PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Constipation Severity Instrument (CSI) and assess its reliability and validity in the Iranian Persian language with chronic functional constipation.
UNASSIGNED: Chronic functional constipation is a common complaint characterized by a range of symptoms. The use of a validated tool adapted to the culture is an important part of the treatment process.
UNASSIGNED: CSI was translated into Persian language according to Beaton\'s guidelines. One hundred and twenty-five patients with chronic functional constipation, according to ROME IV criteria, completed the questionnaires. Face validity was assessed in two qualitative and quantitative forms (impact score), internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed by Cronbach\'s alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating the total scores of the CSI and the WCSS. The floor/ ceiling effects of the questionnaire were also assessed.
UNASSIGNED: The impact score of all questions was greater than 1.5. The Cronbach\'s alpha coefficient for the total score was 0.90 and the ICC was 0.90. The total score of the CSI was significantly correlated with the total score of the WCSS (Spearman\'s p=0.74). No floor/ceiling effects were found.
UNASSIGNED: The Persian version of the CSI is a reliable and valid tool that can be used for psychometric evaluation. Clinicians can also benefit from this questionnaire when assessing treatment outcomes in Iranian patients.
UNASSIGNED: Chronic functional constipation is a common complaint characterized by a range of symptoms. The use of a validated tool adapted to the culture is an important part of the treatment process.
UNASSIGNED: CSI was translated into Persian language according to Beaton\'s guidelines. One hundred and twenty-five patients with chronic functional constipation, according to ROME IV criteria, completed the questionnaires. Face validity was assessed in two qualitative and quantitative forms (impact score), internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed by Cronbach\'s alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating the total scores of the CSI and the WCSS. The floor/ ceiling effects of the questionnaire were also assessed.
UNASSIGNED: The impact score of all questions was greater than 1.5. The Cronbach\'s alpha coefficient for the total score was 0.90 and the ICC was 0.90. The total score of the CSI was significantly correlated with the total score of the WCSS (Spearman\'s p=0.74). No floor/ceiling effects were found.
UNASSIGNED: The Persian version of the CSI is a reliable and valid tool that can be used for psychometric evaluation. Clinicians can also benefit from this questionnaire when assessing treatment outcomes in Iranian patients.
摘要：
■这项研究的目的是翻译和跨文化适应便秘严重程度工具（CSI），并评估其在伊朗波斯语中的可靠性和有效性患有慢性功能性便秘。
■慢性功能性便秘是以一系列症状为特征的常见主诉。使用适用于培养物的经过验证的工具是处理过程的重要部分。
■根据Beaton的指南，CSI被翻译成波斯语。125名慢性功能性便秘患者，根据罗马四世标准，完成问卷。面部效度以定性和定量两种形式进行评估(影响评分)，内部一致性和重测信度通过Cronbachα系数和组内相关系数(ICC)进行评估，分别。通过关联CSI和WCSS的总分来评估收敛效度。还评估了问卷的地板/天花板效应。
■所有问题的影响得分均大于1.5。总分的Cronbachα系数为0.90，ICC为0.90。CSI的总分与WCSS的总分显着相关（Spearman'sp=0.74）。没有发现地板/天花板效应。
■CSI的波斯语版本是一种可靠且有效的工具，可用于心理测验评估。在评估伊朗患者的治疗结果时，临床医生也可以从该问卷中受益。
■慢性功能性便秘是以一系列症状为特征的常见主诉。使用适用于培养物的经过验证的工具是处理过程的重要部分。
■根据Beaton的指南，CSI被翻译成波斯语。125名慢性功能性便秘患者，根据罗马四世标准，完成问卷。面部效度以定性和定量两种形式进行评估(影响评分)，内部一致性和重测信度通过Cronbachα系数和组内相关系数(ICC)进行评估，分别。通过关联CSI和WCSS的总分来评估收敛效度。还评估了问卷的地板/天花板效应。
■所有问题的影响得分均大于1.5。总分的Cronbachα系数为0.90，ICC为0.90。CSI的总分与WCSS的总分显着相关（Spearman'sp=0.74）。没有发现地板/天花板效应。
■CSI的波斯语版本是一种可靠且有效的工具，可用于心理测验评估。在评估伊朗患者的治疗结果时，临床医生也可以从该问卷中受益。
