■合作学习方法对于建立更具包容性的学校特别有趣;然而,它们没有得到广泛实施。在合作学习方法中,拼图策略对老师很有吸引力,因为它似乎很容易实施并遵循其四步教学结构;此外,这种方法被认为可以提高学生的社会化和学习能力。为了准确识别拼图法的效果,提出并使用荟萃分析方法完成了对该方法对重要学生教育成果影响的研究的系统回顾.
■共分析了69个拼图研究,并在归纳和演绎主题分析后保留了三个主要结果:学习(包括成就和动机),社会关系,和自尊(包括学术自尊和社会自尊)。如果可能,进行了补充荟萃分析,以量化拼图对成就的影响(n=43),动机(n=5),社会关系(n=4),和学术自尊(n=4)。
■我们审查的主要结果集中在拼图效应的不一致性和研究之间关于所有保留的学生教育成果的高度变异性(即,成就,动机,社会关系,和学术自尊),除了社会自尊,只有三项研究得出结论,拼图方法有积极的影响。此外,在研究中观察到均匀的结果。我们的综述强调了可以解释研究中这种变异性的几个因素:样本量,教室里学生的多样性,以及所教内容的类型。
■这些因素的调节作用必须进行实证检验,因为他们提出了更有效地实现Jigsaw方法的方法。
UNASSIGNED: Cooperative learning methods are particularly interesting for building more inclusive schools; however, they have not been widely implemented. Among cooperative learning methods, the Jigsaw strategy is attractive for teachers, as it seems to be easy to implement and follow its four-step teaching structure; in addition, this method is believed to improve students\' socialization and learning. To identify the effects of the Jigsaw method accurately, a systematic
review of studies that have tested the effects of this method on important student educational outcomes was proposed and completed using a meta-analytical approach.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 69 Jigsaw studies were analyzed, and three major outcomes were retained following inductive and deductive thematic analyses: learning (including
achievement and motivation), social relations, and self- esteem (including academic self-esteem and social self-esteem). When possible, complementary meta-analyses were conducted to quantify the Jigsaw effects on
achievement (n = 43), motivation (n = 5), social relations (n = 4), and academic self-esteem (n = 4).
UNASSIGNED: The primary results of our
review focused on the inconsistency of Jigsaw effects and the high degree of variability among studies with regard to all retained student educational outcomes (i.e., achievement, motivation, social relations, and academic self-esteem) with the exception of social self-esteem, for which only three studies concluded that the Jigsaw method had positive effects. Moreover, homogeneous results were observed within studies. Our
review highlights several factors that may explain this variability among studies: the sample size, the diversity of students in the classroom, and the type of content taught.
UNASSIGNED: The moderating roles of these factors must be tested empirically, as they suggest ways of implementing the Jigsaw method more efficiently.