBASE databases were comprehensively explored to perform the article search.
RESULTS: Twenty-one eligible studies were included and analyzed: twelve focused on antitumor miR-based therapeutics and nine on metastatic miR-based therapeutics. We found 18 different miRs tested as potential therapeutic molecules in animal model experiments. About 90% of the selected studies evaluate the efficiency and the safety of miRs as therapeutic agents in triple-negative (TN)-BC mouse models. Among all founded miR-based therapeutics, miR-21 emerged to be the most investigated and proposed as a potential antitumoral molecule for TNBC treatment. Besides, miR-34a and miR-205a appeared to be successful antitumoral and antimetastatic molecules.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis provides a snapshot of the current scenario regarding the miRs as therapeutic molecules in BC. Nevertheless, despite many efforts, none of the selected studies goes beyond preclinical studies, and their translatability in the clinical practice seems quite premature.

AKI has a high mortality rate, may lead to chronic kidney disease, and effective therapies are lacking. Micro-RNAs (miRNAs) regulate biologic processes by potently inhibiting protein expression, and pre-clinical studies have explored their roles in AKI. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of miRNAs as therapeutics in pre-clinical AKI. Study screening, data extraction, and quality assessments were performed by 2 independent reviewers. Seventy studies involving 42 miRNA species were included in the analysis. All studies demonstrated significant effects of the miRNA intervention on kidney function and/or histology, with most implicating apoptosis and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) signaling. Fourteen studies (20.0%) examined the effect of miRNA-21 in AKI, and meta-analysis demonstrated significant increases in serum creatinine and kidney injury scores with miR-21 antagonism and pre-conditioning. No studies reported on adverse effects of miRNA therapy. Limitations also included lack of model diversity (100% rodents, 61.4% ischemia-reperfusion injury), and predominance of male sex (78.6%). Most studies had an unclear risk of bias, and the majority of miRNA-21 studies were conducted by a single team of investigators. In summary, several miRNAs target kidney function and apoptosis in pre-clinical AKI models, with data suggesting that miRNA-21 may mediate protection and kidney repair.Systematic review registration ID: CRD42019128854.

In the past few years, the paramount role of cancer stem cells (CSCs), in terms of cancer initiation, proliferation, metastasis, invasion and chemoresistance, has been revealed by accumulating studies. However, this level of cellular plasticity cannot be entirely explained by genetic mutations. Research on epigenetic modifications as a complementary explanation for the properties of CSCs has been increasing over the past several years. Notably, therapeutic strategies are currently being developed in an effort to reverse aberrant epigenetic alterations using specific chemical inhibitors. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of CSCs and their role in cancer progression, and provide an overview of epigenetic alterations seen in CSCs. Importantly, we focus on primary cancer therapies that target the epigenetic modification of CSCs by the use of specific chemical inhibitors, such as histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors and microRNA-based (miRNA-based) therapeutics.

Recently, manipulation of gene expression and switching genes on or off highlight the potential of nucleic acid-based therapies (NA-BTs). Alzheimer\'s Disease (AD) is a common devastating neurodegenerative disease (NDs) responsible for 60-80% of all cases of dementia and predicted as a main public health concern among aged populations. The aim of this study was to outline the current research in the field of NA-BTs for the treatment of AD disabilities, including strategies to suppress the memory and learning defects, to promote recovery processes, and to reinforce social relationships in these patients. This review was performed via evaluating PubMed reported studies from January 2010 to November 2019. Also, reference lists were checked to find additional studies. All intermediation or complementarity of animal models, case-control and cohort studies, and controlled trials (CTs) on specific NA-BTs to AD were acceptable, although in vitro studies were excluded due to the considerable diversities and heterogeneities. After removing the duplicates according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) instruction, we merged remaining titles across search databases. There are 48 ongoing studies related to the application of nucleic acids in the treatment and diagnosis of AD where more consideration is given to DNA targeting strategies (18 targets for vectors and aptamers), antisense oligonucleotides (10 targets), micro-RNAs mimics (7 targets), antagomiRs (6 targets), small interferences-RNAs (5 targets), as well as mRNAs (2 targets) respectively. All of these targets are grouped into 4 categories according to their role in molecular pathways where amyloid-β (18 targets), neural survival (11 targets), memory and cognition (8 targets), and tau (3 targets) are more targeted pathways, respectively. With recent successes in the systemic delivery of nucleic acids via intravenous injection; it is worth investing in the production of new-generation medicines. There are still several challenges for NA-BTs including, their delivery to the effective modulators, mass production at low cost, sustaining efficacy and minimizing off-target effects. Regarding miRNA-based therapies, given the obvious involvement of miRNAs in numerous facets of brain disease, and the many sophisticated techniques for delivery to the brain, miRNA-based therapies will make new hope for the treatment of neurological diseases such as AD.

MicroRNA (miRNA or miR) therapeutics in cancer are based on targeting or mimicking miRNAs involved in cancer onset, progression, angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis. Several studies conclusively have demonstrated that miRNAs are deeply involved in tumor onset and progression, either behaving as tumor-promoting miRNAs (oncomiRNAs and metastamiRNAs) or as tumor suppressor miRNAs. This review focuses on the most promising examples potentially leading to the development of anticancer, miRNA-based therapeutic protocols. The inhibition of miRNA activity can be readily achieved by the use of miRNA inhibitors and oligomers, including RNA, DNA and DNA analogues (miRNA antisense therapy), small molecule inhibitors, miRNA sponges or through miRNA masking. On the contrary, the enhancement of miRNA function (miRNA replacement therapy) can be achieved by the use of modified miRNA mimetics, such as plasmid or lentiviral vectors carrying miRNA sequences. Combination strategies have been recently developed based on the observation that i) the combined administration of different antagomiR molecules induces greater antitumor effects and ii) some anti-miR molecules can sensitize drug-resistant tumor cell lines to therapeutic drugs. In this review, we discuss two additional issues: i) the combination of miRNA replacement therapy with drug administration and ii) the combination of antagomiR and miRNA replacement therapy. One of the solid results emerging from different independent studies is that miRNA replacement therapy can enhance the antitumor effects of the antitumor drugs. The second important conclusion of the reviewed studies is that the combination of anti-miRNA and miRNA replacement strategies may lead to excellent results, in terms of antitumor effects.