Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: We examined alcohol use and consequences across five categories of same-day drinking intentions and willingness and tested whether same-day motives and protective strategies predicted differences in outcomes across categories of intentions and willingness.
METHODS: In a 14-week ecological momentary assessment design, undergraduate student participants (N = 196) reported drinking intentions and behaviors over 13 surveys weekly (four morning surveys [Thursday through Sunday]; three midday, early, and late evening surveys [Thursday through Saturday]). On average, participants were 20.61 years old (SD = 1.50; range 17-25), 63% identified as female (n = 124), 29% as male (n = 57), and 8% identified as neither male nor female (n = 15; i.e., nonbinary; transgender; genderqueer; agender). Participants reported numbers of drinks consumed on the evening (past 2 hr) and morning (previous day) surveys. Multilevel generalized linear models tested effects of drinking intentions/willingness categories, motives, protective strategies, and interactions between key variables on alcohol use and consequences in several models.
RESULTS: Rates and quantities of drinking were highest on planned drinking days, and especially high when students planned to get drunk. When enhancement and social motives were elevated, students were more likely to drink and consumed more drinks even on unplanned drinking days, and especially when socializing with others. Effects of coping motives were weaker and sparse. Harm reduction protective strategies were associated with more positive and negative consequences with little variation across planned and unplanned drinking days.
CONCLUSIONS: Jointly considering drinking intentions and willingness narrows the intention-behavior gap in student drinking and suggests potential areas of focus for messaging around responsible drinking. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
METHODS: In a 14-week ecological momentary assessment design, undergraduate student participants (N = 196) reported drinking intentions and behaviors over 13 surveys weekly (four morning surveys [Thursday through Sunday]; three midday, early, and late evening surveys [Thursday through Saturday]). On average, participants were 20.61 years old (SD = 1.50; range 17-25), 63% identified as female (n = 124), 29% as male (n = 57), and 8% identified as neither male nor female (n = 15; i.e., nonbinary; transgender; genderqueer; agender). Participants reported numbers of drinks consumed on the evening (past 2 hr) and morning (previous day) surveys. Multilevel generalized linear models tested effects of drinking intentions/willingness categories, motives, protective strategies, and interactions between key variables on alcohol use and consequences in several models.
RESULTS: Rates and quantities of drinking were highest on planned drinking days, and especially high when students planned to get drunk. When enhancement and social motives were elevated, students were more likely to drink and consumed more drinks even on unplanned drinking days, and especially when socializing with others. Effects of coping motives were weaker and sparse. Harm reduction protective strategies were associated with more positive and negative consequences with little variation across planned and unplanned drinking days.
CONCLUSIONS: Jointly considering drinking intentions and willingness narrows the intention-behavior gap in student drinking and suggests potential areas of focus for messaging around responsible drinking. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
摘要：
目的：我们检查了五类当天饮酒意向和意愿的饮酒和后果，并测试了当天动机和保护策略是否预测了不同意向和意愿类别的结果差异。
方法：在为期14周的生态瞬时评估设计中，本科生参与者（N=196）每周进行13次调查（4次上午调查[周四至周日]；3次中午，早期，和深夜调查[周四至周六])。平均而言,参与者为20.61岁（SD=1.50；范围17-25），63%被确认为女性(n=124)，29%为男性（n=57），8%的人既不是男性也不是女性(n=15；即，非二元；变性人；性别同性恋；agender)。参与者报告了晚上（过去2小时）和早上（前一天）的饮料消耗数量调查。多层次广义线性模型测试了饮酒意愿/意愿类别的影响，动机,保护策略,以及几个模型中酒精使用的关键变量和后果之间的相互作用。
结果：在计划饮酒日，饮酒率和饮酒量最高，尤其是当学生打算喝醉时。当增强和社会动机被提升时，即使在计划外的饮酒日，学生也更有可能喝酒和喝更多的饮料，尤其是与他人交往时。应对动机的影响较弱且稀疏。减少危害的保护策略与更积极和消极的后果相关，在计划内和计划外饮酒日几乎没有变化。
结论：共同考虑饮酒意向和意愿缩小了学生饮酒中的意向行为差距，并提出了围绕负责任饮酒传达信息的潜在关注领域。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2024APA，保留所有权利)。
方法：在为期14周的生态瞬时评估设计中，本科生参与者（N=196）每周进行13次调查（4次上午调查[周四至周日]；3次中午，早期，和深夜调查[周四至周六])。平均而言,参与者为20.61岁（SD=1.50；范围17-25），63%被确认为女性(n=124)，29%为男性（n=57），8%的人既不是男性也不是女性(n=15；即，非二元；变性人；性别同性恋；agender)。参与者报告了晚上（过去2小时）和早上（前一天）的饮料消耗数量调查。多层次广义线性模型测试了饮酒意愿/意愿类别的影响，动机,保护策略,以及几个模型中酒精使用的关键变量和后果之间的相互作用。
结果：在计划饮酒日，饮酒率和饮酒量最高，尤其是当学生打算喝醉时。当增强和社会动机被提升时，即使在计划外的饮酒日，学生也更有可能喝酒和喝更多的饮料，尤其是与他人交往时。应对动机的影响较弱且稀疏。减少危害的保护策略与更积极和消极的后果相关，在计划内和计划外饮酒日几乎没有变化。
结论：共同考虑饮酒意向和意愿缩小了学生饮酒中的意向行为差距，并提出了围绕负责任饮酒传达信息的潜在关注领域。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2024APA，保留所有权利)。
