Abstract：
While Spelke provides powerful support for concept nativism, her focus on understanding concept nativism through six innate core knowledge systems is too confining. There is also no reason to suppose that the curse of a compositional mind constitutes a principled reason for positing less innate structure in explaining the origins of concepts. Any solution to such problems must take into account poverty of the stimulus considerations, which argue for postulating more innate structure, not less.
摘要：
虽然Spelke为概念本土主义提供了强有力的支持，她对通过六个先天核心知识系统理解概念本土主义的关注过于局限。也没有理由认为组成思想的诅咒构成了在解释概念起源时提出较少先天结构的原则性原因。任何解决此类问题的办法都必须考虑到贫困的刺激因素，主张假设更多的先天结构，不能少。
