Abstract：
OBJECTIVE: This paper describes several automation tools and software that can be considered during evidence synthesis projects and provides guidance for their integration in the conduct of scoping reviews.
METHODS: The guidance presented in this work is adapted from the results of a scoping review and consultations with the JBI Scoping Review Methodology group.
RESULTS: This paper describes several reliable, validated automation tools and software that can be used to enhance the conduct of scoping reviews. Developments in the automation of systematic reviews, and more recently scoping reviews, are continuously evolving. We detail several helpful tools in order of the key steps recommended by the JBI\'s methodological guidance for undertaking scoping reviews including team establishment, protocol development, searching, de-duplication, screening titles and abstracts, data extraction, data charting, and report writing. While we include several reliable tools and software that can be used for the automation of scoping reviews, there are some limitations to the tools mentioned. For example, some are available in English only and their lack of integration with other tools results in limited interoperability.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper highlighted several useful automation tools and software programs to use in undertaking each step of a scoping review. This guidance has the potential to inform collaborative efforts aiming at the development of evidence informed, integrated automation tools and software packages for enhancing the conduct of high-quality scoping reviews.
METHODS: The guidance presented in this work is adapted from the results of a scoping review and consultations with the JBI Scoping Review Methodology group.
RESULTS: This paper describes several reliable, validated automation tools and software that can be used to enhance the conduct of scoping reviews. Developments in the automation of systematic reviews, and more recently scoping reviews, are continuously evolving. We detail several helpful tools in order of the key steps recommended by the JBI\'s methodological guidance for undertaking scoping reviews including team establishment, protocol development, searching, de-duplication, screening titles and abstracts, data extraction, data charting, and report writing. While we include several reliable tools and software that can be used for the automation of scoping reviews, there are some limitations to the tools mentioned. For example, some are available in English only and their lack of integration with other tools results in limited interoperability.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper highlighted several useful automation tools and software programs to use in undertaking each step of a scoping review. This guidance has the potential to inform collaborative efforts aiming at the development of evidence informed, integrated automation tools and software packages for enhancing the conduct of high-quality scoping reviews.
摘要：
目的：本文描述了在证据综合项目中可以考虑的几种自动化工具和软件，并为其在范围审查进行中的整合提供了指导。
方法：这项工作中提供的指导是根据范围审查和与JBI范围审查方法论小组协商的结果改编的。
结果：本文介绍了几种可靠的，经过验证的自动化工具和软件，可用于增强范围审查的执行。系统审查自动化的发展，以及最近的范围审查，不断发展。我们按照JBI的方法论指导建议的关键步骤，详细介绍了几个有用的工具，以进行范围审查，包括团队建立，协议开发，搜索,重复数据消除,筛选标题和摘要，数据提取,数据图表，和报告写作。虽然我们包括几个可靠的工具和软件，可用于范围审查的自动化，提到的工具有一些限制。例如,有些仅提供英文版本，并且它们缺乏与其他工具的集成导致互操作性有限。
结论：本文重点介绍了几个有用的自动化工具和软件程序，用于开展范围审查的每个步骤。本指南有可能为旨在开发知情证据的合作努力提供信息，集成自动化工具和软件包，用于增强高质量范围审查的进行。
方法：这项工作中提供的指导是根据范围审查和与JBI范围审查方法论小组协商的结果改编的。
结果：本文介绍了几种可靠的，经过验证的自动化工具和软件，可用于增强范围审查的执行。系统审查自动化的发展，以及最近的范围审查，不断发展。我们按照JBI的方法论指导建议的关键步骤，详细介绍了几个有用的工具，以进行范围审查，包括团队建立，协议开发，搜索,重复数据消除,筛选标题和摘要，数据提取,数据图表，和报告写作。虽然我们包括几个可靠的工具和软件，可用于范围审查的自动化，提到的工具有一些限制。例如,有些仅提供英文版本，并且它们缺乏与其他工具的集成导致互操作性有限。
结论：本文重点介绍了几个有用的自动化工具和软件程序，用于开展范围审查的每个步骤。本指南有可能为旨在开发知情证据的合作努力提供信息，集成自动化工具和软件包，用于增强高质量范围审查的进行。
