Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y

吻合术, Roux - en - Y
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:高分辨率阻抗测压(HRIM)在接受Roux-en-Y(R-Y)吻合术的全胃切除术患者中的有效性尚未得到很好的验证。本研究旨在探讨食管内压力是否影响全胃切除术后R-Y吻合术患者的生活质量。
    方法:参与者包括2014年10月至2022年7月期间接受胃癌全胃切除术并接受术后HRIM检查的12例患者。分析HRIM数据与胃切除术后综合征评估量表-37(PGSAS-37)问卷之间的关联。
    结果:几乎所有患者的食管体动力正常。吻合形状(圆形吻合器和线性吻合器重叠方法)不影响食管内压力。吞咽引起的松弛过程中的综合松弛压和食管下括约肌(LES)残余压涉及“腹泻子量表”评分(分别为p=0.0244和p=0.0244)。胃切除术后症状不涉及平均最大代谢压。收缩前速度与消化不良亚表相关,“\”腹泻分量表,“”和“便秘子量表”(分别为p=0.0408,p=0.0143和p=0.0060)。远端潜伏期,即,从食管上括约肌松弛到收缩减速的时间,也与“腹痛分量表”相关(p=0.0399)。LES压力和食管体动力影响全胃切除术后患者的生活质量。
    结论:HRIM用于评估食管内压力对全胃切除术后R-Y重建食管空肠吻合术的功能评估是有用的。
    BACKGROUND: The usefulness of high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) in patients who underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y (R-Y) anastomosis has never been well validated. This study aimed to investigate whether intraesophageal pressure affects quality of life in patients who underwent total gastrectomy with R-Y anastomosis.
    METHODS: The participants comprised 12 patients who underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer between October 2014 and July 2022 and underwent a postsurgical HRIM examination. The association between the HRIM data and Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-37 (PGSAS-37) questionnaires was analyzed.
    RESULTS: Esophageal body motility was normal in almost all patients. The anastomosis shape (circular stapler and overlap method with linear stapler) did not influence intraesophageal pressure. The integrated relaxation pressure and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) residual pressure during swallowing-induced relaxation were involved in \"diarrhea subscale\" scores (p = 0.0244 and p = 0.0244, respectively). The average maximum intrabolus pressure was not involved in postgastrectomy symptom. The contractile front velocity correlated with the \"indigestion subscale,\" \"diarrhea subscale,\" and \"constipation subscale\" (p = 0.0408, p = 0.0143, and p = 0.0060, respectively). The distal latency, i.e., the time from upper esophageal sphincter relaxation to contractile deceleration, was also associated with the \"abdominal pain subscale\" (p = 0.0399). LES pressure and esophageal body motility affected patients\' quality of life after total gastrectomy.
    CONCLUSIONS: HRIM for the evaluation of intraesophageal pressure is useful for the functional assessment of esophagojejunostomy with the R-Y reconstruction after total gastrectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨腹腔镜近端胃切除术改良Kamikawa吻合术与腹腔镜全胃切除术Roux-en-Y吻合术的近期临床疗效。进行回顾性队列研究。收集2016年1月至2022年10月因食管胃结合部腺癌和胃上部腺癌行腹腔镜近端胃切除术的268例患者的临床病理资料。在268名患者中,26例行腹腔镜近端胃切除术加改良上川吻合术的患者分为Kamikawa组,242例行腹腔镜全胃切除术加Roux-en-Y吻合术的患者分为Roux-en-Y组。性别,年龄,BMI,术前白蛋白,肿瘤最大直径,组织学分级,对Kamikawa组和Roux-en-Y组患者的病理分期进行1:1的倾向评分匹配。匹配后,本研究分别纳入Kamikawa组和Roux-en-Y组的16例患者。结果测量:(1)术中情况。(2)术后恢复。(3)后续信息。病人的营养状况,通过门诊和电话随访对反流性食管炎和吻合口进行了调查。营养状况评估包括体重指数和营养风险筛查2002评分。(1)术中情况。所有患者均成功行腹腔镜近端胃切除术和全胃切除术。与Roux-en-Y组相比,上川组消化道重建时间为93.0(74.0-111.0)min。39.7(35.1-46.2)分钟,t=-2.001,P=0.055。,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组总手术时间及术中出血量比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)术后恢复。Kamikawa组与Roux-en-Y组首次肛门排气时间差异无统计学意义。术后第一次液体摄入时间,术后住院时间,术后并发症(P>0.05)。(3)后续信息。所有患者均获得随访。在手术后6个月和12个月时,Kamikawa组的BMI和NRS2002评分优于Roux-en-Y组,分别为22.9±3.0kg/m2和20.8±2.2kg/m2,t=2.165,P=0.038;23.1±3.0kg/m2vs.20.3±2.2kg/m2,t=3.022,P=0.005和2(1-2)2(1-3),Z=-2.585,P=0.010;2(1-2)vs.2(1-3),Z=-2.273,P=0.023。,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Kamikawa组与Roux-en-Y组术后6个月和12个月GERD量表评分及≥B级反流性食管炎发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后上消化道造影未发现所有患者吻合口狭窄。腹腔镜近端胃切除术联合改良上川吻合术治疗食管胃结合部及胃上段腺癌是安全可行的。并能达到良好的抗反流效果。此外,与传统腹腔镜全胃切除术相比,术后营养状况较好。
    To investigate the short-term clinical efficacy of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with modified Kamikawa anastomosis and laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 268 patients who underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction and upper gastric adenocarcinoma from January 2016 to October 2022 were collected. Among 268 patients, 26 underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with modified Kamikawa anastomosis were assigned to Kamikawa group and 242 underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis were assigned to Roux-en-Y group. The sex, age, BMI, preoperative albumin, maximum tumor diameter, histological grade, and pathological stage of patients in the Kamikawa group and the Roux-en-Y group were subjected to 1:1 propensity score matching. After matching, 16 patients in Kamikawa group and Roux-en-Y group were respectively included in this study. Outcome measures: (1) Intraoperative condition. (2) Postoperative recovery. (3) Follow-up information. The patients\' nutritional status, reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stoma were investigated by outpatient and telephone follow-up. Nutritional status assessment comprising body mass index and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 score. (1) Intraoperative condition. All patients successfully underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy. Compared with Roux-en-Y group, the digestive tract reconstruction time in Kamikawa group was longer 93.0(74.0-111.0)min vs. 39.7(35.1-46.2)min, t = -2.001, P = 0.055., and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in total operation time and intraoperative blood loss (P > 0.05). (2) Postoperative recovery. There was no statistically significant difference between Kamikawa group and Roux-en-Y group in first anal exhaust time, first postoperative liquid intake time, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative complications (P > 0.05). (3) Follow-up information. All patients were followed up. BMI and NRS 2002 scores in Kamikawa group were better than those in Roux-en-Y group at 6 and 12 months after surgery 22.9 ± 3.0 kg/m2 vs. 20.8 ± 2.2 kg/m2, t = 2.165, P = 0.038; 23.1 ± 3.0 kg/m2 vs. 20.3 ± 2.2 kg/m2, t = 3.022, P = 0.005 and 2 (1-2) vs. 2 (1-3), Z = -2.585, P = 0.010; 2 (1-2) vs. 2 (1-3), Z = -2.273, P = 0.023., the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in GERD scale score and occurrence of ≥ Grade B reflux esophagitis at 6 and 12 months after surgery between Kamikawa group and Roux-en-Y group (P > 0.05). Anastomotic stenosis was not found in all patients by postoperative upper gastrointestinal angiography. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with modified Kamikawa anastomosis is safe and feasible for the treatment of esophagogastric junction and upper gastric adenocarcinoma, and can achieve good anti-reflux effect. Besides, compared with traditional laparoscopic total gastrectomy, its postoperative nutritional status is better.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:根据日本胃癌治疗指南第5版,对于R0切除后能保留残胃远端一半的早期上胃癌患者,建议行近端胃切除术.然而,最近的大量临床研究表明,指南中的近端胃切除术的手术指征可能过于狭窄。因此,这项荟萃分析纳入了早期和晚期胃癌患者,并比较了两组的短期和长期术后结局.同时,我们只有高质量的临床研究,如倾向评分匹配研究和随机对照试验,这使得我们的研究更加真实可信。
    方法:数据来自PubMed,EMBASE,Medline,和截至2023年6月的Cochrane图书馆,包括近端胃切除术后双道重建术和全胃切除术后Roux-en-Y重建术的治疗结果。主要结果是早期并发症(吻合口漏,吻合口出血,腹部脓肿,腹腔感染,肺部感染,切口感染,肠梗阻,倾倒综合征,胰腺瘘),晚期并发症(肠梗阻,吻合口狭窄,倾倒综合征,再操作,内疝,内镜下胃食管反流的发生率),严重并发症(≥III级C-D评分),生活质量[胃食管反流症状评估(Visick评分)(≥III),洛杉矶分类(C或D)],营养状况(血红蛋白,收到维生素B12补充剂),肿瘤学结果(5年总生存率)。次要结果是手术结果(手术时间,估计失血,术后住院时间,收集的淋巴结数量,气体通过,术后死亡率)。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估纳入研究的质量。
    结果:筛选后,最终纳入了11项研究,包括1154名患者。综合文献结果显示,全胃切除术在平均手术时间上优于近端胃切除术双道重建术(MD=4.92,95%CI:0.22~9.61P=0.04)。然而,荟萃分析结果显示,近端胃双道重建组的血红蛋白(MD=7.12,95%CI:2.40~11.84,P=0.003)和补充维生素B12(OR=0.12,95%CI:0.05~0.26,P<0.00001)优于全胃切除术Roux-en-Y重建组。近端胃切除双道重建术与全胃切除术Roux-en-Y重建术组早期并发症比较差异无统计学意义(OR=1.14,95%CI:0.79~1.64,P=0.50)。晚期并发症(OR=1.37,95%CI:0.78~2.39,P=0.27),胃食管反流症状评估(Visick评分)(≥III)(OR=0.94,95%CI:0.14~1.07P=0.07),洛杉矶分类(C或D)(OR=0.33,95%CI:0.01~8.21,P=0.50),5年总生存率(HR=1.01,95%CI:0.83~1.23,P=0.89)。
    结论:近端胃切除双道吻合术是治疗胃上部癌安全可行的方法。然而,与Roux-en-Y组的全胃切除术相比,双道近端胃切除术组的手术时间稍长.两组在严重并发症(≥Ⅲ级C-D评分)方面与Roux-en-Y组全胃切除术相当,早期并发症,晚期并发症,和生活质量。尽管近端胃切除术的范围小于全胃切除术,它不影响5年生存率,提示患者肿瘤预后良好。与Roux-en-Y组全胃切除术相比,双道重建近端胃切除术的血红蛋白水平较高,补充维生素B12的可能性较低,且远期疗效较好。总之,近端胃切除双道重建术被认为是较合理的手术方式之一。
    BACKGROUND: According to the 5th edition of the Japanese Guidelines for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer, proximal gastrectomy is recommended for patients with early upper gastric cancer who can retain the distal half of the residual stomach after R0 resection. However, a large number of recent clinical studies suggest that surgical indications for proximal gastrectomy in the guidelines may be too narrow. Therefore, this meta-analysis included patients with early and advanced gastric cancer and compared short- and long-term postoperative outcomes between the two groups. At the same time, we only had high-quality clinical studies such as propensity score-matched studies and randomized controlled trials, which made our research more authentic and credible.
    METHODS: Data were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library up to June 2023, and included treatment outcomes after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. The primary results were Early-phase complications(Anastomotic leakage, Anastomotic bleeding, Abdominal abscess, Abdominal infection, Pulmonary infection, Incision infection, Intestinal obstruction, Dumping syndrome, Pancreatic fistula), Late-phase complications(Intestinal obstruction, Anastomosis stricture, Dumping syndrome, Reoperation, Internal hernia, Incidence of endoscopic gastroesophageal reflux), Serious complications (≥ Grade III C-D score), Quality of life[Gastroesophageal reflux symptom evaluation (Visick score)(≥ III), Los Angeles classification(C or D)], Nutritional status(Hemoglobin, Receipt of vitamin B12 supplementation), Oncologic Outcomes(The 5-year overall survival rates). Secondary outcomes were surgical outcomes (Operative time, Estimated blood loss, Postoperative hospital stay, Number of harvested lymph nodes, Gas-passing, Postoperative mortality).The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Newcastle‒Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality of the included studies.
    RESULTS: After screening, 11 studies were finally included, including 1154 patients. Results from the combined literature showed that total gastrectomy had a significant advantage over proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in mean operating time (MD = 4.92, 95% CI: 0.22∼9.61 P = 0.04). However, meta-analysis results showed that Hemoglobin (MD = 7.12, 95% CI:2.40∼11.84, P = 0.003) and Receipt of vitamin B12 supplementation (OR = 0.12, 95% CI:0.05∼0.26, P < 0.00001) in the proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction group were better than those in the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction group. There is no significant difference between the proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction group in Early-phase complications(OR = 1.14,95% CI:0.79∼1.64, P = 0.50), Late-phase complications(OR = 1.37,95% CI:0.78∼2.39, P = 0.27), Gastroesophageal reflux symptom evaluation (Visick score)(≥ III)(OR = 0.94,95% CI:0.14∼1.07 P = 0.07), Los Angeles classification(C or D)(OR = 0.33,95% CI:0.01∼8.21, P = 0.50), the 5-year overall survival rates (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.83 ~ 1.23, P = 0.89).
    CONCLUSIONS: Proximal gastrectomy with double-tract anastomosis is a safe and feasible treatment for upper gastric carcinoma. However, the operating time was slightly longer in the proximal gastrectomy with double-tract group compared to the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y group. The two groups were comparable to the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y group in terms of serious complications (≥ Grade III C-D score), early-phase complications, late-phase complications, and quality of life. Although the scope of proximal gastrectomy is smaller than that of total gastrectomy, it does not affect the 5-year survival rate, indicating good tumor outcomes for patients. Compared to total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y group, proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction had higher hemoglobin levels, lower probability of vitamin B12 supplementation, and better long-term efficacy. In conclusion, proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction is considered one of the more rational surgical approaches for upper gastric cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Published Erratum
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹腔镜近端胃切除术双瓣技术(LPG-DFT)重建技术近年来已被用于近端早期胃癌。然而,其可行性和安全性仍不确定,因为只有少数回顾性研究包含术后并发症和长期生存数据.LPG-DFT用于近端早期胃癌的研究尚处于早期阶段。大规模,前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT)对于评估LPG-DFT对近端早期胃癌的价值是必要的.
    方法:这项研究是一个多中心,prospective,开放标签,RCT研究LPG-DFT与腹腔镜全胃切除术联合Roux-en-Y(LTG-RY)重建治疗近端早期胃癌的抗反流作用。共有216名符合条件的患者将被随机分配到LPG-DFT组或LTG-RY组,比例为1:1,使用中央,动态分层区组随机化方法,如果符合纳入标准。一般和临床数据将在患者参加研究时收集,并在其医疗和随访途径的每个阶段与患者保持同步。主要终点是术后12个月内反流性食管炎(洛杉矶B级或以上)患者的比例。次要终点包括术中结果,术后恢复,术后疼痛评估,病理结果,术后生活质量,术后营养状况,发病率和死亡率,和肿瘤结局(3年总生存率(OS),3年无病生存期(DFS),5年DFS和5年OS)。
    背景:该方案于2022年9月28日获得中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院伦理委员会批准(注册号:SYSKY-2022-276-02)。我们将在国际同行评审期刊上报告正面和负面的发现。
    背景:NCT05890339。
    BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double flap technique (LPG-DFT) reconstruction has been used for proximal early gastric cancer in recent years. However, its feasibility and safety remain uncertain, as only a few retrospective studies have contained postoperative complications and long-term survival data. LPG-DFT for proximal early gastric cancer is still in the early stages of research. Large-scale, prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are necessary to assess the value of LPG-DFT for proximal early gastric cancer.
    METHODS: This study is a multicentre, prospective, open-label, RCT that investigates the antireflux effect of LPG-DFT compared with laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y (LTG-RY) reconstruction for proximal early gastric cancer. A total of 216 eligible patients will be randomly assigned to the LPG-DFT group or the LTG-RY group at a 1:1 ratio using a central, dynamic and stratified block randomisation method, if inclusion criteria are met. General and clinical data will be collected when the patient is enrolled in the study and keep pace with the patient at each stage of his medical and follow-up pathway. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with reflux esophagitis (Los Angeles Grade B or more) within 12 months postoperatively. The secondary endpoints included intraoperative outcomes, postoperative recovery, postoperative pain assessment, pathological outcomes, postoperative quality of life, postoperative nutrition status, morbidity and mortality rate, and oncological outcomes (3-year overall survival (OS), 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), 5-year DFS and 5-year OS).
    BACKGROUND: The protocol is approved by the Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University ethics committee (registration number: SYSKY-2022-276-02) on 28 September 2022.We will report the positive as well as negative findings in international peer-reviewed journals.
    BACKGROUND: NCT05890339.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:胰十二指肠切除术是一种复杂的腹腔内手术,用于治疗胰头或壶腹周围区域的良性和恶性疾病。尽管外科技术有了发展,胰十二指肠切除术的术后并发症发生率仍然很高。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较孤立的Roux-en-Y胰肠吻合术(IRYPJ)的手术结果,和常规胰肠吻合术(CPJ)。
    方法:我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)声明的首选报告项目进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。我们搜索了以下电子数据库——PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,Cochrane中央对照试验登记册(中央),和临床试验。评估了比较胰十二指肠切除术后IRYPJ和CPJ的疗效和安全性的已发表试验。搜索词是“胰十二指肠切除术,\"\"Whipple,保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术,\"\"胰肠吻合术,\"\"Roux-en-Y,“和”孤立的Roux环胰空肠吻合术。“仅包括比较胰十二指肠切除术后IRYPJ和CPJ结果的随机对照试验。分析结果测量为术后胰瘘(POPF),临床相关POPF(CR-POPF),胆漏和胃排空延迟(DGE)。
    结果:初步检索得出342个结果,但只有4个随机对照试验符合纳入标准,纳入数据综合和荟萃分析。POPF的Meta分析显示,与CPJ相比,IRYPJ与较少的POPF相关,但差异无统计学意义(风险比=0.58,p=0.56)。CR-POPF(风险比=0.17,p=0.87)和DGE(风险比=0.74,p=0.46)也观察到类似的发现。
    结论:与CPJ相比,孤立的Roux-en-Y胰肠吻合术与更好的结局无关。
    BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complex intra-abdominal operation used for the treatment of benign and malignant disease of the pancreatic head or periampullary region. Despite developments in surgical techniques, pancreaticoduodenectomy is still associated with high rate of postoperative complications. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the surgical outcomes of isolated Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy (IRYPJ), and conventional pancreaticojejunostomy(CPJ).
    METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. We searched the following electronic databases - PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinical-Trials.gov. Published trials comparing the efficacy and safety of IRYPJ and CPJ after pancreaticoduodenectomy were evaluated. The search terms were \"pancreaticoduodenectomy,\" \"Whipple,\" \"pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy,\" \"pancreaticojejunostomy,\" \"Roux-en-Y,\" and \"isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy.\" Only randomised controlled trials comparing outcome of IRYPJ and CPJ after pancreaticoduodenectomy were included. The analysed outcome measures were postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF), bile leak and delayed gastric emptying (DGE).
    RESULTS: The initial search yielded 342 results but only four randomised control trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included for data synthesis and meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of POPF revealed that IRYPJ is associated with less POPF compared to CPJ but the difference was not statistically significant (risk ratio = 0.58, p = 0.56). A similar finding was also observed with CR-POPF (risk ratio = 0.17, p = 0.87) and DGE (risk ratio = 0.74, p = 0.46).
    CONCLUSIONS: Isolated Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy is not associated with a superior outcome when compared to CPJ.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是探讨双道重建术对短期临床结果的影响,通过与食管胃吻合术和Roux-en-Y重建全胃切除术比较,可以改善近端胃切除术后患者的生活质量和营养状况。
    方法:接受双路重建术(DTR)的患者的临床资料,食管胃造口术(EG),回顾性收集了2020年5月至2022年5月的全胃切除术和Roux-en-Y重建术(TG-RY).临床特点,短期手术结果,比较三组患者术后生活质量和营养状况。
    结果:与DTR组相比,TG组手术时间明显缩短(200(180,240)分钟vs.230(210,255)分钟,p<0.01),和更多的淋巴结被删除(28(22,25)与22(19.31),p<0.01),术中失血量无显著差异,第一次排气时间,术后住院时间及术后并发症发生率。DTR组36例患者完成术后消化道造影,其中21人(58.3%)显示双道型食物通过。DTR组术后反流症状发生率为9.2%,EG组为43.8%,TG组为23.2%,分别为(P<0.01)。EORTCQLQ-STO22问卷调查显示,与EG组相比,DTR组有较少的反流症状(P<0.05),焦虑症状较少(P<0.05),吞咽症状较多(P<0.05)。与TG组相比,DTR组有较少的反流症状(P<0.05)。两组之间无其他显著性差异。与TG组和EG组相比,DTR能较好地维持术后BMI,在血红蛋白和白蛋白方面,三组之间没有统计学差异。
    结论:尽管部分双束重建方法并不总能确保食物如预期的那样沿着两条途径进入远端空肠,它仍然显示令人满意的抗反流效果。此外,与胃食管吻合术和Roux-en-Y重建全胃切除术相比,它可以改善患者的生活质量并保持更好的营养状况。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of double-tract reconstruction on short-term clinical outcome, quality of life and nutritional status of patients after proximal gastrectomy by comparing with esophagogastrostomy and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction.
    METHODS: The clinical data of patients who underwent double tract reconstruction (DTR), esophagogastrostomy (EG), total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (TG-RY) were retrospectively collected from May 2020 to May 2022. The clinical characteristics, short-term surgical outcomes, postoperative quality of life and nutritional status were compared among the three groups.
    RESULTS: Compared with the DTR group, the operation time in the TG group was significantly shorter (200(180,240) minutes vs. 230(210,255) minutes, p < 0.01), and more lymph nodes were removed (28(22, 25) vs. 22(19.31), p < 0.01), there were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, first flatus time, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complication rate among the three groups. Postoperative digestive tract angiography was completed in 36 patients in the DTR group, of which 21 (58.3%) showed double-tract type of food passing. The incidence of postoperative reflux symptoms was 9.2% in the DTR group, 43.8% in the EG group and 23.2% in the TG group, repectively (P < 0.01). EORTCQLQ-STO22 questionnaire survey showed that compared with EG group, DTR group had fewer reflux symptoms (P < 0.05), fewer anxiety symptoms (P < 0.05) and more swallowing symptoms (P < 0.05). Compared with TG group, DTR group had fewer reflux symptoms (P < 0.05). There were no other significant differences between the two groups. Compared with TG group and EG group, DTR can better maintain postoperative BMI, and there is no statistical difference between the three groups in terms of hemoglobin and albumin.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although partial double-tract reconstruction approach does not always ensure food to enter the distal jejunum along the two pathways as expected, it still shows satisfactory anti-reflux effect. Moreover, it might improve patients\' quality of life and maintain better nutritional status comparing with gastroesophageal anastomosis and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    胆囊切除术相关的医源性胆道损伤引起复杂的术后并发症,可显著影响患者的生活,常导致慢性肝病和胆道狭窄。这些患者需要放射科医生的多学科干预,内镜医师和外科医生在肝胆重建方面经验丰富。症状从无症状到黄疸,瘙痒和上行性胆管炎。治疗胆道狭窄的最佳策略是基于最佳的术前计划。我们的患者在胆囊切除术中引起医源性病变1年后出现,并通过Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术进行了复杂的胆总管重建。胆道的三维(3D)模型重建在患者的手术计划中至关重要,在整个手术过程中提供额外的术前和术中辅助。3D模型描述了胆管和肝门血管结构之间的详细空间关系,从而可以进行正确的手术解剖和安全的吻合。
    Cholecystectomy-related iatrogenic biliary injuries cause intricate postoperative complications that can significantly affect a patient\'s life, often leading to chronic liver disease and biliary stenosis. These patients require a multidisciplinary approach with intervention from radiologists, endoscopists and surgeons experienced in hepatobiliary reconstruction. Symptoms vary from none to jaundice, pruritus and ascending cholangitis. The best strategy for the management of biliary stricture is based on optimal preoperative planning. Our patient presented 1 year after an iatrogenic lesion was induced during a cholecystectomy, and was managed with a complex common bile duct reconstruction through a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. The three-dimensional (3D) model reconstruction of the biliary tract was pivotal in the planning of the patient\'s surgery, providing additional preoperative and intraoperative assistance throughout the procedure. The 3D model\'s description of detailed spatial relations between the bile duct and the vascular structure in the liver hilum enabled a correct surgical dissection and safe execution of the anastomosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号