Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists

肾上腺素能 β 2 受体激动剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    三联疗法(长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂/长效β2-激动剂/吸入性皮质类固醇)推荐用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)反复发作的患者。多吸入器三联疗法(MITT)与较差的依从性和持久性相关。这项研究评估了在德国的真实世界环境中,COPD患者对单吸入器三联疗法(SITT)与MITT的依从性和持久性。
    这项使用WIG2基准数据库的回顾性分析确定了新开始使用MITT或SITT(糠酸氟替卡松/灭克地铵/维兰特罗[FF/UMEC/VI]或福莫特罗/倍氯松/格隆溴铵[FOR/BDP/GLY])三联治疗的COPD患者符合条件的患者≥35岁,在三联疗法开始之前有1年的连续保险,并且以前没有三联疗法的记录。使用治疗加权的逆概率来平衡基线特征。使用治疗开始后6、12和18个月的覆盖天数(PDC)的比例来测量依从性;在6、12和18个月时测量持久性(直到治疗停止的时间)。用于定义非持久性的间隔>30天。
    在分析中纳入的5710名患者中(平均年龄66岁),71.4%启动了MITT,28.6%启动了SITT(FF/UMEC/VI:41.4%;FOR/BDP/GLY:58.6%)。在所有时间点,SITT与MITT用户的平均PDC均较高;在每个时间点,平均PDC在FF/UMEC/VI用户中最高。在治疗开始后的前6个月,与MITT用户相比,FF/UMEC/VI(29%)和FOR/BDP/GLY(19%)用户的依从性更高.在整个观察期间,FF/UMEC/VI使用者的持续性患者比例最高;在18个月时,16.5%的FF/UMEC/VI用户是持久的,而2.3%的MITT用户是持久的。
    在德国开始SITT的患者在治疗开始后6至18个月内,与开始MITT的患者相比,其依从性和持久性明显更高。在SITT中,FF/UMEC/VI用户的依从性和持久性比例最高。
    UNASSIGNED: Triple therapy (long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist/inhaled corticosteroid) is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who experience recurrent exacerbations. Multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) is associated with poor adherence and persistence. This study assessed comparative adherence and persistence to single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) versus MITT among patients with COPD in a real-world setting in Germany.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective analysis using the WIG2 benchmark database identified patients with COPD newly initiating triple therapy with MITT or SITT (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol [FF/UMEC/VI] or formoterol/beclomethasone/glycopyrronium bromide [FOR/BDP/GLY]) November 2017-June 2019. Eligible patients were ≥35 years with 1 year\'s continual insurance prior to triple therapy initiation and no previous record of triple therapy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics. Adherence was measured using proportion of days covered (PDC) at 6, 12, and 18 months post-treatment initiation; persistence (time until treatment discontinuation) was measured at 6, 12, and 18 months, with a gap of >30 days used to define non-persistence.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 5710 patients included in the analysis (mean age 66 years), 71.4% initiated MITT and 28.6% initiated SITT (FF/UMEC/VI: 41.4%; FOR/BDP/GLY: 58.6%). Mean PDC was higher among SITT versus MITT users at all time points; at each time point, mean PDC was highest among FF/UMEC/VI users. During the first 6 months following treatment initiation, higher adherence was exhibited by FF/UMEC/VI (29%) and FOR/BDP/GLY (19%) users versus MITT users. Over the entire observation period, FF/UMEC/VI users had the highest proportion of persistent patients; at 18 months, 16.5% of FF/UMEC/VI users were persistent versus 2.3% of MITT users.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients initiating SITT in Germany had significantly higher adherence and persistence compared with patients initiating MITT over 6 to 18 months following treatment initiation. Among SITT, FF/UMEC/VI users had the highest proportion of adherence and persistence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本回顾性纵向队列研究旨在探索儿童咳嗽变异性哮喘(CVA)的最佳治疗方案和治疗持续时间。
    方法:将314例CVA患儿分为吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)联合长效β2激动剂(LABA)组,ICS联合白三烯受体拮抗剂(LTRA)组,ICS单药治疗组和LTRA单药治疗组。对所有临床资料进行统计学分析。采用Logistic回归模型比较不同治疗方案在各随访时间点的优缺点及最佳治疗方案。采用基于逆概率加权的Cox比例风险回归模型,以哮喘复发或进展为终点,比较不同用药方案对不良结局的影响。
    结果:(1)经过综合分析,ICS+LABA组是8周内CVA的首选对照方案。经过8周的诊断,ICS组或LTRA组的疗效与ICS+LABA组和ICS+LTRA组相当.(2)ICS+LABA组早期咳嗽有明显改善,特别是在第4周时;ICS+LTRA和ICS组的症状在第36周时显著改善.单独的LTRA组在20周时显示出显著的改善。
    结论:ICS+LABA,ICS+LTRA,单独ICS和单独LTRA可以有效治疗CVA。ICS+LABA可以在CVA诊断后8周内最快改善症状,其次是ICS+LATR组。8周后,基于儿童症状的缓解,可将其减少至单独ICS以控制CVA至少36周.
    OBJECTIVE: This retrospective longitudinal cohort study aimed to explore the best therapeutic regimen and treatment duration of cough variant asthma (CVA) in children.
    METHODS: A total of 314 children with CVA were divided into receive inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) group, ICS combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) group, ICS monotherapy group and LTRA monotherapy group. All clinical data were statistically analyzed. Logistic regression model was used to compare the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment schemes at each follow-up time point and the best treatment scheme. The Cox proportional hazard regression model based on inverse probability weighting was used to compare the effects of different medication regimens on adverse outcomes with asthma recurrence or progression as the end point.
    RESULTS: (1) After comprehensive analysis, ICS + LABA group was the preferred control regimen for CVA within 8 weeks. After 8 weeks of diagnosis, the efficacy of ICS group or LTRA group was comparable to that of ICS + LABA group and ICS + LTRA group. (2) The ICS + LABA group showed a significant improvement in cough at an early stage, particularly at 4 weeks; the symptoms of ICS + LTRA and ICS groups were significantly improved at 36 weeks. The LTRA group alone showed significant improvement at 20 weeks.
    CONCLUSIONS: ICS + LABA, ICS + LTRA, ICS alone and LTRA alone can effectively treat CVA. ICS + LABA could improve the symptoms most quickly within 8 weeks after CVA diagnosis, followed by ICS + LATR group. After 8 weeks, it can be reduced to ICS alone to control CVA for at least 36 weeks based on the remission of symptoms in children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COPD对医疗保健造成了巨大的经济负担。COPD的替代治疗策略可能与不同的成本相关,这取决于它们的相对安全性和有效性。我们比较了与LAMA或LABA/ICS启动相关的成本和医疗资源利用率(HCRU)。
    使用韩国国民健康保险服务数据库,我们纳入了2005年1月至2015年4月期间开始接受LAMA或LABA/ICS治疗的COPD患者.在三年的随访期内,比较了倾向评分匹配的个体的全因和COPD相关医疗费用以及HCRU。
    每个治疗组共纳入2444名患者。与LABA/ICS组相比,LAMA组的成本显著降低,均为全因(403.08vs474.50美元/患者每月[PPPM],成本比1.18,95%置信区间[CI]=1.10-1.26,p<0.0001)和COPD相关(216.37vs267.32美元PPPM,成本比1.24,95%CI=1.13-1.35,p<0.0001)医疗费用。全因HCRU组间无显著差异,而与COPD相关的HRCU在LAMA组中较高(0.66vs0.60次就诊PPPM,p<0.0001)。
    开始使用LAMA治疗的COPD患者的全因和COPD相关医疗费用低于开始使用LABA/ICS的患者,尽管全因HCCU相似且COPD相关HCCU较高。用LAMA启动是治疗COPD的一种经济有效的选择。
    UNASSIGNED: COPD causes substantial economic burden on healthcare. Alternative treatment strategies for COPD can be associated with different costs dependent upon their relative safety and effectiveness. We compared costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with LAMA or LABA/ICS initiation.
    UNASSIGNED: Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we enrolled COPD patients initiating treatment with LAMA or LABA/ICS between January 2005 and April 2015. Propensity score matched individuals were compared on all-cause and COPD-related medical costs and HCRU over a three-year follow-up period.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 2444 patients were enrolled in each treatment group. LAMA group was associated with significantly lower costs than LABA/ICS group, both in all-cause (403.08 vs 474.50 USD per patient per month [PPPM], cost ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.10-1.26, p<0.0001) and COPD-related (216.37 vs 267.32 USD PPPM, cost ratio 1.24, 95% CI=1.13-1.35, p<0.0001) medical costs. All-cause HCRU was not significantly different between groups, while COPD-related HRCU was higher in LAMA group (0.66 vs 0.60 medical visits PPPM, p<0.0001).
    UNASSIGNED: COPD patients initiating treatment with LAMA were associated with lower all-cause and COPD-related medical costs than those starting with LABA/ICS despite the similar all-cause HCRU and higher COPD-related HCRU. Initiation with LAMA is a cost-efficient option for the treatment of COPD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在随机对照试验中,含有二丙酸倍氯米松/富马酸福莫特罗/格隆溴铵87/5/9μg的体外单吸入器三联疗法(efSITT)已证明对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者有效。
    TRIWIN研究评估了efSITT在以前接受过多次吸入三联疗法(MITT)治疗的COPD患者中递送二丙酸倍氯米松/富马酸福莫特罗/格隆溴铵87/5/9μg的有效性。希腊的一项现实研究。
    预期,多中心,观察,非干预性研究进行了24周.
    总共475名符合条件的患者患有中度至重度COPD,使用efSITT治疗的适应症,尽管接受了MITT,但仍有症状。COPD评估测试(CAT)评分,肺功能参数,使用救援药物,并在基线(第1次访视)记录吸入器使用的依从性,3(访问2)治疗后6个月(访视3)。
    平均CAT得分从第1次访问时的21.4分下降到第2次访问时的16.6分和第3次访问时的15.1分(所有配对比较的p<0.001)。在第3次访问时,79.8%的患者达到了超过最小临床重要差异的CAT改善(2),与基线相比。1s内平均用力呼气量(%pred。)从第1次访问时的55.4%增加到研究期结束时的63.5%(p<0.001),而意味着强迫肺活量(%pred。)从第1次访问时的71.1%增加到第3次访问时的76.7%(p<0.001)。坚持吸入器的平均测试分数从42.5分增加到45.3分和46.3分,对于三次访问,分别(比较访问1/2和访问1/3,p<0.001;比较访问2/3,p=0.006)。显示良好依从性的患者百分比从基线时的33.7%上升到第3次访问时的58.3%。在研究期间结束时,使用救护药物的患者百分比从16.2%下降到7.4%(p<0.001)。肺功能参数也得到改善。
    TRIWIN结果表明,二丙酸倍氯米松/富马酸福莫特罗/格隆铵可以有效改善健康状况,肺功能,和依从性,并减少以前接受MITT治疗的COPD患者的抢救药物使用,在希腊的现实世界中。
    UNASSIGNED: The extrafine single inhaler triple therapy (efSITT) containing beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium 87/5/9 μg has proved to be efficacious in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in randomized control trials.
    UNASSIGNED: TRIWIN study evaluated the effectiveness of efSITT delivering beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium 87/5/9 μg in COPD patients previously treated with multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) in a real-world study in Greece.
    UNASSIGNED: Prospective, multicenter, observational, non-interventional study was conducted over 24 weeks.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 475 eligible patients had moderate-to-severe COPD, an indication for treatment with efSITT, and were symptomatic despite receiving MITT. COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, pulmonary function parameters, use of rescue medication, and adherence to inhaler use were recorded at baseline (Visit 1), 3 (Visit 2), and 6 months (Visit 3) after treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: Mean CAT score decreased from 21.4 points at Visit 1, to 16.6 at Visit 2 and 15.1 at Visit 3 (p < 0.001 for all pair comparisons). At Visit 3, 79.8% of patients reached a CAT improvement exceeding minimal clinically important difference (⩾2), compared to baseline. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%pred.) increased from 55.4% at Visit 1 to 63.5% at the end of study period (p < 0.001), while mean forced vital capacity (%pred.) increased from 71.1% at Visit 1, to 76.7% at Visit 3 (p < 0.001). The mean Test of Adherence to Inhalers score increased from 42.5 to 45.3 and 46.3 points, for the three visits, respectively (p < 0.001 comparing Visits 1/2 and Visits 1/3; p = 0.006 comparing Visits 2/3). The percentage of patients showing good adherence rose from 33.7% at baseline to 58.3% at Visit 3. The percentage of patients using rescue medication during the last month dropped from 16.2% to 7.4% at the end of study period (p < 0.001). Pulmonary function parameters also improved.
    UNASSIGNED: The TRIWIN results suggest that extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium is effective in improving health status, pulmonary function, and adherence and in reducing rescue medication use in COPD patients previously treated with MITT, in a real-world setting in Greece.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估哮喘的特点和治疗模式,包括短效β2激动剂(SABA)处方,在SABA在哮喘中使用(SABINAIII)研究的新加坡队列中的初级和专科护理。
    方法:横截面,观察性研究。
    方法:在新加坡的五个地点进行的多中心研究。
    方法:哮喘患者(年龄≥12岁),人口统计数据,使用电子病例报告表收集疾病特征和哮喘治疗处方。患者根据研究者定义的哮喘严重程度(2017年全球哮喘倡议建议指导)和实践类型(初级/专科护理)进行分类。
    结果:在分析的205例患者中(平均(SD)年龄,53.6(16.8)岁;女性,62%),55.9%由专科医生登记,44.1%由初级保健医生登记。大多数研究患者(80.5%)患有中度至重度哮喘(86.0%为专科护理,74.4%为初级护理)。在入学前的12个月里,18.0%的患者经历了≥1次严重加重。78.0%的患者哮喘得到良好或部分控制。总的来说,在过去的12个月中,所有患者中有17.1%的患者被处方超过SABA(≥3SABA罐/年),与初级保健相比,专科护理中的过度处方更大(26.3%vs5.6%).只有2.9%的患者接受SABA单药治疗,而41.0%的人除了维持治疗外还接受SABA治疗。在后者中,40.5%的人被过量使用SABA。总的来说,在研究访视期间,处方≥3个SABA罐(vs0-2个SABA罐)的患者被评估为哮喘未控制的比例较高(42.9%vs17.6%).14.1%和84.9%的患者采用吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)或ICS/长效β2激动剂固定剂量组合形式的维持治疗,分别,在入学前的12个月。
    结论:在这个新加坡队列中,除了维持治疗外,〜17%的所有患者和超过40%的患者都处方SABA过量。这些发现强调需要将临床实践与最新的循证治疗建议保持一致。
    背景:NCT03857178。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate asthma characteristics and treatment patterns, including short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) prescriptions, in primary and specialist care in the Singapore cohort of the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA III) study.
    METHODS: Cross-sectional, observational study.
    METHODS: Multicentre study conducted at five sites across Singapore.
    METHODS: In patients with asthma (aged ≥12 years), data on demographics, disease characteristics and asthma treatment prescriptions were collected using electronic case report forms. Patients were classified by investigator-defined asthma severity (guided by 2017 Global Initiative for Asthma recommendations) and practice type (primary/specialist care).
    RESULTS: Of the 205 patients analysed (mean (SD) age, 53.6 (16.8) years; female, 62%), 55.9% were enrolled by specialists and 44.1% by primary care physicians. Most study patients (80.5%) had moderate-to-severe asthma (86.0% in specialist care and 74.4% in primary care). In the 12 months before study enrolment, 18.0% of patients experienced ≥1 severe exacerbation. Asthma was well or partly controlled in 78.0% of patients. Overall, 17.1% of all patients were overprescribed SABA (≥3 SABA canisters/year) in the preceding 12 months, and overprescription was greater in specialist versus primary care (26.3% vs 5.6%). Only 2.9% of patients were prescribed SABA monotherapy, while 41.0% received SABA in addition to maintenance therapy. Among the latter, 40.5% were overprescribed SABA. Overall, a higher percentage of patients prescribed ≥3 SABA canisters (vs 0-2 SABA canisters) were assessed as having uncontrolled asthma during the study visit (42.9% vs 17.6%). Maintenance therapy in the form of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or ICS/long-acting β2 agonist fixed-dose combinations were prescribed to 14.1% and 84.9% of patients, respectively, in the 12 months before enrolment.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this Singapore cohort, ~17% of all patients and more than 40% of patients prescribed SABA in addition to maintenance therapy were overprescribed SABA. These findings emphasise the need to align clinical practices with the latest evidence-based treatment recommendations.
    BACKGROUND: NCT03857178.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在定义韩国的真实世界处方模式,并比较慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)药物的有效性。我们使用韩国健康保险审查和评估服务提供的国家索赔数据,并检查了首次诊断为COPD并在2017年5月1日至2018年4月30日期间开始治疗的患者,药物方案没有变化。在30,784例COPD患者中,长效β2激动剂(LABA)联合长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)(32.7%),吸入性皮质类固醇-LABA(ICS-LABA)(25.6%),LAMA(18.3%),ICS(5.8%),或LABA(4.6%)被规定为首选吸入器。LABA-LAMA的使用(危险比[HR],0.248-0.584),LAMA(HR,0.320-0.641),ICS-LABA(HR,0.325-0.643),和黄嘌呤(HR,0.563-0.828)与不使用每种药物相比,显着降低了总的和严重的恶化率。然而,单独使用ICS或LABA未产生此类效果.继续使用LABA-LAMA,LAMA,ICS-LABA对加重率有显著影响,而ICS的长期使用,LABA,黄嘌呤没有。此外,一些高剂量的ICS-LABA未显示显著作用.这项现实世界的研究表明,LAMA和/或LABA可能是治疗的首选,正如最近的指导方针所建议的那样。然而,ICS,黄嘌呤,在韩国,高剂量ICS-LABA仍经常被处方为一线药物。
    This study aimed to define real-world prescription patterns in Korea and compare the effectiveness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) medications. We used national claims data provided by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in Korea and examined patients who were first diagnosed with COPD and started treatment between May 1, 2017, and April 30, 2018, with no change in drug regimen. Among 30,784 patients with COPD, long-acting β2 agonist (LABA) combined with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) (32.7%), inhaled corticosteroid-LABA (ICS-LABA) (25.6%), LAMA (18.3%), ICS (5.8%), or LABA (4.6%) were prescribed as the first-choice inhalers. The use of LABA-LAMA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.248-0.584), LAMA (HR, 0.320-0.641), ICS-LABA (HR, 0.325-0.643), and xanthine (HR, 0.563-0.828) significantly reduced the total and severe exacerbation rates compared with no use of each medication. However, the use of ICS or LABA individually did not yield such effects. The continued use of LABA-LAMA, LAMA, and ICS-LABA showed a significant effect on exacerbation rate, whereas the long-term use of ICS, LABA, and xanthine did not. Moreover, some high doses of ICS-LABA did not show significant effects. This real-world study revealed that LAMA and/or LABA could be the first choice of therapy, as recommended by recent guidelines. However, ICS, xanthine, and high-dose ICS-LABA are still being prescribed frequently as first-line drugs in Korea.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COPD与肺癌的发生发展有关。吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)对肺癌的保护作用仍存在争议。因此,这项研究根据吸入剂处方和COPD合并症调查了肺癌的发展。
    方法:根据韩国健康保险审查和评估服务数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究。从索引日期到2020年12月31日,对肺癌的发展进行了调查。该队列包括COPD患者(≥40岁),使用新的吸入器处方。排除在筛查期间有任何癌症病史或在索引日期后更换吸入器的患者。
    结果:在63,442名合格患者中,39,588例患者(62.4%)为长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)和长效β2激动剂(LABA)组,ICS/LABA组22,718(35.8%),和1,136(1.8%)的LABA组。多因素分析显示,根据吸入剂处方,肺癌的发展无明显差异。多变量分析,根据年龄调整,性别,以及单变量分析中的重要因素,证明弥漫性间质性肺病(DILD)(HR=2.68;95CI=1.86-3.85),Charlson合并症指数得分较高(HR=1.05;95CI=1.01-1.08),筛查期间两次或两次以上住院(HR=1.19;95CI=1.01-1.39),随着年龄和男性,与肺癌的发生发展独立相关。
    结论:我们的数据表明,肺癌的发展与吸入剂处方无关,但是有了共存的DILD,Charlson合并症指数得分较高,经常住院。
    BACKGROUND: COPD is associated with the development of lung cancer. A protective effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on lung cancer is still controversial. Hence, this study investigated the development of lung cancer according to inhaler prescription and comorbidties in COPD.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. The development of lung cancer was investigated from the index date to December 31, 2020. This cohort included COPD patients (≥ 40 years) with new prescription of inhalers. Patients with a previous history of any cancer during screening period or a switch of inhaler after the index date were excluded.
    RESULTS: Of the 63,442 eligible patients, 39,588 patients (62.4%) were in the long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) group, 22,718 (35.8%) in the ICS/LABA group, and 1,136 (1.8%) in the LABA group. Multivariate analysis showed no significant difference in the development of lung cancer according to inhaler prescription. Multivariate analysis, adjusted for age, sex, and significant factors in the univariate analysis, demonstrated that diffuse interstitial lung disease (DILD) (HR = 2.68; 95%CI = 1.86-3.85), a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score (HR = 1.05; 95%CI = 1.01-1.08), and two or more hospitalizations during screening period (HR = 1.19; 95%CI = 1.01-1.39), along with older age and male sex, were independently associated with the development of lung cancer.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the development of lung cancer is not independently associated with inhaler prescription, but with coexisting DILD, a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and frequent hospitalization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在哮喘患者中过度使用短效β2激动剂(SABA)仍然是一个值得注意的问题,因为它与较高的死亡率有关。不能低估SABA在哮喘管理中的全球相关性,它对哮喘患者构成重大健康风险,并给医疗保健系统带来负担。这项研究,作为全球SABINA计划的一部分,旨在描述中国人群中与SABA使用相关的处方模式和临床结局。
    方法:回顾性队列研究使用香港医院管理局(HA)的临床数据分析和报告系统(CDARS)的匿名电子医疗记录进行。纳入2011年至2018年间新诊断为哮喘且年龄≥12岁的患者,根据自哮喘诊断之日起的一年基线期内SABA使用情况(≤2、3-6、7-10或≥11个毒气罐/年)进行分层。从指数后一年到最早的事件审查对患者进行随访:结局发生和研究期结束(2020年12月31日)。Cox比例回归和负二项回归分别用于估计与SABA使用相关的死亡风险和住院频率。在调整了年龄之后,性别,Charlson合并症指数(CCI),和吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)剂量。结果包括所有原因,哮喘相关,与呼吸有关的死亡率,因任何原因入院的频率,以及因哮喘入院的频率。
    结果:17,782名哮喘患者(平均年龄46.7岁,包括40.8%的男性),59.1%的患者过度使用SABA(每年≥3个罐)。每位患者的处方中位数为5.61SABA罐/年。与每年≤2个毒气罐的患者相比,基线期间过度使用SABA与更高的全因死亡风险相关。关联是剂量依赖性的,使用≥11罐/年(调整后风险比:1.42,95%CI:1.13,1.79)和3-6罐/年(调整后风险比:1.22,95%CI:1.00,1.50)的风险最高.较高的SABA处方量与住院频率增加相关,在7-10个罐/年的亚组中观察到最大风险(调整后的比率:4.81,95%CI:3.66,6.37)。
    结论:在香港哮喘患者中,过度使用SABA是普遍存在的,并且与全因死亡风险和住院频率增加相关。
    BACKGROUND: Excessive use of short-acting β2 agonists (SABA) in patients with asthma continues to be a notable concern due to its link to higher mortality rates. Global relevance of SABA overuse in asthma management cannot be understated, it poses significant health risk to patients with asthma and imposes burden on healthcare systems. This study, as part of global SABINA progamme, aimed to describe the prescribing patterns and clinical outcomes associated with SABA use in the Chinese population.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was conducted using anonymized electronic healthcare records of Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS) from Hong Kong Hospital Authority (HA). Patients newly diagnosed with asthma between 2011 and 2018 and aged ≥12 years were included, stratified by SABA use (≤2, 3-6, 7-10, or ≥11 canisters/year) during one-year baseline period since asthma diagnosis date. Patients were followed up from one-year post-index until earliest censoring of events: outcome occurrence and end of study period (31 December 2020). Cox proportional regression and negative binomial regression were used to estimate the mortality risk and frequency of hospital admissions associated with SABA use respectively, after adjusting for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose. Outcomes include all-cause, asthma-related, and respiratory-related mortality, frequency of hospital admissions for any cause, and frequency of hospital admissions due to asthma.
    RESULTS: 17,782 patients with asthma (mean age 46.7 years, 40.8% male) were included and 59.1% of patients were overusing SABA (≥ 3 canisters per year). Each patient was prescribed a median of 5.61 SABA canisters/year. SABA overuse during baseline period was associated with higher all-cause mortality risk compared to patients with ≤2 canisters/year. Association was dose-dependent, highest risk in those used ≥11 canisters/year (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.79) and 3-6 canisters/year (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.50). Higher SABA prescription volume associated with increased frequency of hospital admissions with greatest risk observed in 7-10 canisters/year subgroup (adjusted rate ratio: 4.81, 95% CI: 3.66, 6.37).
    CONCLUSIONS: SABA overuse is prevalent and is associated with increased all-cause mortality risk and frequency of hospital admissions among the patients with asthma in Hong Kong.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:建议在GOLDB患者中使用LABA/LAMA治疗。我们假设三联疗法(LABA/LAMA/ICS)在实现和维持临床控制(CC)方面优于LABA/LAMA。在GOLDB患者亚组(此处称为GOLDB+患者)中考虑影响和疾病稳定性的复合结局,其特征在于:(1)尽管接受常规LABA/LAMA治疗,但仍有症状(CAT≥10);(2)在过去一年中经历过一次中度加重;(3)血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数(BEC)≥150个细胞/μL.
    方法:ANTESB+研究是一项前瞻性研究,多中心,开放标签,随机化,务实,旨在检验这一假设的对照试验。它将随机分配1028名B患者,以继续使用其主治医师开具的常规LABA/LAMA组合,或开始使用氟替卡松糠酸酯(FF)92μg/umecidinium(UMEC)55μg/维兰特罗(VI)22μg在单个吸入器q.d中进行12个月。主要疗效结果将是达到的CC水平。次要结果包括临床重要恶化指数(CID),年恶化率,和FEV1。探索目标包括BEC和吸烟状况的相互作用,全因死亡率和LABA/LAMA臂上切换治疗臂的患者比例。安全性分析包括不良事件和肺炎发生率。
    结果:首例患者于2024年2月29日招募;结果预计在2026年第一季度。
    结论:ANTESB+研究是第一个:(1)探索三联疗法在B+COPD患者人群中的疗效和安全性;(2)使用综合指数(CC)作为COPD试验的主要结果。
    BACKGROUND: Treatment with LABA/LAMA is recommended in GOLD B patients. We hypothesized that triple therapy (LABA/LAMA/ICS) will be superior to LABA/LAMA in achieving and maintaining clinical control (CC), a composite outcome that considers both impact and disease stability in a subgroup of GOLD B patients (here termed GOLD B+ patients) characterized by: (1) remaining symptomatic (CAT≥10) despite regular LABA/LAMA therapy; (2) having suffered one moderate exacerbation in the previous year; and (3) having blood eosinophil counts (BEC) ≥150cells/μL.
    METHODS: The ANTES B+ study is a prospective, multicenter, open label, randomized, pragmatic, controlled trial designed to test this hypothesis. It will randomize 1028 B+ patients to continue with their usual LABA/LAMA combination prescribed by their attending physician or to begin fluticasone furoate (FF) 92μg/umeclidinium (UMEC) 55μg/vilanterol (VI) 22μg in a single inhaler q.d. for 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome will be the level of CC achieved. Secondary outcomes include the clinical important deterioration index (CID), annual rate of exacerbations, and FEV1. Exploratory objectives include the interaction of BEC and smoking status, all-cause mortality and proportion of patients on LABA/LAMA arm that switch therapy arms. Safety analysis include adverse events and incidence of pneumonia.
    RESULTS: The first patient was recruited on February 29, 2024; results are expected in the first quarter of 2026.
    CONCLUSIONS: The ANTES B+ study is the first to: (1) explore the efficacy and safety of triple therapy in a population of B+ COPD patients and (2) use a composite index (CC) as the primary result of a COPD trial.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管坚持吸入性皮质类固醇/长效β2激动剂(ICS/LABA)治疗,许多哮喘患者经历中度加重。有关中度恶化对医疗保健系统影响的数据有限。这项研究评估了接受ICS/LABA的患者中度加重的频率和经济负担。
    方法:回顾性,纵向研究分析了Optum在2015年10月1日至2019年12月31日期间记录的数据。合格标准包括年龄≥18岁的患者,在12个月的预指数(首次ICS/LABA索赔)中,有≥1项ICS/LABA索赔和≥1项哮喘医疗索赔。主要目标包括描述中度加重频率,以及相关的医疗资源利用率(HRU)和成本。次要目标是评估中度加重与随后严重加重风险之间的关系。在指数后的12个月内,按中度加重频率对患者进行分层。使用新开发的算法确定中度加重。
    结果:在指标后的前12个月,61.6%的患者经历了≥1次中度加重。哮喘相关就诊的平均次数为每人每年4.1次,哮喘相关总费用中位数为3544美元。HRU和费用随着加重频率的增加而增加。门诊和住院就诊占这些费用的比例相似。中度加重与未来严重加重的发生率和风险增加相关(发生率比,1.56;危险比,1.51[均p<0.001])。
    结论:这项研究强调,尽管接受ICS/LABA治疗,仍有很大比例的患者继续经历中度加重,随后经历经济负担和未来严重加重的风险增加。
    BACKGROUND: Despite adherence to inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy, many patients with asthma experience moderate exacerbations. Data on the impact of moderate exacerbations on the healthcare system are limited. This study assessed the frequency and economic burden of moderate exacerbations in patients receiving ICS/LABA.
    METHODS: Retrospective, longitudinal study analyzed data from Optum\'s de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database recorded between October 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Eligibility criteria included patients ≥18 years of age with ≥1 ICS/LABA claim and ≥1 medical claim for asthma in the 12 months pre-index (first ICS/LABA claim). Primary objectives included describing moderate exacerbation frequency, and associated healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs. A secondary objective was assessing the relationship between moderate exacerbations and subsequent risk of severe exacerbations. Patients were stratified by moderate exacerbation frequency in the 12 months post index. Moderate exacerbations were identified using a newly developed algorithm.
    RESULTS: In the first 12 months post index 61.6% of patients experienced ≥1 moderate exacerbation. Mean number of asthma-related visits was 4.1 per person/year and median total asthma-related costs was $3544. HRU and costs increased with increasing exacerbation frequency. Outpatient and inpatient visits accounted for a similar proportion of these costs. Moderate exacerbations were associated with an increased rate and risk of future severe exacerbations (incidence rate ratio, 1.56; hazard ratio, 1.51 [both p < 0.001]).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted that a high proportion of patients continue to experience moderate exacerbations despite ICS/LABA therapy and subsequently experience increased economic burden and risk of future severe exacerbations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号