PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: A logbook system is essential to ensure standardized competency in medical education. This survey will provide the first overview of our current logbook and can serve as an initial proposal for improvement to a more relevant and valuable tool to assess our postgraduate training programme.
METHODS: This survey was conducted among all Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) anaesthetic trainees. The data for this survey was collected by using Google Forms. A link to the form was distributed to all UKM anaesthetic trainees. The survey questionnaire consisted of five sections, demographic data, strengths and weaknesses of logbook content, evaluation of logbook usage experience, perception of the feedback received regarding the logbook performance, and potential improvements that can be made.
RESULTS: 107 anaesthetic trainees participated in this study. All of the sections in the logbook were deemed relevant by more than 60% of the trainees except for the on-call section which was seen as relevant only by 37.4% of them. 53.3% agreed that the logbook is useful for learning during the course. However, only 43.9% of them perceived that the logbook was easy and convenient to use. Only 59 respondents received feedback regarding their logbook performance. The analysis of open-ended answers highlights the necessity of transitioning to a fully digitalized logbook system for easy accessibility. It also reveals the need to re-evaluate specific logbook contents and incorporate additional teaching and learning tools to enhance the overall training process. Moreover, the findings emphasize the importance of effectively implementing feedback mechanisms within the logbook system to optimize student learning.
CONCLUSIONS: Serving as a foundational step towards developing a more efficient and structured educational tool, this research provides valuable insights for future advancements in medical education, particularly in anaesthesiology.
METHODS: This survey was conducted among all Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) anaesthetic trainees. The data for this survey was collected by using Google Forms. A link to the form was distributed to all UKM anaesthetic trainees. The survey questionnaire consisted of five sections, demographic data, strengths and weaknesses of logbook content, evaluation of logbook usage experience, perception of the feedback received regarding the logbook performance, and potential improvements that can be made.
RESULTS: 107 anaesthetic trainees participated in this study. All of the sections in the logbook were deemed relevant by more than 60% of the trainees except for the on-call section which was seen as relevant only by 37.4% of them. 53.3% agreed that the logbook is useful for learning during the course. However, only 43.9% of them perceived that the logbook was easy and convenient to use. Only 59 respondents received feedback regarding their logbook performance. The analysis of open-ended answers highlights the necessity of transitioning to a fully digitalized logbook system for easy accessibility. It also reveals the need to re-evaluate specific logbook contents and incorporate additional teaching and learning tools to enhance the overall training process. Moreover, the findings emphasize the importance of effectively implementing feedback mechanisms within the logbook system to optimize student learning.
CONCLUSIONS: Serving as a foundational step towards developing a more efficient and structured educational tool, this research provides valuable insights for future advancements in medical education, particularly in anaesthesiology.
摘要：
背景：日志系统对于确保医学教育的标准化能力至关重要。这项调查将提供我们目前的日志的第一个概述，可以作为一个初步的建议，改进一个更相关和有价值的工具，以评估我们的研究生培训计划。
方法：这项调查是在所有马来西亚Kebangsaan大学（UKM）麻醉学员中进行的。这项调查的数据是使用GoogleForms收集的。表格的链接已分发给所有UKM麻醉学员。调查问卷由五个部分组成，人口统计数据，日志内容的优缺点，评估使用日志的经验，对收到的关于日志性能的反馈的感知，以及可以进行的潜在改进。
结果：107名麻醉受训者参与了这项研究。超过60％的学员认为日志中的所有部分都相关，但待命部分仅37.4％的学员认为相关。53.3％的人同意日志对课程期间的学习有用。然而,只有43.9%的人认为日志使用简单方便。只有59名受访者收到了有关其日志表现的反馈。对开放式答案的分析强调了过渡到完全数字化的日志系统以便于访问的必要性。它还表明需要重新评估特定的日志内容，并纳入其他教学和学习工具，以增强整体培训过程。此外，研究结果强调了在日志系统中有效实施反馈机制以优化学生学习的重要性。
结论：作为开发更高效和结构化教育工具的基础步骤，这项研究为医学教育的未来发展提供了有价值的见解，尤其是麻醉学。
方法：这项调查是在所有马来西亚Kebangsaan大学（UKM）麻醉学员中进行的。这项调查的数据是使用GoogleForms收集的。表格的链接已分发给所有UKM麻醉学员。调查问卷由五个部分组成，人口统计数据，日志内容的优缺点，评估使用日志的经验，对收到的关于日志性能的反馈的感知，以及可以进行的潜在改进。
结果：107名麻醉受训者参与了这项研究。超过60％的学员认为日志中的所有部分都相关，但待命部分仅37.4％的学员认为相关。53.3％的人同意日志对课程期间的学习有用。然而,只有43.9%的人认为日志使用简单方便。只有59名受访者收到了有关其日志表现的反馈。对开放式答案的分析强调了过渡到完全数字化的日志系统以便于访问的必要性。它还表明需要重新评估特定的日志内容，并纳入其他教学和学习工具，以增强整体培训过程。此外，研究结果强调了在日志系统中有效实施反馈机制以优化学生学习的重要性。
结论：作为开发更高效和结构化教育工具的基础步骤，这项研究为医学教育的未来发展提供了有价值的见解，尤其是麻醉学。
