Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to delineate the safety zone concerning the anteriorization of the AL and correlate it with the behavior of the AL, analyzing its feasibility.
METHODS: Adhering to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) manual guidelines, both the protocol and this review were conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. MeSH terms, combined with free terms, were utilized to search for articles in the following databases: Embase, LILACS, LIVIVO, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and grey literature.
RESULTS: Fifteen articles were select following the eligibility criteria. An average safe zone of 4.75 mm in humans was observed, with a prevalence 60.8% and average anterior length of the AL of 2.09 mm in humans.
CONCLUSIONS: The AL has varied patterns across different populations, then, it could not be asserted a 100% safe zone. Preoperative analysis of the AL with CBCT is always necessary. While it could be stated that a safe zone should be employed as an inviolable region, stipulated measures of a safe zone should be regarded as an area of greater attention in preoperative planning.
METHODS: Adhering to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) manual guidelines, both the protocol and this review were conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. MeSH terms, combined with free terms, were utilized to search for articles in the following databases: Embase, LILACS, LIVIVO, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and grey literature.
RESULTS: Fifteen articles were select following the eligibility criteria. An average safe zone of 4.75 mm in humans was observed, with a prevalence 60.8% and average anterior length of the AL of 2.09 mm in humans.
CONCLUSIONS: The AL has varied patterns across different populations, then, it could not be asserted a 100% safe zone. Preoperative analysis of the AL with CBCT is always necessary. While it could be stated that a safe zone should be employed as an inviolable region, stipulated measures of a safe zone should be regarded as an area of greater attention in preoperative planning.
摘要：
目的：这项研究的目的是划定有关AL的前向的安全区，并将其与AL的行为相关联，分析其可行性。
方法：遵守JoannaBriggsInstitute(JBI)手册指南，方案和本综述均基于系统评价首选报告项目和Meta分析扩展范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)检查表进行.MeSH术语，结合自由条款，用于在以下数据库中搜索文章：Embase，LILACS,LIVIVIVO,PubMed/MEDLINE,Scopus,WebofScience,灰色文学
结果：根据资格标准选择了15篇文章。观察到人类的平均安全区为4.75毫米，在人类中，患病率为60.8%，AL的平均前长度为2.09mm。
结论：AL在不同人群中具有不同的模式，然后,它不能被断言为100%安全区域。术前分析AL与CBCT始终是必要的。虽然可以说安全区应该被用作不可侵犯的区域，规定的安全区措施应被视为术前计划中更应注意的领域。
方法：遵守JoannaBriggsInstitute(JBI)手册指南，方案和本综述均基于系统评价首选报告项目和Meta分析扩展范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)检查表进行.MeSH术语，结合自由条款，用于在以下数据库中搜索文章：Embase，LILACS,LIVIVIVO,PubMed/MEDLINE,Scopus,WebofScience,灰色文学
结果：根据资格标准选择了15篇文章。观察到人类的平均安全区为4.75毫米，在人类中，患病率为60.8%，AL的平均前长度为2.09mm。
结论：AL在不同人群中具有不同的模式，然后,它不能被断言为100%安全区域。术前分析AL与CBCT始终是必要的。虽然可以说安全区应该被用作不可侵犯的区域，规定的安全区措施应被视为术前计划中更应注意的领域。
