METHODS: Three natural experiments examined the impact of promotional activities on sales of a) no-added-sugar (NAS) plant-based milk (in 199 stores), b) products promoted during \'Veganuary\' (in 96 stores), and c) seasonal fruit (in 100 non-randomised intervention and 100 matched control stores). Data were provided on store-level product sales, in units sold and monetary value (£), aggregated weekly. Predominant socioeconomic position (SEP) of the store population was provided by the retailer. Analyses used interrupted time series and multivariable hierarchical mixed-effects models.
RESULTS: Sales of both promoted and total NAS plant-based milks increased significantly during the promotional period (Promoted:+126 units, 95%CI: 105-148; Overall:+307 units, 95%CI: 264-349). The increase was greater in stores with predominately low SEP shoppers. During Veganuary, sales increased significantly for plant-based foods on promotion (+60 units, 95%CI: 37-84), but not for sales of plant-based foods overall (dairy alternatives: -1131 units, 95%CI: -5821-3559; meat alternatives: 1403 units, 95%CI: -749-3554). There was no evidence of a change in weekly sales of promoted seasonal fruit products (assessed via ratio change in units sold: 0.01, 95%CI: 0.00-0.02), and overall fruit category sales slightly decreased in intervention stores relative to control (ratio change in units sold: -0.01, 95%CI: -0.01-0.00).
CONCLUSIONS: During promotional campaigns there was evidence that sales of plant-based products increased, but not seasonal fruits. There was no evidence for any sustained change beyond the intervention period.
方法:三个自然实验检查了促销活动对a)无添加糖(NAS)植物性牛奶(199家商店)销售的影响,B)在“素食”期间推广的产品(在96家商店中),和c)季节性水果(在100个非随机干预和100个匹配的对照存储中)。提供了商店一级产品销售的数据,以售出单位和货币价值(GB)计算,每周汇总。商店人口的主要社会经济地位(SEP)由零售商提供。分析使用中断时间序列和多变量分层混合效应模型。
结果:促销期间,促销和NAS植物性牛奶的总销量显着增加(促销:126个单位,95CI:105-148;总体:+307台,95CI:264-349)。在SEP购物者普遍较低的商店中,增幅更大。在素食期间,促销时植物性食品的销售额大幅增长(+60单位,95CI:37-84),但不用于整体植物性食品的销售(乳制品替代品:-1131单位,95CI:-5821-3559;肉类替代品:1403单位,95CI:-749-3554)。没有证据表明促销的季节性水果产品的每周销售发生变化(通过销售单位的比率变化进行评估:0.01,95CI:0.00-0.02),相对于对照,干预商店的整体水果类别销售额略有下降(销售单位的比率变化:-0.01,95CI:-0.01-0.00)。
结论:在促销活动中,有证据表明植物性产品的销售有所增加,但不是时令水果。没有证据表明干预期后有任何持续变化。