PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Too much sedentary behavior (SB) and too little physical activity (PA) place adult workers at risk for chronic illness. It remains unclear which occupations and subgroups within occupations have the highest and lowest SB and PA, and little is known about the effects of organizational factors on these behaviors and metrics. Thus, our main aims were to review and summarize evidence describing daily SB and PA collected using accelerometry across various occupations and to identify organizational factors influencing SB and PA.
METHODS: A literature search of six databases was performed for relevant studies published through March 2023. Eligible studies were in English, targeted working populations, had a sample size > 75, and objectively measured both SB and PA for seven consecutive days using accelerometers. Following PRISMA guidelines, 5,197 studies were identified, and 19 articles met our inclusion criteria. Five of these studies were included in a meta-analysis comparing time spent in SB, light PA (LPA), and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) across occupations. Methodological quality was assessed using a Joanna Briggs Institute tool.
RESULTS: We found that 63% of the studies reported daily time spent in SB and in MVPA, but fewer reported LPA, moderate PA, and vigorous PA. The average time spent in SB was 553.34 min/day, in LPA was 299.77 min/day, and in MVPA was 33.87 min/day. In occupational subgroup analysis, we observed that office workers had 2.3 h more SB, 2.4 less hours LPA, and 14 min less MVPA per day than nurses. However, most studies either did not specify workers\' occupations or grouped occupations. Shift work and workplace facilities significantly influenced SB and PA, but organizational factors affecting these behaviors were not sufficiently investigated (e.g., occupation type, work environment and workplace facilities, and shift work).
CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed to explore SB and PA patterns within occupational subgroups. Additionally, it is important to explore work-related individual (e.g., job task), interpersonal (e.g., social support from colleagues), organizational (e.g., work policy), and environmental factors influencing SB and PA. Future studies should also investigate the association of these factors with SB and PA.
METHODS: A literature search of six databases was performed for relevant studies published through March 2023. Eligible studies were in English, targeted working populations, had a sample size > 75, and objectively measured both SB and PA for seven consecutive days using accelerometers. Following PRISMA guidelines, 5,197 studies were identified, and 19 articles met our inclusion criteria. Five of these studies were included in a meta-analysis comparing time spent in SB, light PA (LPA), and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) across occupations. Methodological quality was assessed using a Joanna Briggs Institute tool.
RESULTS: We found that 63% of the studies reported daily time spent in SB and in MVPA, but fewer reported LPA, moderate PA, and vigorous PA. The average time spent in SB was 553.34 min/day, in LPA was 299.77 min/day, and in MVPA was 33.87 min/day. In occupational subgroup analysis, we observed that office workers had 2.3 h more SB, 2.4 less hours LPA, and 14 min less MVPA per day than nurses. However, most studies either did not specify workers\' occupations or grouped occupations. Shift work and workplace facilities significantly influenced SB and PA, but organizational factors affecting these behaviors were not sufficiently investigated (e.g., occupation type, work environment and workplace facilities, and shift work).
CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed to explore SB and PA patterns within occupational subgroups. Additionally, it is important to explore work-related individual (e.g., job task), interpersonal (e.g., social support from colleagues), organizational (e.g., work policy), and environmental factors influencing SB and PA. Future studies should also investigate the association of these factors with SB and PA.
摘要：
背景：久坐行为（SB）过多和体力活动（PA）过少会使成年工人面临慢性疾病的风险。尚不清楚职业中的哪些职业和亚组具有最高和最低的SB和PA，对组织因素对这些行为和指标的影响知之甚少。因此，我们的主要目的是回顾和总结描述在不同职业中使用加速度测量法收集的每日SB和PA的证据,并确定影响SB和PA的组织因素.
方法：针对截至2023年3月发表的相关研究，对六个数据库进行了文献检索。合格的学习是英语，有针对性的工作人群，样本量>75，并且使用加速度计连续7天客观地测量了SB和PA。按照PRISMA准则,确定了5197项研究，19篇文章符合我们的纳入标准。其中五项研究纳入了一项荟萃分析，比较了在SB中花费的时间，轻型PA(LPA),以及各种职业的中度到剧烈的PA（MVPA）。使用JoannaBriggs研究所工具评估方法学质量。
结果：我们发现，63%的研究报告了每天在SB和MVPA中花费的时间，但LPA报告较少,中度PA,充满活力的PA。在SB中花费的平均时间为553.34分钟/天，LPA为299.77分钟/天，MVPA为33.87分钟/天。在职业亚组分析中，我们观察到上班族的SB多2.3小时，减少2.4小时LPA，每天比护士少14分钟的MVPA。然而,大多数研究都没有指定工人的职业或分组职业。轮班工作和工作场所设施显著影响SB和PA，但影响这些行为的组织因素没有得到充分调查(例如，职业类型,工作环境和工作场所设施，和轮班工作)。
结论：需要更多的研究来探索职业亚组中的SB和PA模式。此外,探索与工作相关的个人(例如，作业任务)，人际关系(例如，同事的社会支持)，组织(例如，工作政策)，以及影响SB和PA的环境因素。未来的研究还应调查这些因素与SB和PA的关系。
方法：针对截至2023年3月发表的相关研究，对六个数据库进行了文献检索。合格的学习是英语，有针对性的工作人群，样本量>75，并且使用加速度计连续7天客观地测量了SB和PA。按照PRISMA准则,确定了5197项研究，19篇文章符合我们的纳入标准。其中五项研究纳入了一项荟萃分析，比较了在SB中花费的时间，轻型PA(LPA),以及各种职业的中度到剧烈的PA（MVPA）。使用JoannaBriggs研究所工具评估方法学质量。
结果：我们发现，63%的研究报告了每天在SB和MVPA中花费的时间，但LPA报告较少,中度PA,充满活力的PA。在SB中花费的平均时间为553.34分钟/天，LPA为299.77分钟/天，MVPA为33.87分钟/天。在职业亚组分析中，我们观察到上班族的SB多2.3小时，减少2.4小时LPA，每天比护士少14分钟的MVPA。然而,大多数研究都没有指定工人的职业或分组职业。轮班工作和工作场所设施显著影响SB和PA，但影响这些行为的组织因素没有得到充分调查(例如，职业类型,工作环境和工作场所设施，和轮班工作)。
结论：需要更多的研究来探索职业亚组中的SB和PA模式。此外,探索与工作相关的个人(例如，作业任务)，人际关系(例如，同事的社会支持)，组织(例如，工作政策)，以及影响SB和PA的环境因素。未来的研究还应调查这些因素与SB和PA的关系。
