PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: With digital and social media advances, animated health communications (health animations) are highly prevalent globally, yet the evidence base underpinning them remains unclear and limited. While individual studies have attempted to explore the effectiveness, acceptability and usability of specific features of health animations, there is substantial heterogeneity in study design, comparators and the animation design and content. Consequently, there is a need to synthesise evidence of health animations using an approach that recognises this contextual complexity, which may affect their impact.
METHODS: This project aims to understand why, how, for whom, to what extent and in which contexts health animations are expected to promote preventive health behaviours. We will conduct a realist review following Pawson\'s five iterative stages to (1) define the review scope and locate existing theories; (2) search for evidence; (3) select and appraise evidence; (4) extract data and (5) synthesise data and refine theory. Engagement with stakeholders involved in developing, testing, implementing or commissioning health communications, including animations, will allow the initial programme theory to be tested and refined. The findings will be reported in accordance with Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards.
BACKGROUND: Ethical approval for the public stakeholder work was provided by the Northumbria University Research Ethics Committee. We will disseminate the findings widely through outputs tailored to target specific professional, public and patient audiences. Dissemination will occur through stakeholder engagement as part of the research, a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.
UNASSIGNED: CRD42023447127.
METHODS: This project aims to understand why, how, for whom, to what extent and in which contexts health animations are expected to promote preventive health behaviours. We will conduct a realist review following Pawson\'s five iterative stages to (1) define the review scope and locate existing theories; (2) search for evidence; (3) select and appraise evidence; (4) extract data and (5) synthesise data and refine theory. Engagement with stakeholders involved in developing, testing, implementing or commissioning health communications, including animations, will allow the initial programme theory to be tested and refined. The findings will be reported in accordance with Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards.
BACKGROUND: Ethical approval for the public stakeholder work was provided by the Northumbria University Research Ethics Committee. We will disseminate the findings widely through outputs tailored to target specific professional, public and patient audiences. Dissemination will occur through stakeholder engagement as part of the research, a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.
UNASSIGNED: CRD42023447127.
摘要：
背景：随着数字和社交媒体的进步，动画健康传播(健康动画)在全球范围内非常普遍，然而，支持它们的证据基础仍然不清楚和有限。虽然个别研究试图探索有效性，健康动画的特定功能的可接受性和可用性，研究设计存在很大的异质性，比较器和动画设计和内容。因此,有必要使用一种认识到这种上下文复杂性的方法来综合健康动画的证据，这可能会影响他们的影响。
方法：该项目旨在了解为什么，如何,为谁,在何种程度上以及在何种情况下，健康动画有望促进预防性健康行为。我们将在Pawson的五个迭代阶段之后进行现实性审查，以（1）定义审查范围并定位现有理论；（2）寻找证据；（3）选择和评估证据；（4）提取数据；（5）综合数据并完善理论。与参与开发的利益相关者互动，测试,实施或调试健康通信，包括动画，将允许对初始程序理论进行测试和完善。研究结果将根据现实主义和元叙事证据综合：不断发展的标准进行报告。
背景：公众利益相关者工作的伦理批准由诺森比亚大学研究伦理委员会提供。我们将通过针对特定专业人员量身定制的产出广泛传播调查结果，公众和耐心的观众。作为研究的一部分，传播将通过利益相关者的参与进行，同行评审的出版物和会议演示文稿。
■CRD42023447127。
方法：该项目旨在了解为什么，如何,为谁,在何种程度上以及在何种情况下，健康动画有望促进预防性健康行为。我们将在Pawson的五个迭代阶段之后进行现实性审查，以（1）定义审查范围并定位现有理论；（2）寻找证据；（3）选择和评估证据；（4）提取数据；（5）综合数据并完善理论。与参与开发的利益相关者互动，测试,实施或调试健康通信，包括动画，将允许对初始程序理论进行测试和完善。研究结果将根据现实主义和元叙事证据综合：不断发展的标准进行报告。
背景：公众利益相关者工作的伦理批准由诺森比亚大学研究伦理委员会提供。我们将通过针对特定专业人员量身定制的产出广泛传播调查结果，公众和耐心的观众。作为研究的一部分，传播将通过利益相关者的参与进行，同行评审的出版物和会议演示文稿。
■CRD42023447127。
