Abstract：
The authors want to invite the integrated care community to reflect with us on an evolutionary shift in how we approach matters of justice and equity: from a diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) framework to a perspective that centers the relational concepts of belonging, dignity, and justice (BDJ) for a more just world (Davis, 2021). Our desire to reflect, question, and pivot is inspired by the Ecocycle Planning Model-which I (Deepu George) used to critically frame the Collaborative Family Healthcare Association\'s (CFHA) history in Part I of the article (George, 2023a) and creatively anticipate our future in Part II (George & Khatri, 2024). In this article, the authors want to focus on the nodes of maturity and creative destruction, as well as the idea of the rigidity trap-to examine our collective energies around the idea of DEI. With CFHA\'s 30th anniversary upon us, we pause and reflect on not only the benefits of DEI efforts heretofore, but also the pitfalls, to avoid the rigidity trap, which is likely to occur when we embrace tenets of an idea that may no longer serve the values we once aspired to or fail to evolve in favor of the familiar. Considering critiques of the limitations of DEI work in practice and literature, the authors believe a BDJ approach will better inform our growth moving forward. Therefore, the authors want to reflect, honor, and build upon the impact and gains from DEI and adapt them to better serve the needs of all-especially the historically marginalized and underrepresented voices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
摘要：
作者希望邀请综合护理社区与我们一起思考我们如何处理正义和公平问题的进化转变：从多样性，股本，和包含(DEI)框架，以归属感的关系概念为中心，尊严,和正义(BDJ)为一个更公正的世界(戴维斯，2021)。我们渴望反思，question,枢轴的灵感来自生态周期规划模型-我(DeepuGeorge)在文章的第一部分中用来批判性地构建合作家庭医疗保健协会(CFHA)的历史(George，2023a)，并在第二部分创造性地预测我们的未来(乔治和哈特里，2024).在这篇文章中,作者希望关注成熟度和创造性破坏的节点，以及刚性陷阱的想法-围绕DEI的想法检查我们的集体能量。随着CFHA成立30周年，我们停下来思考，不仅是迄今为止DEI努力的好处，还有陷阱，为了避免刚性陷阱，这是很可能发生的，当我们拥抱的理念，可能不再服务于我们曾经渴望或未能演变为有利于熟悉的价值观。考虑到对DEI工作在实践和文献中的局限性的批评，作者认为，BDJ方法将更好地为我们的增长提供信息。因此,作者想反思，荣誉,并在DEI的影响和收益的基础上进行调整，以更好地满足所有人的需求，特别是历史上被边缘化和代表性不足的声音。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2024APA，保留所有权利)。
