Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: de Lemos Muller, CH, Farinha, JB, Leal-Menezes, R, and Ramis, TR. Aerobic training with blood flow restriction on muscle hypertrophy and strength: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 38(7): 1341-1349, 2024-Integrating strength and endurance training in a single exercise session, even on separate days, can be physically demanding and time-consuming. Therefore, there is a growing interest in identifying efficient training methods that can concurrently enhance cardiovascular and neuromuscular performance through a singular training modality. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effects of aerobic training with blood flow restriction (AT + BFR) on muscle hypertrophy and strength gains in healthy individuals. Our study was registered at PROSPERO and used multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science), seeking clinical trials that examined AT + BFR influence on muscle hypertrophy and strength gains in individuals aged 18-60 years and comparing with aerobic training without BFR. The risk of bias and method quality were assessed using the ROB2.0 tool and PEDro scale, respectively, and the quality of evidence was evaluated with the GRADE method. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis, and standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated for each outcome. Of 4,462 records, 29 full texts were assessed for eligibility, with 7 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. The results indicated that AT + BFR was more beneficial for inducing muscle hypertrophy than aerobic training without BFR (SMD [95% CI] = 0.86 [0.37-1.35]; I2 = 42%). Furthermore, AT + BFR was associated with greater improvements in muscle strength (SMD [95% CI] = 0.41 [0.10-0.72]; I2 = 0%). Despite the generally high risk of bias for both outcomes, these encouraging findings underscore the clinical significance of AT + BFR as a compelling tool for enhancing neuromuscular parameters.
摘要：
■deLemosMuller,CH,Farinha,JB,Leal-Menezes,R,还有Ramis,TR.有氧训练限制血流对肌肉肥大和力量的影响：系统评价和荟萃分析。JStrengthCondRes38（7）：1341-1349，2024年-在一次锻炼中整合力量和耐力训练，即使在不同的日子里，可能是体力要求和耗时的。因此,人们对确定有效的训练方法越来越感兴趣，这些方法可以通过单一的训练方式同时增强心血管和神经肌肉的表现。这项研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析，以探讨有氧训练伴血流限制（ATBFR）对健康人肌肉肥大和力量增强的影响。我们的研究在PROSPERO注册，并使用多个数据库(PubMed，Embase,Scopus,和WebofScience)，寻求临床试验，检查AT+BFR对18-60岁个体肌肉肥大和力量增加的影响，并与无BFR的有氧训练进行比较。使用ROB2.0工具和PEDro量表评估偏倚风险和方法质量，分别,采用GRADE法对证据质量进行评价。随机效应模型用于荟萃分析，并计算每个结果的标准化平均差(SMD)。在4462条记录中，对29篇全文进行了资格评估，7篇文章符合纳入标准。结果表明，ATBFR比没有BFR的有氧训练更有利于诱导肌肉肥大（SMD[95％CI]=0.86[0.37-1.35]；I2=42％）。此外，AT+BFR与肌肉力量的更大改善相关(SMD[95%CI]=0.41[0.10-0.72];I2=0%)。尽管这两种结果的偏倚风险普遍很高，这些令人鼓舞的发现强调了AT+BFR作为增强神经肌肉参数的重要工具的临床意义.
