Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: There are no data on the additional contribution of dry needling (DN) for trigger points (TPs) accompanying patients with cervical spondylosis (CS).
UNASSIGNED: To analyse the contribution of DN applied to concomitant active TPs in the upper trapezius muscle on the treatment outcomes of physiotherapy in CS.
UNASSIGNED: In this prospective randomized controlled study, 70 patients with CS and active TPs in the upper trapezius muscle were included. The first group received physiotherapy for 5 days per week for 3 weeks. The second group received DN with the same program. All participants were evaluated before treatment (day 0) and at the end of treatment (day 21) in terms of pain, functional status, quality of life, anxiety/depression scores, and number of TPs.
UNASSIGNED: 33 patients in the first group and 32 patients in the second group completed the study. While the change over time was found significant in all variables, the change was not different between groups. The group-time interaction effect was not found to be statistically significant in any variable. Percentage changes of all variables were similar between the groups.
UNASSIGNED: DN treatment added to the physiotherapy did not contribute to recovery in patients with CS.
UNASSIGNED: To analyse the contribution of DN applied to concomitant active TPs in the upper trapezius muscle on the treatment outcomes of physiotherapy in CS.
UNASSIGNED: In this prospective randomized controlled study, 70 patients with CS and active TPs in the upper trapezius muscle were included. The first group received physiotherapy for 5 days per week for 3 weeks. The second group received DN with the same program. All participants were evaluated before treatment (day 0) and at the end of treatment (day 21) in terms of pain, functional status, quality of life, anxiety/depression scores, and number of TPs.
UNASSIGNED: 33 patients in the first group and 32 patients in the second group completed the study. While the change over time was found significant in all variables, the change was not different between groups. The group-time interaction effect was not found to be statistically significant in any variable. Percentage changes of all variables were similar between the groups.
UNASSIGNED: DN treatment added to the physiotherapy did not contribute to recovery in patients with CS.
摘要：
■没有关于干针（DN）对伴随颈椎病（CS）患者的触发点（TP）的额外贡献的数据。
■分析DN应用于上斜方肌伴随活动TP对CS物理治疗结果的影响。
■在这项前瞻性随机对照研究中，包括70例CS和上斜方肌活动TP患者。第一组接受物理治疗，每周5天，共3周。第二组接收具有相同节目的DN。在治疗前（第0天）和治疗结束时（第21天）对所有参与者进行疼痛评估，功能状态，生活质量,焦虑/抑郁评分,和TP的数量。
■第一组中的33名患者和第二组中的32名患者完成了研究。虽然在所有变量中发现随时间的变化是显著的，组间的变化没有差异.在任何变量中，均未发现组时间交互作用具有统计学意义。组间所有变量的百分比变化相似。
■在物理疗法中添加DN治疗并不能促进CS患者的康复。
■分析DN应用于上斜方肌伴随活动TP对CS物理治疗结果的影响。
■在这项前瞻性随机对照研究中，包括70例CS和上斜方肌活动TP患者。第一组接受物理治疗，每周5天，共3周。第二组接收具有相同节目的DN。在治疗前（第0天）和治疗结束时（第21天）对所有参与者进行疼痛评估，功能状态，生活质量,焦虑/抑郁评分,和TP的数量。
■第一组中的33名患者和第二组中的32名患者完成了研究。虽然在所有变量中发现随时间的变化是显著的，组间的变化没有差异.在任何变量中，均未发现组时间交互作用具有统计学意义。组间所有变量的百分比变化相似。
■在物理疗法中添加DN治疗并不能促进CS患者的康复。
