Abstract：
The article is a response to Kaldybekov and his colleague\'s, 2024 paper about Foucault\'s theory on power. I argue that it is difficult to understand Foucault\'s theory of power without looking into his intellectual life and experiences, especially his war experiences. The objective of my study is to show that there is a connection between Foucault\'s ideas about power and his own lived life, and that he always has been critical of totalitarian theories although he seems influenced by Marxist theories, early in his career. In the paper I show how he deals with this dilemma by incorporating some of Nietzsche\'s ideas into his thinking. To illustrate the connection between Foucault\'s lived life and his theories about power, I take a particular point of departure in Foucault\'s lecture series on psychiatric power in the 1970s and an interview conducted by the Italian journalist Trombadori.
摘要：
这篇文章是对Kaldybekov和他的同事的回应，2024年福柯权力理论论文。我认为，如果不研究福柯的知识生活和经历，很难理解他的权力理论，尤其是他的战争经历.我研究的目的是证明福柯关于权力的想法和他自己的生活之间存在联系，尽管他似乎受到马克思主义理论的影响，但他一直对极权主义理论持批评态度，在他职业生涯的早期。在这篇论文中，我展示了他如何通过将尼采的一些思想融入他的思想中来处理这个困境。为了说明福柯的生活和他的权力理论之间的联系，我在福柯1970年代关于精神病学权力的系列讲座和意大利记者Trombadori进行的采访中提出了一个特别的出发点。
