UNASSIGNED: To test the performance of TVS-CSE in predicting sPTD among asymptomatic women in the mid-trimester at risk of sPTD either due to clinical factors or due to a short cervix.
UNASSIGNED: Prospective observational study performed at a tertiary hospital in South India. Asymptomatic pregnant women between 16 and 24 weeks who had one or more clinical risk factors for sPTD or CL <2.5 cm were included. GE Voluson E-8 ultrasound machine was used. After CL measurement, elastography color coding was noted around the internal-os in the sagittal view. The strain ratio (SR) was calculated using the trace method on three ROIs (Region of Interest): Internal-os in sagittal view (IN), whole cervix in sagittal view (WN), and internal-os in axial view (AN). Reference Tissue (RT) of similar size and depth was chosen in the darkest blue region on elastography (stiffest area) outside the cervix, posterior/lateral to the cervix over the ligament insertion. Lower the SR - softer the cervix. Two trained fetal medicine consultants performed the initial 57 cases until intra/inter-observer correlation was satisfactory. Delivery before 37 weeks (after 26 weeks), in which the process of labor has begun spontaneously, or labor was induced after PPROM-was considered as sPTD. SRs were assessed to determine how well they could predict sPTD independently or combined with cervical length.
UNASSIGNED: Out of 221 recruited,17 were lost to follow-up after 32 weeks; 204 were delivered in our hospital. Irrespective of the route of delivery, 71 (34.8%) had sPTD. Of the remaining 133, 106 delivered at term, and 27 underwent medically indicated PTD. Apart from multiple pregnancies, no other preterm-related risk factors (including CL < 2.5 cm) showed significant association with sPTD. Red CSE pattern around internal-os was associated with a significantly higher (54.5%) incidence of sPTD. CLs were similar (3.63 ± 0.67 vs. 3.63 ± 0.80, p = .981) whereas SRs in all three ROIs were significantly lower among sPTD group versus no sPTD group (IN:0.65 ± 0.29 vs 0.79 ± 0.30 p = .001, WN:0.34 ± 0.13 vs 0.39 ± 0.15, p = .013, AN:0.37 ± 0.16 vs 0.48 ± 0.26, p = .002, respectively). Using ROC curves, while CL was not predictive (AUROC 0.49, p = .81), SRs showed moderate predictive value toward sPTD with the best AUC of 0.624 (p = .003) at IN. Prediction was slightly better for early sPTD <32 weeks (AUC 0.653 p = 0.03). The best cutoff for SR at IN was 0.72, below which there was a moderate accuracy in predicting sPTD (sensitivity 52.11%, specificity 60.9%, PPV 41.57%, NPV 70.44%, diagnostic OR 1.69 and overall accuracy of 57.84%). A weak positive correlation is seen between IN and CL (Pearson\'s correlation R = 0.181). Multi-variable binary logistic regression analysis suggested that SRs at IN (Adjusted OR - 0.259 CI 0.079-0.850), AN (Adjusted OR 0.182 CI 0.034-0.963), Multiple Pregnancy (Adjusted OR 3.5 CI 1.51-8.13) and previous sPTD/PPROM (Adjusted OR 2.72 CI 0.97-7.61) independently predicted sPTD.
UNASSIGNED: TVS CSE performed better than CL as an independent predictive tool toward sPTD, although predictive efficacy was modest at best. Since technology is now available in high-end USG machines in tertiary care centers, we propose optimal utilization of CSE in LMICs to triage at-risk populations since low SRs are strongly associated with sPTD.
■为了测试TVS-CSE在预测由于临床因素或由于子宫颈短而有sPTD风险的妊娠中期无症状妇女中sPTD的性能。
■在印度南部一家三级医院进行的前瞻性观察性研究。包括16至24周有一个或多个sPTD或CL<2.5cm临床危险因素的无症状孕妇。使用GEVolusonE-8超声机。CL测量后,在矢状视图的内部操作系统周围注意到弹性成像彩色编码。应变比(SR)是使用追踪方法在三个ROI(感兴趣区域)上计算的:矢状视图中的内部操作系统(IN),矢状视图中的整个子宫颈(WN),和内部操作系统在轴向视图(AN)。在宫颈外弹性成像上最暗的蓝色区域(最坚硬的区域)中选择相似大小和深度的参考组织(RT),后/外侧子宫颈在韧带插入。降低SR-使子宫颈变软。两名训练有素的胎儿医学顾问完成了最初的57例病例,直到观察者内/观察者间的相关性令人满意。分娩前37周(26周后),劳动过程自发开始,或在PPROM被认为是sPTD后引产。对SR进行了评估,以确定它们独立或结合宫颈长度预测sPTD的能力。
■在被招募的221人中,32周后17例失访;204例在我们医院分娩。无论交付途径如何,71例(34.8%)有sPTD。在任期内交付的其余133、106中,27人接受了医学指示的PTD。除了多胎妊娠,无其他早产相关危险因素(包括CL<2.5cm)与sPTD显著相关.内部操作系统周围的红色CSE模式与sPTD的发生率显着升高(54.5%)相关。CLs相似(3.63±0.67vs.3.63±0.80,p=.981),而sPTD组与无sPTD组相比,所有三个ROI的SR均显着降低(IN:0.65±0.29vs0.79±0.30p=.001,WN:0.34±0.13vs0.39±0.15,p=.013,AN:0.37±0.16vs0.48±0.26,p=.002)。使用ROC曲线,而CL不是预测性的(AUROC0.49,p=0.81),SRs对sPTD显示中等预测值,在IN时最佳AUC为0.624(p=0.003)。早期sPTD<32周的预测略好(AUC0.653p=0.03)。在IN时,SR的最佳临界值为0.72,低于该临界值,预测sPTD的准确性中等(灵敏度为52.11%,特异性60.9%,PPV41.57%,净现值70.44%,诊断OR1.69,总体准确率为57.84%)。在IN和CL之间观察到微弱的正相关(皮尔逊相关性R=0.181)。多变量二元逻辑回归分析表明,在IN处的SRs(调整后OR-0.259CI0.079-0.850),AN(调整后OR0.182CI0.034-0.963),多胎妊娠(校正OR3.5CI1.51-8.13)和先前的sPTD/PPROM(校正OR2.72CI0.97-7.61)独立预测了sPTD。
■作为sPTD的独立预测工具,TVSCSE比CL表现更好,尽管预测功效充其量是适度的。由于技术现在可以在三级护理中心的高端USG机器中使用,我们建议在LMICs中最佳利用CSE来分诊高危人群,因为低SRs与sPTD密切相关.