UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of mHealth-enabled DMPs to determine their effectiveness in reducing readmissions and mortality in patients with CAD.
UNASSIGNED: We systematically searched English language studies from January 1, 2007, to August 3, 2021, in multiple databases. Studies comparing mHealth-enabled DMPs with standard DMPs without mHealth were included if they had a minimum 30-day follow-up for at least one of all-cause or cardiovascular-related mortality, readmissions, or major adverse cardiovascular events.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 3,411 references from our search, 155 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility, and data were extracted from 18 publications. Pooled findings for all-cause readmissions (10 studies, n = 1,514) and cardiac-related readmissions (9 studies, n = 1,009) indicated that mHealth-enabled DMPs reduced all-cause (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.50-0.91) and cardiac-related hospitalizations (RR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.44-0.68) and emergency department visits (RR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.26-0.54) compared to DMPs without mHealth. There was no significant reduction for mortality outcomes (RR: 1.72; 95% CI: 0.64-4.64) or major adverse cardiovascular events (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.40-1.15).
UNASSIGNED: DMPs integrated with mHealth should be considered an effective intervention for better outcomes in patients with CAD.
■本研究的目的是对mHealth启用的DMPs进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定其在降低CAD患者再入院和死亡率方面的有效性。
■我们在多个数据库中系统地搜索了2007年1月1日至2021年8月3日的英语语言研究。如果至少对全因死亡率或心血管相关死亡率之一进行了至少30天的随访,则包括将mHealth启用的DMPs与无mHealth的标准DMPs进行比较的研究。再入院,或主要不良心血管事件。
■在我们搜索的3,411个引用中,对155项全文研究进行了资格评估,数据来自18种出版物。全因再入院的汇总结果(10项研究,n=1,514)和心脏相关的再入院(9项研究,n=1,009)表明,与没有mHealth的DMP相比,mHealth启用的DMP减少了所有原因(RR:0.68;95%CI:0.50-0.91)和心脏相关的住院(RR:0.55;95%CI:0.44-0.68)和急诊科就诊(RR:0.37;95%CI:0.26-0.54)。死亡率(RR:1.72;95%CI:0.64-4.64)或主要不良心血管事件(RR:0.68;95%CI:0.40-1.15)没有显着降低。
■与mHealth整合的DMPs应被认为是改善CAD患者预后的有效干预措施。