Age Factors

年龄因素
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脐疝(UH)是一种常见的儿科疾病,由于自发性闭合的发生率很高,因此建议将无症状UH的手术修复推迟到3岁以后。我们的目标是确定是否遵守准则,紧急手术修复率,结果,成本,以及魁北克省(加拿大)UH修复的机构间转诊模式。
    方法:这是一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,使用卫生管理数据库对2010年至2020年期间接受UH修复的28天至17岁儿童进行了研究。有多种手术的孩子,或围手术期延长的时间被排除.早期修复被定义为3岁或3岁以下的选择性手术。
    结果:在3215个孩子中,1744(54.2%)为女性,1872(58.2%)在三级儿童医院接受治疗。在3215名儿童中,有2853名(89.7%)得到了指导。住在距离治疗医院75公里以上的患者(OR2.36,95%CI1.33-4.16,P<0.01),具有预先存在的合并症(或,2.82;95%CI,1.96-4.05;P<0.001),或在三级中心接受治疗(OR2.10,95%CI1.45-3.03,P<0.001)的早期修复风险较高。3岁或3岁以下的修复和紧急手术与成本显着增加411$(P<0.001)和558$(P<0.001)相关,分别。
    结论:魁北克省对UH修复的年龄特异性指南的依从率很高。未来的研究应该探索解释转移到三级中心的因素,以及这些反映资源有效利用的程度。
    方法:三级。
    方法:回顾性对比研究。
    BACKGROUND: Umbilical hernia (UH) is a common pediatric condition, for which delaying surgical repair for asymptomatic UH until after age 3 is recommended due to a high incidence of spontaneous closure. We aimed to determine the adherence to guidelines, rate of urgent surgical repair, outcomes, cost, and interinstitutional referral patterns of UH repair in the province of Quebec (Canada).
    METHODS: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study of children 28 days to 17 years old who underwent UH repair between 2010 and 2020 using health administrative databases. Children who had multiple procedures, or prolonged peri-operative stays were excluded. Early repair was defined as elective surgery at or under age 3.
    RESULTS: Of the 3215 children, 1744 (54.2%) were female, and 1872 (58.2%) were treated in a tertiary children\'s hospital. Guidelines were respected for 2853 out of 3215 children (89.7%). Patients living over 75 km from their treating hospitals (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.33-4.16, P < 0.01), with pre-existing comorbidities (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.96-4.05; P < 0.001), or being treated in a tertiary center (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.45-3.03, P < 0.001) had a higher risk of early repair. Repair at or under age 3 and urgent surgery were associated with significant cost increases of 411$ (P < 0.001) and 558$ (P < 0.001), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Quebec has a high rate of adherence to age-specific guidelines for UH repair. Future research should explore factors that explain transfers into tertiary centers, and the extent to which these reflect efficient use of resources.
    METHODS: level III.
    METHODS: Retrospective comparative study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)在老年人中的疗效尚不清楚。这项研究评估了GDMT(阿司匹林或P2Y12抑制剂,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂,β-受体阻滞剂,和他汀类药物)出院时对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的老年急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的长期死亡率。方法和结果:在2009-2020年接受PCI的2,547例连续AMI患者中,我们回顾性分析了573例年龄≥80岁的患者。中位随访期为1,140天。出院时为192名(33.5%)患者开了GDMT。与无GDMT的患者相比,GDMT患者较年轻,ST段抬高型心肌梗死和左前降支罪犯病变的发生率较高,较高的峰值肌酸磷酸激酶浓度,降低左心室射血分数(LVEF)。在调整了混杂因素后,GDMT与较低的心血管死亡率独立相关(风险比[HR]0.35;95%置信区间[CI]0.16-0.81),但非全因死亡率(HR0.77;95%CI0.50-1.18)。在亚组分析中,GDMT对心血管死亡的有利影响在80-89岁的患者中显著,LVEF<50%,或估计肾小球滤过率≥30mL/min/1.73m2。
    结论:接受PCI的年龄≥80岁的AMI患者的GDMT与较低的心血管死亡率相关,但不是全因死亡率。
    BACKGROUND: The efficacy of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in the elderly remains unclear. This study evaluated the impact of GDMT (aspirin or a P2Y12inhibitor, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, β-blocker, and statin) at discharge on long-term mortality in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods and Results: Of 2,547 consecutive patients with AMI undergoing PCI in 2009-2020, we retrospectively analyzed 573 patients aged ≥80 years. The median follow-up period was 1,140 days. GDMT was prescribed to 192 (33.5%) patients at discharge. Compared with patients without GDMT, those with GDMT were younger and had higher rates of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and left anterior descending artery culprit lesion, higher peak creatine phosphokinase concentration, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). After adjusting for confounders, GDMT was independently associated with a lower cardiovascular death rate (hazard ratio [HR] 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.81), but not with all-cause mortality (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.50-1.18). In the subgroup analysis, the favorable impact of GDMT on cardiovascular death was significant in patients aged 80-89 years, with LVEF <50%, or with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2.
    CONCLUSIONS: GDMT in patients with AMI aged ≥80 years undergoing PCI was associated with a lower cardiovascular death rate but not all-cause mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:本综述旨在总结来自不同国家的平均风险和高风险个体的不同结直肠癌指南。
    方法:关于指南的全面文献检索,协商一致建议,或在过去10年内(2012年1月1日至2022年8月27日)发表的关于结直肠癌筛查的立场声明,是在EBSCOhost进行的,JSTOR,PubMed,ProQuest,Sage,和科学直接。
    结果:本综述共纳入18条指南。大多数指南建议对平均风险个体进行45至75岁的筛查。关于高风险个体结直肠癌筛查的建议更加多样化,并且取决于风险因素。对于具有结直肠癌家族史或晚期结直肠息肉家族史的高危人群,筛查应该从40岁开始。一些经常建议的筛查方式按频率顺序是结肠镜检查,FIT,反恐委员会。此外,建议了几个筛查间隔,包括平均风险每10年进行一次结肠镜检查,高危人群每5-10年进行一次结肠镜检查,平均风险每年FIT,高风险个体每1-2年FIT,和反恐委员会每五年为所有个人。
    结论:所有具有平均风险的个体应在45至75岁之间接受结直肠癌筛查。同时,风险较高的个人,比如那些有积极家族史的人,应该在40岁开始筛查。建议了几种推荐的筛查方式,包括平均风险每10年进行一次结肠镜检查,高风险每5-10年进行一次结肠镜检查,平均风险每年FIT,高风险每1-2年FIT,和反恐委员会每五年。
    OBJECTIVE: This review aims to summarize the different colorectal cancer guidelines for average-risk and high-risk individuals from various countries.
    METHODS: A comprehensive literature search regarding guidelines, consensus recommendations, or position statements about colorectal cancer screening published within the last 10 years (1st January 2012 to 27th August 2022), was performed at EBSCOhost, JSTOR, PubMed, ProQuest, SAGE, and ScienceDirect.
    RESULTS: A total of 18 guidelines were included in this review. Most guidelines recommended screening between 45 and 75 years for average-risk individuals. Recommendations regarding colorectal cancer screening in high-risk individuals were more varied and depended on the risk factor. For high-risk individuals with a positive family history of colorectal cancer or advanced colorectal polyp, screening should begin at age 40. Some frequently suggested screening modalities in order of frequency are colonoscopy, FIT, and CTC. Furthermore, several screening intervals were suggested, including colonoscopy every 10 years for average-risk and every 5-10 years for high-risk individuals, FIT annually in average-risk and every 1-2 years in high-risk individuals, and CTC every five years for all individuals.
    CONCLUSIONS: All individuals with average-risk should undergo colorectal cancer screening between 45 and 75. Meanwhile, individuals with higher risks, such as those with a positive family history, should begin screening at age 40. Several recommended screening modalities were suggested, including colonoscopy every 10 years in average-risk and every 5-10 years in high-risk, FIT annually in average-risk and every 1-2 years in high-risk, and CTC every five years.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究自2016年修订以来,英国公众对饮酒指南的认识和知识的趋势,该指南已从每日指南转变为每周指南。让指导方针对男性和女性都是一样的,并将男性的指导方针减少了大约三分之一。
    方法:数据来自代表,重复横断面调查。我们分析了2016年至2022年间8168名成年饮酒者对饮酒指南的认识和知识的变化,以及与社会人口统计学特征的关联。吸烟状况和饮酒水平。
    结果:知道指南的饮酒者比例从2016年的86.0%(95CI84.0-88.0%)下降到2019年的81.7%(79.5-84.0%),然后在COVID-19大流行期间上升。2020年达到91.6%(90.1-93.1%)的峰值。从2016年起,正确确定该指南最多14个单位/周的比例保持在大约四分之一(25.0%,22.4-27.5%)至2018年(25.8%,23.2-28.3%),而给出14个或更少单位的比例从52.1(49.2-55.0%)上升到57.4%(54.6-60.3%)。然而,到2022年,指南知识显著恶化,这些数字降至19.7(17.4-21.9%)和46.5%(43.6-49.4%),分别。亚组随时间的变化相似。年龄≥35岁、女性、受教育程度更高,社会地位更高。
    结论:英国大多数成年饮酒者都知道低风险饮酒指南。然而,自他们宣布以来的6年,修订后的饮酒指南知识仍然贫乏。不到四分之一的人知道建议的每周限额,只有大约一半的人认为这是14个单位或更少。不平等一直存在,这样弱势群体仍然不太可能知道准则。
    OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in public awareness and knowledge of drinking guidelines in the UK since their revision in 2016, which had moved from a daily to a weekly guideline, made the guideline the same for men and women, and reduced the guideline for men by around one-third.
    METHODS: Data were from a representative, repeat cross-sectional survey. We analysed changes in awareness and knowledge of drinking guidelines among 8168 adult drinkers between 2016 and 2022 and associations with sociodemographic characteristics, smoking status and level of alcohol consumption.
    RESULTS: The proportion of drinkers aware of guidelines declined from 86.0% (95%CI 84.0-88.0%) in 2016 to 81.7% (79.5-84.0%) in 2019, then increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, peaking at 91.6% (90.1-93.1%) in 2020. The proportion who correctly identified the guideline as a maximum of exactly 14 units/week remained at around a quarter from 2016 (25.0%, 22.4-27.5%) to 2018 (25.8%, 23.2-28.3%), whereas the proportion who gave a figure of 14 units or fewer rose from 52.1 (49.2-55.0%) to 57.4% (54.6-60.3%). However, by 2022, guideline knowledge had worsened significantly, with these figures falling to 19.7 (17.4-21.9%) and 46.5% (43.6-49.4%), respectively. Changes over time were similar across subgroups. Odds of guideline awareness and knowledge were higher among drinkers who were aged ≥35, female, more educated and from more advantaged social grades.
    CONCLUSIONS: The majority of adult drinkers in the UK are aware of low-risk drinking guidelines. However, 6 years since their announcement, knowledge of the revised drinking guidelines remains poor. Less than a quarter know the recommended weekly limit and only around half think it is 14 units or less. Inequalities have persisted over time, such that disadvantaged groups remain less likely to know the guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在肿瘤学会诊中被诊断为管腔转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的大多数患者都是老年人。老年患者MBC的特征是激素受体(HR)表达百分比较高,人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)表达较低。由于缺乏支持决策过程的确凿证据,因此对这些患者进行哪种治疗的决定很复杂。本文的目的是回顾老年人腔MBC治疗的科学证据。为此,西班牙医学肿瘤学会(SEOM)的肿瘤科,西班牙乳腺癌研究小组(GEICAM)和SOLTI小组任命了一组专家,他们共同制定了共识建议,以优化该人群的治疗.结论是,仅患者的实际年龄不应指导治疗决策,并且在建立治疗之前,应尽可能进行老年综合评估(CGA)。老年人群的治疗选择应考虑患者的基线状态,每种治疗的预期益处和毒性,以及治疗毒性对患者生活质量和功能的影响。
    Most patients diagnosed with luminal metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who are seen in oncology consultations are elderly. MBC in elderly patients is characterized by a higher percentage of hormone receptor (HR) expression and a lower expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The decision regarding which treatment to administer to these patients is complex due to the lack of solid evidence to support the decision-making process. The objective of this paper is to review the scientific evidence on the treatment of elderly patients with luminal MBC. For this purpose, the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), the Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM) and the SOLTI Group appointed a group of experts who have worked together to establish consensus recommendations to optimize the treatment of this population. It was concluded that the chronological age of the patient alone should not guide therapeutic decisions and that a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) should be performed whenever possible before establishing treatment. Treatment selection for the elderly population should consider the patient\'s baseline status, the expected benefit and toxicity of each treatment, and the impact of treatment toxicity on the patient\'s quality of life and functionality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了实现到2030年结束艾滋病的目标,泰国已将抗逆转录病毒治疗作为预防手段,并将男男性行为者(MSM)和变性女性(TGW)的艾滋病毒暴露前预防作为其核心艾滋病毒控制策略。然而,在缺乏可靠的流行病学指标的情况下,这些政策对这些人群中艾滋病毒流行过程的影响仍然未知。为了帮助回答这个问题,我们为曼谷制定了艾滋病毒流行病共识倡议,泰国,分析流行病学和计划数据,并在专家和利益相关者之间就MSM和TGW中HIV流行的演变状态达成协议。使用定制的Delphi流程来咨询和巩固专家和利益相关者的观点。专家们在与代表政府的利益相关者举行的会议上,介绍并讨论了曼谷MSM和TGW最近和正在进行的研究(2014年至2018年)的艾滋病毒流行率和发病率数据。捐助者,和民间社会。MSM和TGW之间就艾滋病毒流行的过程达成了共识。根据提供的数据,会议参与者一致认为,2014年至2018年曼谷MSM人群的HIV患病率和发病率有所下降.尽管这些下降,发现艾滋病毒的患病率和发病率仍然很高。在年轻的MSM中尤其如此。与会者一致认为,没有证据表明曼谷TGW的艾滋病毒流行率和发病率有所下降。引入抗逆转录病毒治疗作为预防和艾滋病毒暴露前预防可能导致了这些下降。然而,艾滋病毒的流行和发病率仍然很高,曼谷TGW没有下降的迹象。以目前MSM和TGW的新艾滋病毒感染率,泰国将无法实现到2030年终结艾滋病的目标。这项HIV共识倡议可以作为建立流行病学和计划数据及其对大城市影响的协议和宣传的模型。
    To reach its goal of ending AIDS by 2030, Thailand has adopted antiretroviral treatment as prevention and HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis for men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) as its core HIV control strategy. However, in the absence of reliable epidemiologic indicators, the impact of these policies on the course of the HIV epidemic in these groups remains unknown. To help answer this question, we formulated an HIV epidemic consensus initiative for Bangkok, Thailand, to analyze epidemiologic and program data and reach agreement between experts and stakeholders on the evolving state of the HIV epidemic among MSM and TGW. A customized Delphi process was used to consult and consolidate viewpoints of experts and stakeholders. Experts presented and discussed HIV prevalence and incidence data from recent and ongoing studies among MSM and TGW in Bangkok (2014 to 2018) during a meeting with stakeholders representing government, donors, and civil society. Agreement about the course of the HIV epidemic among MSM and TGW was attained by voting consensus. Based on presented data, meeting participants agreed that HIV prevalence and incidence had decreased among Bangkok MSM from 2014 to 2018. Despite these declines, HIV prevalence and incidence were found to remain high. This was particularly the case among younger MSM. Participants agreed that there was no evidence for a decrease in HIV prevalence and incidence among Bangkok TGW. Introduction of antiretroviral treatment as prevention and HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis may have contributed to these declines. However, HIV prevalence and incidence remained high, and no signs of a decrease were reported among Bangkok TGW. At the current rate of new HIV infections in MSM and TGW, Thailand will not reach its goal of ending AIDS by 2030. This HIV consensus initiative may serve as a model for building agreement and advocacy on epidemiologic and program data and their implications for a large metropolitan city.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    SARS-CoV-2大流行的快速扩散要求治疗选择的快速发展。人类重组单克隆抗体(mAb)最近已被食品和药物管理局(FDA)和意大利药品管理局(AIFA)批准用于年龄≥12岁的SARS-CoV-2感染和特定危险因素的受试者。目前,适应症特定于使用两种不同的单克隆抗体组合:BamlanivimabEtesevimab(由礼来公司生产)和CasirivimabImdevimab(由Regeneron公司生产)。这些药物在感染初期的成年患者中显示出良好的效果,而迄今为止,关于它们在儿童中使用的数据很少。AIFA标准来自现有文献,该文献报道有合并症的儿童患严重COVID-19的风险增加。然而,分析严重疾病进展决定因素的研究主要是单中心的,数量有限,报告大多是通用风险类别。因此,意大利儿科学会邀请其附属科学会根据AIFA根据最新文献和专家协议提出的标准修订,编写一份共识文件。这项共识试图详细说明哪些患者实际上有患上严重疾病的风险,分析儿童最常见的合并症,为了详细说明单克隆抗体给药的适应症,并指导临床医生识别合格患者。
    The fast diffusion of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have called for an equally rapid evolution of the therapeutic options.The Human recombinant monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) in subjects aged ≥12 with SARS-CoV-2 infection and specific risk factors.Currently the indications are specific for the use of two different mAbs combination: Bamlanivimab+Etesevimab (produced by Eli Lilly) and Casirivimab+Imdevimab (produced by Regeneron).These drugs have shown favorable effects in adult patients in the initial phase of infection, whereas to date few data are available on their use in children.AIFA criteria derived from the existing literature which reports an increased risk of severe COVID-19 in children with comorbidities. However, the studies analyzing the determinants for progression to severe disease are mainly monocentric, with limited numbers and reporting mostly generic risk categories.Thus, the Italian Society of Pediatrics invited its affiliated Scientific Societies to produce a Consensus document based on the revision of the criteria proposed by AIFA in light of the most recent literature and experts\' agreement.This Consensus tries to detail which patients actually have the risk to develop severe disease, analyzing the most common comorbidities in children, in order to detail the indications for mAbs administration and to guide the clinicians in identifying eligible patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胶质瘤是最常见的原发性脑肿瘤。处于危险中的器官的接近程度,渗透的自然,在选择处方剂量和放射治疗技术时,必须考虑胶质瘤的放射抗性。胶质瘤患者的管理基于临床因素(年龄,KPS)和肿瘤特征(组织学,分子生物学,肿瘤位置),并且强烈依赖于可用的和相关的治疗方法,比如手术,放射治疗,和化疗。分子生物标志物的知识是目前必不可少的,它们作为促进诊断和治疗决策的额外因素正在不断演变.我们介绍了法国放射肿瘤学会关于神经胶质瘤患者进行放射治疗的适应症和技术程序的最新建议。
    Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumour. The proximity of organs at risk, the infiltrating nature, and the radioresistance of gliomas have to be taken into account in the choice of prescribed dose and technique of radiotherapy. The management of glioma patients is based on clinical factors (age, KPS) and tumour characteristics (histology, molecular biology, tumour location), and strongly depends on available and associated treatments, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. The knowledge of molecular biomarkers is currently essential, they are increasingly evolving as additional factors that facilitate diagnostics and therapeutic decision-making. We present the update of the recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on the indications and the technical procedures for performing radiation therapy in patients with gliomas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The purpose of the first two editions of the guidelines for external radiotherapy procedures, published in 2007 and 2016 respectively, was to issue recommendations aimed at optimising, harmonising and standardising practices. The purpose of this third edition, which includes brachytherapy, is identical while also taking into account recent technological improvements (intensity modulation radiation therapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and three-dimension brachytherapy) along with findings from literature. Part one describes the daily use of general principles (quality, security, image-guided radiation therapy); part two describes each treatment step for the main types of cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility to determine regional diagnostic reference levels (RDRLs) for paediatric conventional and CT examinations using the European guidelines and to compare RDRLs derived from weight and age groups, respectively.
    METHODS: Data were collected from 31 hospitals in 4 countries, for 7 examination types for a total of 2978 patients. RDRLs were derived for each weight and age group, respectively, when the total number of patients exceeded 15.
    RESULTS: It was possible to derive RDRLs for most, but not all, weight-based and age-based groups for the seven examinations. The result using weight-based and age-based groups differed substantially. The RDRLs were lower than or equal to the European and recently published national DRLs.
    CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to derive RDRLs. However, a thorough review of the clinical indications and methodologies has to be performed previous to data collection. This study does not support the notion that DRLs derived using age and weight groups are exchangeable.
    CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric DRLs should be derived using weight-based groups with access to the actual weight of the patients. DRLs developed using weight differ markedly from those developed with the use of age. There is still a need to harmonize the method to derive solid DRLs for paediatric radiological examinations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号