关键词: Community-Based Participatory Research Patient Participation Population Dynamics

Mesh : Humans Canada Black People Research Design Review Literature as Topic

来  源:   DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081296

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: In the context of health research in Canada, various terms and labels have been employed to reference the Black population. This practice has had the unintended consequence of diminishing the comparability and efficiency of studies. Furthermore, using a broad term such as \'Black\' may fail to encompass the diversity and intricacy of the ethnocultural backgrounds of people who are racialised as such. It may also obscure the subtleties of their experiences and health outcomes. This study aims to examine how health researchers have defined Black within the scope of their work and different labels used to identify the Black population in Canada.
METHODS: We have developed and employed a comprehensive and sensitive search strategy to identify articles concerning the health and wellness of the Black population in Canada. Both peer-reviewed and grey literature will be searched. Original articles published in both English and French will be included. The screening process will consist of two stages: the title and abstract screening, followed by a thorough examination of full-text articles. Additionally, single citation tracking and manual search of reference lists will be conducted. Study characteristics and relevant information on the definition of the Black population will be extracted, followed by reflective thematic analysis and presentation of the key findings.
BACKGROUND: This review will not require ethical approval. We will disseminate the results through meetings with stakeholders. From the beginning, a knowledge translation approach was decided upon following consultation with citizen researchers and community champions. Our findings will also be disseminated through oral and poster presentations, peer-reviewed publications, and social media.
摘要:
背景:在加拿大健康研究的背景下,各种术语和标签被用来指代黑人人口。这种做法产生了意想不到的后果,即降低了研究的可比性和效率。此外,使用诸如“Black”之类的广义术语可能无法涵盖种族化人群的种族文化背景的多样性和复杂性。这也可能掩盖了他们的经历和健康结果的微妙之处。这项研究旨在研究健康研究人员如何在他们的工作范围内定义黑人,以及用于识别加拿大黑人人口的不同标签。
方法:我们开发并采用了全面而敏感的搜索策略,以识别有关加拿大黑人人口健康和健康的文章。同行评审和灰色文献都将被搜索。将包括以英语和法语发表的原始文章。筛选过程将包括两个阶段:标题筛选和摘要筛选,其次是对全文文章的全面审查。此外,将进行单引文跟踪和手动搜索参考列表。将对黑人人口定义的研究特征和相关信息进行提取,其次是反思性的专题分析和主要调查结果的介绍。
背景:此审查将不需要道德批准。我们将通过与利益攸关方的会议传播成果。从一开始,在与公民研究人员和社区倡导者协商后,决定了一种知识翻译方法。我们的研究结果也将通过口头和海报展示来传播,同行评审的出版物,和社交媒体。
公众号