METHODS: Adhering rigorously to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, a comprehensive scoping review protocol was developed. Collaborating with a research librarian, a systematic search strategy targeted peer-reviewed literature from databases such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, complemented by a thorough grey literature search. Titles and abstracts will be screened, followed by extracting bibliographic details and outcome information using a standardized framework. Subsequently, the results will be systematically summarized and presented in a structured tabular format (S1 Checklist).
CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review promises an in-depth understanding of current research regarding the impact of community knowledge in malaria programmes. The identification of knowledge gaps and intervention needs serves as a valuable resource for malaria-affected countries. The profound implications of community knowledge underscore its pivotal role in enhancing the effectiveness of prevention, control, and elimination efforts. Insights from this review will assist policymakers, empowering implementers and community leaders in designing effective interventions. This concerted effort aims to adeptly leverage community knowledge, thereby propelling progress toward the achievement of malaria elimination goals.
方法:严格遵守系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的荟萃分析扩展(PRISMA-ScR)指南,制定了全面的范围审查方案.与研究馆员合作,系统的搜索策略针对来自PubMed等数据库的同行评审文献,Embase,Scopus,和WebofScience,辅以全面的灰色文献检索。标题和摘要将被筛选,然后使用标准化框架提取书目详细信息和结果信息。随后,结果将被系统地总结和呈现在一个结构化的表格格式(S1清单).
结论:本范围审查保证了对当前有关社区知识在疟疾规划中的影响的研究的深入了解。查明知识差距和干预需求是受疟疾影响国家的宝贵资源。社区知识的深远影响强调了其在提高预防效力方面的关键作用,control,消除努力。这次审查的见解将有助于政策制定者,授权实施者和社区领导人设计有效的干预措施。这种共同努力旨在巧妙地利用社区知识,从而推动实现消除疟疾目标的进展。