To assess the efficacy and safety of capecitabine in treating advanced colon cancer. Patients with advanced colon cancer were randomized into three groups: control group (n = 50, daily dose 2,500 mg/m2), the medium-dose group (n = 50, daily dose 2,000 mg/m2), and the low-dose group (n = 50, daily dose 1,500 mg/m2) capecitabine for 4 cycles(12 weeks). Afterwards, the response rate, quality of life, and adverse reactions of the three groups were collected for comparison. Efficacy rates were 50%, 70%, and 72%, respectively, with the low-dose group showing the highest efficacy (χ2 = 6.424, p = 0.040); Quality of life comparison results indicated significant differences in physical function (F = 98.528, p < 0.001), role function (F = 123.418, p < 0.001), social function(F = 89.539, p < 0.001), emotional function (6 F = 77.295, p < 0.001), cognitive function (F = 83.529, p < 0.001), and overall quality of life (F = 99.528, p < 0.001) among the three groups, and the three groups returned consistent scores, with the low-dose group scoring highest. Incidence rates were 86.00%, 46.00%, 34.00%, with the control group having the highest rate (χ2 = 16.505, p < 0.001). Capecitabine at a dosage of 1,500 mg/m2 demonstrated a good therapeutic effect and improved the quality of life in patients with advanced colon cancer, with a lower incidence of adverse reactions. A prolonged treatment cycle with reduced dosage is suggested to further improve treatment outcomes and patient prognosis. Trial registration The study was registered on clicaltrials.gov \'NCT06246461\' on 30/01/2024.

Many different options of neoadjuvant treatments for advanced colon cancer are emerging. An accurate preoperative staging is crucial to select the most appropriate treatment option. A retrospective study was carried out on a national series of operated patients with T4 tumors. Considering the anatomo-pathological analysis of the surgical specimen as the gold standard, a diagnostic accuracy study was carried out on the variables T and N staging and the presence of peritoneal metastases (M1c). The parameters calculated were sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios, as well as the overall accuracy. A total of 50 centers participated in the study in which 1950 patients were analyzed. The sensitivity of CT for correct staging of T4 colon tumors was 57%. Regarding N staging, the overall accuracy was 63%, with a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 62%; however, the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.7 and 0.58, respectively. For the diagnosis of peritoneal metastases, the accuracy was 94.8%, with a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 98%; in the case of peritoneal metastases, the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 24.4 and 0.61, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of CT in the setting of advanced colon cancer still has some shortcomings for accurate diagnosis of stage T4, correct classification of lymph nodes, and preoperative detection of peritoneal metastases.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for advanced colon cancer are mainly combinations of chemotherapy and targeted drugs. However, poor physical health and medication intolerance limit the choice of anticancer drugs. Colon cancer with cirrhosis is a particular patient group that poses a challenge to clinical treatment.
METHODS: This article presents a case of a patient in the decompensated stage of cirrhosis who was diagnosed with advanced colon cancer. The initial presentation was a nodule on his navel named the Sister Mary Joseph\'s nodule, which was later confirmed by biopsy and PET-CT as one of the metastases of colon cancer. The patient was treated with cetuximab and 5-fluorouracil at a below-guideline dose; however, portal vein thrombosis developed and led to death. This entire process, from diagnosis to death, occurred within a span of three months.
CONCLUSIONS: Cancers with cirrhosis are a special group that deserves more attention. There is no unified treatment guideline for these patients, especially those with extrahepatic primary tumors. We should be more cautious when choosing treatment for such patients in the future. Both chemotherapy and targeted treatment may potentially induce portal vein thrombosis, which appears to have a higher incidence and worse prognosis than cancers without cirrhosis.

UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the clinical effect and safety of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced colon cancer.
UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective study. The subjects of this study were 120 patients with advanced colon cancer who were admitted to The No.2 Hospital of Baoding from November 30, 2019 to November 30, 2021. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into two groups, with 60 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were given F0LF0X4 regimen, while those in the study group were provided with Bevacizumab therapy on the basis of the method in the control group. All patients were evaluated after two cycles of treatment. The comparison of outcome measures included the curative effects, adverse drug reactions, improvement of quality-of-life scores and changes in tumor markers between the two groups.
UNASSIGNED: The total effective rate of the study group was significantly better than that of the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug reactions between the two groups. After treatment, the study group had a significantly higher rate of improved quality of life score, while the obviously lower rate of the aggravated score than those in the control group. The levels of CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group after treatment.
UNASSIGNED: Targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy is a safe and effective therapeutic option that has a definite curative effect in the treatment of patients with advanced colon cancer.

Duodenal or pancreatic invasion in locally advanced right colon cancer (LARCC) is a challenging situation that can pose difficulties in its management. When the duodenum alone is invaded, the surgeon may undertake right hemicolectomy (RH) en bloc with the affected patch of duodenum. The duodenal defect can be reconstructed using several techniques. When invasion of the pancreas is present, RH en bloc with duodenopancreatectomy (DP) is the treatment of choice. We present our experience regarding the treatment and prognostic results of this rare colon cancer form. We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who underwent surgery for right-sided colon cancer with duodenal and/or pancreatic invasion between January 2004 and March 2020. Among the 110 patients with LARCC, pancreas and/or duodenum invasion was encountered in 22 patients, with a mean age of 49.5 years. From the 22 patients, 5 patients underwent palliative procedures, with a maximal survival of 15 months. Three patients underwent RH alone, with lethal outcome in the first year in 66% of the cases. RH en bloc with antrectomy was performed in 2 patients. Eight patients underwent RH with DP, with a 1-year survival of 75% (6/8) and a 5-year survival of 50% (3/6). Thirty-day mortality post-DP was noted in 25% (2/8) of the cases. Four patients underwent RH with limited duodenal resection, with no recurrence of disease at 11 to 39 months postoperatively. Among the duodenal defect restoration, simple duodenal suture was practiced in 2 patients, duodenojejunostomy in one patient and pedicled ileal flap in 1 case. In conclusion, although postoperative mortality can be significant, en bloc resection for LARCC invading the duodenum and/or pancreas offers prolonged survival in a considerable number of patients.

OBJECTIVE: Advanced colon cancers with bladder invasion pose a heavy burden and challenge towards patients and surgeons. Herein, we report our series with regards to operative and oncological outcomes in our 8 years of experience.
METHODS: All patients with advanced colonic tumours and suspected bladder invasion being operated from 2012 to 2020 were included. The histological findings, clinical and oncological outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included. Partial cystectomy was performed in 17 of them (77%). No neoadjuvant treatment was prescribed. All preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan showed bladder invasion or colovesical fistula. True tumour invasion to bladder (T4b disease) was confirmed in 17 patients (77%) by histopathology. The 3-year overall survival and recurrence rates were 82% and 9%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: En bloc resection of colonic tumour with adherent bladder in advanced colon cancers can achieve a good operative and oncological outcome without neoadjuvant therapy. The relatively low concordance rate between preoperative CT scan and final histopathology may limit the benefit of routine administration of neoadjuvant therapy as it may overtreat and delay subsequent oncological treatment of our patients with possible added morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines advocate minimal ileal resection when right hemicolectomy is performed for right-sided colon cancer. The practice, thought to prevent malabsorption syndrome, does not appear to foster local recurrence. Little evidence based on rigorous study exists, however. To understand the pattern of lymphatic spread of right-sided colon cancer toward the small bowel and thus determine the appropriate margin size, we prospectively investigated anatomical distribution of lymph nodes (LNs) in the small bowel mesentery and of metastasis to these nodes in patients with right-sided colon cancer treated by such surgery.
METHODS: In each case, the mesenteric specimen, which had been dissected along the ileocolic vessels and included intermediate LNs, was divided into 2 areas: that 0-3 cm from the vessel pedicle (area 1) and that 3-5 cm from the pedicle (area 2). The peri-intestinal mesentery was cut into 9 segments.
RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were included in the study. Overall, 3366 LNs were dissected. Four hundred fifty-three of these LNs were located in area 1 (90 cases), and 15 (3.3%) were metastatic. Only 63 LNs were located in area 2 (34 cases; average of 0.69 per patient); none was metastatic. Overall, 269 LNs were found in the small bowel mesentery (in 56 of the 91 patients). Only 4 were positive (3 cases), and all were within 5 cm of the ileocecal valve.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that a surgical margin 3 cm from the ileocecal pedicle and a short (5 cm) ileal margin are oncologically reasonable for effective right hemicolectomy.

BACKGROUND: The observation of spontaneous regression (SR) has been well documented for many cancer types, including renal cell carcinoma, non-Hodgkin\'s lymphoma, leukemia, neuroblastoma, and malignant melanoma. However, the SR frequency in colorectal cancer is very rare. Therefore, the accumulation of SR colorectal cancer cases might contribute to find the regression mechanism.
METHODS: A 67-year-old woman received colonoscopy due to being positive for fecal occult blood testing and was diagnosed as having a transverse colon cancer at a local hospital. She was admitted to our institution for surgical treatment of the colon cancer. The colonoscopy revealed a type 2 tumor of 13 mm in diameter at the hepatic flexure of the transverse colon. The enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed an enlarged lymph node in the intermediate lymph node region. The 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT showed no abnormal accumulation on the transverse colon; however, an abnormal accumulation was found at the enlarged lymph node. The patient was preoperatively diagnosed as having advanced transverse colon cancer with lymph node metastasis and underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with D3 lymph node dissection. Pathological examination showed only a scar-like tissue and no cancerous lesion in the transverse colon, while a metastatic lymph node was histologically confirmed in the intermediate lymph node region. Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 expression was observed in the cancer cells of both biopsy specimens and resected lymph nodes. No recurrence was seen for 5 years after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: We reported a rare case of SR of the primary transverse colon cancer without regression of the metastatic regional lymph node. We considered that colorectal cancer with SR should be resected because even if SR of the primary lesion occurs, lymph node metastasis might have an inconsistent behavior as shown in the present case.

MET overexpression/amplification has been associated with resistance to anti- epidermal growth factor receptor therapies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Combining tivantinib, an inhibitor of the MET receptor tyrosine kinase, and cetuximab may be effective in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-resistant MET-high mCRC.
This multicenter, single-arm, Simon 2-stage, phase II study enrolled patients with MET-high, KRAS wild-type mCRC, who were treated with ≥ 1 prior systemic therapy, with at least stable disease on the last treatment regimen containing cetuximab or panitumumab. Patients were enrolled if they presented tumor progression on cetuximab or panitumumab within 3 months before enrollment. Patients received tivantinib (360 mg twice daily) plus cetuximab (500 mg intravenously every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was objective response rate; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. The treatment would be considered effective if ≥ 5 confirmed partial responses were observed among 41 patients.
In total, 41 patients were evaluated, 4 patients (9.8%) achieved an objective response, the median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (95% confidence interval, 1.9-4.2 months), and the median overall survival was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval, 7.1-15.1 months). Among 13 patients with tested MET amplification, 2 responding patients had MET amplification compared with none of the nonresponding patients. The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (14.6%), skin toxicity (12.2%), and fatigue (9.8%).
Although the study did not meet its primary endpoint, efficacy results suggest some activity of the tested combination, with almost 10% of patients achieving objective response in a difficult-to-treat setting. Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of tivantinib and cetuximab.

While the risk of developing colorectal cancer increases with age, there are limited prospective data regarding best treatment in the older adult population. We launched a phase III trial to evaluate difference in treatment outcome for older adults (aged ≥70years) with advanced colorectal cancer. Here we review the challenges faced and reasons for poor accrual to N0949.
We describe the conceptualization, development and limited results of N0949, a randomized phase III study of fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab with or without oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX7 or XELOX) as first line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Fluoropyrimidine was physician choice (e.g., 5-FU/LV or capecitabine).
Of the projected 380 patients, only 32 patients were enrolled between the study activation in January 2011 until its closure in September 2012. Reasons for poor accrual included eligibility criteria that were too stringent, discomfort with randomizing older patients to regimens of varying intensity without considering their physical fitness, and discomfort with the use of bevacizumab in the older patient population. Several efforts were mounted to design a rationale and age-appropriate study, consider toxicities and varying study practices, and be responsive to stakeholder feedback.
Challenges were experienced in conducting the first prospective phase III study evaluating progression-free survival of older adults with advanced colorectal cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab with or without oxaliplatin in the USA. Future efforts to evaluate treatment outcomes in the older adult population should reflect on lessons learned in this large national effort.