Abstract：
BACKGROUND: The proposed concept of secure/insecure lifeattachment reflects the experience of the world and life as a good (or insecure/threatening) place to be. The present article describes the theoretical foundation, development, and validation of a revised measure that captures the phenomenon of secure/insecure life attachment. The revised scale consists of seven dimensions: (1) Coexistence, (2) Reliability, (3) Safetiness, (4) Integration, (5) Inclusion, (6) Participation, and (7) Deliberation.
METHODS: In three studies (N = 1,059), we examined the factor structure and the convergent and predictive validity of the Life Attachment Scale-Revised (LAS-R).
RESULTS: Our results support a seven-factor structure of the scale, reflecting the aforementioned dimensions. Furthermore, convergent and predictive validity were established through correlations with related concepts of life satisfaction, flourishing, openness to the future, and perceived stress.
CONCLUSIONS: We have devised and substantiated a scale adept at gauging dimensions of secure and insecure/disordered life attachment. Empirical evidence from statistical analyses supports the assumption that the LAS-R is psychometrically sound, establishing its reliability and validity as a dependable instrument. Thus, the scale has promising implications for developing the empirical base for research in many areas of psychology, sociology, and the social sciences.
METHODS: In three studies (N = 1,059), we examined the factor structure and the convergent and predictive validity of the Life Attachment Scale-Revised (LAS-R).
RESULTS: Our results support a seven-factor structure of the scale, reflecting the aforementioned dimensions. Furthermore, convergent and predictive validity were established through correlations with related concepts of life satisfaction, flourishing, openness to the future, and perceived stress.
CONCLUSIONS: We have devised and substantiated a scale adept at gauging dimensions of secure and insecure/disordered life attachment. Empirical evidence from statistical analyses supports the assumption that the LAS-R is psychometrically sound, establishing its reliability and validity as a dependable instrument. Thus, the scale has promising implications for developing the empirical base for research in many areas of psychology, sociology, and the social sciences.
摘要：
背景：提出的安全/不安全的生活依恋概念反映了世界和生活的经验，是一个好（或不安全/威胁）的地方。本文阐述了理论基础,发展,并确认修订后的措施，以捕获安全/不安全的生活依恋现象。修订后的量表由七个维度组成：(1)共存，(2)可靠性,(3)安全性,（4）集成，(5)包容,(6)参与,和（7）审议。
方法：在三项研究中（N=1,059），我们检查了修订的生命体依恋量表（LAS-R）的因子结构以及收敛和预测效度。
结果：我们的结果支持量表的七因素结构，反映上述尺寸。此外，通过与生活满意度相关概念的相关性来建立收敛效度和预测效度，蓬勃发展，对未来的开放,和感知的压力。
结论：我们设计并证实了一种能够测量安全和不安全/无序生命依恋尺寸的尺度。来自统计分析的经验证据支持LAS-R在心理上是合理的假设，确立其作为可靠工具的可靠性和有效性。因此，该量表对发展心理学许多领域的研究经验基础具有积极的意义，社会学,和社会科学。
方法：在三项研究中（N=1,059），我们检查了修订的生命体依恋量表（LAS-R）的因子结构以及收敛和预测效度。
结果：我们的结果支持量表的七因素结构，反映上述尺寸。此外，通过与生活满意度相关概念的相关性来建立收敛效度和预测效度，蓬勃发展，对未来的开放,和感知的压力。
结论：我们设计并证实了一种能够测量安全和不安全/无序生命依恋尺寸的尺度。来自统计分析的经验证据支持LAS-R在心理上是合理的假设，确立其作为可靠工具的可靠性和有效性。因此，该量表对发展心理学许多领域的研究经验基础具有积极的意义，社会学,和社会科学。
