AKI, acute kidney injury

AKI,急性肾损伤
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:小儿急性肾损伤(AKI)是一个全球性健康问题,在资源有限的环境中,其相关死亡风险不成比例地显著。有必要了解脆弱人群中小儿AKI的流行病学。这里,我们提出了一项前瞻性研究,调查南亚国家儿童"严重透析依赖性AKI"的流行病学和相关危险因素,这将是同类研究中首例也是最大规模的.
    方法:ASPIRE研究(PCRRT-ICONICFoundation计划的一部分)是一个多中心,在南亚国家进行的前瞻性观察研究。所有需要在任何合作医疗中心进行AKI透析的≤18岁儿童和青少年均被纳入。进行数据收集,直到观察到以下终点之一:(1)放电,(2)死亡,(3)违背医嘱出院。
    结果:从2019年到2022年,共有308名患有严重AKI的儿童入组。平均年龄为6.17岁(63%为男性)。继发性AKI比原发性AKI更普遍(67.2%),主要是由于感染,脱水,和肾毒素。原发性AKI的常见原因是肾小球肾炎,溶血性尿毒综合征,狼疮性肾炎,和梗阻性尿路病.震惊,需要通风,凝血病常见于需要透析的重度AKI患儿.最主要的肾脏替代疗法是腹膜透析(60.7%)。死亡率为32.1%。
    结论:南亚儿童AKI的常见原因是可以预防的。这些患有严重透析依赖性AKI的儿童死亡率很高。“需要有针对性的干预措施来早期预防和识别AKI,并在资源较少的国家启动支持性护理。
    BACKGROUND: Pediatric acute kidney injury (AKI) is a global health concern with an associated mortality risk disproportionately pronounced in resource-limited settings. There is a pertinent need to understand the epidemiology of pediatric AKI in vulnerable populations. Here, we proposed a prospective study to investigate the epidemiology and associated risk factors of \"severe dialysis dependent AKI\" in children among South Asian nations which would be the first and largest of its kind.
    METHODS: The ASPIRE study (part of PCRRT-ICONIC Foundation initiative) is a multi-center, prospective observational study conducted in South Asian countries. All children and adolescents ≤ 18 years of age who required dialysis for AKI in any of the collaborating medical centers were enrolled. Data collection was performed until one of the following endpoints was observed: (1) discharge, (2) death, and (3) discharge against medical advice.
    RESULTS: From 2019 to 2022, a total of 308 children with severe AKI were enrolled. The mean age was 6.17 years (63% males). Secondary AKI was more prevalent than primary AKI (67.2%), which predominantly occurred due to infections, dehydration, and nephrotoxins. Common causes of primary AKI were glomerulonephritis, hemolytic uremic syndrome, lupus nephritis, and obstructive uropathy. Shock, need for ventilation, and coagulopathy were commonly seen in children with severe AKI who needed dialysis. The foremost kidney replacement therapy used was peritoneal dialysis (60.7%). The mortality rate was 32.1%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Common causes of AKI in children in South Asia are preventable. Mortality is high among these children suffering from \"severe dialysis dependent AKI.\" Targeted interventions to prevent and identify AKI early and initiate supportive care in less-resourced nations are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:粘菌素被认为是治疗MDR革兰氏阴性菌的一种有价值和最后手段的治疗选择。肾毒性是粘菌素临床上最相关的不良反应。体内研究表明,施用氧化应激降低剂,比如抗坏血酸,是克服粘菌素诱导的肾毒性(CIN)的有希望的策略。然而,有限的临床数据探讨了辅助抗坏血酸治疗预防CI的潜在益处。因此,本研究旨在评估在危重患者中,抗坏血酸作为辅助治疗CIN的潜在肾保护作用.
    UNASSIGNED:本研究是在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城(KAMC)进行的一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是所有接受静脉粘菌素治疗的成年危重患者。根据在粘菌素开始后三天内使用抗坏血酸作为伴随疗法,将符合条件的患者分为两组。主要结果是粘菌素启动后的CIN几率,而次要结局是30天死亡率,住院死亡率,ICU,医院LOS根据患者的年龄使用倾向评分(PS)匹配(1:1比例),SOFA得分,还有血清肌酐.
    UNASSIGNED:共筛选451名患者是否符合资格;90名患者根据所选标准进行倾向评分匹配后纳入。与未接受抗坏血酸(AA)辅助治疗的患者相比,粘菌素开始后发生CIN的几率相似(OR(95CI):0.83(0.33,2.10),p值=0.68)。此外,30天死亡率,住院死亡率,ICU,两组的住院LOS相似.
    未经证实:在粘菌素治疗期间辅助使用抗坏血酸与较低的CI几率无关。需要更大样本量的进一步研究来证实这些发现。
    UNASSIGNED: Colistin is considered a valuable and last-resort therapeutic option for MDR gram-negative bacteria. Nephrotoxicity is the most clinically pertinent adverse effect of colistin. Vivo studies suggest that administering oxidative stress-reducing agents, such as ascorbic acid, is a promising strategy to overcome colistin-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN). However, limited clinical data explores the potential benefit of adjunctive ascorbic acid therapy for preventing CIN. Therefore, this study aims to assess the potential nephroprotective role of ascorbic acid as adjunctive therapy against CIN in critically ill patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective cohort study at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) for all critically ill adult patients who received IV colistin. Eligible patients were classified into two groups based on the ascorbic acid use as concomitant therapy within three days of colistin initiation. The primary outcome was CIN odds after colistin initiation, while the secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, ICU, and hospital LOS. Propensity score (PS) matching was used (1:1 ratio) based on the patient\'s age, SOFA score, and serum creatinine.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 451 patients were screened for eligibility; 90 patients were included after propensity score matching based on the selected criteria. The odds of developing CIN after colistin initiation were similar between patients who received ascorbic acid (AA) as adjunctive therapy compared to patients who did not (OR (95 %CI): 0.83 (0.33, 2.10), p-value = 0.68). In addition, the 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, ICU, and hospital LOS were similar between the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Adjunctive use of Ascorbic acid during colistin therapy was not associated with lower odds of CIN. Further studies with a larger sample size are required to confirm these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经批准:在印度进行的试验中,重组粒细胞集落刺激因子(GCSF)可改善酒精相关性肝炎(AH)的生存率。该试验的目的是确定pegfilgrastim的安全性和有效性,长效重组GCSF,在美国AH患者中。
    未经批准:此预期,随机化,在2017年3月至2020年3月之间进行的开放标签试验,在第1天和第8天,将临床诊断为AH且Maddrey判别函数评分≥32的患者随机分组至治疗标准(SOC)或SOC+pegfilgrastim(皮下0.6mg)(clinicaltrials.govNCT02776059).SOC为己酮可可碱或泼尼松龙28天,由患者的主治医生决定。如果在第8天白细胞计数超过30,000/mm3,则不施用pegfilgrastim的第二次注射。主要结果是在第90天的存活。次要结果包括急性肾损伤(AKI)的发生率,肝肾综合征(HRS),肝性脑病,或感染。
    未经评估:由于COVID19大流行,该研究提前终止。18例患者随机接受SOC治疗,16例随机接受SOC+pegfilgrastim治疗。所有患者均接受泼尼松龙作为SOC。9名患者在第8天由于WBC>30,000/mm3而未能接受第二剂量的pegfilgrastin。两组90天的生存率相似(SOC:0.83[95%置信区间[CI]:0.57-0.94]vs.pegfilgrastim:0.73[95%CI:0.44-0.89];p>0.05;差异CI:-0.18-0.38)。AKI的发生率,HRS,肝性脑病,两组治疗组的感染情况相似,且未出现因pegfilgrastim引起的严重不良事件.
    UNASSIGNED:这项II期试验发现,与单独接受泼尼松龙的受试者相比,接受pegfilgrastim+泼尼松龙的AH受试者在90天没有生存益处。
    UNASSIGNED:由美国国立卫生研究院和国家酗酒和酗酒研究所U01-AA021886和U01-AA021884提供。
    UNASSIGNED: In trials conducted in India, recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) improved survival in alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH). The aim of this trial was to determine the safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim, a long-acting recombinant GCSF, in patients with AH in the United States.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective, randomized, open label trial conducted between March 2017 and March 2020 randomized patients with a clinical diagnosis of AH and a Maddrey discriminant function score ≥32 to standard of care (SOC) or SOC+pegfilgrastim (0.6 mg subcutaneously) on Day 1 and Day 8 (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02776059). SOC was 28 days of either pentoxifylline or prednisolone, as determined by the patient\'s primary physician. The second injection of pegfilgrastim was not administered if the white blood cell count exceeded 30,000/mm3 on Day 8. Primary outcome was survival at Day 90. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), hepatic encephalopathy, or infections.
    UNASSIGNED: The study was terminated early due to COVID19 pandemic. Eighteen patients were randomized to SOC and 16 to SOC+pegfilgrastim. All patients received prednisolone as SOC. Nine patients failed to receive a second dose of pegfilgrastin due to WBC > 30,000/mm3 on Day 8. Survival at 90 days was similar in both groups (SOC: 0.83 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.94] vs. pegfilgrastim: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.44-0.89]; p > 0.05; CI for difference: -0.18-0.38). The incidences of AKI, HRS, hepatic encephalopathy, and infections were similar in both treatment arms and there were no serious adverse events attributed to pegfilgrastim.
    UNASSIGNED: This phase II trial found no survival benefit at 90 days among subjects with AH who received pegfilgrastim+prednisolone compared with subjects receiving prednisolone alone.
    UNASSIGNED: was provided by the United States National Institutes of Health and National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism U01-AA021886 and U01-AA021884.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:这项荟萃分析旨在比较成年患者心脏手术中使用热停搏液和冷停搏液的临床结果,试验序贯分析(TSA)用于确定结果的结论性。
    UNASSIGNED:在PubMed上进行了电子搜索,Medline,Scopus,EMBASE,和Cochrane库,以确定所有比较心脏手术中热停搏液和冷停搏液的研究。主要终点为住院或30天死亡率,心肌梗塞,低心输出量综合征,主动脉内球囊泵的使用,中风,和新的心房颤动。次要终点为急性肾损伤,住院时间,和重症监护病房的住院时间。对(1)自2010年Fan及其同事发表以来发表的研究进行了预先指定的亚组分析,(2)随机对照研究,(3)具有低偏倚风险的研究,(4)冠状动脉搭桥术,(5)冷血与冷晶体心脏停搏液的研究。进行TSA以确定结果的结论性,使用低偏倚风险研究中没有显著异质性的所有结局。
    未经证实:术后死亡率无显著差异,心肌梗塞,低心输出量综合征,主动脉内球囊泵的使用,中风,新的心房颤动,热停搏液和冷停搏液之间的急性肾损伤。TSA得出结论,目前的证据足以排除这些结果的相对风险降低20%。
    未经批准:关于安全结果,目前的证据表明,在热停搏液和冷停搏液之间的选择仍然是外科医生的偏好。
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis aimed to compare clinical outcomes of warm and cold cardioplegia in cardiac surgeries in adult patients, with trial sequential analysis (TSA) used to determine the conclusiveness of the results.
    UNASSIGNED: Electronic searches were performed on PubMed, Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane library to identify all studies that compared warm and cold cardioplegia in cardiac surgeries. Primary end points were in-hospital or 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, low cardiac output syndrome, intra-aortic balloon pump use, stroke, and new atrial fibrillation. Secondary end points were acute kidney injury, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay. Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed for (1) studies published since publication of Fan and colleagues in 2010, (2) randomized controlled studies, (3) studies with low risk of bias, (4) coronary artery bypass graft surgeries, and (5) studies with cold blood versus those with cold crystalloid cardioplegia. TSA was performed to determine conclusiveness of the results, using on all outcomes without significant heterogeneity from studies of low risk of bias.
    UNASSIGNED: No significant differences were found between post-operative rates of mortality, myocardial infarction, low cardiac output syndrome, intra-aortic balloon pump use, stroke, new atrial fibrillation, and acute kidney injury between warm and cold cardioplegia. TSA concluded that current evidence was sufficient to rule out a 20% relative risk reduction in these outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Concerning safety outcomes, current evidence suggests that the choice between warm and cold cardioplegia remains in the surgeon\'s preference.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)预示着肝硬化死亡率增加,强制预防策略。诺氟沙星是SBP预防的推荐选择。然而,它的使用引起了人们对抗生素耐药性的担忧。利福昔明已被建议作为替代品。我们研究了利福昔明对诺氟沙星在SBP的一级和二级预防中的疗效。
    未经评估:在这项开放标记的随机试验中,患有腹液蛋白水平(<1.5g/l)的晚期肝硬化患者,Child-Pugh评分≥9分,血清胆红素≥3mg/dl或肾功能受损(初级预防组),或先前有SBP的患者(二级预防组)接受诺氟沙星(每天一次400mg)或利福昔明(每天两次550mg)。所有患者随访6个月,主要终点是事件SBP的发展。
    未经评估:对142名患者进行了资格评估,其中132人符合入学标准;12人失去随访,而4人停止治疗。在初级预防的患者中,SBP的发生率相似(14.3%vs.24.3%,P=0.5),而在二级预防中,利福昔明的SBP复发率较低(7%vs.39%P=0.004)。利福昔明显著降低二级预防中发生SBP的几率[OR(95%CI0.14(0.02-0.73;P=0.02)]。接受利福昔明作为二级预防的患者的肝性脑病发作也较少(23.1%vs.51.5%,P=0.02)。两组的180天生存率相似(P=0.5,P=0.2)。
    未经评估:与诺氟沙星相比,利福昔明显着减少了SBP的事件,以及用作二级预防的HE,而对于初级预防,两者具有相似的效果(NCT03695705)。
    UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT03695705。
    UNASSIGNED: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) heralds increased mortality in cirrhosis, mandating strategies for prophylaxis. Norfloxacin has been the recommended choice for SBP prevention. However, its use has raised concerns about antibiotic resistance. Rifaximin has been suggested as an alternative. We investigated the efficacy of rifaximin against norfloxacin in primary and secondary prophylaxis of SBP.
    UNASSIGNED: In this open-labeled randomized trial, patients with either advanced cirrhosis having ascitic fluid protein levels (<1.5 g/l), Child-Pugh score ≥9 points, serum bilirubin ≥3 mg/dl or impaired renal function (primary prophylaxis group), or those with prior SBP (secondary prophylaxis group) received either norfloxacin (400 mg once daily) or rifaximin (550 mg twice daily). All patients were followed for six months, with the primary endpoint being the development of incident SBP.
    UNASSIGNED: 142 patients were assessed for eligibility, of which 132 met the enrolment criteria; 12 were lost to follow-up, while 4 discontinued treatment. In patients on primary prophylaxis, occurrence of SBP was similar (14.3% vs. 24.3%, P = 0.5), whereas in secondary prophylaxis SBP recurrence was lower with rifaximin (7% vs. 39% P = 0.004). Rifaximin significantly reduced the odds for SBP development in secondary prophylaxis [OR (95% CI0.14 (0.02-0.73; P = 0.02)]. Patients receiving rifaximin as secondary prophylaxis also had fewer episodes of hepatic encephalopathy (23.1% vs. 51.5%, P = 0.02). 180-day survival between the arms in either group was similar (P = 0.5, P = 0.2).
    UNASSIGNED: In comparison to norfloxacin, rifaximin significantly reduces incident events of SBP, as well as HE when used as a secondary prophylaxis, whereas for primary prophylaxis both have similar effects (NCT03695705).
    UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03695705.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性急性肝衰竭(ACLF)是急性门脉高压综合征,短期死亡率高。ACLF患者的平均动脉压(MAP)较低,全身血管阻力,和高心输出量.这个,反过来,导致腹水发生率增加,急性肾损伤,还有低钠血症.我们评估了早期添加米多君的作用,到目前为止还没有被分析。
    开始服用米多君的ACLF患者(Gr。A)除了包括腹水控制的护理标准(SOC)外,还将其与仅接受SOC(Gr。B).目的是评估血液动力学,腹水控制,利尿剂相关并发症,和死亡率在1个月。
    45名ACLF患者(Gr。A-21;Gr。B-24)被纳入试点研究。在纳入时,各组的基线特征相似.米多君的剂量为22.5(7.5-22.5)mg/天,Gr为22.29±8.75天。A.米多君显著进步MAP和尿钠排泄。只有33.34%的患者需要Gr穿刺。A与Gr的62.5%相比。B(p=0.05)。Gr.患者耐受的利尿剂剂量高于Gr。B.Gr中54.2%的患者出现利尿剂相关并发症。B与Gr中的23.8%相比。A(p=0.03)。14%的Gr。米多君出现副作用,需要调整剂量。两组在第30天的死亡率相似。
    添加米多君可改善血流动力学,利尿剂的耐受性,ACLF患者的腹水控制。
    UNASSIGNED: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a syndrome of acute portal hypertension with high short-term mortality. ACLF patients have low mean arterial pressure (MAP), systemic vascular resistance, and high cardiac output. This, in turn, leads to an increased incidence of ascites, acute kidney injury, and hyponatremia. We evaluated the role of the early addition of midodrine, which has not been analyzed to date.
    UNASSIGNED: ACLF patients who were started on midodrine (Gr. A) in addition to standard of care (SOC) for ascites control were included and compared with those who received only SOC (Gr. B). The aim was to assess the hemodynamics, ascites control, diuretic-related complications, and mortality at 1 month.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty-five ACLF patients (Gr. A-21; Gr. B-24) were included in the pilot study. At inclusion, the baseline characteristics were similar among the groups. The dose of midodrine was 22.5 (7.5-22.5) mg/day for 22.29 ± 8.75 days in Gr. A. Midodrine significantly improved the MAP and urinary sodium excretion. Only 33.34% of patients required paracentesis in Gr. A compared with 62.5% in Gr. B (p = 0.05). Gr. A patients tolerated a higher dose of diuretics than Gr. B. Diuretic-related complications developed in 54.2% of patients in Gr. B compared with only 23.8% in Gr. A (p = 0.03). Fourteen percent in Gr. A developed side effects to midodrine and required dose modification. Mortality at day 30 was similar in both groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Addition of midodrine improves the hemodynamics, tolerability of diuretics, and ascites control in ACLF patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管术中使用留置导尿管(IUC),但可能会引起并发症(例如,谵妄),只有少数可靠的研究调查了术中IUC使用与并发症之间的关联.我们假设使用IUC可能会增加术后精神状态改变和/或导尿管感染的发生率。
    在这项回顾性单中心队列研究中,我们分析了2013年1月至2018年12月期间在我们机构接受手术的成年患者的数据.主要终点是精神状态改变和/或导尿管感染的发生率。将患者分为IUC组和对照组。多变量logistic回归模型用于确定术后并发症的预测因子。多变量Cox比例风险回归模型用于分析无匹配和倾向加权逆患者的出院情况.
    在接受检查的14284例患者中,我们分析了5112例患者(对照组,44.0%;IUC组,56.0%)。几乎所有手术都包括侵入性较小的手术。术后精神状态改变和术后导尿管感染的患病率分别为3.56%和0.04%,分别。在逆倾向加权之后,两组的所有基线特征相似.然而,IUCs患者术后并发症的风险较高(调整后的比值比,1.97;95%置信区间[CI],1.50-2.59)和延长住院时间(危险比,0.84;95%CI,0.80-0.89)。
    在接受微创手术的患者中,IUC可能与精神状态改变或导尿管感染的相对高风险有关。这些数据可能有助于有关IUCs围手术期使用的术前讨论。
    UNASSIGNED: Although indwelling urinary catheters (IUCs) are used intraoperatively and may cause complications (e.g., delirium), only few robust studies have investigated the association between intraoperative IUC use and complications. We hypothesized that IUC use might increase the postoperative incidence of altered mental status and/or urinary catheter infection.
    UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective single-center cohort study, we analyzed the data of adult patients undergoing surgery at our facility between January 2013 and December 2018. The primary endpoint was altered mental status and/or incidence of urinary catheter infections. The patients were divided into IUC and control groups. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify the predictors of postoperative complications, and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze hospital discharge in unmatched and inverse propensity-weighted patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 14,284 patients that were reviewed, we analyzed 5112 patients (control group, 44.0%; IUC group, 56.0%). Almost all procedures comprised less invasive surgeries. The prevalence of postoperative altered mental status and postoperative urinary catheter infection were 3.56% and 0.04%, respectively. After inverse propensity weighting, all baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. However, patients with IUCs had a higher risk of postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-2.59) and prolonged hospital stays (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.89).
    UNASSIGNED: In patients undergoing less invasive surgery, IUCs may be associated with a relatively high risk of altered mental status or urinary catheter infection. These data may facilitate preoperative discussions regarding the perioperative use of IUCs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性肝衰竭(ALF)是急性肝炎等常见疾病的罕见并发症。在印度,病毒性肝炎和抗结核药物引起的肝毒性是ALF的最常见原因。临床上,这些患者出现黄疸,脑病,和凝血病。肝性脑病(HE)和脑水肿是ALF过程中最重要的临床事件,其次是额外的感染,并确定这些患者的预后。ALF中脑病和脑水肿的发病机制是独特且多因素的。氨在发病机制中起着至关重要的作用,几种疗法旨在纠正这种异常。新型氨降低剂的作用仍在不断发展。这些患者最好在拥有肝移植(LT)设施的三级医院进行治疗。据记载,积极的强化医疗管理可以挽救大部分患者。在那些预后因素较差的患者中,LT是唯一被证明能提高生存率的有效疗法。然而,识别预后差的合适患者仍然是一个挑战。密切监测,早期识别和治疗并发症,和表亲移植形成一线方法来管理这类患者。最近的研究表明,使用动态预后模型可以更好地选择肝移植患者,及时移植可以挽救预后不良因素的ALF患者的生命。
    Acute liver failure (ALF) is not an uncommon complication of a common disease such as acute hepatitis. Viral hepatitis followed by antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity are the commonest causes of ALF in India. Clinically, such patients present with appearance of jaundice, encephalopathy, and coagulopathy. Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and cerebral edema are central and most important clinical event in the course of ALF, followed by superadded infections, and determine the outcome in these patients. The pathogenesis of encephalopathy and cerebral edema in ALF is unique and multifactorial. Ammonia plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis, and several therapies aim to correct this abnormality. The role of newer ammonia-lowering agents is still evolving. These patients are best managed at a tertiary care hospital with facility for liver transplantation (LT). Aggressive intensive medical management has been documented to salvage a substantial proportion of patients. In those with poor prognostic factors, LT is the only effective therapy that has been shown to improve survival. However, recognizing suitable patients with poor prognosis has remained a challenge. Close monitoring, early identification and treatment of complications, and couseling for transplant form the first-line approach to manage such patients. Recent research shows that use of dynamic prognostic models is better for selecting patients undergoing liver transplantation and timely transplant can save life of patients with ALF with poor prognostic factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性肝衰竭(ALF)是罕见的,不可预测的,各种病因导致的急性肝损伤(ALI)的潜在致命并发症。文献中报道的ALF病因具有区域差异,影响临床表现和自然病程。在旨在反映印度临床实践的共识文章的这一部分中,疾病负担,流行病学,临床表现,监测,和预测已经讨论过了。在印度,病毒性肝炎是ALF的最常见原因,抗结核药物引起的药物性肝炎是第二常见的原因。ALF的临床表现以黄疸为特征,凝血病,和脑病。区分ALF和其他肝衰竭的原因是很重要的,包括慢性急性肝衰竭,亚急性肝功能衰竭,以及某些可以模仿这种表现的热带感染。该疾病通常具有暴发性临床过程,短期死亡率很高。死亡通常归因于脑部并发症,感染,导致多器官衰竭。及时肝移植(LT)可以改变结果,因此,在可以安排LT之前,为患者提供重症监护至关重要。评估预后以选择适合LT的患者同样重要。已经提出了几个预后评分,他们的比较表明,本土开发的动态分数比西方世界描述的分数更具优势。ALF的管理将在本文件的第2部分中描述。
    Acute liver failure (ALF) is an infrequent, unpredictable, potentially fatal complication of acute liver injury (ALI) consequent to varied etiologies. Etiologies of ALF as reported in the literature have regional differences, which affects the clinical presentation and natural course. In this part of the consensus article designed to reflect the clinical practices in India, disease burden, epidemiology, clinical presentation, monitoring, and prognostication have been discussed. In India, viral hepatitis is the most frequent cause of ALF, with drug-induced hepatitis due to antituberculosis drugs being the second most frequent cause. The clinical presentation of ALF is characterized by jaundice, coagulopathy, and encephalopathy. It is important to differentiate ALF from other causes of liver failure, including acute on chronic liver failure, subacute liver failure, as well as certain tropical infections which can mimic this presentation. The disease often has a fulminant clinical course with high short-term mortality. Death is usually attributable to cerebral complications, infections, and resultant multiorgan failure. Timely liver transplantation (LT) can change the outcome, and hence, it is vital to provide intensive care to patients until LT can be arranged. It is equally important to assess prognosis to select patients who are suitable for LT. Several prognostic scores have been proposed, and their comparisons show that indigenously developed dynamic scores have an edge over scores described from the Western world. Management of ALF will be described in part 2 of this document.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Worldwide, the prescribing pattern of the Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) has increased. They are considered highly effective medications in controlling various conditions including inflammatory diseases. They are associated with various adverse effects including gastrointestinal bleeding and ulcer and renal toxicity though. These adverse effects are generally potentiated when NSAIDs are co-prescribed with other drugs that share similar adverse effects and toxicities. Developing severe side effects from NSAIDs is more prone among elderly patients. Hence, it is crucial to evaluate prescribing pattern of these agents to prevent/decrease the number of unwanted side effects caused by NSAIDs.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the prescribing pattern of NSAIDs among elderly and the co-prescribing of NSAIDs and different interacting drugs, which could lead to more incidences of NSAIDs-induced toxicities among Jordanian elderly patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A multicenter retrospective study was performed during a three months period in Jordan. The study involves a total number of (n = 5916) elderly patient\'s records obtained from Four governmental hospitals in Jordan.
    RESULTS: A total number of (n = 20450) drugs were prescribed and dispensed for patient. NSAIDs drugs prescribing percentage was 10.3% of total medications number. Aspirin was the most commonly prescribed NSAIDs among patients (70.4%), followed by Diclofenac sodium in all dosage forms (25.1%) and oral Ibuprofen (3.1%. In addition, Aspirin was the highest NSAIDs co-prescribed with ACEI (e.g., Enalapril), ARBs (e.g. Candesartan and Losartan), Diuretics (Furosemide, Indapamide, Hydrochlorothiazide, Amiloride, and Spironolactone), Warfarin and antiplatelets (Clopidogreal and Ticagrelor) followed by Diclofenac and other NSAIDs.
    CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs prescribing rate among elderly patients was high. Additionally the co-prescribing of NSAIDs especially Aspirin with other agents, which contributes to NSAIDs nephrotoxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity, were high. Strict measurements and action plans should be taken by prescribers to optimize the medical treatment in elderly through maximizing the benefits and decreasing the unwanted side effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号