Abstract：
The present study aimed to find out differences of social support, perceived emotion invalidation, psychological needs, and use of adaptive and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies in maritally adjusted and maladjusted after controlling for age, education, employment status, and depressive symptomatology. The cross-sectional study uses a matched pairs design. The sample was divided into two groups; maritally adjusted and maladjusted women (n = 40 pairs) on basis of scores obtained on revised-dyadic adjustment scale. Forty maritally adjusted women were matched with 40 maritally maladjusted women according to age, education, and employment status. Social support questionnaire, perceived invalidation of emotion scale, basic psychological need satisfaction frustration scale, cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire, and center for epidemiologic studies depression scale were administered. One-way ANCOVA revealed that maritally maladjusted women had lower level of social support [mean difference; -5.65(-9.97, -1.33), p < 0.05, partial η2 = 0.08] and more emotional invalidation [mean difference; 15.36(13.08, 17.65), p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.71] compared to maritally adjusted women after controlling for the effect of depressive symptomatology. Maritally maladjusted women had more need frustration [mean difference; 10.75(7.59, 13.92), p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.38] compared to maritally adjusted women. However, maritally adjusted women had more need satisfaction [mean difference; 13.36(9.67, 17.05), p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.41] compared to maritally maladjusted women. Maritally adjusted women used more adaptive CER strategies (acceptance, refocus on planning and putting into perspective) [mean difference; 4.66(2.36, 6.95), p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.18] compared to maritally maladjusted women whereas, maritally maladjusted women used more maladaptive strategies (self-blame, catastrophizing and blaming others) [mean difference; 4.66(2.77, 6.54), p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.25] compared to maritally adjusted women. Maladjusted women had less social support and more emotional invalidation of emotions and psychological needs frustration. They used more maladaptive strategies to manage their negative emotions in comparison to maritally adjusted women. Identification of these cognitive emotion regulation strategies will help clinicians and counselors to devise psychological intervention targeting the use of adaptive strategies to minimize the negative mental health consequences.
摘要：
本研究旨在找出社会支持的差异，感知到的情绪无效，心理需求,以及在控制年龄后，在军事调整和调整不良中使用适应性和适应不良的认知情绪调节策略，教育,就业状况,和抑郁症状。横断面研究采用配对设计。样本分为两组；根据修订的二元调整量表获得的分数，进行婚姻调整的妇女和失调的妇女（n=40对）。根据年龄，将40名婚姻适应妇女与40名婚姻失调妇女进行匹配，教育,和就业状况。社会支持问卷，情感量表的感知无效，基本心理需要满足挫折量表，认知情绪调节问卷，和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表进行了管理。单向ANCOVA显示，婚姻失调的妇女的社会支持水平较低[平均差异；-5.65（-9.97，-1.33），p<0.05，部分η2=0.08]和更多的情绪无效[平均差；15.36（13.08，17.65），p<0.001，部分η2=0.71]与控制抑郁症状作用后的婚姻调整女性相比。婚姻失调的妇女更需要沮丧[平均差异；10.75（7.59，13.92），p<0.001，部分η2=0.38]与婚姻调整女性相比。然而,接受婚姻调整的妇女的需求满意度更高[平均差异；13.36（9.67，17.05），与婚姻失调的女性相比，p<0.001，部分η2=0.41]。经过婚姻调整的妇女使用了更多的适应性CER策略(接受，重新关注规划和透视)[平均差异；4.66(2.36，6.95)，p<0.001，部分η2=0.18]与婚姻失调的女性相比，婚姻失调的女性使用了更多的适应不良的策略(自责，灾难和责备他人)[平均差；4.66(2.77，6.54)，p<0.001，部分η2=0.25]与婚姻调整女性相比。适应不良妇女的社会支持较少，情绪无效和心理需求受挫更多。与经过婚姻调整的女性相比，他们使用了更多的适应不良策略来管理自己的负面情绪。识别这些认知情绪调节策略将有助于临床医生和咨询师设计针对使用适应性策略的心理干预措施，以最大程度地减少负面的心理健康后果。
