Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: Literature underscores the importance of emotion dysregulation in clinical research. However, one critical limitation of the existing investigations in this area involves the lack of psychometrically valid measures for assessing emotion dysregulation in individuals\' daily lives. This study examined the factor structure and psychometric properties of momentary versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (mDERS) and the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Positive (mDERS-P).
UNASSIGNED: Participants were 145 community women (M age = 40.66, 40.7% white) experiencing intimate partner violence and using substances who participated in a baseline interview and then completed surveys three times a day for 30 days.
UNASSIGNED: Analyses supported the reliability of the mDERS and the mDERS-P. The two-state, two-trait model, with separate factors for negative and positive emotion dysregulation at both the within-and between-levels, fit the data best. Momentary negative, but not positive, emotions were positively related to the mDERS; both momentary negative and positive emotions were positively related to the mDERS-P. Baseline trait negative, but not positive, emotion dysregulation, was related to greater variability in momentary negative and positive emotion dysregulation.
UNASSIGNED: Findings advance our understanding and measurement of emotion dysregulation using intensive longitudinal approaches.
UNASSIGNED: Participants were 145 community women (M age = 40.66, 40.7% white) experiencing intimate partner violence and using substances who participated in a baseline interview and then completed surveys three times a day for 30 days.
UNASSIGNED: Analyses supported the reliability of the mDERS and the mDERS-P. The two-state, two-trait model, with separate factors for negative and positive emotion dysregulation at both the within-and between-levels, fit the data best. Momentary negative, but not positive, emotions were positively related to the mDERS; both momentary negative and positive emotions were positively related to the mDERS-P. Baseline trait negative, but not positive, emotion dysregulation, was related to greater variability in momentary negative and positive emotion dysregulation.
UNASSIGNED: Findings advance our understanding and measurement of emotion dysregulation using intensive longitudinal approaches.
摘要：
■文献强调了情绪失调在临床研究中的重要性。然而,该领域现有调查的一个关键限制是缺乏心理测量有效的措施来评估个体日常生活中的情绪失调。这项研究检查了情绪调节困难量表（mDERS）和情绪调节困难量表阳性（mDERS-P）的瞬时版本的因子结构和心理测量特性。
■参与者是145名社区妇女（年龄=40.66岁，40.7％的白人），他们经历了亲密伴侣暴力并使用了参与基线访谈的物质，然后每天三次完成调查，为期30天。
■分析支持mDERS和mDERS-P的可靠性。两个国家,双特征模型，在水平内和水平之间都有不同的负面和积极情绪失调因素，最适合数据。暂时否定，但不是积极的，情绪与mDERS呈正相关；瞬时负面和积极情绪均与mDERS-P呈正相关。基线特征阴性，但不是积极的，情绪失调,与瞬时负面和积极情绪失调的更大变异性有关。
■研究结果推进了我们使用密集的纵向方法对情绪失调的理解和测量。
■参与者是145名社区妇女（年龄=40.66岁，40.7％的白人），他们经历了亲密伴侣暴力并使用了参与基线访谈的物质，然后每天三次完成调查，为期30天。
■分析支持mDERS和mDERS-P的可靠性。两个国家,双特征模型，在水平内和水平之间都有不同的负面和积极情绪失调因素，最适合数据。暂时否定，但不是积极的，情绪与mDERS呈正相关；瞬时负面和积极情绪均与mDERS-P呈正相关。基线特征阴性，但不是积极的，情绪失调,与瞬时负面和积极情绪失调的更大变异性有关。
■研究结果推进了我们使用密集的纵向方法对情绪失调的理解和测量。
