Aged, 80 and over

80 岁及以上
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:右心室损害在接受经导管边缘到边缘修复治疗继发性二尖瓣返流(SMR)的患者中很常见。这些患者对指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)的依从性较差。
    目的:本研究的目的是评估GDMT对该患者队列长期生存的影响。
    方法:在EuroSMR(经导管修复继发性二尖瓣反流的欧洲注册中心)国际注册中,我们选择了SMR和右心室损害(三尖瓣环平面收缩期偏移≤17mm和/或超声心动图右心室-肺动脉耦合<0.40mm/mmHg)的患者.滴定的指南指导药物治疗(GDMTtit)被定义为3种药物的共同处方,在最近的随访中至少占目标剂量的一半。主要结果是6年全因死亡率。
    结果:在1,213例SMR和右心室损害患者中,852有关于药物治疗的完整数据。使用GDMTtit的123例患者的长期生存率明显高于未使用GDMTtit的729例患者(61.8%vs36.0%;P<0.00001)。倾向评分匹配分析证实GDMTtit与更高生存率之间存在显著关联(61.0%vs43.1%;P=0.018)。GDMTtit是全因死亡率的独立预测因子(HR:0.61;95%CI:0.39-0.93;GDMTtit患者与未GDMTtit患者的P=0.02)。在分析的所有亚组中证实了其与更好结果的关联。
    结论:在接受经导管边缘到边缘修复SMR的右心室损害患者中,将GDMT滴定至目标剂量的至少一半与长达6年的全因死亡风险降低40%相关,并且应独立于合并症进行。
    BACKGROUND: Right ventricular impairment is common among patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). Adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure is poor in these patients.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of GDMT on long-term survival in this patient cohort.
    METHODS: Within the EuroSMR (European Registry of Transcatheter Repair for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation) international registry, we selected patients with SMR and right ventricular impairment (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion ≤17 mm and/or echocardiographic right ventricular-to-pulmonary artery coupling <0.40 mm/mm Hg). Titrated guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMTtit) was defined as a coprescription of 3 drug classes with at least one-half of the target dose at the latest follow-up. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 6 years.
    RESULTS: Among 1,213 patients with SMR and right ventricular impairment, 852 had complete data on medical therapy. The 123 patients who were on GDMTtit showed a significantly higher long-term survival vs the 729 patients not on GDMTtit (61.8% vs 36.0%; P < 0.00001). Propensity score-matched analysis confirmed a significant association between GDMTtit and higher survival (61.0% vs 43.1%; P = 0.018). GDMTtit was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.39-0.93; P = 0.02 for patients on GDMTtit vs those not on GDMTtit). Its association with better outcomes was confirmed among all subgroups analyzed.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with right ventricular impairment undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for SMR, titration of GDMT to at least one-half of the target dose is associated with a 40% lower risk of all-cause death up to 6 years and should be pursued independent of comorbidities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估血液病下一代测序(NGS)小组使用第5版WHO淋巴样肿瘤分类(WHO-HAEM5)和国际共识分类(ICC)来增强髓系肿瘤(MN)的诊断和分类。根据WHO分类(WHO-HAEM4R)的修订第四版,对112例诊断为MN的患者进行了141基因NGS小组的血液病测试。还进行了辅助研究,包括骨髓细胞形态学和常规细胞遗传学。然后根据WHO-HAEM5和ICC对病例进行重新分类,以评估这两种分类的实际影响。急性髓系白血病(AML)的突变检出率为93%,89%为骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS),94%为骨髓增殖性肿瘤(MPN),100%用于骨髓增生异常/骨髓增殖性肿瘤(MDS/MPN)(WHO-HAEM4R)。NGS为26名和29名WHO-HAEM5和ICC患者提供了分类信息,分别。在MPN中,NGS通过检测JAK2、MPL、或者CALR突变,而13例“三阴性”MPN病例显示至少1例突变。血液系统疾病的NGS小组检测提高了MN的诊断和分类。当诊断为ICC时,NGS比WHO-HAEM5产生更多的分类亚型信息。
    This study aimed to assess hematological diseases next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel enhances the diagnosis and classification of myeloid neoplasms (MN) using the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of Myeloid Tumors. A cohort of 112 patients diagnosed with MN according to the revised fourth edition of the WHO classification (WHO-HAEM4R) underwent testing with a 141-gene NGS panel for hematological diseases. Ancillary studies were also conducted, including bone marrow cytomorphology and routine cytogenetics. The cases were then reclassified according to WHO-HAEM5 and ICC to assess the practical impact of these 2 classifications. The mutation detection rates were 93% for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 89% for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), 94% for myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), and 100% for myelodysplasia/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) (WHO-HAEM4R). NGS provided subclassified information for 26 and 29 patients with WHO-HAEM5 and ICC, respectively. In MPN, NGS confirmed diagnoses in 16 cases by detecting JAK2, MPL, or CALR mutations, whereas 13 \"triple-negative\" MPN cases revealed at least 1 mutation. NGS panel testing for hematological diseases improves the diagnosis and classification of MN. When diagnosed with ICC, NGS produces more classification subtype information than WHO-HAEM5.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:了解骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)和AML的遗传易感性对治疗决策具有重要的临床意义,监视,和照顾有风险的亲戚。国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南最近纳入了根据个人和家族史特征对MDS/AML患者进行种系遗传评估的建议。但是尚未研究实施这些建议的实用性。
    方法:成立了遗传性血液学质量改善(QI)委员会,以在诊断为MDS/AML的患者的前瞻性队列中实施这些指南。对于符合NCCN指南标准的患者,建议转诊进行种系基因检测。将转诊模式和遗传评估结果与MDS/AML患者的历史队列进行比较。确定了评估的障碍。
    结果:在QI委员会评估的90例MDS/AML患者中,59(66%)符合种系评估标准。QI委员会的实施导致根据NCCN指南(31%v14%,P=.03)。然而,在QI委员会提出建议时,大多数符合标准的患者从未因医学敏锐度高或死亡或临终关怀而被转诊.尽管如此,接受基因检测的12例患者中有2例(17%)被诊断为遗传性髓系恶性肿瘤综合征.
    结论:目前的NCCN指南导致三分之二的MDS/AML患者符合种系评估标准。以遗传性血液学为重点的QI委员会为初步实施提供了帮助,并适度改善了NCCN指南的依从性。然而,与MDS/AML相关的高发病率和高死亡率以及住院时间延长对传统的门诊遗传咨询模式提出了挑战.指南依从性的进一步改善需要为该患者群体创新遗传咨询和测试的新模式。
    OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of an inherited predisposition to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and AML has important clinical implications for treatment decisions, surveillance, and care of at-risk relatives. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recently incorporated recommendations for germline genetic evaluation of patients with MDS/AML on the basis of personal and family history features, but the practicality of implementing these recommendations has not been studied.
    METHODS: A hereditary hematology quality improvement (QI) committee was formed to implement these guidelines in a prospective cohort of patients diagnosed with MDS/AML. Referral for germline genetic testing was recommended for patients meeting NCCN guideline criteria. Referral patterns and genetic evaluation outcomes were compared with a historical cohort of patients with MDS/AML. Barriers to evaluation were identified.
    RESULTS: Of the 90 patients with MDS/AML evaluated by the QI committee, 59 (66%) met criteria for germline evaluation. Implementation of the QI committee led to more referrals for germline evaluation in accordance with NCCN guidelines (31% v 14%, P = .03). However, the majority of those meeting criteria were never referred due to high medical acuity or being deceased or in hospice at the time of QI committee recommendations. Despite this, two (17%) of the 12 patients undergoing genetic testing were diagnosed with a hereditary myeloid malignancy syndrome.
    CONCLUSIONS: Current NCCN guidelines resulted in two thirds of patients with MDS/AML meeting criteria for germline evaluation. A hereditary hematology-focused QI committee aided initial implementation and modestly improved NCCN guideline adherence. However, the high morbidity and mortality and prolonged inpatient stays associated with MDS/AML challenged traditional outpatient genetic counseling models. Further improvements in guideline adherence require innovating new models of genetic counseling and testing for this patient population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景技术腹膜透析(PD)作为终末期肾病(ESRD)患者的关键肾脏替代疗法。利用腹膜进行液体和物质交换。尽管有效,PD因腹膜炎等并发症而受损,这显著影响了患者的预后。我们的报告的新颖性在于介绍了由2种异常病原体引起的罕见PD相关性腹膜炎病例,强调严格的感染控制措施的重要性。病例报告我们报告了一名80岁的非洲裔美国女性ESRD患者,他在8个月内两次因非复发性腹膜炎发作入院。这些事件归因于罕见病原体反硝化嗜酸性杆菌/木氧杆菌和耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌。尽管每次发作都有类似的症状,如腹痛和浑浊的透析流出物,这些罕见细菌的存在凸显了治疗与PD相关感染的复杂挑战.治疗策略包括靶向抗生素治疗,通过敏感性测试确定。值得注意的是,移除PD导管的决定遵循广泛的患者教育,确保患者理解这种方法背后的基本原理。这关键的一步,随着随后转向血液透析,是解决感染的关键,说明患者参与复杂PD相关感染管理的重要性。结论该病例强调了治疗PD相关腹膜炎的复杂性,特别是不常见和耐药的细菌。它强调了严格的感染控制措施的重要性,需要考虑非典型病原体,以及患者参与治疗决策的关键作用。我们的见解主张采取更明智的方法来处理此类感染,旨在降低发病率并改善患者预后。对复发性腹膜炎和治疗策略的文献检查为有效地导航这些具有挑战性的病例提供了关键观点。
    BACKGROUND Peritoneal dialysis (PD) serves as a critical renal replacement therapy for individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), leveraging the peritoneum for fluid and substance exchange. Despite its effectiveness, PD is marred by complications such as peritonitis, which significantly impacts patient outcomes. The novelty of our report lies in the presentation of a rare case of PD-associated peritonitis caused by 2 unusual pathogens, emphasizing the importance of rigorous infection control measures. CASE REPORT We report on an 80-year-old African-American female patient with ESRD undergoing PD, who was admitted twice within 8 months for non-recurring episodes of peritonitis. These episodes were attributed to the rare pathogens Achromobacter denitrificans/xylosoxidans and Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Despite presenting with similar symptoms during each episode, such as abdominal pain and turbid dialysis effluent, the presence of these uncommon bacteria highlights the intricate challenges in managing infections associated with PD. The treatment strategy encompassed targeted antibiotic therapy, determined through susceptibility testing. Notably, the decision to remove the PD catheter followed extensive patient education, ensuring the patient comprehended the rationale behind this approach. This crucial step, along with the subsequent shift to hemodialysis, was pivotal in resolving the infection, illustrating the importance of patient involvement in the management of complex PD-related infections. CONCLUSIONS This case underscores the complexities of managing PD-associated peritonitis, particularly with uncommon and resistant bacteria. It emphasizes the importance of rigorous infection control measures, the need to consider atypical pathogens, and the critical role of patient involvement in treatment decisions. Our insights advocate for a more informed approach to handling such infections, aiming to reduce morbidity and improve patient outcomes. The examination of the literature on recurrent peritonitis and treatment strategies provides key perspectives for navigating these challenging cases effectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与年轻患者相比,老年人的创伤死亡率更高。衰老与多个系统的生理变化相关,并与虚弱相关。虚弱是老年创伤患者死亡的危险因素。我们旨在为老年创伤患者的管理提供循证指南,以改善其并减少徒劳的程序。
    方法:六个专家急性护理和创伤外科医师工作组根据主题和指定的PICO问题广泛审查了文献。根据GRADE方法对声明和建议进行了评估,并在2023年WSES第十届国际大会上获得了该领域专家的共识。
    结果:老年创伤患者的管理需要了解衰老生理学,集中的分诊,包括药物史,脆弱评估,营养状况,早期启动创伤治疗方案以改善预后。老年人的急性创伤疼痛必须通过多模式镇痛方法来管理,以避免使用阿片类药物的副作用。建议在穿透性(腹部,胸)创伤,严重烧伤和开放性骨折的老年患者减少脓毒症并发症。在没有败血症和脓毒性休克迹象的钝性创伤中不推荐使用抗生素。高危和中危老年创伤患者应根据肾功能情况尽早使用LMWH或UFH预防静脉血栓栓塞,患者体重和出血风险。姑息治疗小组应尽快参与,以考虑患者的指示,以多学科方法讨论生命的终结。家庭感情和代表的欲望,所有的决定都应该分享。
    结论:老年创伤患者的管理需要了解衰老生理学,基于评估虚弱和创伤早期激活方案的重点分诊,以改善结局。需要老年重症监护病房以多学科方法护理老年和虚弱的创伤患者,以降低死亡率并改善预后。
    The trauma mortality rate is higher in the elderly compared with younger patients. Ageing is associated with physiological changes in multiple systems and correlated with frailty. Frailty is a risk factor for mortality in elderly trauma patients. We aim to provide evidence-based guidelines for the management of geriatric trauma patients to improve it and reduce futile procedures.
    Six working groups of expert acute care and trauma surgeons reviewed extensively the literature according to the topic and the PICO question assigned. Statements and recommendations were assessed according to the GRADE methodology and approved by a consensus of experts in the field at the 10th international congress of the WSES in 2023.
    The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage, including drug history, frailty assessment, nutritional status, and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Acute trauma pain in the elderly has to be managed in a multimodal analgesic approach, to avoid side effects of opioid use. Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in penetrating (abdominal, thoracic) trauma, in severely burned and in open fractures elderly patients to decrease septic complications. Antibiotics are not recommended in blunt trauma in the absence of signs of sepsis and septic shock. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with LMWH or UFH should be administrated as soon as possible in high and moderate-risk elderly trauma patients according to the renal function, weight of the patient and bleeding risk. A palliative care team should be involved as soon as possible to discuss the end of life in a multidisciplinary approach considering the patient\'s directives, family feelings and representatives\' desires, and all decisions should be shared.
    The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage based on assessing frailty and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Geriatric Intensive Care Units are needed to care for elderly and frail trauma patients in a multidisciplinary approach to decrease mortality and improve outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尿潴留是一种医疗并发症,使患者面临不必要痛苦和伤害的风险。众所周知,骨科患者面临的风险增加,呼吁基于证据的术前评估和相应的措施,以防止膀胱问题。这项研究的目的是评估医护人员对髋关节手术患者尿潴留风险评估指南的依从性。
    方法:这是一项观察性研究,从2021年1月到2021年4月,采用描述性和比较性设计,对三个数据源进行三角测量。1)对瑞典17家医院的1382名髋关节手术患者的病历进行了审查,以评估出院时尿潴留和排尿相关变量的术前风险。2)患者完成了关于术后下尿路症状的调查,和3)数据是从国家质量登记中提取的关于手术类型,术前身体状况,围手术期泌尿系并发症。用卡方/Fisher精确检验分析组间差异,t检验,Wilcoxon秩和检验,或者Mann-WhitneyU-test.使用Logistic回归分析与完成的尿潴留风险评估相关的变量。
    结果:在所有研究参与者中,23.4%(n=323)在术前记录了尿潴留的风险评估。是否进行风险评估与急性手术(OR3.56,95%CI2.48-5.12)和在学术医院接受手术(OR4.59,95%CI2.68-7.85)显着相关。急性患者更常受到尿潴留的影响,并且在出院时出现膀胱问题和/或留置导管。超过十分之一的患者(11。9%,n=53)完成调查后,髋关节手术后膀胱问题加剧。
    结论:该研究表明,根据循证指南,尿潴留风险评估缺乏依从性,这对护理质量和患者安全产生了负面影响。
    Urinary retention is a healthcare complication putting patients at risk of unnecessary suffering and harm. Orthopaedic patients are known to face an increased such risk, calling for evidence-based preoperative assessment and corresponding measures to prevent bladder problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate healthcare professionals\' adherence to risk assessment guidelines for urinary retention in hip surgery patients. This was an observational study from January 2021 to April 2021 with a descriptive and comparative design, triangulating three data sources: (I) Medical records for 1382 hip surgery patients across 17 hospitals in Sweden were reviewed for preoperative risk assessments for urinary retention and voiding-related variables at discharge; (II) The patients completed a survey regarding postoperative lower urinary tract symptoms, and; (III) data were extracted from a national quality registry regarding type of surgery, preoperative physical status, and perioperative urinary complications. Group differences were analysed with Chi-square/Fisher\'s exact test, t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, or Mann-Whitney U-test. Logistic regression was used to analyse variables associated with completed risk assessments for urinary retention. Of all study participants, 23.4% (n = 323) had a preoperative documented risk assessment of urinary retention. Whether a risk assessment was performed was significantly associated with acute surgery [odds ratio (OR) 3.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.48-5.12] and undergoing surgery at an academic hospital (OR 4.59, 95% CI 2.68-7.85). Acute patients were more often affected by urinary retention and had bladder issues and/or an indwelling catheter at discharge. More than every tenth patient (11. 9%, n = 53) completing the survey experienced intensified bladder problems after their hip surgery. The study shows a lack of adherence to risk assessment for urinary retention according to evidence-based guidelines, which negatively affects quality of care and patient safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:维生素B12是人体多种功能的必需营养素。因此,许多临床情况证明测定血清B12是合理的;然而,没有基于证据的指南可用于确定何时订购B12测试。在这里,我们研究了B12测定排序模式,以确定提高效率和最小化不适当请求的方法。
    方法:使用医院的健康信息系统对2018年7月至2019年6月一年内的所有血清B12要求进行审查。这些请求共3,400项,其中评估了前1000名的数据。患者人口统计学,血液学数据,血清叶酸,从电子请求中提取铁蛋白。在可用的情况下检索医师身份和请求原因。
    结果:在可获得患者年龄的877B12请求中,大多数(80.3%)为中青年患者。有趣的是,在1,000个审查请求中,只有四分之一的血清B12水平较低;其余四分之三的水平正常。叶酸,可与维生素B12一起订购,在82例中进行了测试,其中只有两个(2.4%)患有叶酸缺乏症。
    结论:这项研究强调了维生素B12测定不正确排序的高发生率,表明需要修订准则以促进最佳测试排序。
    OBJECTIVE: Vitamin B12 is an essential nutrient for numerous functions in the human body. As such, many clinical scenarios justify assaying serum B12; however, there are no evidence-based guidelines available for determining when to order B12 tests. Here we investigate B12 assay ordering patterns to identify methods of enhancing efficiency and minimizing inappropriate requests.
    METHODS: All serum B12 requests within the year spanning July 2018 to June 2019 were reviewed using the hospital\'s health information system. These amounted to 3,400 requests, of which data from the first 1,000 were evaluated. Patient demographics, hematological data, serum folate, and ferritin were extracted from the electronic requests. Physician identity and request reason were retrieved where available.
    RESULTS: Of the 877 B12 requests for which patient age was available, the majority (80.3%) were for young and middle-aged patients. Interestingly, serum B12 was low in only a quarter of the 1,000 reviewed requests; the remaining three quarters had normal levels. Folate, which can be ordered with vitamin B12, was tested in 82 cases, of which only two (2.4%) had folate deficiency.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a high occurrence of improper ordering of vitamin B12 assays, indicating a need for revised guidelines to promote optimal test ordering.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:该指南由意大利全科医生-初级保健和老年病医院-社区协会推广,并由国家卫生研究院和一个专家小组参与,其中包括来自25个科学和卫生专业组织的代表。该指南的目的是制定基于证据的建议,以评估不同临床环境中老年人的CGA疗效以及基于CGA的工具评估预后的准确性和实用性。
    方法:根据意大利国家指南和NICE标准体系(英国国家健康与护理卓越研究所)的方法手册,该指南是根据建议评估的分级制定的,发展和评价。最初选择了通过数据库搜索收集的20,000多个记录。根据117项符合纳入标准并在一般实践和初级保健中进行的研究(包括26项研究),确定了16项关于CGA疗效的建议。医疗和外科诊所(16项研究),急诊科(17项研究),医院内科和外科病房(53项研究),长期护理设施和疗养院(5项研究),临终关怀和姑息治疗网络(无研究)。关于基于CGA的预后工具的9项建议是基于42项在一般实践和初级保健中进行的研究(5项研究)的问题,医疗和外科诊所(4项研究),和医院病房(33项研究)。
    结果:使用CGA可以减少住院,死亡率,制度化,谵妄的风险,提高药物处方的适当性,并在不同环境下维持功能活动。进一步研究CGA在康复设施中的功效,疗养院,和临终关怀和姑息治疗设置建议。基于CGA的工具,特别是多维预后指数,应该用来预测不同环境下的一些负面结果。
    结论:本指南在临床实践中可能是有用的,并且可以作为支持在老年人中使用CGA研究的工具。
    BACKGROUND: The guideline was promoted by the Italian General Practitioners-Primary Care and Geriatrics Hospital-Community Societies and was carried out involving the National Institute of Health and an Expert Panel including representatives from 25 Scientific and Health-Professional Organizations. The aim of the Guideline was to develop evidence-based recommendations on the efficacy of CGA in older people across different clinical settings and the accuracy and utility of CGA-based tools to assess prognosis.
    METHODS: According to the methodological handbook of the Italian National System of Guidelines and NICE criteria (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in England), the Guideline was produced based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Over 20,000 records gathered through databases searches were initially selected. Sixteen recommendations on CGA efficacy were defined based on 117 studies that met the inclusion criteria and were performed in general practices and primary care (26 studies included), medical and surgical clinics (16 studies), emergency departments (17 studies), hospital medical and surgical wards (53 studies), long-term care facilities and nursing homes (5 studies), hospices and palliative care networks (no studies). Nine recommendations on CGA-based prognostic tools were issues based on 42 included studies carried out in general practices and primary care (5 studies), medical and surgical clinics (4 studies), and hospital wards (33 studies).
    RESULTS: Using CGA can be useful to reduce hospitalization, mortality, institutionalization, the risk of delirium, and improve appropriateness in drug prescription and maintain functional activities in different settings. Further research on the efficacy of CGA in rehabilitative facilities, nursing homes, and hospice and palliative-care settings is recommended. CGA-based tools, particularly the Multidimensional Prognostic Index, should be used to predict some negative outcomes in different settings.
    CONCLUSIONS: This Guideline may be useful in clinical practice and as a tool to support research on the use of CGA in older people.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号