Abstract：
This study examined the stability of Attachment Script Assessment (ASA) deactivation, hyperactivation, and anomalous content and their significance for parenting outcomes in mothers (Mage = 31 years; 78% White/European American) and 6-month-old infants. Comparable to ASA secure base script knowledge (SBSK), mothers\' ASA deactivation, hyperactivation, and anomalous content were significantly, moderately stable over two years (r\'s = .40 - .43). Mothers\' ASA hyperactivation and anomalous content were associated with greater maternal intrusiveness, whereas ASA deactivation was associated with greater detachment and less intrusiveness. Only ASA anomalous content was associated with lower maternal sensitivity. Mothers\' ASA deactivation was associated with less dynamic change in respiratory sinus arrhythmia during the Still-Face Procedure-reflective of limited mobilization of physiological resources to support responding to infants. Findings support the validity of ASA deactivation, hyperactivation, and anomalous content scripts, and demonstrate their utility in examining adult attachment stability and predictive significance for parent-child outcomes.
摘要：
本研究检查了附件脚本评估(ASA)停用的稳定性，过度激活,以及异常内容及其对母亲（Mage=31岁；78％白人/欧洲裔美国人）和6个月大婴儿的育儿结果的意义。与ASA安全基础脚本知识(SBSK)相当，母亲\'ASA停用，过度激活,异常含量显著，在两年内适度稳定(r\s=.40-.43)。母亲的ASA过度激活和异常含量与更大的母亲侵入性相关，而ASA停用与更大的脱离和更小的侵入性相关。只有ASA异常含量与较低的母体敏感性相关。母亲的ASA停用与静脸手术期间呼吸性窦性心律失常的动态变化较小相关，这反映了有限的生理资源动员以支持对婴儿的反应。调查结果支持ASA停用的有效性，过度激活,和异常的内容脚本，并证明它们在检查成人依恋稳定性和对亲子结局的预测意义方面的效用。
