BACKGROUND: Iloprost has been proposed as an alternative to amputation in Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) patients when revascularization was unsuccessful or not possible. Nonetheless, there is limited evidence of its benefit. The main objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of iloprost and the secondary objective was to evaluate its safety.
METHODS: In this cohort study including CLI patients from the COPART registry from 2006/10 to 2021/01, patients exposed to iloprost were matched with up to three unexposed patients according to age, sex, and Propensity Score (PS) for exposure to iloprost. The main outcome combined the occurrence of all-cause death and major amputations; survival was assessed over one-year using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox model analyses. Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) were chosen as the safety outcome; the association with iloprost was estimated using a logistic regression model.
RESULTS: Among 1850 CLI patients, 201 were exposed to iloprost (71.6% men; median age: 72 years vs. 72.1%; 75 years for unexposed). In 134 exposed patients matched to 375 unexposed patients, 14 major amputations and 24 deaths occurred in exposed patients (28.4%) vs. 33 and 46 respectively in the unexposed patients (20.9%). The hazard ratio (HR) was of 1.49 (95% Confidence Interval: 1.01-2.20). The association remained in the subgroup of \"no option\" patients (HR: 1.74; [1.01-2.20]). Regarding safety, 21/201 (10.7%) exposed patients experienced MACE vs. 146/1649 (9.41%) unexposed patients (unadjusted Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.17 [0.72-1.90]; adjusted OR: 1.23 [0.72-2.11]).
CONCLUSIONS: The study did not find any benefit of iloprost in CLI patients and even suggested a deleterious effect.

UNASSIGNED: The aim was to assess the prognostic impact of perfusion assessments including ankle-brachial Index (ABI) and toe-brachial Index (TBI) on survival of patients who present with diabetic foot ulceration and to analyse clinical outcomes when patients are categorised into three levels of limb ischaemia.
UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients presenting with foot ulceration. Patients continued with their standard of care, after having baseline assessments of limb perfusion. Patients were retrospectively categorised into three groups according to baseline ABI and TBI: Group 1 (n=31) non-ischaemic (TBI≥0.75, ABI≥0.9), Group 2 (n=67) isolated low TBI with foot ischaemia (TBI<0.75, ABI≥0.90) and Group 3 (n=30) foot-leg ischaemia (TBI<0.75, ABI<0.90).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 128 patients took part in the study. Low TBI was associated with a significant decrease in patient survival (42±20 versus 51±16 months, p=0.011). There was a progressive and significant decline in mean patient survival time (51±16 versus 44±20 versus 39±22 months, respectively, for ANOVA across the three groups, p=0.04). Patients with isolated low TBI had angioplasty and bypass at a rate similar to that of patients in Group 3 (low ABI and low TBI). The proportion of angioplasties was significantly higher in the isolated low TBI (19.4% (13/67) versus the non-ischaemic 3.2% (1/31), p=0.033). Such revascularisation resulted in ulcer healing within the foot ischaemic group that was similar to the non-ischaemic group (68% versus 60% over 12 months, p=0.454).
UNASSIGNED: Regardless of ABI level, measurement of TBI identifies patients with isolated low TBI who require specialised care pathways and revascularisation to achieve ulcer healing that is similar to non-ischaemic patients.

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) represents the most severe form of peripheral artery disease and has a large impact on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Interventions are aimed at improving tissue perfusion and averting amputation and secondary cardiovascular complications with an optimal risk-benefit ratio. Several prediction models regarding postprocedural outcomes in CLTI patients have been developed on the basis of randomized controlled trials to improve clinical decision-making. We aimed to determine model performance in predicting clinical outcomes in selected CLTI cohorts.
This study validated the Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL), Finland National Vascular registry (FINNVASC), and Prevention of Infrainguinal Vein Graft Failure (PREVENT III) models in data sets from a peripheral artery disease registry study (Athero-Express) and two randomized controlled trials of CLTI in The Netherlands, Rejuvenating Endothelial Progenitor Cells via Transcutaneous Intra-arterial Supplementation (JUVENTAS) and Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Drug-eluting Stents for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Critical Limb Ischemia (PADI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to calculate their predictive capacity. The primary outcome was amputation-free survival (AFS); secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and amputation at 12 months after intervention.
The BASIL and PREVENT III models showed predictive values regarding postintervention mortality in the JUVENTAS cohort with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 81% and 70%, respectively. Prediction of AFS was poor to fair (AUC, 0.60-0.71) for all models in each population, with the highest predictive value of 71% for the BASIL model in the JUVENTAS population. The FINNVASC model showed the highest predictive value regarding amputation risk in the PADI population with AUC of 78% at 12 months.
In general, all models performed poor to fair in predicting mortality and amputation. Because the BASIL model performed best in predicting AFS, we propose use of the BASIL model to aid in the clinical decision-making process in CLTI. However, improvements in performance have to be made for any of these models to be of real additional value in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between surgical reconstruction and endovascular therapy (EVT) for critical limb ischemia (CLI) in today\'s real-world settings.
RESULTS: This multicenter, prospective, observational study registered and followed 548 Japanese CLI patients. The registration was in advance of revascularization; 197 patients were scheduled to receive surgical reconstruction, and the remaining 351 were scheduled to receive EVT. The primary end point was 3-year amputation-free survival, compared between the 2 treatments in an intention-to-treat manner, using propensity score matching. Interaction analysis was additionally performed to explore which subgroups had better outcomes with surgical reconstruction or EVT. After propensity score matching, the 3-year amputation-free survival was not significantly different between the 2 groups (52% [95% confidence interval, 43%-60%] and 52% [95% confidence interval, 44-60%]; P=0.26). Subsequent interaction analysis identified (1) Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification W-3, (2) fI-2/3, (3) history of ipsilateral minor amputation, (4) history of revascularization after CLI onset, and (5) bilateral CLI as the factors more favorable for surgical reconstruction, whereas (1) diabetes mellitus, (2) renal failure, (3) anemia, (4) history of nonadherence to cardiovascular risk management, and (5) contralateral major amputation were as those less favorable for surgical reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3-year amputation-free survival was not different between surgical reconstruction and EVT in the overall CLI population. The subsequent interaction analysis suggested that there would be a subgroup more suited for surgical reconstruction and another benefiting more from EVT.
BACKGROUND: URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/. Unique identifier: UMIN000007050.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to investigate the 3-year follow-up results of OLIVE registry patients.
BACKGROUND: Although favorable 12-month clinical outcomes after endovascular therapy (EVT) in OLIVE registry patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) from infrainguinal disease have been reported, long-term results after EVT remain unknown.
METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter registry study that consecutively enrolled patients who received infrainguinal EVT for CLI. The primary outcome was 3-year amputation-free survival (AFS), whereas secondary outcome measures were 3-year freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE), wound-free survival, and wound recurrence rate. Prognostic predictors for each outcome were also elucidated by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis or the log-rank test.
RESULTS: The completion rate of 3-year follow-up was 95%. Three-year AFS, freedom from MALE, and wound-free survival rates were 55.2%, 84.0%, and 49.6%, respectively. Wound recurrence out to 3 years was 43.9%. After multivariable analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.43, p = 0.001), body mass index ≤18.5 (HR: 2.17, p = 0.001), dialysis (HR: 2.91, p < 0.001), and Rutherford 6 (HR: 1.64, p = 0.047) were identified as predictors of 3-year major amputation or death. Statin use (HR: 0.28, p = 0.02), Rutherford 6 (HR: 2.40, p = 0.02), straight-line flow to the foot (HR: 0.27, p = 0.001), and heart failure (HR: 1.96, p = 0.04) were identified as 3-year MALE predictors. Finally, CLI due to isolated below-the-knee lesion was a wound recurrence predictor (HR: 4.28, p ≤ 0.001). Three-year survival, freedom from major amputation, and reintervention rates were 63.0%, 87.9%, and 43.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: In CLI patients with infrainguinal lesions, 3-year clinical results of EVT were reasonable despite high reintervention and moderate ulcer recurrence rate. (A Prospective, Multi-Center, Three-Year Follow-Up Study on Endovascular Treatment for Infra-Inguinal Vessel in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia [OLIVE 3-Year Follow-Up Study]; UMIN000014759).