PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse is varied in different countries. For validating the results of numerous studies on the prevalence of Pelvic organ prolapse in the world, a meta-analysis study seems necessary to provide an accurate and valid prevalence for planners and researchers in this field. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the worldwide prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse using the meta-analysis method.
UNASSIGNED: By using valid keywords, searching was done in ISI Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Medline databases, and 22 articles were selected based on inclusion criteria between 2009 and 2021. The quality of articles was checked using The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. Meta-analysis was performed on collected data using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software (CMA, Version 2). Meta-analysis of data was done with a random-effects model. The heterogeneity of the study was checked using the I2 index. Publication bias was assessed by the Egger test and funnel graph.
UNASSIGNED: The overall prevalence of included studies was 30.9% (95% confidence interval: 24.4-38.2%), (P<0.001, heterogeneity I2=99.8%). Meta-analysis of subgroups in studies that used a questionnaire to estimate the prevalence rate showed the prevalence was 25.0% and, in the studies, used the physical examination was 41.8%.
UNASSIGNED: Studies carried out in different parts of the world have examined the prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse using different tools. Since some cases are asymptomatic, especially in the low stage of prolapse, physical examination of pelvic organ prolapse should be considered an essential tool in evaluating pelvic organ prolapse.
UNASSIGNED: By using valid keywords, searching was done in ISI Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Medline databases, and 22 articles were selected based on inclusion criteria between 2009 and 2021. The quality of articles was checked using The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. Meta-analysis was performed on collected data using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software (CMA, Version 2). Meta-analysis of data was done with a random-effects model. The heterogeneity of the study was checked using the I2 index. Publication bias was assessed by the Egger test and funnel graph.
UNASSIGNED: The overall prevalence of included studies was 30.9% (95% confidence interval: 24.4-38.2%), (P<0.001, heterogeneity I2=99.8%). Meta-analysis of subgroups in studies that used a questionnaire to estimate the prevalence rate showed the prevalence was 25.0% and, in the studies, used the physical examination was 41.8%.
UNASSIGNED: Studies carried out in different parts of the world have examined the prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse using different tools. Since some cases are asymptomatic, especially in the low stage of prolapse, physical examination of pelvic organ prolapse should be considered an essential tool in evaluating pelvic organ prolapse.
摘要：
■盆腔器官脱垂的患病率在不同国家有所不同。为了验证世界上盆腔器官脱垂患病率的大量研究结果，荟萃分析研究似乎有必要为该领域的计划者和研究人员提供准确有效的患病率。因此,我们旨在使用meta分析方法调查盆腔器官脱垂的全球患病率.
■通过使用有效的关键字，在ISIWebofScience中进行了搜索，PubMed,Scopus,和Medline数据库，根据2009年至2021年的纳入标准选择了22篇文章。使用JoannaBriggs研究所(JBI)清单检查物品的质量。使用综合荟萃分析软件(CMA，版本2）。采用随机效应模型对数据进行Meta分析。使用I2指数检查研究的异质性。通过Egger测试和漏斗图评估发表偏倚。
■纳入研究的总体患病率为30.9％（95％置信区间：24.4-38.2％），(P<0.001,异质性I2=99.8%)。在使用问卷估计患病率的研究中，亚组的荟萃分析显示患病率为25.0％，在研究中，使用体格检查的占41.8%。
■在世界各地进行的研究使用不同的工具检查了盆腔器官脱垂的患病率。由于有些病例是无症状的,尤其是在脱垂的低阶段，盆腔器官脱垂的体格检查应被视为评估盆腔器官脱垂的重要工具。
■通过使用有效的关键字，在ISIWebofScience中进行了搜索，PubMed,Scopus,和Medline数据库，根据2009年至2021年的纳入标准选择了22篇文章。使用JoannaBriggs研究所(JBI)清单检查物品的质量。使用综合荟萃分析软件(CMA，版本2）。采用随机效应模型对数据进行Meta分析。使用I2指数检查研究的异质性。通过Egger测试和漏斗图评估发表偏倚。
■纳入研究的总体患病率为30.9％（95％置信区间：24.4-38.2％），(P<0.001,异质性I2=99.8%)。在使用问卷估计患病率的研究中，亚组的荟萃分析显示患病率为25.0％，在研究中，使用体格检查的占41.8%。
■在世界各地进行的研究使用不同的工具检查了盆腔器官脱垂的患病率。由于有些病例是无症状的,尤其是在脱垂的低阶段，盆腔器官脱垂的体格检查应被视为评估盆腔器官脱垂的重要工具。
