METHODS: We enrolled a purposive sample of 17 adult TGD cancer survivors and 5 co-survivors. We aimed for a diverse sample across cancer experience, age, racial/ethnic background, sexual orientation, and gender identity. We conducted 90-min individual interviews via videoconference and used reflexive thematic analysis, guided by a focus on three social determinants of health.
RESULTS: Themes describing challenges were as follows: (1) Cancer treatment\'s impact on sexual health was insufficiently addressed by cancer care providers; (2) fertility-related information and conversations were complicated by gendered expectations and ultimately did not meet survivors\' needs; (3) feeling excluded and uncared-for in healthcare settings due to gendered language and lack of supportive services that met their needs; and (4) TGD survivors commonly reported high financial burden, negatively impacting their access to care. Strategies to overcome these challenges were (1) a solid social support network that can be integrated into the care team to meet the unique SRH needs of TGD survivors and (2) gender-affirming healthcare providers and environments to address SRH care needs and concerns.
CONCLUSIONS: TGD survivors and co-survivors desire improved access to gender-affirming SRH care in cancer survivorship.
CONCLUSIONS: Key opportunities to improve gender-affirming SRH care in cancer survivorship include fostering and engaging TGD survivors\' support networks and implementing system-level changes in cancer care settings.
方法:我们登记了17名成人TGD癌症幸存者和5名共同幸存者的目的样本。我们的目标是针对癌症经历的不同样本,年龄,种族/民族背景,性取向,和性别认同。我们通过视频会议进行了90分钟的个人访谈,并使用了反身性主题分析,以关注健康的三个社会决定因素为指导。
结果:描述挑战的主题如下:(1)癌症护理提供者没有充分解决癌症治疗对性健康的影响;(2)与生育相关的信息和对话因性别期望而变得复杂,最终无法满足幸存者的需求;(3)由于性别语言和缺乏满足其需求的支持性服务,在医疗保健环境中感到被排斥和无人照顾;(4)对他们获得护理的机会产生负面影响。克服这些挑战的策略是(1)可以整合到护理团队中的坚实的社会支持网络,以满足TGD幸存者的独特SRH需求;(2)确认性别的医疗保健提供者和环境,以解决SRH护理需求和问题。
结论:TGD幸存者和共同幸存者希望改善癌症幸存者获得性别确认SRH护理的机会。
结论:改善癌症幸存者性别确认SRH护理的主要机会包括培养和吸引TGD幸存者的支持网络,以及在癌症护理环境中实施系统级的改变。